Specific Pattern of Gene Expression During Induction of Mouse Erythroleukemia Cells

Specific Pattern of Gene Expression During Induction of Mouse Erythroleukemia Cells

Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Specific pattern of gene expression during induction of mouse erythroleukemia cells Peter J. Fraser and Peter J. Curtis The Wistar Institute of Anatomy and Biology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104 USA We have studied the expression of several characterized genes during induction of mouse erythroleukemia (MEL) cells with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and have observed a specific pattern of changes in transcriptional activity and steady-state RNA levels associated with erythroid differentiation. During induction there is a gradual, steady decrease in total transcriptional activity and RNA content per cell, which by day 3 of DMSO treatment amounts to less than 50% of the level in the uninduced cell. During this time we observe increases in transcriptional activity for 5-aminolevulinic acid synthase, carbonic anhydrase form II, and band 3 coordinate with the large increase in [3-globin gene transcription. The results also demonstrate an early decrease in transcription for carbonic anhydrase form I, which precedes decreases in transcription for glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase and rRNA genes. Changes in steady-state RNA levels reflected changes in transcriptional activity during induction except for carbonic anhydrase II mRNA. These results represent the first report characterizing the regulated expression at transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels of several known genes that are characteristically expressed in the erythrocyte. The results demonstrate that coordinate gene expression in erythroid differentiation occurs primarily at the level of transcription. [Key Words: Coordinated gene regulation; transcriptional activity; erythroid differentiation] Received June 25, 1987; revised version accepted August 14, 1987. Adult erythroid differentiation requires activation and/ dinately such that they may assemble to form the char- or modulation of many genes whose expression is regu- acteristic erythrocyte cytoskeleton. lated both temporally and quantitatively. The result is One approach to the study of gene expression in ery- the generation of highly specialized cells whose func- throid differentiation utilizes the mouse erythroleu- tions and capabilities are defined by expression of spe- kemia (MEL) cell system. MEL cells are erythroid pre- cific gene products. Several of these genes are considered cursor cells transformed by the Friend virus complex. tissue specific, such as globin and glycophorin (Colin et Upon addition of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) or a va- al. 1986), in that their expression is restricted to cells of riety of other agents, MEL cells undergo a series of bio- erythroid lineage. Others, such as the genes for carbonic chemical and morphological changes that closely re- anhydrase form I (CAI) (Tashian 1977) and erythroid semble the events of normal erythroid differentiation. forms of the anion transport protein, band 3 (Cox et al. Volloch and Housman (1982)have shown that under the 1985), and the cytoskeletal protein spectrin (Riederer et proper culture conditions, subcloned, rapidly inducing al. 1986), are limited in expression to a few tissues, but MEL cells undergo changes in morphological character- may still be considered erythroid specific. A third class istics similar to those of normal mouse orthochromato- of genes exist that are expressed in nearly all tissues but philic erythroblasts and reticulocytes, resulting in ter- maintain erythroid-specific pattems of inducibility or minal differentiation and enucleation. Among the ob- modulation. Examples of this latter group are 5-amino- served changes are progressively smaller cells and levulinic acid (ALA) synthase (Sassa 1976), the first en- increasingly condensed nuclei, leading to a reduction in zyme in the heme biosynthetic pathway, and carbonic RNA content and a decreased rate of synthesis of total anhydrase form II (CAII) (Tashian 1977), which is in- RNA (Sherton and Kabat 1976). The most dramatic and volved in the reversible hydration of CO2. Both these oft noted change is the marked increase in the rate of genes are expressed in a variety of tissues, but their ex- transcription of a- and/3-globin genes resulting in accu- pression is specifically modulated during erythroid dif- mulation of globin mRNA and hemoglobin (Aviv et al. ferentiation. Several of the gene products induced during 1976; Curtis and Weissmann 1976; Nudel et al. 1977; erythroid differentiation, for example, the heme biosyn- Orkin and Swerdlow 1977; Lowenhaupt et al. 1978; thetic enzymes and oL- and f~-globin polypeptides, are Hofer et al. 1982). Also observed is an increase of newly mutually