Algebraic Cycles and Topology of Real Enriques Surfaces

Algebraic Cycles and Topology of Real Enriques Surfaces

Compositio Mathematica 110: 215±237, 1998. 215 c 1998 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Algebraic cycles and topology of real Enriques surfaces ?? FRED ERIC MANGOLTE1 ? and JOOST VAN HAMEL2 1Laboratoire de Mathematiques, Universite de Savoie, 73376 Le Bourget du Lac Cedex, France; e-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Mathematics, University of Utrecht, Budapestlaan 6, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands; e-mail: [email protected] Received:14 May 1996; accepted in ®nal form 22 October 1996 H Y R; Z= Abstract. For a real Enriques surface Y we prove that every homology class in 1 2 can be R represented by a real algebraic curve if and only if all connected components of Y are orientable. Furthermore, we give a characterization of real Enriques surfaces which are Galois-Maximal and/or Y Z-Galois-Maximal and we determine the Brauer group of any real Enriques surface . Mathematics Subject Classi®cations (1991): 14C25 14P25 14J28 13A20. Key words: Algebraic cycles, real algebraic surfaces, Enriques surfaces, Galois-Maximality, Brauer group. 1. Introduction Y C Let Y be a complex algebraic surface. Let us denote by the set of closed points alg H Y C ; Z of Y endowed with the Euclidean topology and let 2 be the subgroup Y C ; Z of the homology group H2 generated by the fundamental classes of Y algebraic curves on Y .If is an Enriques surface, we have alg Y C ; Z=H YC;Z: H2 2 One of the goals of the present paper is to prove a similar property for real Enriques surfaces with orientable real part. See Theorem 1.1 below. R By an algebraic variety Y over we mean a geometrically integral, separated = f ;g C = R scheme of ®nite type over the real numbers. The Galois group G 1 of C Y acts on Y , the set of complex points of , via an antiholomorphic involution and R the real part Y is precisely the set of ®xed points under this action. An algebraic R variety Y over will be called a real Enriques surface, a real K3-surface, etc., if Y = Y C the complexi®cation C is a complex Enriques surface, resp. a complex K3-surface, etc. Consider the following two classi®cation problems: ? The ®rst author was supported in part by HCM contract ERBCHBG-CT-920011 (MAP-Project) and in part by HCM contract ERBCHRX-CT93-0408. ?? The second author was supported in part by EC grant ERBCHRX-CT94-0506. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 26 Sep 2021 at 16:44:06, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000223408405 **INTERPRINT**/Preproof: A M/c 4: PIPS Nr.: 124150 MATHKAP comp4075.tex; 5/12/1997; 11:40; v.7; p.1 216 FRED ERIC MANGOLTE AND JOOST VAN HAMEL Y R classi®cation of topological types of algebraic varieties over (the mani- C folds Y up to equivariant diffeomorphism), Y R classi®cation of topological types of the real parts . For real Enriques surfaces the two classi®cations have been investigated recently by Nikulin in [Ni2]. The topological classi®cation of the real parts was completed by Degtyarev and Kharlamov, who give in [DKh1] a description of all 87 topological types. Let us mention here that the real part of a real Enriques surface Y need not Y R be connected and that a connected component V of is either a nonorientable surface of genus 6 11 or it is homeomorphic to a sphere or to a torus. C The problem of classifying Y up to equivariant diffeomorphism still lacks a satisfactory solution. In the attempts to solve this problem, equivariant (co)homology plays an important role (see [Ni2], [NS], [DKh2]). It establishes for any algebraic R G Y C variety Y over a link between the action of on the (co)homology of and R Y d the topology of Y . For example, if is of dimension , the famous inequalities 2n X 1 H Y R; Z= 6 H G; H Y C ; Z= ; r dim 2 dim 2 (1) = r 0 2 n X 2 H Y R ; Z= 6 H G; H Y C ; Z; dim even 2 dim r (2) = r 0 2n X 1 H Y R ; Z= 6 H G; H Y C ; Z; dim odd 2 dim r (3) = r 0 (cf. [Kr1] or [Si]) can be proven using equivariant homology. We will say that Y is