XXXIVth International Congress on Law and Mental Health Sigmund Freud University Vienna July 12th – 17th, 2015 Under the auspices of/ Sous l’égide de International Academy of Law and Mental Health Académie Internationale de Droit et de Santé Mentale Sigmund Freud University Vienna XXXIVth International Congress on Law and Mental Health David N. Weisstub Chair Université de Montréal/Institut Philippe-Pinel Otto M. Lesch Alfred Pritz Co-Chair Co-Chair Medical University of Vienna Sigmund Freud University Vienna Patrons Ministries of Justice, Internal Affairs, and Health of the Federal Republic of Austria Collaborators Institut Philippe-Pinel de Montréal Medical University of Vienna International Network on Therapeutic Jurisprudence (INTJ) Iberoamerican Association of Therapeutic Jurisprudence (AITJ) Société Française de Médecine Légale Sponsors Vienna Convention Bureau Elsevier Science Elsevier Masson Springer International Scientific Committee David N. Weisstub Chair Université de Montréal/Institut Philippe-Pinel Otto M. Lesch Alfred Pritz Co-Chair Co-Chair Medical University of Vienna Sigmund Freud University Vienna Steve Abdool Edward Latessa Aurea Alcalde Cecilia Leonard Julio Arboleda-Florez Sherri McCarthy Harold Bursztajn George Mendelson Amy Campbell Christian Mormont Terry Carney Thomas Nilsson Kathy Cerminara Michael Perlin Richard Dembo Werner Platz Eric Drogin Susanna Radovic Francisca Fariña Sergio Rigonatti Alan Felthous Steven Segal Renée Fugère Jagannathan Srinivasaraghavan Susan Green Wendy Stanyon Thomas Gutheil Lenore Walker Jacqueline Helfgott David Wexler Christian Hervé George Woods Artemis Igoumenou Gerald Young Norbert Konrad National Organising Committee Otto M. Lesch Chair Medical University of Vienna Alexander Dvorak Alfred Pritz Andreas Erfurth Georg Psota Gabriele Fischer Gabriele Sachs Karin Gutierrez-Lobos Henriette Walter Giselher Guttmann Johannes Wancata Hans Haltmayer Gerhard Wiesbeck Werner Platz Tomáš Zima SCHEDULE Sigmund Freud University SUNDAY, JULY 12th, 2015 ……………………………………………………....2 9:30 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. ……………………………………………..………………..2 Sigmund Freud University MONDAY, JULY 13th, 2015 …………………………………………………..…3 8:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. ……………………………………………………………..3 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. ………………………………………………………..…..7 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..13 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..19 TUESDAY, JULY 14th, 2015 …………………………………………………...25 8:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. ……………………………………………………………25 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. …………………………………………………………..30 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..36 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..41 WEDNESDAY, JULY 15th, 2015 ………………………………………………61 8:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. ……………………………………………………………61 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. …………………………………………………………..68 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..75 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………..83 THURSDAY, JULY 16th, 2015 …………………………………………………91 8:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. ……………………………………………………………91 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. …………………………………………………………..98 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ……………………………………………………………105 FRIDAY, JULY 17th, 2015 …………………………………………………….112 8:15 a.m. – 10:15 a.m. …………………………………………………………..112 10:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. …………………………………………………………118 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m. ………………………………………………..…………..124 4:00 p.m. – 6:00 p.m. …………………………………………………..………..129 1 Sigmund Freud University th SUNDAY, JULY 12 , 2015 Pre-Conference – Freud, Psychoanalysis, and Law FREUD’S DUBIOUS VIEWS ON RELIGION AND LAW David Novak, University of Toronto WHY ONLY RISK AND NEED IN FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY? WHAT HAS PSYCHOANALYSIS TO SAY ABOUT RESPONSIVITY TREATMENT? Stefan Bogaerts, Tilburg University LESSONS FROM YALE SCHOOL OF LAW AND PSYCHOANALYSIS, CIRCA 1963 Robert Burt, Yale Law School LUNCH TRAUMA AND THE STATE WITH SIGMUND FREUD AS WITNESS Elizabeth Ann Danto, City University of New York AN ASSESSMENT OF THE EXISTENCE AND INFLUENCE OF PSYCHOANALYTIC JURISPRUDENCE IN THE 21ST CENTURY David Caudill, Villanova University DISCUSSION Moderator: Reinier Munk, VU University Amsterdam 2 Sigmund Freud University MONDAY, JULY 13th, 2015 8:15 A.M. – 10:15 A.M. Room 1 FREUD, PSYCHOANALYSIS AND LAW The Acceptance of Both Unconscious Self and the Inevitable World in Spinoza’s Therapy of the Emotions and Notion of Moral Responsibility Heidi Ravven, Hamilton College The Disconnect between Law and Psychology: A Proposal for Change David Shapiro, Southeastern University Freud, Psychoanalysis, and the Law Morris Eagle, Delphi University Discussant Evert Van Leeuwen, Radboud University Nijmegen Room 2 MEDICAL AND RESEARCH ETHICS Is the Bucharest