Our Union Fabriks: Studies in the Working Class Series Editors: Ingo Schmidt and Jeff Taylor

Our Union Fabriks: Studies in the Working Class Series editors: Ingo Schmidt and Jeff Taylor Capital is dead labor. Karl Marx Fabriks: Studies in the Working Class provides a broad-based forum for labour studies research. Of particular interest are works that challenge familiar national and institutional narratives, focusing instead on gender-based, occupational, racial, and regional divisions among workers and on strategies for fostering working-class solidarity. e series also seeks to resurrect both social class analysis and the view of labour movements as a potentially liberating social force. It invites contributions not only from labour historians but from industrial relations scholars, political scientists, economists, sociologists and social movement theorists, and anyone else whose concerns lie with the history and organization of labour, its philosophical underpinnings, and the struggle for economic and social justice. <a href="/goto?url=http://www.aupress.ca/index.php/books/120178" target="_blank">e Political Economy of Workplace Injury in Canada </a>bob barnetson Our Union: UAW/CAW Local 27 from 1950 to 1990 Jason Russell OURUNION UAW/CAW Local 27 from 1950 to 1990 Jason Russell Copyright © 2011 Jason Russell Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, AB T5J 3S6 ISBN 978-1-926836-43-0 (print) 978-1-926836-44-7 (PDF) 978-1-926836-45-4 (epub) A volume in Fabriks: Studies in the Working Class: ISSN 1925-6477 (print) 1925-6485 (digital) Cover and interior design by Natalie Olsen, Kisscut Design. Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Book Printers. library and archives canada cataloguing in publication Russell, Jason, 1968– Our union : UAW/CAW Local 27 from 1950–1990 / Jason Russell. (Fabriks : studies in the working class, ISSN 1925-6477) Includes bibliographical references. Issued also in electronic format. ISBN 978-1-926836-43-0 1. CAW-Canada. Local 27—History. 2. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America. Canadian Region—History. 3. Labor unions—Ontario—London—History. 4. Labor union locals—Ontario—London—History. 5. Labor union locals—Social aspects—Ontario—London. 6. Automobile industry workers— Labor unions—Canada—History—20th century. I. Title. II. Series: Fabriks : studies in the working class <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">HD6528.A82C385 2011 </li><li style="flex:1">331.88’12920971326 </li><li style="flex:1">C2011-905716-6 </li></ul>We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund (CBF) for our publishing activities. Assistance provided by the Government of Alberta, Alberta Multimedia Development Fund. is publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution– Noncommercial–No D<a href="/goto?url=http://www.creativecommons" target="_blank">erivative Works 2.5 Canada: see www.creativecommons. </a>org. e text may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that credit is given to the original author. To obtain permission for uses beyond those outlined in the Creative Commons license, please contact AU Press, Athabasca University, at [email protected]. CONTENTS List of Tables vi List of Illustrations vii Acknowledgements ix Introduction: Local Unions in the Post–World War II Decades 3I2345678Built to Last 17 The National Union 49 Employers and Bargaining Units 79 Collective Bargaining 103 Labour Relations 141 The Social and Community Agenda 165 Community Politics and Activism 201 “It Was All About Families” 223 Conclusion: Looking Back 251 Appendix A: Local 27 Bargaining Units Appendix B: Interviews 264 Notes 265 263 Bibliography 309 Index 319 TABLES 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 5.1 Wages at GM Diesel Versus Wages in London, Ontario, 1951 113 Selected Local 27 Wages Versus London Wages, Early 1960s 114 Selected Local 27 Wages Versus London Wages, Early 1970s 114 Selected Local 27 Wage Increases Versus London Wages, 1981 116 Local 27 Bargaining Units with COLA Provisions 119 Local 27 Bargaining Units with Pension Plans 129 Local 27 Arbitrations by Bargaining Unit, 1950–90 152 Union Membership (AFL-CIO/CLC Affiliates) in London, 1966–84 206 Local 27 Membership, 1960, 1975, and 1990 206 7.1 7.2 7.3 7.4 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 8.6 Provincial Election Results for London Ridings, 1963–90 212 Federal Election Results for London Ridings, 1963–90 213 Population of London by Marital Status, 1951–91 226 London Families, 1951–91 227 Women in the London Labour Force, 1971–91 228 Population of London by Ancestry, 1951 236 Languages Spoken in London, 1986 236 Home Ownership in London, 1951–91 238 vi ILLUSTRATIONS 1.1 1.2 2.1 2.2 3.1 4.1 5.1 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 7.1 Founding members of Local 27 34 Pin-up cartoon 36 To Russia with Bob 67 Free trade protest 68 “Why?” campaign 88 Hector McLellan and family 126 Turkey of the Month Award 145 Pay equity 177 Depicting management 180 3M strike 183 Roland Parris 187 London planning districts, 1971 193 Homeowner, citizen, consumer, and union member 194 Generational change 197 Labour Day picnic 208 8.1 8.2 8.3 Kelvinator closure 224 e negotiating committee 229 Washing dishes 231 vii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS is book originated