Impact of Professionalism on Injuries in Rugby Union

Impact of Professionalism on Injuries in Rugby Union

348 Br J Sports Med 2000;34:348–351 Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsm.34.5.348 on 1 October 2000. Downloaded from Impact of professionalism on injuries in rugby union W M Garraway, A J Lee, S J Hutton, EBAWRussell, D A D Macleod Abstract Professionalism was adopted by the inter- Objectives—To measure the frequency national rugby board (IRB) after the second and nature of injuries occurring in com- World Cup in South Africa in 1995. Professional petitive matches since professionalism players have had to adapt to the demands of was introduced in rugby union. increased physical and mental robustness as well Methods—The cohort study previously as show the strength and pace expected of full conducted in players from senior rugby time athletes. Expectations of increased stand- clubs in the Scottish Borders in 1993–1994 ards have also filtered down to the continuing when rugby union was an entirely amateur majority of amateur players. Yet little is known about the level and pattern of injuries occurring sport was repeated in 1997–1998. The same since rugby union became a professional sport. injury definition, outcome criteria, and Experience is limited to a report of a New Zea- method of calculating playing hours were land Super 12 rugby squad of 25 players, which used. In total, 803 (84%) of 960 eligible described higher levels of injury than previously players participated, including all 30 adult reported in first grade rugby.1 Garraway and players who played professionally for the Macleod2 conducted an epidemiological survey Scottish Rugby Union or Border Reivers of rugby injuries during the 1993–1994 season District. The 576 injury episodes in 381 of when rugby union was an entirely amateur sport these players in competitive matches were in Scotland. They concluded that rugby injuries compared with the 373 injuries in 266 play- constituted an important source of morbidity in ers out of 975 (94 %) who were eligible and young men. We now report on rugby injuries registered with the same senior rugby clubs occurring during the 1997–1998 season and in 1993–1994. Outcomes were the occur- compare the results of this study with our previ- rence of injury episodes, days away from ous findings. playing or training for rugby, and time lost to employment or attendance at school/ Methods college as a consequence of being injured. The survey design, field staV, documentation, Results—The proportion of players who severity criteria, and outcome of injuries as well were injured almost doubled from 1993– as the calculation of playing hours at risk were 1994 to 1997–1998, despite an overall reduc- the same as in the study carried out in the http://bjsm.bmj.com/ 1993–1994 season.2 A rugby injury was tion of 7% of the playing strength of defined as one sustained during a competitive participating clubs. Period prevalence in- match which prevented the player from train- jury rates rose in all age specific groups, ing or playing rugby from the time of the injury particularly in younger players. This trans- or from the end of the match in which the Alvie Epidemiology lated into an injury episode every 3.4 injury was sustained. An injury that allowed a Associates, Aviemore, matches in 1993–94, rising to one in every player to return to rugby or rugby related prac- Scotland 2.0 matches in 1997–1998. An injury episode W M Garraway tice within seven days of its occurrence was occurred in a professional team for every classified as transient. on September 30, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. Public Health 59 minutes of competitive play. Profes- All 26 Scottish Rugby Union (SRU) aYli- Sciences, Department sional players sustained a higher pro- ated senior rugby clubs in the Border Reivers of Community Health portion of recurrent injuries, particularly (previously called the South of Scotland) Sciences, University of in the early part of the season. Some 56% of Edinburgh, District were invited to participate. The players Edinburgh, Scotland all their days lost to the game were caused from three clubs were excluded because of lack A J Lee by injuries to the muscles, ligaments, and of club cooperation. Two other clubs merged at S J Hutton joints of the knee, hip, and thigh. the beginning of the season. Player registration EBAWRussell Conclusions—The introduction of profes- details and playing exposures were available for 803 (84%) of the 960 eligible players, includ- Department of sionalism in rugby union has coincided Surgery, St John’s with an increase in injuries to both profes- ing all 30 adult professionals contracted to the Hospital, Livingston, sional and amateur players. To reduce SRU or the Border Reivers