FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model

FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model

Review Vanna Volga Stochastic-Local-Volatility Mixture Local Volatility Model Summary FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model Uwe Wystup Fr´ed´ericBossens, Andreas Weber MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com July 2020 FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 1 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Stochastic-Local-Volatility Mixture Local Volatility Model Summary Agenda 1 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Versions of Vanna-Volga Design and Consistency Issues 2 Stochastic-Local-Volatility LV and SV vanilla smile fit SLV Step by Step SLV Pricing / Validation 3 Mixture Local Volatility Model MLV Main Features Vol Process Comparison MLV vs. SLV Granular Model Marking 4 Summary Product/Model Matrix Key Take-Aways FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 2 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Stochastic-Local-Volatility Mixture Local Volatility Model Summary Agenda 1 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Versions of Vanna-Volga Design and Consistency Issues 2 Stochastic-Local-Volatility LV and SV vanilla smile fit SLV Step by Step SLV Pricing / Validation 3 Mixture Local Volatility Model MLV Main Features Vol Process Comparison MLV vs. SLV Granular Model Marking 4 Summary Product/Model Matrix Key Take-Aways FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 3 / 37 2 For a long time it matched market prices for barrier options and touch contracts quite good. 3 Market fit at least better than the alternatively available Local Volatility (LV) or Stochastic Volatility (SV) models. Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Early Days 1 Pricing in Vanna Volga (VV) model is popular in FX as it still allows to compute prices nearly as fast as in the BS model, using analytical formulas. FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 4 / 37 3 Market fit at least better than the alternatively available Local Volatility (LV) or Stochastic Volatility (SV) models. Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Early Days 1 Pricing in Vanna Volga (VV) model is popular in FX as it still allows to compute prices nearly as fast as in the BS model, using analytical formulas. 2 For a long time it matched market prices for barrier options and touch contracts quite good. FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 4 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Early Days 1 Pricing in Vanna Volga (VV) model is popular in FX as it still allows to compute prices nearly as fast as in the BS model, using analytical formulas. 2 For a long time it matched market prices for barrier options and touch contracts quite good. 3 Market fit at least better than the alternatively available Local Volatility (LV) or Stochastic Volatility (SV) models. FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 4 / 37 2 Single product type rules of thumb 3 Fits the hedging instruments (plain vanilla options) only reasonably well in the 25-delta range 4 Not clear how to apply to more exotic products 5 Volatility too flat in the wings Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Drawbacks 1 Consistent pricing for different option types not guaranteed FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 5 / 37 3 Fits the hedging instruments (plain vanilla options) only reasonably well in the 25-delta range 4 Not clear how to apply to more exotic products 5 Volatility too flat in the wings Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Drawbacks 1 Consistent pricing for different option types not guaranteed 2 Single product type rules of thumb FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 5 / 37 4 Not clear how to apply to more exotic products 5 Volatility too flat in the wings Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Drawbacks 1 Consistent pricing for different option types not guaranteed 2 Single product type rules of thumb 3 Fits the hedging instruments (plain vanilla options) only reasonably well in the 25-delta range FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 5 / 37 5 Volatility too flat in the wings Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Drawbacks 1 Consistent pricing for different option types not guaranteed 2 Single product type rules of thumb 3 Fits the hedging instruments (plain vanilla options) only reasonably well in the 25-delta range 4 Not clear how to apply to more exotic products FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 5 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Review Vanna Volga: Drawbacks 1 Consistent pricing for different option types not guaranteed 2 Single product type rules of thumb 3 Fits the hedging instruments (plain vanilla options) only reasonably well in the 25-delta range 4 Not clear how to apply to more exotic products 5 Volatility too flat in the wings FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 5 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Wystup/Traders' Rule of Thumb 2003 (VV) [Wystup, 2003], [Wystup, 2006]: compute the cost of the overhedge of risk reversals (RR) and butterflies (BF) to hedge vanna and volga of an option EXO. VV-value = TV + p[cost of vanna + cost of volga] (1) with vannaEXO cost of vanna = × OH RR (2) vannaRR volgaEXO cost of volga = × OH BF (3) volgaBF p = no-touch probability or modifications (4) OH = overhedge = market price − TV (5) FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 6 / 37 Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Castagna/Mercurio 2007 (VV2) [Castagna and Mercurio, 2007], [Castagna and Mercurio, 2006]: portfolio of three calls hedging an option risk up to second order (in particular the vanna and volga of an option 3 X c(K; σK ) = c(K; σBS ) + xi (K)[c(Ki ; σi ) − c(Ki ; σBS )] (6) i=1 with @c(K,σBS ) K2 K3 @σ ln K ln K x1(K) = @c(K1,σBS ) ln K2 ln K3 @σ K1 K1 K @c(K,σBS ) ln K ln 3 @σ K1 K x2(K) = @c(K2,σBS ) ln K2 ln K3 @σ K1 K2 @c(K,σBS ) ln K ln K @σ K1 K2 x3(K) = (7) @c(K3,σBS ) ln K3 ln K3 @σ K1 K2 FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 7 / 37 Include vega Include third order Greeks (volunga, vanunga) One-touch probability: which measure? domestic, foreign, physical, mixes? Apply different weights to vega, vanna and volga, e.g. vanna weight = 1+p No-Touch-Probability p, vega and volga weight = 2 , [Fisher, 2007] Not clear how to translate to Double-Touch products Which volatility to use for the touch probability: ATM, average of ATM and barrier vol, derived from equilibrium condition NTvv=NTbs+NTvv*...[Bossens et al., 2010] Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Vanna-Volga Design Issues Hedge with BF and RR vs Hedge with 3 Vanillas, and if vanillas then which ones? FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 8 / 37 Include third order Greeks (volunga, vanunga) One-touch probability: which measure? domestic, foreign, physical, mixes? Apply different weights to vega, vanna and volga, e.g. vanna weight = 1+p No-Touch-Probability p, vega and volga weight = 2 , [Fisher, 2007] Not clear how to translate to Double-Touch products Which volatility to use for the touch probability: ATM, average of ATM and barrier vol, derived from equilibrium condition NTvv=NTbs+NTvv*...[Bossens et al., 2010] Review Vanna Volga Early Days and Drawbacks Stochastic-Local-Volatility Versions of Vanna-Volga Mixture Local Volatility Model Design and Consistency Issues Summary Vanna-Volga Design Issues Hedge with BF and RR vs Hedge with 3 Vanillas, and if vanillas then which ones? Include vega FX Derivatives: Stochastic-Local-Volatility Model c by MathFinance AG uwe.wystup@mathfinance.com 8 / 37 One-touch probability: which measure? domestic, foreign, physical, mixes? Apply different

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    68 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us