as my doctoral dissertation, which I completed in the Graduate Program in History at York University. While my status as a part-time student at York meant that I was always on the periphery of the stimulating and dynamic atmosphere of that program, I was fortunate to have benefited from crucial intellectual links with a small group of fellow Canadian history students and with other members of the Toronto Labour Studies Group. I am particularly grateful for my connection with Jenny Carson, Cindy Loch-Drake, Todd Stubbs, Susana Miranda, and Nathan Smith. Over the past eight years, we have all either moved through our dissertation research or into the academy as faculty, and I have been inspired by their dedication and support. I was also fortunate to have had supportive colleagues beyond the Canadian labour history community. I particularly wish to acknowledge my colleagues at Empire State College, who have helped ease me into life as a full-time faculty member, with special thanks to Roger Keeran, my MA supervisor, who has become a very supportive colleague. I also wish to thank the members of my dissertation committee. Kathryn McPherson and Paul Craven provided excellent guidance and were unfailingly patient from the moment I first approached them. I am grateful as well to Carolyn Podruchny, Sam Gindin, Peter McInnis, and Mark omas, who also sat on my examining committee. Above all, without Craig Heron, my dissertation supervisor, none of this would have been possible. I owe him intellectual debts that cannot be repaid. He has been a great mentor. I also owe a debt of gratitude to the past and present members of UAW/ CAW Local 27, especially all those who agreed to interviews. e memories and insights of activists like Julie White, Roland Parris, Hector McLellan, ix Bob Nickerson, and Al Seymour, among others, enabled me to add nuance and depth to my analysis. Roland was always an enthusiastic supporter of my work, and I only wish he’d lived to see this book published. I am especially grateful to Tim Carrie and Jim Wilkes, who provided much- needed help with accessing Local 27’s records, as well as to the staff of the Archive of Labour and Urban Affairs at Wayne State University, the Archives of Ontario, the Archives and Research Collection Centre at the University of Western Ontario, and Library and Archives Canada. In particular, I thank Kathy Bennett, at the CAW national office, for helping me locate CAW archival documents at Library and Archives Canada. I am grateful to Alvin Finkel, a friend and colleague at Athabasca University, both for his encouragement and for his valuable comments on my work, and to Walter Hildebrandt, Pamela MacFarland Holway, and all the staff at Athabasca University Press. My grandparents — George Alexander (Alec) Russell, Norma Rus- sell, William Dalton (Mike) Rapsey, and Muriel Rapsey — were oﬅen in my thoughts as I researched and wrote this book. Alec and Norma raised five children, and Alec oﬅen worked two jobs, despite suffering from poor health. Mike was a long-time member of the United Auto Workers. He and Muriel had two children and understood very well the impact that a local union had on their lives. Alec and Mike were also steadfast social democrats. Both of my grandfathers served in the Canadian Army in World War II, and Muriel was an English war bride. Alec died at a relatively young age, but Norma is still with us. Mike and Muriel passed away aﬅer years of hard work and a peaceful retirement. My grandparents worked extremely hard to provide for their children and grandchildren. I think they would be gratified to know how much their lives inspired me to learn more about what a local union did for its workers. I also wish to thank my parents, Tom Russell and Trudy Warren, who have been unfailingly supportive of my academic work. So has Laura Liepins, my wife. Even in moments when I despaired of ever completing my PhD, Laura always believed in me. Finally, I thank my son, omas Russell, who is always my greatest inspiration. is book is ultimately for him. Alec, Norma, Mike, and Muriel would have wanted it that way. xOUR UNION INTRODUCTION Local Unions in the Post–World War II Decades is book is as much an outgrowth of years of rank-and-file union activism as it is the result of academic curiosity. My interest in organized labour began when I first became a union member through summer employment at a gas utility in St. Catharines, Ontario. I became aware of Local 27 of the Canadian Auto Workers (CAW; formerly the United Auto Workers [UAW]) when I found work at another gas utility in London, Ontario, and joined a comparatively small Communication, Energy, and Paperworkers Union (CEP) local with barely one hundred members. at local rented the Local 27 hall for its monthly meetings. I sat in the hall as a visitor, anecdotally learning some aspects of its past. My academic interest in organized labour was piqued as an undergraduate student and has not abated since. Having been a rank-and-file member of a large Canadian industrial union, as well as a local officer, I spent years reading about and considering the meaning of unions. A growing body of scholarship has established that the working-class experience in Canada underwent some profound changes in the half century aﬅer World War II. In the 1950s and 1960s, real wages