District. Senior Scotland this, attention should be focused on the rugby club amateur players participated in an D A D Macleod tackle, where many injuries occur. The average of 21.8 competitive matches (22 484 hours of play) and professionals in 25.1 Correspondence to: International Rugby Board should place a W M Garraway, Alvie moratorium on the use of protective competitive matches (1003 hours of play) dur- Epidemiology Associates, equipment in competitive matches until ing the season. A total of 576 injury episodes Druim Mhor, By Loch Alvie, occurred in 381 of the 803 players. Players in Aviemore PH22 1QB, its contribution to player morbidity has Scotland been fully assessed. the 1993–1994 survey registered with clubs email: (Br J Sports Med 2000;34:348–351) who had disbanded, merged, or would not [email protected] cooperate in the 1997–1998 survey were Accepted for publication Keywords: injury; professionalism; protective equip- excluded. Thus 975 (94%) of the 1032 players 24 February 2000 ment; rugby who took part in the 1993–1994 survey were www.bjsportmed.com Injuries in professional rugby union 349 Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsm.34.5.348 on 1 October 2000. Downloaded from Table 1 Frequency and distribution of injury episodes occurring in competitive matches according to age Period prevalence per 1000 Players (hours played) Players injured (%) Injury episodes (%) playing hours 95% CI for the Age group diVerence in (years) 1997–98 1993–94 1997–98 1993–94 1997–98 1993–94 1997–98 1993–94 prevalence rates <16 59 (1856) 108 (3656) 18 (31) 14 (13) 20 (3) 17 (5) 10.8 4.6 0.9 to 11.3 16–19 192 (6427) 217 (6272) 78 (41) 44 (20) 108 (19) 65 (17) 16.8 10.4 2.4 to 10.5 20–24 205 (6185) 269 (6617) 102 (50) 91 (34) 153 (27) 135 (36) 24.7 20.4 0.9 to 7.7 25–29 196 (5488) 223 (5387) 113 (58) 73 (33) 191 (33) 103 (28) 34.8 19.1 10.8 to 20.5 30–34 99 (2507) 115 (2395) 51 (52) 34 (30) 82 (14) 43 (12) 32.7 18.0 6.0 to 23.5 >35 52 (1024) 43 (897) 19 (37) 10 (23) 22 (4) 10 (3) 21.5 11.1 −0.9 to 21.6 Total 803 (23487) 975 (25224) 381 (47) 266 (27) 576 (100) 373 (100) 24.5 14.8 7.3 to 12.2 used to compare injury rates, an overall reduc- NATURE AND SITE OF INJURY tion of 7% in the playing strength of the 22 The distribution of injury episodes, classified as participating clubs. Kaplan-Meier estimates transient and mild (up to 28 days away from were used to calculate the median duration of playing/training), moderate (up to 84 days), or absence from playing or training for rugby and severe (84 days or more), were similar in 1993– time lost to employment or attendance at 1994 and 1997–1998 and between professional school or college as the result of injury in com- and amateur players. The musculoskeletal sys- petitive matches. Injuries in both surveys were tem contributed the highest proportion of coded according to the International Classifi- primary injuries in 1993–1994 and 1997–1998. cation of Diseases (ICD, 9th revision). Table 3 compares injury episode rates for dislo- cations, strains, and sprains according to the season, selected anatomical site, and players’ Results contractual status. The incidence and period FREQUENCY AND DISTRIBUTION prevalence rates per 1000 playing hours for these Table 1 summarises the age specific injury rates injuries rose by 43% and 65% (in amateurs) and in 1993–1994 (when there were only amateur 152% and 405% (for professionals) between players) and 1997–1998 (for professional and 1993–1994 and 1997–1998 respectively. The amateur players). The number of hours of com- knee joint recorded the greatest increase in rates, petitive rugby was lower in 1997–1998, particu- particularly for professionals who showed five- larly for players aged less than 16 years. Yet the fold and sevenfold rises compared with ama- overall proportion of players who were injured teurs in 1997–1998 and 1993–1994 respec- almost doubled, from 27% in 1993–1994 to tively. No spinal injuries were recorded in 47% in 1997–1998. The rise was particularly 25 224 playing hours in 1993–1994. Two neck high in teenage players. Period prevalence rates dislocations (ICD 722.0 and 953.0) occurred in were raised in all age specific groups. The 95% 23 487 playing hours in 1997–1998, one of confidence interval (CI) for the diVerence in which resulted in permanent neurological dam- prevalence between professional and amateur age. Neck dislocations, strains, and sprains http://bjsm.bmj.com/ players was 29.5 to 60.9 injury episodes per occurring in 1993–1994 and 1997–1998 were 1000 player hours. Overall, these rates translate classified under ICD 722.0, 722.4, 839.0, into an injury episode for every 3.4 matches in 847.0, 848.2, 953.0, and 953.4.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    4 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us