1 Cross-Cultural Patterns of Interracial Marriage by Tim B. Heaton

1 Cross-Cultural Patterns of Interracial Marriage by Tim B. Heaton

Cross-Cultural Patterns of Interracial Marriage By Tim B. Heaton And Cardell K. Jacobson Department of Sociology Brigham Young University September 2004 1 Cross-Cultural Patterns of Interracial Marriage Abstract This paper compares patterns of interracial marriage in seven different cultural contexts. Four aspects of intermarriage are considered. First, log-linear models are as estimated to gage the extent of overall homogamy and race specific homogamy in each setting. Second, residuals from these models are used to assess gender differences in intermarriage. Multinomial logistic regression is then used to evaluate age and educational differences. Age is included as a surrogate for trends over time, and education is included as a measure of social status. We hypothesize that intermarriage will increase over time-but not necessarily at the same rate for each racial group or racial category. We also hypothesize that higher education is associated with higher rates of outmarriage from low-status groups, but lower rates of outmarriage from high-status groups. In other words, the average difference in status between two groups will be associated with the degree of influence education has on intermarriage. Census data were obtained for each of the cultural contexts. We begin with the United States because a substantial body of research focuses on the United States. Canada shares some culture, history, and language with the United States, but does not have a legacy of slavery and has different patterns of immigration. New Zealand, like the U.S. and Canada, has as history of British and European settlement, but the indigenous population of New Zealand is a much larger share of the total population. In contrast to these three immigrant societies, South Africa experienced colonization, but the indigenous population remained the numerical majority. South Africa also had a period when contact between groups was legally and socially restricted. The next two data sets are from provinces in China. Beijing is selected because it is the political and educational center of the society. We also include a province where a minority group is the numerical majority. Finally, we include Hawaii because of its reputation as a melting pot for a wide variety of different groups. 2 Ideological, social, and political forces have been working to reduce racial discrimination and to create more equal relationships among racial and ethnic groups. Marriage is often viewed as the last barrier to racial integration, making intermarriage a critical indicator of inter-group relationships. While numerous researchers have examined inter-group marriage between racial and ethnic groups in the United States, fewer have examined factors associated with inter-group marriage in an international perspective. Using recent census data, we examine the factors predicting inter-group marriage in the United States, Canada, New Zealand, South Africa, and parts of the Peoples Republic of China. We also include Hawaii as a special case since that state has a long history of racial tolerance and intermarriage. The six societies are geographically diverse, have different racial and ethnic histories, and compositions. Increased international migration in recent decades has increased the racial and ethnic diversity in a number of countries, resulting in greater social proximity between individuals from different groups and contact in the workplace and other social institutions. This international migration is, at least in part, a major factor leading to interracial unions (Sung, 1990; Tzeng, 2000). At the same time, cultural norms against inter-group marriage have decreased resulting in less pressure to marry homogamously. The United States, Canada, and New Zealand are all immigrant societies in which Euro- Americans or whites are the dominant group. South Africa provides a contrast to these immigrant societies because while it was a colonized country, the indigenous peoples remained a numerical majority. The whites, of course, had the political, social, and economic power. China provides an additional contrast. While many people consider current-day China to be ethnically homogamous, China actually is composed of 56 groups, 55 of which China recognizes officially as minority groups. Altogether, the minority groups comprise four percent of the population. The groups are not evenly distributed across China, however. We examine two areas in China, Beijing, its capital city and Xinjiang Province in Northwest China. Xinjiang Province is composed of Uyghers (percent), Han (percent), as well as several other smaller groups. Though the Han are the dominant group in China, they number less than half the population in Xinjiang Province and are mostly immigrants or the children of immigrants in the province. In this paper we examine three factors that have been shown to be related to inter- group in previous research and compare the factors across the six contexts. More specifically; gender, age and education have been used as indicators of cultural and social indicators of racial and ethnic status. Gender Imbalances in Interracial Marriage Gender imbalances in interracial marriages are common in the United States and Canada (Qian, 1997; Jacobson and Heaton, 2000), and Canada (Ram, 1990; Tzeng, 2000). In both countries white male-Asian female marriages are much more common than the reverse. Black-white marriages in the United States, however, show an inverse pattern with Black male-white female marriage numbering roughly twice the number of white male-black female marriages. The Asian female-white male marriages in Canada also tend to occur when the wife has high educational levels or works more often than her husband (Tzeng, 2000). 3 Studies conducted in the United States also show that interethnic marriage is more common for foreign females than it is for foreign males (Lee and Yamanaka, 1990). This is especially true for those from male-dominated cultures such as Japan (Tinker, 1982). Some of the gender differences in interracial may reflect decreasing traditional norms. In most Asian cultures the family name is continued through the sons, not daughters, and historically sons have been valued more than daughters. While this gives Asian sons more latitude in choosing a mate, the daughters may also look outside their traditional community to seek a mate (Koo 1985; Watson, Jashcok and Miers, 1994; Cheung, 1997; Hays, 2001). A similar phenomenon may be occurring in Black-White marriages. As traditional norms about marriage decline white women may seek partners outside of their own group. Generation or Age The literature on inter-group marriage suggests that younger generations are consistently more likely than older generations both to approve of inter-group marriage (Schuman et al., 1997) and to marry exogamously. Research in the United States has consistently shown age to be inversely associated with inter-group marriage (Gurak and Fitzpatrick, 1982; Tinker, 1982; Wong, 1989; Sung, 1990; Lee and Yamanaka, 1990; Qian, 1997; Jacobson and Heaton, 2000). Lee and Yamanaka’s (1990) study, for example, found that native-born Asian Americans were three times more likely to intermarry than foreign-born women. Researchers have suggested that younger generations have shed discriminatory beliefs and practices, resulting in a more open attitude towards other races (Gurak and Fitzpatrick, 1982). Some researchers also believe that younger generations are better able to adapt to a new culture and society (Tinker, 1982; Gurak and Fitzpatrick, 1982). Further, Younger generations, or second or subsequent generations, generally are more assimilated and thus less likely to have strong ties to their native land and cultures (Lee and Yamanaka 1990; Sung, 1990; Wong, 1989). Generational status and intermarriage are also important in Canada where younger generations are significantly more likely than younger generations to marry exogamously (Ram, 1990; Tzeng, 2000). For white ethnic groups the reverse is true (Kalbach, 2000). For white ethnic groups, couples often are married before their arrival in Canada (Kalbach, 2003). A second explanation for the lower rates of outmarriage among the younger generations is that they often do not speak either of the official Canadian languages. Tzeng (2000), for example, estimates that 98 percent of those who are outmarried are capable of speaking one or both of the official languages. Cultural factors, no doubt, also affect the rates of intermarriage. Older members of society are more simply more set in their ways, adhere to older social norms, and thus are less to intermarry. Furthermore the norms and acceptance of Intergroup marriage have changed dramatically over the past 40 or so years (see Schuman et al., 1997). Education A number of researchers have found that individuals from higher socio-economic status groups are more likely than others to exhibit both higher acceptance of others and are more likely to marry exogamously (e.g. Sandefur and McKinnel, 1986; Tinker, 1982; Schoen, Wooldredge, and Thomas, 1989). While inter-group contact within educational institutions often remains less than ideal for the improvement of racial attitudes (Schaefer, 1996), educational institutions provide opportunities for increased inter-group 4 contact and acceptance that may not exist in other parts of society. The increased approval may result from at least two aspects of education. First, attendance at college may facilitate normative acceptance of others. Indeed, the research indicates

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    27 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us