Impacts of Hurricane Katrina & Boxing Indian Ocean Tsunami on Ports

Impacts of Hurricane Katrina & Boxing Indian Ocean Tsunami on Ports

Impacts of Hurricane Katrina & Boxing Indian Ocean Tsunami On Ports & Harbors Facilities Engineering Seminar American Associate of Port Authorities January 11-13, 2006 By John Headland We learn from history, that we learn nothing from history.” George Bernard Shaw Author, Playwright TRINCOMALEE COLOMBO GALLE DayDay 11 #13#13 TypicalTypical SriSri LankanLankan SceneScene NearNear PanaduraPanadura TsunamiTsunami InundationInundation == 3.33.3 mm East Sri Lanka (AP Photo): Raging water at beach front properties. DayDay 44 #19#19 HambantotaHambantota SriSri LankaLanka Runup=Runup= 11m11m Thailand Sumatra Runup by Philip Liu Tsunami Impacts On Ports & Harbors Port of Colombo •General cargo terminal and 2 container terminals •12-15 m draft (Jaya) and 9-11 m draft (SAGT) •2 million T.E.U in 2004 •Reinforced concrete deck on piles •200 Ha water area, 130 Ha land area Tsunami Height = 2.6 m DayDay 22 ## 55 PortPort ofof ColomboColombo SriSri LankaLanka NoNo DiscernableDiscernable DamageDamage DayDay 22 ## 3737 PortPort ofof ColomboColombo SriSri LankaLanka AA ShipShip LostLost ControlControl InIn ThisThis EntranceEntrance DuringDuring thethe TsunamiTsunami Tsunami Height= 5.3 m DayDay 11 #100#100 SriSri LankaLanka PortPort ofof GalleGalle 2m2m SedimentationSedimentation DuringDuring TsunamiTsunami DayDay 11 #108#108 SriSri LankaLanka PortPort ofof GalleGalle WarehouseWarehouse DamageDamage DayDay 11 ## 115115 SriSri LankaLanka PortPort ofof GalleGalle DredgeDredge GroundedGrounded OnOn WharfWharf TsunamiTsunami Height=Height= 5.35.3 mm Areas Visited Port of Chennai Port of Chennai Meas. Height = 2.8 m Runup In Area = 5 m 2nd Ship Container Berth- Port of Chennai 2nd Ship Container Berth- Mooring Lines Parted Mooring Dolphin SecondSecond ShipShip BeingBeing DrawnDrawn OutOut ofof EntranceEntrance WillWill KnockKnock OutOut MooringMooring DolphinDolphin Ship Held By One Line InnerInner HarborHarbor BerthBerth PortPort Blair-Blair- TsunamiTsunami HeightHeight ofof 3m3m Flood Damage To Utilities – Container Wharf Dry Dock - Port Blair Junglighat Harbor Pier PheonixPheonix BBayay DrydockDrydock Roads, Bridges & Railroad DayDay 1#341#34 KosgodaKosgoda SriSri LankaLanka DayDay 11 #49#49 AmbalangodaAmbalangoda SriSri LankaLanka TsunamiTsunami Runup=Runup= 4.74.7 mm DayDay 44 #105#105 ArugamArugam BBayay SriSri LankaLanka DayDay 44 ## 108108 ArugamArugam BBayay SriSri LankaLanka CausewayCauseway LostLost NoNo FoliageFoliage OnOn TreeTree Coastal Structures DayDay 33 ## 1111 MoratuwaMoratuwa SriSri LankaLanka Runup=Runup= 4.44.4 mm DayDay 11 ## 102102 GalleGalle SeawallSeawall SriSri LankaLanka DayDay 33 ## 141141 HikkaduwaHikkaduwa FFishingishing HarborHarbor -- SSriri LankaLanka BacksideBackside BreakwaterBreakwater DamageDamage TsunamiTsunami InundationInundation == 4.734.73 mm Locally Generated Tsunami propagation Into Ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles Tsunami Source Locations Catalina Source Characteristics Numerical Model Setup Bathymetry 1000 900 800 700 r) e t 600 e m 0 1 ng i pac d s ri 500 G ( 400 300 Bathymetry [m] Above 4 0 - 4 200 -4 - 0 -8 - -4 -12 - -8 -16 - -12 -20 - -16 -24 - -20 -28 - -24 100 -32 - -28 -36 - -32 -40 - -36 -44 - -40 -48 - -44 -52 - -48 Below -52 0 Undefined 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 (Grid spacing 10 meter) 1/1/1999 12:00:00 PM, Time step: 0, Layer: 0 Bathymetry Animated Results Lasuen Knoll Earthquake Palos Verdes, No Breakwater Catalina 7 Segment Earthquake Gage Locations Palos Verdes Landslide II POLA 3.00 Pier 400 C Pier 400 E Pier 300 LA Main Channel 2.00 VT Bridge LA East Basin ) L 1.00 S M , m ( e c 0.00 a rf r Su e t a -1.00 W -2.00 -3.00 12:00:00 12:09:00 12:18:00 12:27:00 12:36:00 12:45:00 12:54:00 13:03:00 13:12:00 13:21:00 13:30:00 13:39:00 13:48:00 13:57:00 Time Palos Verdes Landslide II POLB 3.00 Pier J South Pier J LB SE Basin LB East Basin 2.00 Pier T Near Gap L) 1.00 S M , m e ( 0.00 ac rf u r S e -1.00 Wat -2.00 -3.00 12:00:00 12:09:00 12:18:00 12:27:00 12:36:00 12:45:00 12:54:00 13:03:00 13:12:00 13:21:00 13:30:00 13:39:00 13:48:00 13:57:00 Time Okushiri Tsunami 1993 5 ch9(cm) MIKE21-BW 4 3 m) c Okushiri Tsunami ( l ve 2 Le r te Wa 1 0 Comparison between -1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Tim e (Second) Physical Model 5 ch7(cm ) MIKE21-BW Results and 4 3 ) Numerical Model m (c 2 l eve L r e Results t 1 a W 0 -1 -2 0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224 Time (Second) 4 ch5(cm) MIKE21-BW 3 2 ) m c ( vel e 1 L r e t a W 0 -1 -2 0 2 4 6 8 1012141618202224 Tim e (Second) CONCLUSIONS-TSUNAMI • Risks Can Be Quantified and Managed • Port of Chennai Survived 3-5 m Tsunami, Back In Operation Within Days • Moorings Vulnerable to Water Level Rise • Tsunami Currents Important (Scour, Navigation) • Manageable Risk of Ship Impact Damages • Properly Built Ports Can Survive • Utility Systems Vulnerable Priorities 1. Education 2. Warning System (Communications & Measurements) 3. Inundation Mapping 4. Evacuation Planning 5. Better Zoning/Building Practices ASCE/COPRI Post Katrina Damage Assessment Trip Post-Disaster Assessment Teams • Overall – New Orleans (T. Dalrymple) – Mississippi Ports (S. Curtis) – Louisiana Ports (N. Pansic) – Alabama/Mississippi Shoreline Areas (S. Douglass) New Orleans Team • ASCE- COPRI – T. Dalrymple, Johns Hopkins University – J. Battjes, TU Delft, The Netherlands – S. Tanaka, Public Works Research Institute, Japan – J. Headland, Moffatt & Nichol Mission • Collect perishable data and observations; • Gain on-site understanding; and • Pass along observations and lessons. ADCIC HINDCAST Hassan Mashriqui LSU Contact [email protected] ICWW London Street N & S 17th Street London Street Air Products N & S Bienvenue Gate Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street N&S Inner Harbor Navigation Pipeline Canal: 9th Ward Canal Tidal Gate 17th Street Canal 17th Street Canal 17th Street Canal 17th Street Canal Elevation ~+ 14’ No Scour Behind Wall Port of New Orleans …and crane damage at the APM Container Terminal. Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Elevation ~+ 14’ Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Scour From Overtopping Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Scour From Overtopping & Breach Earthen Levee Failure Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South Inner Harbor Navigation Canal: France Street South New Orleans Industrial Canal Hurricane Wave Forces On Piers and Bridges Huntington Beach Pier, California (1988 Storm) Catalina Island Ferry Terminal, 1960’s Hs= 10 feet, Tp = 7 sec, Still Intact