Moon Jung, Waters

Moon Jung, Waters

A Systematic Approach for Improving the Recovery of Hydrophobic Peptides during LC-MS Analyses November 2019 Moon Chul (Moon) Jung, Ph.D. Waters Corporation, Chemistry Technology Center R&D ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 1 Proteins and peptides can be quite sticky! Molecule or ¡ Non-Specific Binding (NSB) or Non-Specific Adsorption (NSA) Surface – Biomolecules tend to adhere to any exposed surfaces. – Any chemical interaction can be the source of NSB, Non-polar Polar but most dominantly… Uncharged Charged Polar Polar o Polarity-based interactions, e.g., hydrophobic attraction o Ionic interactions, e.g., coulombic attraction Basic Acidic (cationic) (anionic) ¡ NSB of biomolecules is more difficult to deal with compared to NSB of small molecules – Biomolecules are larger and more complex than small molecules. o There may be multiple binding interactions between biomolecules. – Proteins may be cooperatively deformed during the adsorption process. o And may be permanently lost. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL Figure from F. Poncin et al., J. Func. Biomater. 3(3), 528, 2012 2 How does Non-Specific Binding (NSB) affect analyses? 5 ng/mL [10µL] - WithoutLeuprolide + RP Dilution - 95:5 (MW- Waters Untreated1209.4) - Rep 1 hormone antagonist peptide 100 50x scale Technical Replicate 1 Minimal NSB 5 ng/mL [10µL] - Without + RP Dilution - 95:5 - Waters Untreated - Rep 1 100 Technical Replicate 2 CV: 1.7% Technical Replicate 3 (n = 3) % CV: 41.8% % (n = 3) Non-specific binding can lead to: – Low sensitivity – High variability – Unreliable analytical results 0 Time 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 High NSB 0 Time 1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 3 Blocking agent: an alternative strategy to mask NSB – Detergents (surfactants), such as Tween-20 or Triton X-100 – Large polymeric molecules, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) – Carrier proteins, such as bovine serum albumin, casein, or rat plasma May be effective in reducing NSB, but may induce… • Increased sample complexity • Possible matrix effects Froth formation during pipetting leads to measurement errors • Contamination of columns and instrumentation 0.002% PEG 0.1% rat plasma 100 µg/mL BSA No blocking agent ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 4 A dilemma in the peptide bioanalysis workflow Do we want to add blocking agents to the clean samples? Sample Sample Preparation Where do we LC-MS/MS Sensitivity ↑ Cleanedput the clean,-up Specificity ↑ concentratedsamples Analysis + matrix Recovery ↑ sample? Matrix Effects ↓ Can we risk the analyte loss? ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 5 Waters introduced QuanRecovery Plates and Vials Use it, don’t lose it! Clean polypropylene sample containers for LC/MS applications: no silanol activities Hydrophilic surface modification: no coating or extra chemicals on the surface 300 µL injection vial 700 µL 96-well plate ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 6 What is the impact of the sample container on recovery? Increasing hydrophobicity i.e., more challenging peptides • Recovery of hydrophobic peptides is a good indicator for the NSB losses. • Not all containers are suitable for peptides. Average recovery (n=4) of four peptides (1 ng/mL each) after 24 hours storage at 4°C. Sample prepared in 80:20 water/ACN + 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 7 How does the sample matrix composition affect recovery? QuanRecovery showed greater recoveries in low organic sample matrices. …but is this a significant benefit? Average recovery of 1 ng/mL teriparatide (n=4) after 24 hours of storage at 4 ºC. Samples prepared in water/ACN mixtures of various ratios, all acidified with 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 8 How does the sample matrix composition affect recovery? Poor recovery Good recovery Poor chromatography ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 9 How does the sample matrix composition affect recovery? %ACN range leading to good chromatography %ACN range leading to good recovery (>90%) in each container Highly organic sample matrices help reduce NSB losses, but they may not be suitable for LC injections. Average