dependent for function and presumably re- synthesized carbonic anhydrase II mRNA (Curtis 1983) quire coordination of expression. Likewise, peripheral as well as increased synthesis of oL- and [3-spectrin (Eisen and integral membrane proteins must be expressed coor- et al. 1977; Pfeffer et al. 1986), band 3 (Sabban et al. GENES & DEVELOPMENT1:855-861 © 1987 by Cold SpringHarbor Laboratory ISSN 0890-9369/87 $1.00 855 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 28, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Fraser and Curtis 1980), band 4 (Pfeffer and Redman 1981), and other ery- 0 1 2 3 throid-specific polypeptides. Induction of the activities of the heme synthesizing enzymes ALA synthase, ALA A dehydrase, uroporphyrinogen synthase, and ferrochela- tase have also been reported (Sassa 1976). In MEL cells, accumulation of globin mRNA and he- B t ~ moglobin has been shown to result mainly from an in- crease in the rate of transcription of the globin gene (Ganguly and Skoultchi 1985). However, little or no in- c @e formation is available concerning the regulation of other genes expressed during erythroid differentiation. Our D study attempts to identify regulatory steps in the ex- pression of coordinately controlled genes by examining the expression of several genes involved in the specific pattern of gene activation and inactivation during MEL cell induction. Cloned cDNAs for mouse a-spectrin, band 3, CAI, CAII, globin, ALA synthase, and glyceralde- hyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPD) and genomic se- quences for ribosomal RNA were used to determine the G changes in transcription rates and steady-state RNA levels of the respective genes. Our results demonstrate H changes at the transcriptional level that are accompa- nied by changes in steady-state levels. ALA synthase, CAII, band 3, and globin show transcriptional increases at approximately the same time, suggesting the possi- bility of coordinate control of transcription of these genes. Figure 1. Autoradiogram of in vitro transcription assay with isolated nuclei from MEL ceils from days 0-3 of DMSO treat- ment. Four separate hybridization vessels were used, each of Results which contained a set of filters (A-H) and an equal proportion of the total yield of 32p-labeled nuclear RNA from day 0, 1, 2, or 3. Filter I (rRNA) was hybridized separately with 1/22 as much Changes in transcription rate during MEL cell induction [a2p]RNA as filters A-H. (A) oL-Spectrin; (B) band 3; (C) CA[; (D) CAII; (E) globin; (F) ALA synthase; (G) GAPD; (H)rabies virus To assess changes in transcription rate for the various glycoprotein; (I) rRNA. genes during induction, we employed in vitro nuclear run-on techniques. Nuclei were isolated from 108 cells from each time point: uninduced cells (day 0) and cells treated with 1.8% DMSO for 1, 2, and 3 days (days 1-3). table counts, dropped greater than 50% from day 0 to [a2P]UTP was incorporated into nascent RNA via elonga- day 3 (Fig. 2A). tion and isolated for hybridization to immobilized As is characteristic of MEL cell induction, we observe plasmids containing cDNA inserts.. Figure 1 displays the a greater than 40-fold increase per icell in globin gene results of a2p-labeled nuclear RNA, obtained from MEL transcription. ALA synthase shows a parallel increase in cells from days 0-3, hybridized to plasmids containing transcription. For both these genes the largest increase cDNA inserts. occurred on day 2, with the transcription rate reaching To obtain data that would indicate the change in tran- its highest point on day 3. Increases in transcription are scription rate of a gene during induction, it is necessary also seen for carbonic anhydrase form II (CAII) and band to measure the transcriptional activity of a gene for a 3. CAII also shows its largest increase in transcription constant number of cells, rather than as a proportion of on day 2 before decreasing on day 3. total transcriptional activity, which diminishes with Transcription of rRNA and GAPD decreased during time after induction. The amount of labeled RNA used induction, with the most significant reductions occur- in the hybridizations was equivalent to that obtained ring between days 1 and 2, falling 60% and 80%, respec- from an equal number of cells from each day. Our results tively. CAI transcription was highest in the uninduced are therefore proportional to the number of RNA mole- MEL cell, followed by a rapid decrease of nearly 50% in cules produced from a given gene per cell over unit time the first 24 hr of induction. CAI transcription levels and indicate the change in the rate of synthesis of RNA continued to decline to near background levels by day 3. at that locus for each day. A graphic representation of the actual number of counts Previous studies have shown and our results confirm bound after correcting for background is

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us