Active Spacecraft Potential Control for Cluster – Implementation and first Results

Active Spacecraft Potential Control for Cluster – Implementation and first Results

c Annales Geophysicae (2001) 19: 1289–1302 European Geophysical Society 2001 Annales Geophysicae Active spacecraft potential control for Cluster – implementation and first results K. Torkar1, W. Riedler1, C. P. Escoubet2, M. Fehringer2, R. Schmidt2, R. J. L. Grard2, H. Arends2, F. Rudenauer¨ 3, W. Steiger4, B. T. Narheim5, K. Svenes5, R. Torbert6, M. Andre´7, A. Fazakerley8, R. Goldstein9, R. C. Olsen10, A. Pedersen11, E. Whipple12, and H. Zhao13 1Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, 8042 Graz, Austria 2Space Science Department of ESA/ESTEC, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 3Now at: International Atomic Energy Agency, Safeguards Analytical Laboratory, 2444 Seibersdorf, Austria 4Institute for Physics, Austrian Research Centers Seibersdorf, 2444 Seibersdorf, Austria 5Forsvarets Forskningsinstitutt, Avdeling for Elektronikk, 2007 Kjeller, Norway 6Space Science Center, Science and Engineering Research Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA 7Swedish Institute of Space Physics, Uppsala Division, 75121 Uppsala, Sweden 8Dept. of Physics, Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Dorking, Surrey, UK 9Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas 78238, USA 10Physics Department, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California 93943, USA 11Dept. of Physics, University of Oslo, Blindern, Norway 12University of Washington, Geophysics Department, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA 13Center for Space Science and Applied Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, P. R. China Received: 17 April 2001 – Revised: 20 August 2001 – Accepted: 23 August 2001 Abstract. Electrostatic charging of a spacecraft modifies the larged sheath around the spacecraft which causes problems distribution of electrons and ions before the particles enter for boom-mounted probes. the sensors mounted on the spacecraft body. The floating Key words. Space plasma physics (spacecraft sheaths, potential of magnetospheric satellites in sunlight very often wakes, charging); Instruments and techniques; Active per- reaches several tens of volts, making measurements of the turbation experiments cold (several eV) component of the ambient ions impossi- ble. The plasma electron data become contaminated by large fluxes of photoelectrons attracted back into the sensors. 1 Introduction The Cluster spacecraft are equipped with emitters of the liquid metal ion source type, producing indium ions at 5 to Solid bodies embedded in plasma and irradiated by the Sun 9 keV energy at currents of some tens of microampere. This acquire an electric potential that is determined by the equilib- current shifts the equilibrium potential of the spacecraft to rium of the various charging currents. The relevant currents moderately positive values. The design and principles of are due to photo-emission caused by sunlight, plasma cur- the operation of the instrument for active spacecraft poten- rents due to ambient electrons and ions, and secondary elec- tial control (ASPOC) are presented in detail. tron currents caused by the impact of primary electrons and Experience with spacecraft potential control from the ions. In the plasmasphere, which is generally only briefly commissioning phase and the first two months of the op- touched by the Cluster orbit, the plasma electron current to erational phase are now available. The instrument is oper- a spacecraft surface at the plasma potential is comparable or ated with constant ion current for most of the time, but tests exceeds the total photoelectron current generated at the sur- have been carried out with varying currents and a “feedback” face. Hence, the equilibrium potential is close to zero or neg- mode with the instrument EFW, which measures the space- ative. Outside the plasmasphere, i.e. almost throughout the craft potential . That has been reduced to values according to orbit of Cluster, the plasma density drops to values well be- expectations. In addition, the low energy electron measure- low some 100 cm−3, so that an increasingly small portion of ments show substantially reduced fluxes of photoelectrons the photoelectrons at high energy suffices to counterbalance as expected. The flux decrease in photoelectrons returning the plasma electron current, which leads to significant pos- to the spacecraft, however, occurs at the expense of an en- itive potentials of the spacecraft. In extremely low density plasmas (< 0.1 cm−3), such as in the lobes of the Earth’s Correspondence to: K. Torkar ([email protected]) magnetotail, spacecraft potentials in sunlight conditions can 1290 K. Torkar et al.: Active spacecraft potential control for Cluster reach values > 50 V, as already shown by GEOS and ISEE 2 Operating principle observations (Pedersen et al., 1983). Sensors for both ions and electrons suffer from high space- If one neglects ion currents and the secondary emission, and craft potentials since the particles are accelerated or deceler- assumes the orbit-limited case, when the Debye length is ated and their trajectories are modified in the