recovery of 1 ng/mL teriparatide (n=4) after 24 hours of storage at 4 ºC. Samples prepared in water/ACN mixtures of various ratios, all acidified with 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 10 Temperature vs. peptide recovery Non-refrigerated sample storage or the exposure to an elevated temperature during sample handling may increase NSB losses. Average recovery of 1 ng/mL melittin and glucagon (n=4) after 47 hours of storage at various temperatures. Samples were prepared in 80:20 water/ACN + 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 11 Non-specific binding losses at high and low concentrations 1 ng/mL Insulin 100 ng/mL NSB losses are more apparent at low QuanRecovery Plate concentrations, but still % % cause challenges at high concentrations. Standard Polypropylene Plate 0 Time0 Time 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.40 1.45 1.50 Chromatographic peaks of insulin after storage for 24 hours at 4 ºC. Samples were 96% loss 50% loss prepared in 80:20 water/ACN + 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 12 Impact of non-specific binding on calibration curves QuanRecovery Plate and the Carrier Protein Method both produced linear calibration curves. The commercially available low bind plate was unable to produce a linear curve. No curve observed using a The NSB losses skewed conventional polypropylene plate. the calibration curves, and thus severely limited the assay dynamic ranges. The calibration curve for melittin (0.05 – 100 ng/mL) after standards were stored for 24 hours at 4 ºC. Standards were prepared in 80:20 water/ACN + 0.2% TFA. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 13 Another way of losing samples – residual volumes The container design influences the available sample volume for injections. Peak areas from repeated injections of 1 µL sample from a single well/vial. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 14 Does it really work? – Bioanalysis of synthetic peptides ¡ Pramlintide acetate (SYMLINTM) suffers from a high degree of non-specific binding. – It’s a large peptide (MW 3949). – It’s moderately hydrophobic (HPLC Index: 88.7). 5 ng/mL [10 µL] - Without + RP Dilution - Pramlintide - 80:20 - Waters Untreated - Rep 2 100 QuanRecovery Plate 36x increase in peak area Peak Area Recovery % QuanRecovery Plate 9278 99.0% Conventional PP Plate 259 2.8% Conventional PP Plate Peak area and recovery of 10 ng/mL pramlintide stored in each plate. 0 Time 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 1.65 1.70 1.75 1.80 1.85 1.90 1.95 2.00 ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL Caitlin Dunning, look for her EBF poster for more details.15 Does it really work? – mAb subunit analysis Precursor Fragment Fragment mAb (m/z) (m/z) Identity Adalimumab 1236.02 Cetuximab 1236.81 1329.85 P119 – y96 NIST mAb 1288.84 100 ng/mL mAb, after 24 hours of storage. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL Caitlin Dunning 16 Summary ¡ Proteins and peptides may adsorb to any surface, especially to sample containers, while waiting for LC-MS injections. ¡ Such losses are detrimental to the assay because they negatively affect recovery, sensitivity, and reproducibility. ¡ Optimizing experimental factors influence the severity of non-specific binding. Follow these steps to prevent the losses in the container. – Choose an appropriate container. – Select a compatible sample matrix. – Select an optimal sample storage condition. ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 17 Acknowledgements Tom Walter Caitlin Dunning Mary Lame Kim Haynes, Brian Murphy, and Markus Wanninger Waters EBF Team EBF organizers Thanks for attending! ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 18 To learn more about non-specific binding losses… ¡ Posters at EBF – Factors that influence the recovery of hydrophobic peptides during LC-MS sample handling – Development of a SPE LC-MS/MS Method for the Bioanalytical Quantification of Pramlintide from Serum ¡ Waters QuanRecovery page http://www.waters.com/QuanRecovery ¡ Whitepaper on non-specific binding losses http://www.waters.com/waters/library.htm?lid=135018 646 Use it, don’t lose it! ©2019 Waters Corporation COMPANY CONFIDENTIAL 19 .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us