Symbionts in Waiting: the Dynamics of Incipient Endosymbiont Complementation and Replacement in Minimal Bacterial Communities of Psyllids Jennifer L

Symbionts in Waiting: the Dynamics of Incipient Endosymbiont Complementation and Replacement in Minimal Bacterial Communities of Psyllids Jennifer L

Morrow et al. Microbiome (2017) 5:58 DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0276-4 RESEARCH Open Access Symbionts in waiting: the dynamics of incipient endosymbiont complementation and replacement in minimal bacterial communities of psyllids Jennifer L. Morrow1, Aidan A. G. Hall1,2 and Markus Riegler1* Abstract Background: Obligate bacterial primary (P-) endosymbionts that are maternally inherited and codiverge with hosts are widespread across insect lineages with nutritionally restricted diets. Secondary (S-) endosymbionts are mostly facultative, but in some hosts, they complement P-endosymbiont function and therefore become obligate. Phylogenetic evidence exists for host switching and replacement of S-endosymbionts. The community dynamics that precede endosymbiont replacement and complementation have been little studied across host species, yet they are fundamental to the evolution of endosymbiosis. Results: We performed bacterial 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing of 25 psyllid species (Hemiptera, Psylloidea) across different developmental stages and ecological niches by focusing on the characterisation of the bacteria other than the universally present P-endosymbiont Carsonella (Gammaproteobacteria). Most species harboured only one dominant representative of diverse gammaproteobacterial S-endosymbionts that was consistently detected across all host individuals and populations (Arsenophonus in eight species, Sodalis or Sodalis-like bacteria in four species, unclassified Enterobacteriaceae in eight species). The identity of this dominant obligate S-endosymbiont varied across closely related host species. Unexpectedly, five psyllid species had two or three co-occurring endosymbiont species other than Carsonella within all host individuals, including a Rickettsiella-like bacterium (Gammaproteobacteria) in one psyllid species. Based on standard and quantitative PCR, all psyllids carried Carsonella, at higher titres than their dominant S-endosymbionts. Some psyllids also had Alphaproteobacteria (Lariskella, Rickettsia, Wolbachia) at varying prevalence. Incidence of other bacteria, including known plant pathogens, was low. Ecological niche of gall-forming, lerp-forming and free-living psyllid species did not impact endosymbiont communities. Two flush-feeding psyllid species had population-specific differences, and this was attributable to the higher endosymbiont diversity in native ranges and the absence of some endosymbionts in invasive ranges. Conclusions: Our data support the hypothesis of strict vertical transmission of minimal core communities of bacteria in psyllids. We also found evidence for S-endosymbiont replacement across closely related psyllid species. Multiple dominant S-endosymbionts present in some host species, including at low titre, constitute potential examples of incipient endosymbiont complementation or replacement. Our multiple comparisons of deep-sequenced minimal insect bacterial communities exposed the dynamics involved in shaping insect endosymbiosis. Keywords: Core microbiota, Symbiosis, Endosymbiont replacement, Carsonella, Psyllid, Arsenophonus, Sodalis, Enterobacteriaceae, Plant pathogenic bacteria, Insect * Correspondence: [email protected] 1Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © The Author(s). 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Morrow et al. Microbiome (2017) 5:58 Page 2 of 23 Background varying prevalence within species or varying incidence Animals’ diverse interactions with bacterial symbionts across related species. Only a few studies have comprehen- can sit anywhere on the scale from parasitism to mutual- sively characterised entire bacterial communities of hosts ism, including interactions of invertebrates with mater- both within and across a significant number of species nally inherited intracellular bacterial endosymbionts that [9, 22], yet such studies are required to detect all provide fitness benefits to hosts. Endosymbiosis can present bacteria in hosts, including bacterial symbionts result in genome size reduction of bacterial symbionts thatmayevolvefromanindifferenttransientrole(as and their loss of function [1], requiring complementa- perhaps seen by a low prevalence or low bacterial titre) tion or replacement by other endosymbionts [2, 3]. Prior to a mutualistic role in their hosts (and they could be to this, host