Chapter 6. Literature Cited 1 Note: The literature cited is currently separated by chapter and section. It will be combined into one 2 master list for the camera-ready FEIS. 3 Chapter 1 4 Griset, S. 2011. An Ethnohistory of the Rosemont Copper Project Area in the Eastern Santa Rita 5 Mountains, Pima County, Arizona. Cultural Resources Report No. 09-238. Prepared for U.S. 6 Forest Service, Coronado National Forest. Prepared on behalf of Rosemont Copper 7 Company. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental Consultants. 8 U.S. Forest Service. 1986. Coronado National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan. U.S. 9 Forest Service, Southwestern Region. 10 ———. 2004. Training Guide for Reclamation Bond Estimation and Administration: For Mineral 11 Plans of Operation Authorized and Administered under 36 CFR 228A. Washington, D.C.: 12 U.S. Forest Service. April. 13 ———. 2009. Scoping Summary Report #1: Extent of Public Participation—Rosemont Copper 14 Project, a Proposed Mining Operation in Southern Arizona. Tucson, Arizona: Coronado 15 National Forest. August. 16 WestLand Resources Inc. 2007. Mine Plan of Operations. Project No. 1049.05.B.700. Prepared for 17 Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: WestLand Resources, Inc. July 11. 18 Chapter 2 19 20 AMEC Earth and Environmental Inc. 2009. Rosemont Copper Company Dry Stack Tailings Storage 21 Facility Final Design Report. Project No. 84201191. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 22 Company. Englewood, Colorado: AMEC Earth and Environmental, Inc. April 15. 23 Arizona Corporation Commission. 2012. Order Granting Tucson Electric Power Certificate of 24 Environmental Compatibility as Modified by the Commission and Vacating Decsion No. 25 73074. Arizona Corporation Commission Case No. 164, Docket No. L-00000C-11-0400- 26 00164, Decision No. 73232. Signed and docketed June 12, 2012. 27 Arizona Department of Environmental Quality. 2012. State of Arizona Aquifer Protection Permit No. 28 P-106100. Place ID 135845, LTF 49639. Issued to Rosemont Copper Company. April 3. 29 Arizona Department of Transportation. 2012. Rosemont Copper Project Draft Environmental Impact 30 Statement Proposed SR 83 Improvements Mile Post 58.5 – 47.1. Letter from Mick Hont, 31 P.E., Acting Tucson District Engineer (Operations), Arizona Department of Transportation, 32 to Walt Keyes, Road Manager, Coronado National Forest. Phoenix, Arizona: Arizona 33 Department of Transportation. September 19. 34 Arizona Department of Water Resources. 2013. Long-term storage account summary. Updated 35 through January 2013. Available at: 36 http://www.azwater.gov/AzDWR/WaterManagement/Recharge/. Accessed February 25, 37 2013. 38 Arnold, K., and T. Meyer. 2006. Rosemont Tailings Siting Study. Project No. 06.50.0300. Tucson, 39 Arizona: Vector Arizona. May 26. 40 Augusta Resource Corporation. 2012. News release: Augusta announces 2012 feasibility study 41 update results. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. July 24. 42 Bartz, B.A. 2012. Rosemont Copper T-Intersection Project; SR 83 Drainage Improvements Analysis. 43 Job No. 7ROS110101. Technical memorandum. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 44 Psomas. July 9. Preliminary Administrative FEIS – Cooperator Review July 2013 1 DRAFT – Deliberative – Subject to Change Chapter 6. Literature Cited 1 Beck, E. 2012. Director, Transmission Policy and Contracts, Tucson Electric Power and UniSource 2 Energy Services. Tucson. Email to Chris Garrett, SWCA Environmental Consultants, Inc., 3 regarding transmission lines. 4 CDM Smith. 2012. Preliminary Reclamation and Closure Plan for the Barrel Alternative, Rosemont 5 Copper Company, July 2012, Rosemont Copper Project. Prepared for Rosemont Copper 6 Company. Tucson, Arizona: CDM Smith. July 9. 7 Council on Environmental Quality. 2007. A Citizen's Guide to the NEPA: Having Your Voice Heard. 8 Executive Office of the President. December. 9 ———. 2011. Appropriate Use of Mitigation and Monitoring and Clarifying the Appropriate Use of 10 Mitigated Findings of No Significant Impact. Prepared by N.H. Sutley. Washington, D.C.: 11 Executive Office of the President, Council on Environmental Quality. January 14. 12 Davis, T. 2012. New Rosemont flap centers on power-line capacity. Arizona Daily Star, 11 13 November. Tucson. 14 Derby, J. 2010. Rosemont Copper Project Alternatives for Detailed Analysis. File Code 1950-3/2810. 15 Tucson, Arizona: Coronado National Forest. May 10. 16 Golder Associates Inc. 2010. Rosemont Mine Landforming, Evaluation of Mine Waste Slope 17 Geometry. Project No. 093-81962. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. 18 Lakewood, Colorado: Golder Associates Inc. February 17. 19 Huss, C. 2007. Rosemont Copper Project Feasibility Study, Vol. 1: NI 43-101 Technical Report. 