South Lakeland Local Committee 1 June 2021 Appendix 4 – Consultation Summary Little Langdale, Rydal and Skelwith Bridge No Waiting At Any Time TRO 2020 CONSULTATION FEEDBACK RESPONSE TO CONSULTATION, ADVERTISING AND OBJECTIONS DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Consultation Summary Statutory Consultees Cumbria Constabulary - Fully support all the 3 proposals and believe they will contribute to improved safety on the highways and improved traffic flow. Response to letter drop among residents, advertising and objections 1. A number of residents responded to our letter drop informing them of the proposals. Some made comments; some made objections. 2. A summary of these responses and objections now follows together with discussion and recommendations. Little Langdale Ref Respondent Support/ Comments Our Response No. Object 1A Resident of Little Strongly object to the double yellow lines near Objects to the proposals. Langdale Objects Greenbank Terrace after the keep clear lines that Concerns have been raised regarding already exist. This is the only parking for vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. Greenbank Terrace. Object to the double yellow The proposed no waiting at any time double lines near Land Parrock as this is where I can yellow lines are at sections of road which are frequently get parked. Reducing parking further particularly narrow to prevent obstructive will only exacerbate the situation and is hardly a parking and improve visibility at junctions. solution on parking. 2A Resident of Little Partially supports the proposals welcome the Partially supports the proposals. Langdale Partial adoption of double yellow lines at 2 pinch points Concerns have been raised regarding Support near the and of Greenbank Terrace. To have vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. restrictions near Iving Howe and the first section The proposed no waiting at any time double near Greenbank Terrace would help to keep yellow lines are at sections of road which are passing places clear and prevent gridlock. The particularly narrow to prevent obstructive other proposed restrictions on the U5277 will take parking and improve visibility at junctions. away parking from residents that do not have access to off road parking. Please consider the needs of people in terrace properties without off street parking. 3A Resident of Little Support Strongly in favour of the proposals. Visitors are Supports the proposals. Langdale unaware that parking in these sections can lead Recommend the proposals are approved. to traffic congestions and can be highly dangerous in terms of access for emergency vehicles. 4A Resident of Little Object Objects to proposals. Objects to the proposals. Langdale No public transport services in Little Langdale. Concerns have been raised regarding Unfair to further reduce the amount of parking vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. without providing a public car park. Yellow lines The proposed no waiting at any time double will detract from the valley and promote unsafe yellow lines are at sections of road which are parking. particularly narrow to prevent obstructive parking and improve visibility at junctions. 5A Resident of Little Support Supports proposals. Supports the proposals. Langdale Recommend the proposals are approved. Practical and balanced proposals which will mitigate traffic gridlock and anti-social parking problems. 6A Resident of Lakes Support Support in principle. Supports the proposals. division May prove futile unless more car parks are Recommend the proposals are approved. provided. 7A Resident of Little Support Fully support the proposals. Supports the proposals. Langdale Recommend the proposals are approved. 8A Property Owner Little Objects Appreciate the need for some parking restrictions Objects to the proposals. Langdale around the pinch points. Concerned that it could Concerns have been raised regarding make it very difficult for residents who do not have vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. own private parking. Very little parking will be The proposed no waiting at any time double permitted in the area and will be very detrimental yellow lines are at sections of road which are if these proposals go ahead especially to holiday particularly narrow to prevent obstructive let businesses. Would like consideration to be parking and improve visibility at junctions. given to parking permits for the use of residents. A residents parking scheme cannot be Please ensure residents have access to allocated included in these proposals without parking. readvertising. 9A Property Owner Little Objects Concerned the amount the amount of parking Objects to the proposals. Langdale spaces that will be left available. Park on the side Concerns have been raised regarding of the road as property does not have any off vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. street parking. Proposed restrictions will The proposed no waiting at any time double significantly reduce the amount of available yellow lines are at sections of road which are parking and will be detrimental to our business. particularly narrow to prevent obstructive Would like to see the introduction of permits for parking and improve visibility at junctions. A residents and off street parking. residents parking scheme cannot be included in these proposals without readvertising. 