rose, hours of work were reduced, and increased disposable income allowed more formal schooling for children and a much higher level of expenditures on cars, suburban homes, and other consumer goods; at the same time, state social-security measures brought some protection against unem- ployment, illness, and old age. e workforce experiencing these changes was also undergoing transformations that brought more women and new immigrant groups into the labour market. Roughly a third of workers 3— historically, a huge increase in the proportion of the workforce — confronted those changes as union members. is book addresses the role of one local union within these developments. Among the many changes that the postwar period brought to the working class was a new legal framework for peacetime labour-management relations. is framework took shape in the immediate postwar years, especially with the adoption of laws like the federal Industrial Relations and Disputes Investigation Act (IRDIA) and its provincial counterparts. Canadian industrial workers joined unions, many of which were affiliates of the American Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) and, aﬅer 1955, the unified AFL-CIO. ose unions — especially the UAW — pursued bargaining agendas that improved workers’ standards of living. Canadian unions tried to influence foreign policy in various ways, one of which was to forge links with the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the New Democratic Party (NDP) at the national and provincial levels. Unions sought to represent their members in the workplace while also articulating a wider social and political agenda. e labour movement’s importance in working-class life has drawn considerable scholarly attention. e resulting research — concentrated on national unions, anti-Communism, state policy, and issues surround- ing collective bargaining — has revealed much about the nature of unions and working-class life in postwar Canada. More specifically, the UAW, which is central to this study, has been the focus of much analysis in both Canada and the United States.1 is union, one of the products of the CIO’s creation in 1934, helped shape a working-class political agenda in the postwar years.2 It sought not only to play a central role in its members’ lives, including those in Canada, during those years, but also to exert close administrative and political control over local affairs. Unions’ political agendas in the postwar period reflected divergent ideologies and party politics, all of which were situated at different points on the Leﬅ of the political spectrum. e UAW included leﬅists who would have preferred that their union and the rest of the North American labour movement pursue a more progressive political agenda, especially objectives to which they had been exposed through contact with Communist Introduction /4parties in Canada and the United States.3 e UAW international admin- istration, under long-serving international president Walter Reuther, was committed to anti-Communism in both Canada and the United States even though leﬅists were instrumental in helping to build unions, particularly at the local level. It is almost impossible to discuss the UAW in the postwar decades without considering Reuther and the people whom he appointed to staff positions across the UAW.4 Efforts were made in the late 1940s to root out suspected leﬅist sympathizers, and people such as future Canadian UAW leader George Burt narrowly avoided expulsion. e Leﬅ caucus in the UAW in Canada was able to endure longer than its American counterpart, but only with great difficulty.5 Unions concentrated on helping workers through the collective bargaining process. As noted in the American context, the UAW’s bargaining program was predicated on “a prosperous industry, on competition for market share among the [auto] manufacturers, and on union dominance of the labour market.”6 e UAW, through its bargaining agenda, articu- lated a provider role for itself with respect to its members during their working lives and through their retirement years. Economic measures dominated collective bargaining: for example, pension plans became an important bargaining objective in both Canada and the United States, as did inflation protection in the form of cost-of-living allowances (known as COLA).7 First adopted in American UAW collective agreements in 1948, COLA was bargained in Canada in 1950. COLA, along with the annual improvement factor (AIF) had “a stabilizing effect on union-management relations and constituted the first steps in the construction of Fordist wage relations.”8 Many analyses of organized labour’s development in the post–World War II decades focus on the idea of a postwar settlement or compromise between employers and unions. e postwar settlement is conceptualized as organized labour trading the unfettered right to challenge management, including the right to engage in spontaneous strikes, in return for the right to legal collective bargaining and better economic rewards. Industrial relations practitioners and labour historians view the postwar period in different terms. e former argue that the postwar labour Introduction /5relations system represented a form of industrial democracy, while the latter oﬅen take the view that it was a co-optation of workers’ interests. Recent