2012 Vol. 66 · No. 2 · 91–107 GEOPOLITICAL RELATIONS AND REGIONAL RESTRUCTURING: THE CASE OF THE KUMAON HIMALAYA, INDIA Martin Gerwin and Christoph Bergmann With 4 figures, 1 table and 1 photo Received 06. September 2011 · Accepted 02. May 2012 Summary: While the formation and regulation of international borders have long been on the agenda of geographical and social science research, the actions of populations residing in state-peripheries have received inadequate attention so far. Our case study focuses on the so-called ‘Bhotiyas’ in North India’s Kumaon Himalaya. The Bhotiyas consist of several valley communities who were formerly involved in trans-Himalayan trade. Their ethnic identities and livelihoods remain closely linked to the area of the Sino-Indian border, which was sealed as a result of the war between the two countries in 1962. We contend that these borderlanders are not passive victims of geopolitically induced interventions, but rather active partici- pants in the restructuring of their contested live worlds. Based on the assumption that geopolitical realities are forged across a variety of scale-levels, we analyze shifting livelihoods in terms of both a specific socio-cultural context and broader webs of relations to which people have access or from which they are excluded. This offers new insight into highland-lowland interactions of mountain systems and brings the utilization of natural resources more strongly to the fore of borderland studies. Zusammenfassung: �����������Obwohl die �����������������������������������������������������ntstehung und die Aufrechterhaltung internationaler �����������������������������renzen schon einiges an Auf- merksamkeit in der �eographie und den Sozialwissenschaften erhalten haben, findet das Leben der in diesen staatlichen Randgebieten wohnenden Menschen bisher erst wenig Beachtung. Im Zentrum unserer Fallstudie stehen die sogenannten ‘Bhotiyas’ des Nord-Indischen Kumaon Himalaya. Die Bhotiyas umfassen mehrere Talgemeinschaften die einst im Trans- himalaya-Handel involviert waren. Bis heute verbindet sie ihre Lebensweise und ethnische Identität eng mit dem �ebiet der indisch-chinesischen �renze, die aufgrund eines Krieges zwischen diesen beiden Ländern im Jahre 1962 geschlossen wurde. Wir zeigen auf, dass die Bhotiyas nicht hilflos den geopolitischen Dynamiken ausgeliefert waren, sondern aktiv an der �estaltung ihrer umstrittenen Lebensumwelt teilhaben. Basierend auf der Annahme, dass geopolitische Realitäten auf unterschiedlichen skalaren �benen ausgehandelt werden, analysieren wir Strategien der Lebenssicherung sowohl unter Be- rücksichtigung des lokalen sozio-kulturellen Kontextes als auch hinsichtlich weiter gefasster Beziehungsgeflechte und den damit verbundenen Dynamiken. Der Beitrag bietet neue �rkenntnisse im Hinblick auf Hochland-Tiefland Interaktionen und zeigt die Wichtigkeit natürlicher Ressourcen für das wachsende Feld der �renzraumforschung auf. Keywords: Kumaon Himalaya, Bhotiyas, borderland studies, geopolitics, mountain pastoralists 1 Introduction hoods to understand ongoing processes of border- making and geopolitical interrelations.2) This is even In many border regions around the globe, states more surprising in view of a vast body of literature rely heavily on bureaucratic and infrastructural inter- that emphasizes the interrelation between the terri- ventions to exert a lasting influence at their peripher- torial control over natural resources and states’ as- ies. These efforts, however, intermingle with and are piration to consolidate power and national integrity contested by the practices of the borderland popula- (peluso and vanderGeest 2011). tions themselves.1) Yet there are very few studies that While both natural resources and borders are of consider environmental potentials and local liveli- special significance in Asia’s mountain regions, such as the Himalaya, most authors concerned with the geopolitical dimension do not inquire into its local 1) For reviews on borderland studies see alvarez (1995), Baud and van sChendel (1997), paasi (2009) and Johnson et al. (2011). Particular case studies on South Asian borders are given in warikoo (2009), van sChendel (2005), zutshi 2) For rare exceptions see walker (1999) and sturGeon (2010) and Jones (2012). (2004). DOI: 10.3112/erdkunde.2012.02.01 ISSN 0014-0015 http://www.erdkunde.uni-bonn.de 92 Vol. 66 · No. 2 effects (Mohan 2007; sCott 2008).3) All along the The paper proceeds with an outline of our ana- Himalaya many groups were previously involved in lytic framework that combines recent advances in bor- a complex cross-border network of social, cultural, derland studies with approaches of mountain geogra- and economic relations with residents of the Tibetan phy. The empirical section is