10A Property owner Little Support Strongly in favour of introducing restrictions. Supports the proposals. Langdale Parked cars frequently cause obstructions. Recommend the proposals are approved. 11A Resident of Little Object Objects to the proposals. If these parking Objects to the proposals. Langdale restrictions go in where will people park? There Concerns have been raised regarding are no car parks in the valley and people need vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. some where to park. The proposed no waiting at any time double yellow lines are at sections of road which are particularly narrow to prevent obstructive parking and improve visibility at junctions 12A Resident of the Object Objects to proposals. Where will people park? A Objects to the proposals. Lakes Division car park is required. Concerns have been raised regarding vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. The proposed no waiting at any time double yellow lines are at sections of road which are particularly narrow to prevent obstructive parking and improve visibility at junctions Summary and conclusion: 12 residents/property owners’ responses received with 5 in support, 1 in partial support and 6 in objection. Proposal was brought about after concerns raised regarding problematic parking causing an obstruction throughout sections of the highway in the Little Langdale valley. Cumbria Constabulary have expressed their support for the proposals. Recommended that the proposals are implemented as advertised. Rydal Ref Respondent Support/ Comment Our Response No Object 1B Resident of Rydal Support Support the proposal. Supports the proposals. Would like to see the double yellow lines Recommend the proposals are approved. extended pas Cote How as vehicles park here Not able to extend any of the proposals and cause an obstruction. without readvertising. 2B Resident of Lakes Support Agree in principle. Supports the proposals. division Recommend the proposals are approved. 3B Resident of Rydal Support Supports the measures. These restrictions will Supports the proposals. hopefully mean enforcement can be carried out Recommend the proposals are approved. on people who park on the A591 causing traffic disruption and prevent parking on the pavements. 4B Resident of Rydal Support Supports the proposals. Supports the proposals. Cars park in unsafe locations and block Recommend the proposals are approved. pavements restricting the road and sight lines. 5B Resident of Rydal Support Supports the proposals. Supports the proposals. The proposals will stop cars parking dangerously. Recommend the proposals are approved. 6B Resident of Rydal Support Support the proposals. There have been Supports the proposals. problems for a long time with these escalating in Recommend the proposals are approved. the last few years. 7B Resident of Rydal Support Support the proposals. Supports the proposals. Recommend the proposals are approved. 8B Resident of the Support Support proposals. Supports the proposals. Lakes division Recommend the proposals are approved. Summary and conclusion: 8 residents/property owners’ responses received with all 8 in support. Cumbria Constabulary have expressed their support for the proposals. Recommended that the proposals are implemented as advertised. Skelwith Bridge Ref Respondent Support/Object Comments Our response No 1C Resident of Lakes Support Support in principle. Supports the proposals. Division Recommend the proposals are approved. 2C Resident of Lakes Object Objects. Too many double yellow lines. Where Objects to the proposals. Division will people park. Concerns have been raised regarding vehicles parking and causing an obstruction. The restrictions will prevent obstructive parking. 3C Resident Skelwith Partially Partially supports the proposals. Partially supports the proposals. Bridge Support Very much in support of reducing obstructive Double yellow lines are proposed at the parking. Would like the double yellow lines near community notice board as this is a road community centre notice board single yellow. junction and parking can cause an Concerned not enough parking left for on street obstruction and prevent adequate visibility parking when exiting the junction. There is on street parking available on the B5343 included in the proposals. Recommended the proposals are approved. 4C Resident of Lakes Support Practical and balanced proposals which will Supports the proposals. Division mitigate anti-social parking problems. Recommend the proposals are approved. Summary and conclusion: 4 residents/property owners’ responses received with 2 in support, 1 in partial support and 1 in objection. Cumbria Constabulary have expressed their support for the proposals. Recommended that the proposals are implemented as advertised. .