761149Orig1s000 CLINICAL REVIEW(S)

761149Orig1s000 CLINICAL REVIEW(S)

CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 761149Orig1s000 CLINICAL REVIEW(S) Clinical Review Lawrence Rodichok MD BLA 761149 Enspryng/satralizumab-mwge CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type BLA Application Number(s) 761149 Priority or Standard Standard Submit Date(s) 8/15/19 Received Date(s) 8/15/19 PDUFA Goal Date 8/15/2020 Division/Office DN2/Office of Neuroscience Reviewer Name(s) Lawrence Rodichok MD Review Completion Date 5/28/20 (b) (4) Established/Proper Name Satralizumab-mwge (Proposed) Trade Name Enspryng Applicant Roche/Genentech Dosage Form(s) Injection:120mg/mL in a single-dose prefilled syringe Applicant Proposed Dosing 120 mg subcutaneous at Weeks 0, 2 and 4, and every 4 weeks (Q4W) thereafter Regimen(s) (b) (4) Applicant Proposed Adult with Indication(s)/Population(s) NMOSD. Recommendation on Approval Regulatory Action Recommended The treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Indication(s)/Population(s) (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) (if applicable) antibody positive CDER Clinical Review Template 1 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4654184 Clinical Review Lawrence Rodichok MD BLA 761149 Enspryng/satralizumab-mwge Table of Contents Glossary ......................................................................................................................................... 11 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................... 14 Product Introduction ...................................................................................................... 14 Conclusions on the Substantial Evidence of Effectiveness ............................................ 14 Benefit-Risk Assessment ................................................................................................ 14 Patient Experience Data ................................................................................................. 17 2. Therapeutic Context .............................................................................................................. 19 Analysis of Condition ...................................................................................................... 19 Analysis of Current Treatment Options ......................................................................... 20 3. Regulatory Background ......................................................................................................... 22 U.S. Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ............................................................. 22 Summary of Presubmission/Submission Regulatory Activity ........................................ 22 Foreign Regulatory Actions and Marketing History ....................................................... 23 4. Significant Issues from Other Review Disciplines Pertinent to Clinical Conclusions on Efficacy and Safety................................................................................................................. 23 Office of Scientific Investigations (OSI) .......................................................................... 23 Product Quality .............................................................................................................. 23 Clinical Microbiology ...................................................................................................... 23 Nonclinical Pharmacology/Toxicology ........................................................................... 23 Clinical Pharmacology .................................................................................................... 24 Devices and Companion Diagnostic Issues .................................................................... 24 Consumer Study Reviews ............................................................................................... 24 5. Sources of Clinical Data and Review Strategy ....................................................................... 24 Table of Clinical Studies .................................................................................................. 25 Review Strategy .............................................................................................................. 25 6. Review of Relevant Individual Trials Used to Support Efficacy ............................................. 25 Study 309JG; bn40900. A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Satralizumab-mwge (SA237) As Monotherapy In CDER Clinical Review Template 2 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4654184 Clinical Review Lawrence Rodichok MD BLA 761149 Enspryng/satralizumab-mwge Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and Neuromyelitis Optic Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) ................................................................................................................................... 26 Study Design............................................................................................................ 26 Study Results ........................................................................................................... 35 6.2 Study 307JG; bn40898; A Multicenter, Randomized, Addition To Baseline Treatment, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled, Phase 3 Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety of Satralizumab-mwge (SA237) In Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) And NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD) .................................................................................................... 58 6.2.1 Study Design............................................................................................................ 58 6.2.2 Study Results ........................................................................................................... 62 7 Integrated Review of Effectiveness ....................................................................................... 86 7.2 Assessment of Efficacy Across Trials .............................................................................. 86 7.2.1 Primary Endpoints ................................................................................................... 86 7.2.2 Secondary and Other Endpoints ............................................................................. 86 7.2.3 Subpopulations ....................................................................................................... 86 7.2.4 Dose and Dose-Response........................................................................................ 86 7.2.5 Onset, Duration, and Durability of Efficacy Effects ................................................ 86 7.3 Additional Efficacy Considerations ................................................................................. 87 7.3.1 Considerations on Benefit in the Postmarket Setting ............................................ 87 7.3.2 Other Relevant Benefits .......................................................................................... 87 7.4 Integrated Assessment of Effectiveness ........................................................................ 87 8 Review of Safety .................................................................................................................... 87 8.2 Safety Review Approach ................................................................................................ 87 8.3 Review of the Safety Database ...................................................................................... 87 8.3.1 Overall Exposure ..................................................................................................... 87 8.3.2 Relevant characteristics of the safety population: ................................................. 88 8.3.3 Adequacy of the safety database: .......................................................................... 88 8.4 Adequacy of Applicant’s Clinical Safety Assessments .................................................... 88 8.4.1 Issues Regarding Data Integrity and Submission Quality ....................................... 89 8.4.2 Categorization of Adverse Events ........................................................................... 89 8.4.3 Routine Clinical Tests .............................................................................................. 89 CDER Clinical Review Template 3 Version date: September 6, 2017 for all NDAs and BLAs Reference ID: 4654184 Clinical Review Lawrence Rodichok MD BLA 761149 Enspryng/satralizumab-mwge 8.5 Safety Results ................................................................................................................. 89 8.5.1 Deaths ..................................................................................................................... 89 8.5.2 Serious Adverse Events ........................................................................................... 89 8.5.3 Dropouts and/or Discontinuations Due to Adverse Effects ................................... 94 8.5.4 Significant Adverse Events ...................................................................................... 95 8.5.5 Treatment Emergent Adverse Events and Adverse Reactions ............................... 95 8.5.6 Laboratory Findings .............................................................................................. 104 8.5.7 Vital Signs .............................................................................................................. 121 8.5.8 Electrocardiograms

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    140 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us