research, such as work by Jane Poulsen, suggests that relations between unions and employers depended on the industry in which they operated and the time period in question. My study, as it pertains to inter- action between Local 27 and the employers with which it bargained, will also suggest that the labour relations process was not completely uniform.9 Discussions of the postwar settlement oﬅen focus on Fordism, which in turn is sometimes used in discussions of industrial pluralism. Fordism, a term with a range of definitions, shaped wage relations but was also influenced by unions and their members in other ways. Bryan Palmer suggests that Fordism included high wages, mass production, increased leisure time, and the “conscious structuring by capital of labour into a republic of consumption.”10 Julie Guard, on the other hand, emphasizes that the postwar system was primarily about enhancing the masculinity of male workers.11 erefore, while consumerism was an important part of the postwar system, gender also played a central role. Unions like the UAW eventually abandoned efforts to exert control over the work process through collective bargaining, in exchange for annual wage increases, COLA, pension plans, and other economic rewards. is shiﬅ in policy direction — which Peter McInnis calls a “Faustian bargain”12 — was charted by union leaders such as Reuther, and it helped fuel the consumerism described by Palmer. Leo Panitch and Don Swartz suggest that the postwar labour relations framework ushered in “an era of free collective bargaining” that came under as- sault in the early 1970s; their analysis supports McInnis’s view, since they further note that “the trade unionism which developed in Canada in the postwar years bore all the signs of the web of legal restrictions which enveloped it.”13 Michael Burawoy describes the postwar workplace as one in which a worker became “a citizen in an internal industrial state” and suggests that efforts were made to shape workers into good citizens in that state.14 Analyses of the meaning of the postwar settlement, and Fordism, have thus been done within a range and combination of perspectives, Introduction /6from gender to economics. Workers became consumers but were dif- ferentiated by gender. ey enjoyed legal collective bargaining rights but also faced legal restrictions on how those rights could be exercised. e existing research thus collectively suggests that the postwar settlement and its associated elements, like Fordism, brought both gains and losses for workers and their unions. Evaluating Fordism’s influence on the postwar autoworkers’ union is further complicated by contrasts between Canada and the United States. e UAW certainly pursued economic objectives associated with Ford- ism in both countries. Governments in both Canada and the United States concluded the Auto Pact, an agreement that obliged the Detroit automakers to build as many cars in Canada as they sold.15 But in some respects, state responses to organized labour were different in the two countries. In the United States, government policy came down hard on labour militancy, notably in the 1947 Taﬅ-Hartley Act, and the postwar system essentially unravelled until labour ceased to be a countervailing social force.16 In contrast, the Canadian state did not implement such overtly anti-union laws in the immediate postwar years. e post–World War II labour movement, in particular the UAW, appears to have oﬅen been driven by priorities set by its national and international offices. Fordism, in its various forms, influenced and shaped union policy. e union accepted greater economic gains at the bargaining table in return for leaving management free to run corporations without direct interference from labour. e UAW leadership pursued a political program that was linked to its overall economic program and strove to quell dissent with the broader structure. In disciplining the members to accept the “Fordist regime,” people like Reuther became “managers of discontent” among their rank-and-file members.17 Academics have engaged in spirited debate over the meaning of the UAW’s program and its impact on workers and working-class life.18 e agendas and activities of national and international union offices, however, should not be considered the sum total of what unions actually did in the postwar years; the internal operations of union locals in this period played a critical role as well, but have received little scholarly attention, Introduction /7with the notable exceptions of work by Peter Friedlander and Don Wells.19 Local unions have most oﬅen been seen as part of national and international union structures through purges of progressives or compulsion to accept wider union bargaining priorities.20 Like their parent unions, they have been described as riven by internal political squabbling, with Leﬅ caucuses frequently succumbing to social democratic groups.21 Some independent local unions have been studied, as have some locals in relation to the workplaces that they organized.22 Despite existing analyses of union locals, which show the complex- ity of union membership and the important role that a local played in

Our Union Fabriks: Studies in the Working Class Series Editors: Ingo Schmidt and Jeff Taylor

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support