American Studies in Scandinavia, 50:2 (2018), pp. 3-20. Published by the Nordic Association for American Studies (NAAS). Chocolate Suburb, Vanilla Power: Race, Space and Civil Unrest in Ferguson Chanhaeng Lee Sungkyunkwan University Abstract: In this article, I argue that the demographic and political restructuring of city−suburb dynamics in the United States is key to understanding what happened in Ferguson, Missouri, in the summer of 2014. Ferguson, a once-vanilla suburb where the overwhelming majority of residents were white Americans, was deter- ritorialized from the 1970s onward into a suburb where black Americans became the majority group. However, the whites, as a demographic minority, were still in control and tried to reterritorialize the black suburb. I maintain that the inevitable result of this disjunction between the chocolate suburb and vanilla power was racial antagonism, which exploded in Ferguson in 2014. Keywords: Ferguson, Chocolate Suburb, Vanilla Power, Deterritorialization, Reter- ritorialization, Ecology of Power Many still vividly remember the shooting of black teenager Michael Brown, who was killed in Missouri by a white police officer, Darren Wilson, on August 9, 2014.1 Born in an impoverished suburban area named Ferguson, 1 The author has no offensive intent in using the terms “chocolate” and “vanilla.” These terms came into use in 1975 when George Clinton, the leader of the funk band Parliament, wrote a song titled “Chocolate City.” In this song, Clinton celebrated black urbanization as black domination of the inner city by suggest- ing that “A chocolate city is no dream / It’s my piece of the rock and I dig you, CC / God bless Chocolate City and its (gainin’ on ya!) vanilla suburbs.” These terms were also adopted by sociologists to describe racial residential segregation in urban America. See Reynolds Farley, Howard Schuman, Suzanne Bianchi, Diane Colasanto, and Shirley Hatchett, “Chocolate City, Vanilla Suburbs: Will the Trend toward Racially 4 American Studies in Scandinavia, 50:2 Brown had recently graduated from Normandy High School in the northern St. Louis County in Missouri and was two days away from starting college. The Brown−Wilson case and subsequent outbreak of urban disturbance be- came a national issue during the summer of 2014 and generated numerous interpretations of the causes of the Ferguson incident. Until now, most of these interpretations have focused on the racism displayed by white po- lice officers,2 while a different point of view has concentrated on suburban poverty and racial segregation as a root cause of the Ferguson unrest.3 In contrast to these interpretations, I aim to discover historical causes for the Ferguson unrest in the demographic and political restructuring of cities and suburbs in the United States during the twentieth century. The findings of this study will conclude that the unrest in Ferguson, rather than an aberra- tion, is in fact an unmistakable sign that urban−suburban restructuring can always develop into crisis, anywhere in the United States.4 To analyze the long-term historical changes and their consequences in Ferguson, this study applies the concepts of “deterritorialization” and “re- territorialization” from A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophre- nia (1980) by French philosophers Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari. De- territorialization, according to Deleuze and Guattari, is “the operation of the line of flight.” It is “the complex movement or process by which something escapes or departs from a given territory, where a territory can be a system of any kind, conceptual, linguistic, social or affective.”5 In other words, it is the process of undoing what has already been established. This study adopts the term deterritorialization to refer to a process in which Ferguson, Separate Communities Continue?,” Social Science Research 7 (1978): 319−344. 2 Darryl Pinckney, “In Ferguson,” New York Review of Books, January 8, 2015; Vesla M. Weaver, “Black Citizenship and Summary Punishment: A Brief History to the Present,” Theory & Event 17, no. 3 supple- ment (2014). 3 Rigel Christine Oliveri, “Setting the Stage for Ferguson: Housing Discrimination and Segregation in St. Louis,” University of Missouri School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper no. 2015-13, July 20, 2015; Richard Rothstein, “The Making of Ferguson: Public Policies at the Roots of Its Troubles,” Economic Policy Institute Report, October 15, 2014; Colin Gordon, “Segregation’s Long Shadow,” Dissent, Septem- ber 18, 2014; Elizabeth Kneebone, “Ferguson, Mo. Emblematic of Growing Suburban Poverty,” Brookings Institution, August 15, 2014. 