20 Project No. M3-PN06156. Prepared for Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: M3 21 Engineering and Technology Corporation. August 24. 22 ———. 2009. Rosemont Copper Project Updated Feasibility Study, Vol. 1: NI 43-101 Technical 23 Report. Project No. M3-PN08036. Prepared for Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, 24 Arizona: M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation. January 14. 25 Kline, J., M. York, J. Rasmussen, and C. Hoag. 2012. Memorandum: Pt. 2 SWCA Questions 7, 8, and 26 10 - Professional Opinions on Miscellaneous Public Comments. Project No. 27 183100.020/Task 600. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: 28 SRK Consulting, Inc. August 8. 29 M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation. 2011. Technical Memorandum: Rosemont Mine 30 Outdoor Lighting and Pima County Outdoor Lighting Code. M3-PN08036. Rev. Prepared for 31 Rosemont Copper Company. Tucson, Arizona: M3 Engineering and Technology 32 Corporation. January. 33 ———. 2012. Rosemont Copper Project: NI 43-101 Technical Report, Updated Feasibility Study, 34 Pima County, Arizona, USA. Revision 0. Project No. M3-PN 08036. Prepared for Augusta 35 Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: M3 Engineering and Technology Corporation. 36 August 28. 37 Monrad, C.K., J. Benya, and D.L. Crawford. 2012. Rosemont Copper Project Light Pollution 38 Mitigation Recommendation Report. Revision 1. Monrad Engineering Inc. June 18. 39 Nelson, E. 2012. Conceptual Design of Heap Leach Pump Back Riser Pipe. EA No. 110253. 40 Techncial memorandum. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. Fort Collins, Colorado: 41 Engineering Analytics, Inc. June 25. 42 Ninyo and Moore. 2012. Pavement Design Summary and Materials Design Report, Rosemont Copper 43 Project, Rosemont Copper T-Intersection, Pima County, Arizona. Project No. 603596001. 44 Prepared for Psomas. Tucson, Arizona: Ninyo and Moore. May 25. 45 Pima Association of Governments. 2012. Cienega Creek hydrologic research and findings. Available 46 at: http://www.pagnet.org/tabid/1012/default.aspx. Accessed September 19, 2012. 47 Psomas. 2012. Rosemont Primary Access Road Traffic Impact Analysis Rosemont Copper Company, 48 Pima County, Arizona. Project No. 7ROS110410. Prepared for Rosemont Copper Company. 49 Tucson, Arizona: Psomas. December. 2 Preliminary Administrative FEIS – Cooperator Review July 2013 DRAFT – Deliberative – Subject to Change Chapter 6. Literature Cited 1 Reagor, C. 2008. Arizona's population projections were off due to housing boom; estimates based on 2 new homes hurt cities, schools. The Arizona Republic. 3 Rosemont Copper Company. 2012a. Response to August 8, 2012 Forest Service Letter. Letter from 4 Katherine Ann Arnold, Vice President, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs, Rosemont 5 Copper Company, to Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest. Document 6 No. 059/12-15.3.1. Tucson, Arizona: Rosemont Copper Company. September 12. 7 ———. 2012b. Response to December 4, 2012 Forest Service Letter. Letter from Katherine Ann 8 Arnold, Vice President, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs, Rosemont Copper Company, 9 to Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest. Document No. 072/12- 10 15.3.1. Tucson, Arizona: Rosemont Copper Company. December 14. 11 ———. 2012c. Rosemont Copper Project; Proposed Modifications to Barrel Alternative. Letter from 12 Katherine Ann Arnold, Vice President, Environmental and Regulatory Affairs, Rosemont 13 Copper Company, to Jim Upchurch, Forest Supervisor, Coronado National Forest. Document 14 No. 052/12-15.3.1. Tucson, Arizona: Rosemont Copper Company. July 10. 15 Schor, H.J. 2010. Landform Design Report for the Rosemont Mine Project. Submitted to SWCA 16 Environmental Consultants. Anaheim, California. May 19. 17 Southwestern Region Climate Change and Forest Planning Work Group. 2010. Southwestern Region 18 Climate Change Trends and Forest Planning: A Guide for Addressing Climate Change in 19 Forest Plan Revisions for Southwestern National Forests and National Grasslands. Prepared 20 for U.S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region. May. 21 Stone, C., M. Sieber, and J. Kline. 2011. Review of Alternative Water Sources—Revised. SRK Project 22 No. 183101/2200. Prepared for SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: SRK 23 Consulting, Inc. May 13. 24 SWCA Environmental Consultants. 2013. Incorporation of Geomorphic Reclamation Techniques and 25 Concepts into the Rosemont Copper Project. Draft Memorandum to file by Chris Garrett and 26 Melissa Polm, SWCA Environmental Consultants. Tucson, Arizona: SWCA Environmental 27 Consultants. June 22. 28 Tetra Tech. 2007. Reclamation and Closure Plan: Rosemont Copper. Project No. 320614-400. 29 Prepared for Augusta Resource Corporation. Tucson, Arizona: Tetra Tech. July. 30 ———. 2010. Reclamation Concept Update: Rosemont Copper Project. Project No.