Galois-Maximal or a GM-variety if the ®rst inequality Z Z turns into equality, and Y will be called -Galois-Maximal,ora -GM-variety if C inequalities (2) and (3) are equalities. When the homology of Y is torsion free, the two notions coincide (see [Kr1, Prop. 3.6]). R Y R 6= ; A nonsingular projective surface Y over with is both GM and H Y C ; Z 6= Z-GM if it is simply connected (see [Kr1, Sect. 5.3]). If 1 0, as in the case of an Enriques surface, the situation can be much more complicated. The necessary and suf®cient conditions for a real Enriques surface Y to be a GM-variety were found in [DKh2]; in the present paper we will give necessary and suf®cient Z conditions for Y to be -GM. See Theorem 1.2. As far as we know, this is the ®rst paper on real Enriques surfaces in which equivariant (co)homology with integral coef®cients is studied instead of coef®cients = in Z 2.We expect that the extra information that can be obtained this way (compare for example equations (1)±(3)) will be useful in the topological classi®cation of real Enriques surfaces. In Section 6 we demonstrate the usefulness of integral coef®cients by computing Y Y the Brauer group Br of any real Enriques surface . This completes the partial Y results on the 2-torsion of Br obtained in [NS] and [Ni1]. See Theorem 1.3. Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.229, on 26 Sep 2021 at 16:44:06, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000223408405 comp4075.tex; 5/12/1997; 11:40; v.7; p.2 REAL ENRIQUES SURFACES 217 1.1. MAIN RESULTS alg Y R H Y R; Z= Let be an algebraic variety over . Denote by n 2 the subgroup H Y R; Z= of the homology group n 2 generated by the fundamental classes of Y R n-dimensional Zariski-closed subsets of , see [BH] or [BCR]. We will say that these classes can be represented by algebraic cycles. The problem of determining these groups is still open for most classes of surfaces. alg H X C ; Z=H XC;Z For a real rational surface X we always have 2 2 alg X R ; Z= =H XR;Z= and H1 2 12, see [Si]. For real K3-surfaces, the situa- tion is not so rigid. In most connected components of the moduli space of real K3- alg H X R ; Z= > k surfaces the points corresponding to a surface X with dim 1 2 k 6 form a countable union of real analytic subspaces of codimension k for any X R ; Z= X dim H1 0 2 ,where 0 is any K3-surface corresponding to a point from H X R ; Z= that component. In some components this is only true for k< dim 1 0 2 ; these components do not contain any point corresponding to a surface X with alg X R ; Z= = H X R ; Z= H1 2 1 2 , see [Ma2]. For real Abelian surfaces the situation is similar, see [Hu] or [Ma1, Ch.V]. Y R 6= ; THEOREM 1.1. Let Y be a real Enriques surface with . If all connected R components of the real part Y are orientable, then alg Y R; Z= =H YR;Z= : H1 2 12 Otherwise, alg Y R; Z= = H Y R ; Z= : dim H1 2 dim 1 2 1 See Theorem 4.4 for more details. In order to state further results we should mention that the set of connected components of the real part of a real Enriques surface Y has a natural decomposition R =Y tY into two parts Y 12. Following [DKh1] we will refer to these two parts as the two halves of the real Enriques surface. In [Ni1] it is shown that Y is GM R if both halves of Y are nonempty. It follows from [DKh2, Lem. 6.3.4] that if R Y Y R precisely one of the halves of Y is empty, then is GM if and only if is nonorientable. This result plays an important role in the proof of many of the main results of that paper (see Sect. 7 in loc. cit.). In the present paper we will see in the course of proving Theorem 1.1 that a real Enriques surface with orientable real part is not a Z-GM-variety. In Section 5 we also tackle the nonorientable case and combining our results with the results for = coef®cients in Z 2 that were already known we obtain the following theorem. THEOREM 1.2. Let Y be a real Enriques surface with nonempty real part. Y Y Y (i) Suppose the two halves Y1 and 2 are nonempty. Then is GM. Moreover, Y R is Z-GM if and only if is nonorientable.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us