4 For insightful historical discussions of urban crisis, see Colin Gordon, Mapping Decline: St. Louis and the Fate of the American City (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008); Thomas J. Sugrue, The Origins of the Urban Crisis: Race and Inequality in Postwar Detroit (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Uni- versity Press, 1996). 5 Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1987), 508. CHOCOLATE SUBURB, VANILLA POWER 5 a typical U.S. vanilla suburb mostly populated by white Americans until the late 1960s, was transformed into a chocolate suburb where the majority of residents are black. Meanwhile, Deleuze and Guattari argue that systems of any kind always have within themselves “vectors of deterritorialization,” which are “inseparable from correlative reterritorializations.” They define the process of reterritorialization as a movement that obstructs “the opera- tion of the line of flight” and overlays the deterritorialized territory.6 Again, this study applies the term reterritorialization to indicate an attempt made by white people to consolidate and expand their power in deterritorialized Ferguson. The Ferguson unrest during the summer of 2014 was nothing less than the outcome of racial antagonism arising from the clash between these two conflicting movements: deterritorialization and reterritorialization. By giving us a more focused lens through which to examine the dy- namics of the U.S. city−suburb, Ferguson and the incidents that took place there provide us with important implications for rethinking the ideology of colorblindness. By 2014, U.S. society had matured to the point of electing a black president, but the Ferguson unrest clearly signals the fact that race still functions as a major channel of the unequal distribution of material wealth and power. Moreover, the Ferguson unrest is an undeniable piece of evidence that, despite the ongoing transformation of the U.S. into a multi- racial society, the black−white relationship still holds primary importance among racial issues. The Deterritorialization of Ferguson: From a Vanilla Suburb to a Cho- colate Suburb In 1968, Larman Williams, a resident of Wellston, a black ghetto near St. Louis, purchased a house in Ferguson, a suburb of St. Louis about eight miles northwest of the downtown core. The suburb’s racial makeup was predominantly white when Williams, an assistant principal, moved there.7 Prior to Williams’s move to Ferguson, local residents had prevented black Americans from moving into the suburb, which was labeled a “sundown town”—in other words, a town in which black people were not even al- lowed to walk around freely at night. However, after Williams moved to 6 Ibid., 508−509. See also Paul Patton, Deleuzian Concepts: Philosophy, Colonization, Politics (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2010), 52. 7 Rothstein 2014, 3. 6 American Studies in Scandinavia, 50:2 Ferguson, other blacks who were also in search of a better residential and educational environment for their families started moving in, causing this suburb’s white wall of racial segregation to crack. During the 1970s, in- creasing numbers of blacks moved into Ferguson. Their migration deter- ritorialized this once-vanilla suburb and transformed it into one in which black people made up the overwhelming majority of residents. The build- ing of an all-white Ferguson into the 1960s and its subsequent transfor- mation reflect long-term historical trends in the spatial and demographic restructuring of twentieth-century U.S. city−suburb dynamics. To borrow a theatrical term, the first act of theselongue durée trends was the formation of a chocolate city with vanilla suburbs. A shortage of labor during the World Wars promoted the mingling of various races and ethnici- ties in workplaces. However, such encounters proved limited and tempo- rary because the large-scale migrations of black Americans from the South to the North or from the farms to the cities generated “white flight,” a phe- nomenon of whites leaving cities to move to suburbs.8 Together, the public sector, which includes the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), and the private sector, which includes banks and realtors, functioned as the finan- cial supporters for the departure of the white residents. These institutions enabled white Americans to fulfill their desire to enter the middle class, and thus played a key role in creating racially segregated areas dubbed vanilla suburbs. The white persons who were able to move to these suburbs used racial zoning, restrictive covenants, and local controls to create racially homogeneous, clean, and well-maintained vanilla spaces. Furthermore, as demonstrated by California’s Proposition 13 in 1978 to reduce prop- erty tax rates significantly, white people refused to pay the taxes that could have been used to resolve issues