switches and acquisition of endosymbionts referred to as ‘symbionts in waiting’). must occur, but these processes have not been studied for Many hemipterans, including plant sap-feeding insects entire bacterial communities across many host species. such as aphids, whiteflies and psyllids, have evolved a Insects with minimal bacterial communities consisting of specialised abdominal tissue structure, the bacteriome, a few core species may provide excellent model systems to where P- and S-endosymbionts reside. The bacteriome investigate these symbiont community dynamics. usually consists of bacteriocytes surrounded by a multi- Insects that feed on plant sap or other nutritionally nucleate syncytium [23]. All species of the hemipteran restricted diets depend on nutrient provisioning by superfamily Psylloidea (in a broad sense referred to as primary (P-) endosymbionts that are localised within psyllids) harbour the obligate, maternally inherited P- specialised host cells and omnipresent in host popula- endosymbiont ‘Candidatus Carsonella ruddii’ (hereafter tions due to the efficient and strictly maternal endosym- Carsonella; Gammaproteobacteria) [24]. According to in biont transmission. This results in co-evolution and can situ hybridisation studies of the mulberry psyllid, Anom- be seen in the phylogenetic congruency of bacterial oneura mori, and the Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina endosymbionts and hosts [4]. In contrast to obligate P- citri, Carsonella is housed in vesicles within the bacter- endosymbionts, many host insects also have facultative iocytes, while the S-endosymbionts are localised to the associations with other bacteria, secondary (S-) endo- syncytial region [25–27], confirming early microscopic symbionts, which may provide fitness benefits to hosts observations of both P- and S-endosymbionts of psyllids only in a certain ecological or environmental context [28]. Carsonella has an AT-rich and very small genome [5–8]. S-endosymbionts exhibit some key features that of approximately 160 kb, with few remaining genes are shared with P-endosymbionts: they are intracellular, involved in DNA repair, energy metabolism and cell mostly vertically transmitted (with occasional horizontal envelope synthesis, as well as having lost complete or transmission), and in some instances fixed in host popu- partial amino acid synthesis pathways [10, 29]. As a con- lations [9]. Furthermore, the genomes of P- and many S- sequence of the minimal genome of Carsonella and its endosymbionts have reduced genome sizes, symptomatic reduction in the number of encoded enzymes for amino of long-term, obligate endosymbiosis, combined with acid synthesis, it has been predicted that complementing signs of functional complementation signifying a seem- S-endosymbionts may be just as essential to psyllid fit- ingly stable coexistence of both types of endosymbionts ness as the P-endosymbiont [10]. with the host [10, 11]. Endosymbionts are placed under In some hosts, S-endosymbionts show typical signs of diverse selection pressures, directly from the intracellu- obligate mutualism, whereas closely related bacteria found lar host environment [12], and indirectly through envir- in other host lineages are facultative and do not exhibit onmental and ecological factors such as climate, host extreme gene loss and efficient maternal transmission plant choice, plant use and plant defences that act on their [30]. For example, whole genome assembly of the Entero- insect host [13, 14]. Conversely, endosymbiosis drives the bacteriaceae S-endosymbionts of the psyllids Ctenarytaina evolution of endosymbiont genomes towards accelerated eucalypti and Heteropsylla cubana revealed signs of mutation rates and the accumulation of non-lethal mu- genome reduction, AT bias and metabolic complementar- tations [15], gene loss and sometimes lateral gene transfer ity with the associated Carsonella strain [10]. However, to the host genome [16]. This may necessitate com- unlike Carsonella that codiverges with its host, these S- plementation of P-endosymbiont function by facultative S- endosymbionts have not strictly codiverged across the endosymbionts that can then become obligate to hosts entire host phylogeny: while some psyllid lineages [3, 10]. It can also result in the loss and replacement of appear to show signs of co-evolution with obligate S- established S-endosymbionts after the acquisition of new endosymbionts [31], there is also evidence for multiple endosymbionts by horizontal transmission as evidenced by host switching events

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    23 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us