Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Environmental Assessment Number OR 080-08-11 June 2008 United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Oregon State Office Salem District Cascade Resource Area Township 2 South, Range 7 East, Section 31, Willamette Meridian Salmon River Watershed Clackamas County, Oregon Responsible Agency: USDI - Bureau of Land Management Responsible Official: Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 315-5969 For further information, contact: Zach Jarrett, Project Lead Cascades Resource Area 1717 Fabry Road SE Salem, OR 97306 (503) 375-5610 As the Nation’s principal conservation agency, the Department of Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering economic use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLM/OR/WA/GI-08/062+1792 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................7 1.1 Project Summary............................................................................................................................7 1.1.1 Proposed Action................................................................................................................7 1.1.2 Project Area Location.......................................................................................................7 1.2 Purpose of and Need for Action....................................................................................................9 1.2.1 Need for the Action ..........................................................................................................9 1.2.2 Purpose..............................................................................................................................9 1.2.3 Decision Factors ...............................................................................................................9 1.3 Conformance with Land Use Plan, Statutes, Regulations, and other Plans...............................9 2.0 Description of Alternatives ...........................................................................................................10 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................10 2.2 Alternative 1: Partial Containment (Proposed Action)..............................................................10 2.2.1 Maintenance Components..............................................................................................11 2.2.2 Project Design Features..................................................................................................13 2.3 Alternative 2 (Full Containment)................................................................................................13 2.4 Alternative 3 (No Action)............................................................................................................13 2.5 Alternatives Considered But Not Analyzed In Detail ...............................................................14 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS ..............................14 3.1 Identification of Affected Elements of the Environment Required by Management Direction 14 3.2 Affected Environment and Environmental Effects....................................................................15 3.2.1 Aquatic Resources..........................................................................................................15 3.2.2 Recreation, Visual Resources and Rural Interface .......................................................19 3.2.3 Economic Impacts of Alternatives.................................................................................21 3.3 Compliance with the Aquatic Conservation Strategy................................................................21 4.0 LIST OF PREPARERS.................................................................................................................24 5.0 CONTACTS AND CONSULTATION.......................................................................................24 5.1 Consultation..................................................................................................................................24 5.1.1 ESA Section 7 Consultation...........................................................................................24 5.1.2 Cultural Resources - Section 106 Consultation with State Historical Preservation Office: 25 5.2 Public Scoping and Notification - Tribal Governments, Adjacent Landowners, General Public, and State County and local government offices ........................................................................25 List of Maps MAP 1: WILDWOOD BRIDGE MAINTENANCE PROJECT AREA...................................................................................... 7 Project Name: Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance June 2008 EA# OR080-08-11 p. 3 FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has conducted an environmental analysis (Environmental Assessment Number OR080-08-11) for a proposal to perform footbridge maintenance on BLM lands within the Cascades Resource Area in Clackamas County, Oregon. The Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance Environmental Assessment documents the environmental analysis of the proposed maintenance activity. The EA is attached to and incorporated by reference in this Finding of No Significant Impact determination (FONSI). The analysis in this EA is site-specific and supplements analyses found in the Salem District Proposed Resource Management Plan/Final Environmental Impact Statement, September 1994 (RMP/FEIS). The proposed maintenance activities have been designed to conform to the Salem District Record of Decision and Resource Management Plan, May 1995 (RMP) and related documents which direct and provide the legal framework for management of BLM lands within the Salem District (EA Section 1.3). The EA and FONSI will be made available for public review and will be available on the Salem District website at http://www.blm.gov/or/districts/salem/plans/index.php. The notice for public comment will be published in a legal notice in the Sandy Post newspaper on June 18, 2008. The comment period ends July 3, 2008. Written comments should be addressed to Cindy Enstrom, Field Manager, Cascades Resource Area, 1717 Fabry Road S., Salem, Oregon 97306. Emailed comments may be sent to [email protected]. Attention: Cindy Enstrom. Finding of No Significant Impact Based upon review of the Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance EA and supporting documents, I have determined that the Proposed Action is not a major federal action and would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment, individually or cumulatively with other actions in the general area. No environmental effects meet the definition of significance in context or intensity as defined in 40 CFR 1508.27. Therefore, supplemental or additional information to the analysis in the RMP/FEIS in the form of a new environmental impact statement is not needed. This finding is based on the following discussion: Context: Potential effects resulting from the implementation of the Proposed Action have been analyzed within the context of the Salmon and Sandy Rivers, downstream from the bridge. [40 CFR 1508.27(a)] Intensity: 1. The resources potentially affected by the proposed maintenance activities are: aquatic and recreation resources The effects of the footbridge maintenance project are unlikely to have significant adverse impacts on these resources [40 CFR 1508.27(b) (1)] for the following reasons: • Project design features described in (EA section 2.2.2) would reduce the risk of effects to affected resources to be within RMP standards and guidelines and to be within the effects described in the RMP/EIS. • Aquatic Resources: (EA section 3.2.1) o Proposed Action: Under the proposed action (partial containment) most of the solid materials removed from the bridge surface would be trapped. Water from washing would be allowed to drip through and would enter the Salmon River below the bridge. Project Name: Wildwood Footbridge Maintenance June 2008 EA# OR080-08-11 p. 4 This water (the leachate) would likely contain some pentachlorophenol that would be physically or chemically released during the cleaning process. Capturing water and particulate material would reduce pentachlorophenol from entering the river. The maximum discharge of leachate to the Salmon River is estimated at 0.01 cfs (approximately 4 gallons/minute) equivalent to 0.006% of the estimated discharge at base flow of the Salmon River. Assuming a concentration of pentachlorophenol in the leachate of 20 mg/L, the leachate would be almost immediately diluted to approximately 1.2 ug/L in the Salmon River. This is well below the water quality standard of 20 ug/L and would be unlikely to affect any beneficial use of the Salmon