sheath around much larger than the body (a typical situation in the outer the spacecraft. Some particles may not reach the sensor at magnetosphere) then a spacecraft in sunlight, yet outside the all. Most of the photoelectrons at energies below the space- regions with extremely hot plasma, such as in an active plas- craft potential are trapped in the sheath and eventually return masheet, experiences a random electron current Ia0 from the to the surface of the sensor, causing an additional disturbance plasma to the satellite surface A which is assumed here to be in the measurements and problems for the sensors. spherical. If the electron distribution can be approximated by a Maxwellian, one obtains The problems associated with spacecraft charging have s been recognised very early (for reviews, see e.g. Grard, A 8kTe Ia0 = nee (1) 1973; Whipple, 1981), and measures to improve the situa- 4 πme tion for the particle instruments have been sought. A first and necessary step consists of avoiding local (differential) in the form given by Pedersen (1995) to the original equation charging of spacecraft surfaces, particularly near the particle developed by Mott-Smith and Langmuir (1926). For posi- sensors by making the entire surface of the spacecraft con- tive spacecraft potentials Vs, the plasma electron current is ductive, including the solar panel which has to be coated by further approximated by indium-tin oxide. A second step is achieved by actively low- Vs Ia = Ia0 1 + ering the potential. The rationale for active spacecraft poten- Ve tial control has been established in the early 1980’s (see, e.g. kT V = e (2) Pedersen et al., 1983) and has triggered the installation of e e instruments for the active control of the spacecraft potential where e, n , m , T are the charge, density, mass, and tem- on several spacecraft. A plasma source has been installed on e e e perature of the plasma electrons and k is the Boltzmann con- the Polar spacecraft (Moore et al., 1995), whereas the princi- stant. The area A for a spherical spacecraft of radius R is ple applied on Cluster has been tested earlier on the Geotail 4πR2. With A = 20 m2 for a Cluster spacecraft and V = 0, (Schmidt et al., 1995), Interball-Auroral (Torkar et al., 1998), s the plasma electron current of Eq. (1) becomes numerically: and Equator-S (Torkar et al., 1999) spacecraft. p The instrument itself has been described earlier (Riedler et Ia0 = 0.55ne kTe [µA] (3) al., 1997) in the version built for the first attempt to launch −3 where Ia0 is in µA, ne is in electrons cm and kTe is in eV. the Cluster spacecraft in 1996. For Cluster-II, several parts The photoelectron current Ip is determined by the solar of the hardware and software have been modified, but the spectrum and the material properties of the surface. The overall concept remains unchanged. The following sections photoelectron saturation current density jps varies for dif- provide a review of the instrument as it flies on board the ferent materials, and between laboratory and in-orbit mea- Cluster spacecraft, but novel aspects are the prime focus. The surements. Feuerbacher and Fitton 1972) quote laboratory last part of the paper presents first results from the mission. data of jps for several spacecraft materials in the range be- The primary motivation for active spacecraft potential con- tween 10 and 40 µA m−2. Values up to 60 and 80 µA m−2 trol on Cluster is to permit an almost complete measurement have been found in a study of ISEE-1, GEOS-1, GEOS-2 and of the ambient plasma distribution functions both for elec- Geotail potentials by Pedersen (1995). Part of this variability trons and ions by PEACE (Plasma Electron And Currents is explainble by different materials, surface finishes, and the Experiment, Johnstone et al., 1997, this issue), and for ions ageing processes in the space environment. by CIS (Cluster Ion Spectroscopy, Reme` et al., 1997), re- Assuming a Maxwellian distribution of the photoelectron spectively. Typical floating potentials of up to several tens of population with a mean energy kTp , which is certainly only volts obscure or render impossible the measurement of the a very crude approximation, the current of photoelectrons core of the ion-distribution function, which has a thermal en- which finally escapes from the sunlit surface As into space ergy comparable to the satellite potential. Densities calcu- and thereby contributes to the current balance is for positive lated from particle measurements show large discrepancies spacecraft potential As: from densities derived from wave experiments in these con- −eVs ditions. Measurements in eclipse made on ATS-6, SCATHA I = A j exp (4) p s ps kT and DE-1 have shown the appearance of previously “hidden” p ion populations, invisible in sunlight (Olsen, 1982). Using experimental data from satellites, Pedersen (1995) When interpretating electron measurements, one encoun- found a best fit to the current-voltage characteristics for Vs > = −2 ters additional difficulties due to the contamination of the 10 V by a sum of two exponentials with jps 80 µA m −2 = data by photoelectrons entering into the sensor.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    14 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us