Accurate Measurement of Reactor Neutrinos Close to Surface with STEREO

Accurate Measurement of Reactor Neutrinos Close to Surface with STEREO

Accurate measurement of reactor neutrinos close to surface with STEREO Photo:ILL Vladimir Savu IRFU,CEA, Paris-Saclay University on behalf of the STEREO collaboration Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 1 / 23 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 Motivation Sterile neutrino search and reactorν ¯e measurements Motivation of STEREO I Oscillation test L/E ∼ 10 m/3 MeV ! ∼ 1eV sterile neutrino 2 2 Two new parameters: sin (2θnew ) and∆ mnew Physical Review D 83, 073006 (2011), G. Mention et al. 9 ∆ χ 2 4 1 4 9 5.5 Daya Bay Huber model w/ 68% C.L. I absolute flux 5.0 / fission] 4.5 normalization studies 2 cm 43 4.0 − C.L spectral shape studies [10 I 3.5 68% 239 95% σ −43 σ238 =(10.1±1.0)×10 99.7% σ =(6.04±0.60)×10−43 3.0 241 5.2 5.6 6.0 6.4 6.8 7.2 −43 2 σ235 [10 cm / fission] Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 251801 (2017) Physics Letters B 773 (2017) STEREO will test precisely these 3 questions with a pure 235U spectrum Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 1 / 23 The STEREO experiment Experimental site ILL research facility, Grenoble, France Research reactor core 58 MWth ! 1019 ν¯ s−1 e Water channel 15 m.w.e overburden 235 X Highly U enriched X Compact core (40cm ?) X Short baseline measurement: 9.4m < Lcore < 11.2m 93 tons moved on air cushions AutumnAutumn 2016 2016 I Surface-level experiment I γ and neutron background from neighboring experiments Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 2 / 23 The STEREO experiment Data taking Data taking I Phase-I: 66 days reactor ON { 22 days reactor OFF I Phase-II: 119 days reactor ON { 211 days reactor OFF I Data taking efficiency: 98.5%, 14% dead-time+veto-time after off-line cuts 50 days reactor ON cycles with long periods of reactor OFF allowing for a good characterization of the background Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 3 / 23 The STEREO experiment The Stereo detector The STEREO detector Acrylic buffers PMT Mineral oil I designed for a relative measurement X six identical Target cells filled with Gd doped LS Gamma-catcher ------ External crown scintillator liquid (no Gd) Target 6 cells scintillator liquid (Gd loaded) Counts L Without oscillation Center cell with oscillation Border cell with oscillation 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Evisible [MeV] E I reflectivity of VM2000 foils is above 98% in the 400-950 nm range in air Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 4 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Light cross-talks I The evolution of the light cross-talks between cells is monitored by looking at muon events I Phase I light cross-talks are evolving due to the liquid scintillator infiltrating into the acrylic walls. X Repaired during summer 2017 X Energy reconstruction formalism to account for the evolving light cross-talks I Phase II light cross-talks are reduced and stabilized 20 20 Cell2 → Cell3 Cell2 → Cell3 [%] [%] ij Cell6 → GC Back ij Cell6 → GC Back L Cell3 → GC D19 L → 15 15 Cell3 GC D19 → Cell5 Cell6 Cell5 → Cell6 10 10 5 5 0 0 10/31/16 12/31/16 03/02/17 10/31/17 12/31/17 03/02/18 Date [MM/DD/YY] Date [MM/DD/YY] Phase I light cross-talks Phase II light cross-talks Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 5 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Calibration I Circulation of radioactive sources (68Ge;137 Cs;54 Mn;65 Zn;60 Co;42 K;24 Na; AmBe) along 3 different calibration systems: I internal calibration tubes - 5 z positions I LED system, used to study the single I along the perimeter of the detector photoelectron and the PMT-DAQ I below the central long axis of the detector linearity in the detector Target 3 2 1 Non-linearity [%] 0 −1 −2 −3 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 Charge [PE] Top view of STEREO detector No sign of non-linearity up to 10 MeV for all PMTs Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 6 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Simulation fine tuning - raw charges I Very good agreement between data and 20 simulation at the raw charge level: most 24Na Data points within ±1% 24Na MC I The energy reconstruction will correct to first order the mean offset between the TG cells Preliminary 24Na Data 24Na MC Dilatation Factor Preliminary Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 4 Cell 5 Cell 6 10 45 80 30 60 10 45 80 30 60 10 45 80 Height [cm] Measured (black) and simulated (red) collected Summary of all the dilatation factors fitted from charges in cell 1 (top) and in cell 2 (bottom) when the 25 measured and simulated positions of the the 24Na source is located at the middle of cell 1. 54Mn source. Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 7 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Simulation fine tuning - Quenching dE I Quenching for high dx leads to a non-linear Preliminary response at low energy deposits dL dE ≈ dX dX dE 1 + KB dx Norm. Calib. Coefficient I The effective Birks coefficient KB is adjusted in the MC in order to match the experimental quenching curve I Agreement between experimental and simulated curves reaches sub-% accuracy Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 8 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Energy reconstruction −! Q are the collected charges −1 M matrix constructed from regular monitoring: mij = Ci · Lji −−! −1−! Erec = M Q 54 I Ci calibration coefficients( Mn radioactive source) I Lji cross-talks between cells (cosmics) Preliminary Cell 5 Data/MC agreement of the reconstructed Vertex distribtution for the 54Mn source deployed inside the energy distribution for a 54Mn calibration internal calibration tube Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 9 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Energy reconstruction for all the calibration sources I Residuals from all the radioactive sources I Energy resolution (δE=E) is well reproduced are contained in a ±1% band in the MC for all the radioactive sources I Energy resolution saturates at 5% due to volume effects Cell 1 Cell 2 Cell 3 Cell 4 Preliminary Preliminary Cell 5 Cell 6 Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 10 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Detector response - Y-axis I Same quality and pattern of residuals as for I Neutrons from AmBe source are able to the X,Z axes tested with the calibration traverse the GC cells and reach the Target tubes cells I No further correction needs to be applied I We look at the n-H capture peak Target & Gamma-Catcher AmBe n-H (mid-height) Preliminary Cell ID Data/MC Erec of neutron captures by hydrogen, for the average of 3 horizontal deployment Y-axis scan with AmBe source positions of an AmBe source at mid-height along the Y-axis of the detector Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 11 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response 12B β-decay spectrum I Complementary data to the calibration sources I extended energy range Preliminary I continuous spectrum I extended vertex distribution I β-decay spectrum of 12B ! selection of cosmic muon captures on 12C: − 12 12 µ + C ! B + νµ I Good agreement between the measured and simulated 12B spectra Use the 12B spectrum and the calibration sources to perform a global fit of the energy scale Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 12 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response 12B β-decay spectrum - global fit Preliminary I Global fit of sources + 12B spectrum I Supplementary constraints on the energy Cell 4 scale I Polynomial fit function: Global Fit Data MC Erec = Pol(Erec ) I Distortions of the measured neutrino spectrum induced by the fitted deviation of Data MC Erec to Erec are contained in an envelope obtained by varying the calibration coefficients with ±1% Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 13 / 23 The STEREO experiment Detector response Time stability Fit of the n-H capture peak in Cell 2 Relative deviation to the mean n-H Preliminary n-H capture of neutrons from cosmic rays I Preliminary I Distribution of vertices similar to νe I Stable detector response at 0.3% level in each cell Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 14 / 23 The STEREO experiment Background and shielding Signal and background Inverse beta decay (IBD) interaction: n thermalisation νe diffusion p γ + e+ νe + p e + n energy deposit γ Gd(n,γ)γ)) ! annihilation ~ 8MeV γ cascade e- e+ γ Delayed event ! neutron capture Prompt event ! e+ P Gd: i Eγ;i ∼ 8MeV E + ≈ E − 0:8MeV vis;e νe H: Eγ ∼ 2:2MeV Accidental background Correlated background from cosmic rays I natural radioactivity I stopping muons I reactor induced neutrons and gammas I spallation neutrons Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 15 / 23 The STEREO experiment Background and shielding Background and shielding I Passive shielding for γ, neutrons and magnetic fields I Water channel and active veto for cosmic muons Accidental background Correlated background from cosmic rays I natural radioactivity I stopping muons I reactor induced neutrons and gammas I spallation neutrons Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 16 / 23 The STEREO experiment ν¯e selection and efficiency studies ν¯e signal selection and efficiency studies n thermalisation νe τ ~ 20μs γ diffusion p + I Mean cut efficiency: e γ Gd(n,γ) energy deposit ~ 8MeV γ cascade annihilation 61.4±0.9% e- e+ γ I Dominated by neutron efficiency (delayed Clean after Clean before correlated pair t signal) 1.6 < Eprompt < 7.1 MeVE delayed > 4.5 MeV AmBe source at z=45cm 3000 Data 2500 Simulation 2000 events 1500 1000 500 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 correlation time [µs] 1.5 1.0 0.5 data/MC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 correlation time [µs] Good agreement with Monte-Carlo Good agreement with Monte-Carlo for the neutron in correlation time detection efficiency at the % level Vladimir Savu (CEA) 06.12.2019 { AAP 2019 17 / 23 The STEREO experiment ν¯e selection and efficiency studies Improved Gd Gamma cascade simulation I Delayed signal: gamma cascade

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    31 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us