divided into three parts, Plateau that resulted in a mutually dependent agro- namely colonial history, the period of decolonization trader-pastoralist economy (Van spenGen 2000; that culminates in the Sino-Indian border conflict Bauer 2004). While Nepal settled its border dispute and finally recent dynamics that occurred after India with China already in 1961 (shresta 2005), India liberalized its market in the early 1990s. In each sec- and China are still at odds over large areas. These are tion we consider wider geopolitical constellations and mainly located in the Aksai Chin region of Ladakh border affairs in the Himalaya in relation to the liveli- and the Northeastern parts of Indian sovereign ter- hood choices and coping strategies of the Bhotiyas. ritory (see Fig. 1). However, the persistence of the Moreover, we illustrate that this interplay is not uni- Sino-Indian conflict shows up in manifold forms of form, but takes locally modified forms even in two government intervention all along the Himalayan neighboring transversal valleys that cut through the mountain rim and raises critical issues in the daily High Himalaya. lives of local populations. In the present work we focus on the so-called ‘Bhotiyas’ in North India’s Kumaon Himalaya. The 2 Analyzing border dynamics in a high moun- Bhotiyas consist of several valley communities who tain region were formerly involved in trans-Himalayan trade. Mainly with sheep and goats various commodities Fuelled by a broader epistemological critique of were transported between the �angetic Plains and the cold-war area studies, the interrelation between geo- Tibetan Plateau until the Sino-Indian border became politically motivated interventions and indigenous sealed in 1962 due to war. As will be shown, these forms of agency in peripheral mountain regions has borderlanders are no passive victims of geopolitically received some new scholarly impetus (Forsyth and induced interventions but rather active participants MiChaud 2011). The discussion is anchored in van in the regional restructuring of their live world, in sChendel’s (2002) proposal to conceive highland which mountain forests and grasslands play a signifi- Asia under a single rubric, for which he suggests the cant role.4) Based on the assumption that geopolitical neologism ‘Zomia’.5) Although this ‘world area’ cov- realities are forged across a variety of scale-levels, we ers large parts of Central (Inner), South, �ast and analyze the Bhotiyas’ strategies of natural resource use Southeast Asia, it remained within the blind spot of in terms of both discrete socio-cultural contexts and academic and political histories. In order to over- broader webs of relations to which people have access come the resulting geographies of ignorance, van or from which they are excluded. Historically evolving sChendel pleads for a process-oriented perspective systems of land tenure and community-based institu- that does not reify national borders along specific so- tions are of particular relevance in this regard. The cio-cultural traits but instead focuses more strongly interaction of local norms, formal and informal regu- on interaction and exchange. Based on this agenda, lations, as well as external interventions all contribute sCott (2009) analyzed how the realization of moun- to the constant adjustment of implemented working tain livelihoods is both tied to dynamic processes of procedures and realized utilization strategies (nüsser state-formation in the lowland centers and geared to- and Gerwin 2008). This offers a new perspective on wards the creation and maintenance of ungoverned highland-lowland interactions and allows us to assess non-state spaces in the uplands. local responses to ongoing processes of border-mak- sCott’s version of Zomia dismantles the domi- ing in one particular mountain region. nant paradigm of Southeast Asian scholarship as a state-centric vision that overlooked the manifold 3) kreutzMann (1996, 2003), however, has analyzed this interrelation in the Pamir. 5) van sChendel derived the concept from zomi, a term 4) Regions are treated here as areas that cohere along some signifying ‘highlander’ in a number of Chin-Mizo-Kuki lan- sort of organizing principles, such as typical subsistence strat- guages that are spoken in the borderlands of India, Burma and egies or social identities (GreGory 2000, 687-690). Just like Bangladesh. As an academic device it became often associated the local, these spatial forms describe no static and closed with upland Southeast Asia, though its territorial boundaries ensembles, but are rather “ceaselessly being transformed in remain deliberately vague. MiChaud (2010) provides a detailed reflexive and practical action” (paasi 2010, 2300). discussion of Zomia’s territorial dimension.