Los Angeles' “Clean Up, Green Up” Ordinance: a Victory in the Environmental Justice Fight

Los Angeles' “Clean Up, Green Up” Ordinance: a Victory in the Environmental Justice Fight

Los Angeles’ “Clean Up, Green Up” Ordinance: A Victory in the Environmental Justice Fight BY CARLA J. KIMBROUGH Instead of fighting discrete battles, Communities for researchers, and foundation officials worked collec- a Better Environment, a California environmental tively to create a narrative that showed the impact justice organization, declared war against the pol- of living among polluters. The groups also used lution that plagues neighborhoods where people of the time to find allies in neighborhoods, including color and poor people live. As part of that war dec- residents and business owners, and in the broader laration, the group became a part of a coalition to community. fight environmental racism. The strategy focused on executing a ground game—block by block, finding truth and building alliances. Unending Small Wins Prompted Need for Bigger Change The result of that hard work was new legislation Darryl Molina Sarmiento, Southern California passed unanimously in April 2016 by the Los Angeles program director for Communities for a Better City Council and signed by Mayor Eric Garcetti. Environment (CBE), told part of the story of how The ordinance, commonly known as Clean Up CUGU came to be. CBE had been on the battlefield Green Up or CUGU, created a way that three largely for years, going from one fight against environmen- Latino neighborhoods would begin to see concrete tal racism to the next. measures for securing environmental justice after years of living in the shadow of industries that pol- CBE created toxic tours, which highlight the oil luted air, water, and land. refineries, seaports, recycling plants, and high- way traffic that dominate the landscape shared by Called “historic” and “cutting edge,” the ordinance homes, schools, daycare centers, and ballfields. The creates “green zones” in Boyle Heights, Pacoima/ group also found people who lived in the neigh- Sun Valley, and Wilmington, neighborhoods that borhoods and who suffered health ailments, from score in the topDraft 25 percent of census tracts deemed coughs to cancer. as overburdened by California’s Office of Environ- mental Health Hazard Assessment. Some parts of The group mobilized residents to fight a power these neighborhoods are in the top 10 percent of the plant, force removal of roadway rubble, and state’s most vulnerable areas. demand higher air quality standards. The organiza- tion would spend time and resources on one issue, Under this policy, new and expanding businesses only to be called into battle once again. must reduce the environmental impact on neigh- boring residents with buffer areas, landscaping, and “We needed something that was more sweeping,” other measures. Another measure mandates higher she said of the group’s need for a new approach. air filtration standards in new developments within 1,000 feet of a freeway. The ordinance also created So, CBE looked for how the communities they an ombudsperson to assist local businesses with fought on behalf of were affected. The answers implementing these new regulations. were found in the people who have little access to health clinics and gyms, have lower incomes, expe- This victory took a long time—10 years—and rience language barriers, and who live in neighbor- relied on many collaborations. During that decade, hoods saddled with factors that limit healthy living, community organizations and residents, academic such as the nearby factories, highway exposure, © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) 30 National Civic Review • DOI: 10.1002/ncr.21309 • Spring 2017 A Publication of the National Civic League oil refineries, and other businesses that pollute the Pastor, a professor of sociology and American stud- environment. ies and ethnicity, now works at the University of Southern California where he also serves as director CBE already had established a relationship with Lib- of USC’s Program for Environmental and Regional erty Hill Foundation, a social justice organization Equity. Through Pastor’s work with Liberty Hill, that assists grassroots activities related to commu- Sadd said they discovered that they, as academic nity organizing. Together, in 1996, they established researchers, shared common issues with community the Los Angeles Collaborative for Environmental groups such as CBE. Health and Justice—in short, the Collaborative— that combined academic expertise and community Calling community groups such as CBE “important knowledge to fight for healthy living conditions and stakeholders,” Sadd said these organizations have to study and support the new field of environmental information researchers could not get anywhere else, justice. and they also helped sharpen the focus of research. In December 2010, the expanded collaborative— “We think we do better research because of the col- nine organizations strong—published the 33-page laboration,” Sadd said. “We found colleagues that report Hidden Hazards.1 The report added more we consider equals.” evidence to the discussion of environmental impacts and offered recommendations to government offi- Sadd, though, emphasized that researchers have cials about addressing the hazards of living close to maintained their integrity as they conduct their pollution sources. work. For example, research may not support a belief for which a community group seeks valida- The report, which was built in part on a ground tion. When that happens, researchers and commu- game, used a process that had been honed over the nity groups still enjoy “great mutual respect” and years. James Sadd, a professor of environmental sci- trust, Sadd said. ence at Occidental College, was one of the academic researchers who became interested in environmen- “We’re not doing advocacy research,” Sadd said, tal justice and, as a result, later became involved in even though advocacy around environmental jus- collaborating with community organizers. tice is “frankly right.” Sadd said he owes his interest in environmental Both data and community knowledge have been justice to two ofDraft his students who were enrolled in key to the success of their work. The researchers an interdisciplinary environmental class he taught. had official government databases of businesses One day, the students, who he described as “really and aerial imagery, but that information didn’t line smart and kind of courageous,” told him that his up with what community residents knew, and they work in spatial analysis could be applied in the told him so. Sadd realized that something different examination of hazardous waste. They asked to do had to be done; they had to go out into the neigh- a research project, to which Sadd agreed. borhoods and find the truth. The process became known as “ground truthing.” “I had never seen results so startlingly obvious,” Sadd said of the relationship between race and “It was my idea because the community helped me income and exposure to hazardous waste. realize it,” Sadd said. Ground truthing started with training the people Pairing Academic Researchers, Community and then sending out small teams with notebooks, Organizers Became A Strategy maps, photos, data-entry forms, and portable GPS That eye-opening experience led him to become receivers into designated areas. More than sixty involved in researching environmental justice. He people went street by street in six neighborhoods joined a colleague, Manuel Pastor, who had ties and documented what occupied the land. They veri- to Liberty Hill Foundation, to do such research. fied and added information. National Civic Review DOI: 10.1002/ncr Spring 2017 31 By the summer of 2008, the teams had finished the “The complex problem of reducing exposure to neighborhood expeditions. Once all information toxic hazards in our communities can appear was collected, verified, and synthesized, the “Hid- overwhelming and intractable to most policy- den Hazards” report featured their findings. makers and community residents,” the report said. “However, we have found the following Ultimately, they discovered numerous errors in reg- framework helpful in conceptualizing the prob- ulatory databases, and they learned that many more lem and identifying the steps that are necessary polluters were absent from databases, sometimes to lower health risk while moving towards resil- due to their smaller sizes. They noted that the envi- ient and vibrant local economies.” (p. 24). ronmental impact of smaller businesses clustered in small area can be just as significant as a larger busi- The framework used a three-pronged approach ness. Sometimes, the air pollution levels exceeded focused on prevention (preventing more hazards in state recommendations. overburdened communities), mitigation (cleaning up and reducing existing hazards), and revitaliza- Among the pollution sources included in their tion (using economic revitalization approaches and research were vehicle repair shops, auto body/paint green technologies to transform these neighbor- shops, dry cleaners, printing facilities as well as hoods into healthy, sustainable areas with jobs). idling vehicles, truck traffic in neighborhoods, and The Collaborative’s framework included 11 policy large containers that might hold chemicals. options designed to work together to comprehen- sively battle environmental problems. They also found that these polluters were closer than previously known to “sensitive” areas, such Specifically, the report asked the city to incor- as homes, churches, schools, playgrounds, daycare porate the various practices.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us