Early Intervention Project Like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study? Gregory Pence, University of Alabama at Birmingham The Wellbeing of Clergy Contributors to Human Research Ethics Committees Aviva Kipen, University of Melbourne In Defense of Free Will: Neuroscience and Criminal Responsibility Paul Nestor, University of Massachusetts Boston Deliver Us from Evil? Neuroethico-Legal Issues in the Use of Neuroscience in Public Safety and National Security Agendas James Giordano, Georgetown University 3 Moral Relativism or Just Different Normative Assumptions? Islamic Bioethics vs. International Bioethics Regulations Abdallah Adlan, Kind Saud Abdulaziz University for Health Science Room 3 CHILD ABUSE (I) Moderator Yolisha Singh, University of New South Wales Raising the Age of Criminal Responsibility by the “Back Door”? Heather Keating, University of Sussex Child Abuse, Drug Addiction and Mental Health Problems of Incarcerated Women in Israel Gila Chen, Ashkelon Academic College “I Found This Site by Googling ‘Borderline B*tch’”: Constructing Borderline Personality Disorder in Popular Family Law Advice for Men Ruth Cain, University of Kent Child Murder by Mothers and Evolution Susan Hatters Friedman, University of Auckland Familial-Related Violence of Pregnant Women in France: One Death or Two? Philippe Charlier, UFR of Health Sciences, Montigny-le-Bretonneux, France Room 4 FETAL ALCOHOL SPECTRUM DISORDER (II): RECENT CHANGES IN FASD AND THE LAW One Size Does Not Fit All: Forensic Assessment of Sex Offenders with FASD Natalie Novick Brown, University of Washington The Central Role of Neuropsychology in Forensic FASD Assessment Joette James, George Washington University Forensic Assessment of FASD: The Impact of Suggestibility Valerie McGinn, University of Auckland 4 FASD as a Mitigating Factor in Criminal Cases: Brain Impairment, Risk-Appraisal and Criminal Culpability Stephen Greenspan, University of Colorado FASD in a Nutshell: From the Perspective of a General Pediatrician in the Netherlands Rudi Kohl, Inter-Psy, Groningen, The Netherlands Discussant Anthony Wartnik, APW Consultants, FASD Experts, Seattle, USA Room 5 INVOLUNTARY TREATMENT: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES Involuntary Treatment: Laws, Processes and Safeguards in Western Australia and Chile Louise Southalan, Mental Health Commission of Western Australia Investigated Prior to Decision on Involuntary Care: Patients’ Perspectives Marianne Larsson Lindahl, Lund University Specialist Evaluation of Involuntary Patients Admitted to Acute Emergency Psychiatric Units in Norway – 24 Hour Follow Up: Who Became Converted to Voluntary Admission? Kjetil Hustoft, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway Psychiatric Ambulance: A New Feature in Psychiatric Emergency Care Frode Bremseth, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway A Successful Monitoring System for Released Forensic Patients James Reynolds, Department of Mental Health, Missouri, USA Room 6 UNDERSTANDING THE USE OF COMMUNITY TREATMENT ORDERS General Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization: The Role of Community Treatment Orders Steven Segal, University of California, Berkeley 5 Challenges in the Meta-Analysis and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials of Community Treatment Orders Steve Kisely, University of Queensland Involuntary Psychiatric Treatment in the Community: General Practitioners and the Implementation of CTOs Edwina Light, University of Sydney Perspectives on Supported Decision-Making and Community Treatment Orders Lisa Brophy, University of Melbourne What Would an Ethical, Non-Discriminatory Community Treatment Order Look Like? George Szmukler, King’s College London Room 7 PROBLEM SOLVING COURTS (I) TJ Why Sustainability Values Should Be Leading Guiding Principles for Justice Innovation Alexander de Savornin Lohman, Center for Sustainable Justice, Utrecht, the Netherlands Are 21st Century Problem Solving Courts Better than 19th Century Problem Solving Courts? Nigel Stobbs, Queensland University Tales from the Frontline: The Difficulty of Translating ‘Best Practice’ Guidelines into Effective Therapeutic Courts Elisa Buggy, Drug Court and Family Drug Treatment Court Victoria, Melbourne, Australia Mainstreatming Therapeutic Jurisprudence: Lessons from Family Treatment Court Suzanna Fay-Ramirez, University of Queensland Room 8 FROM DEATH ROW TO GUANTANAMO: PRACTICAL ETHICS IN THE INTERFACE BETWEEN LAW AND MENTAL HEALTH Working with a Client Who Has Survived Torture: Barriers and Strategies for Lawyers and Mental Health Experts David Nevin, Nevin, Benjamin, McKay & Barlett LLP, Boise, USA 6 Katherine Porterfield, New York University Gary Sowards, McBreen & Senior, Los Angeles, USA Scharlette Holdman, Center for Capital Assistance, New Orleans, USA Denny LeBoeuf, American Civil Liberties Union, John Adams Project, New York, USA Interviews, Interrogation and Trauma in Death Penalty Cases Denny LeBoeuf, ACLU John Adams Project, New Orleans, USA Room 9 COMMUNITY TREATMENT