White Beach Pier- Still Intact Paulus Hook Ferry Terminal, Jersey City, NJ US 90 Bay St Louis-Pass Christian US 90 Ocean Springs-Biloxi (West View) I-10 Bridge, Lousianna I-10 Bridge, Lousianna Design Conditions • All Variables For A Range of Return Periods – Tide Levels – Storm Surge Levels – Wave Conditions • Wave Height, Period, Duration By Direction • Hmax is Typically Used For Design – Tidal/Hurricane Induced Currents – Bathymetry (including short and long-term scour effects • Basis For Selecting Design Frequency – Safety (Prevent Loss of Life) – Economics (How Often Can You Afford To Repair/Replace) Vertical (Uplift) Loads • Slowly Varying (Quasi-static) And Peak Impulse Wave Loads on Decks and Beams – Model Tests – El Ghamry (1965) – Wang (1970) – French (1971) – Overbeek and Klabbers (2001) – HRW, McConnell et al (2005) Hs= 5 ft, Tp= 4sec, h= 22 ft, WL @ Deck (+10 ft mllw) 1000 900 sf) 800 re (p 700 600 Quasi-Static Uplift Pressure (psf) 500 Vertical Impact Pressure ave Pressu 400 (psf) 300 200 Vertical W 100 0 O&K HRW HRW-Max Hs= 5 ft, Tp= 8sec, h= 22 ft, WL @ Deck (+10 ft mllw) 1000 900 sf) 800 re (p 700 600 Quasi-Static Uplift Pressure (psf) 500 Vertical Impact Pressure ave Pressu 400 (psf) 300 200 Vertical W 100 0 O&K HRW HRW-Max Lateral Loads • Wave Loads On Slender Members (e.g., piles, beams) – Loads Dominated by Flow Separation (drag) – Stream Function or Fenton Wave Theories – Morrison Equation (u, du/dt with depth for lateral loads) • Wave Loads On Plates and “Large” Structures – Loads Dominated by Wave Pressure – Minikin, Miche-Rundgren – Goda Wave Pressure Equations – McConnell et al (2005) • Current Loads On Submerged Bridge Superstructure Hs= 5 ft, Tp= 4 sec, d= 22 ft, WL @ Deck (+10 ft mllw) 500 450 sf) 400 re (p 350 300 Quasi-Static Seaward Horizonal Pressure (psf) 250 ave Pressu Horizontal Impact 200 Pressure (psf) al W t 150 n rizo 100 Ho 50 0 Goda HRW HRW-Max Stream Function Theory, Wave Profile (H= 9 ft, T= 4 sec, d= 22 feet) 6 5 4 ) t f 3 Structure Width= 40 Feet n ( o i 2 1 evat El 0 est r -1 0 10203040 C -2 -3 -4 Distance From Crest (ft) Stream Function Theory, Wave Profile (H= 8.2 ft, T= 8 sec, d= 22 sec) 6 5 4 3 Structure Width= 40 Feet 2 1 0 -1 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Crest Elevation(ft) -2 -3 -4 Distance From Crest (ft) CONCLUSIONS- HURRICANES • Ports Extensively Damaged – From Wave and Water Levels – From Scour and Overtopping • Moorings/Ships Vulnerable to Water Level Rise and Currents • Extensive Building & Yard Damage • High Risk of Ship Permanently Moored Vessel Impact Damages • Properly Built Ports Can Survive • Utility Systems Vulnerable Recommended Actions For Moving Forward • “Learn From History” • Invest In Hurricane/Tsunami Risk Studies – Similar To Bridge Evaluations – Both Engineering and Economic Efforts – Estimate Damages Due Events – Prepare Damage/Service Interruption Cost – Weigh Corrective Actions Against Potential Damage/Interruption Cost – Invest In Cost-Effective Corrective Actions – Prepare Detailed Emergency Response Plans Recommended Actions For Moving Forward • A Silver Lining… – Forensic Studies Important… – Opportunity to promote the dialogue • Cost-Benefits For Ports & Waterways • Same For Flood Protection.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    111 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us