1 State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) STATE ANNUAL ACTION PLAN (SAAP) (F.Y. 201 7-2018) State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) TABLE OF CONTENTS Checklist Consolidated State Annual Action Plan of all ULBs to be sent for Assessment by MoUD (as per table 6.2) 3-4 Benchmark for SAAP submission 5 Minutes of State High Powered Steering Committee (SHPSC meeting) 6-14 Chapter 1 Project Background and Summary 15-17 Chapter 2 Review of SAAPs 18-42 Chapter 3 State Annual Action Plan ( SAAP) 43 1. Principles of Prioritization 43 2. Importance and O&M 48 3. Reform implementation 50 4. Annual Capacity Building Plan 51 5. A & O.E. 53 6. Financing of projects 53 Chapter 4 Tables 55-88 2 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) Consolidated State Annual Action Plan of all ULBs to be sent for Assessment (As per Table 6.2) Sr. Points of Consideration Yes Give Details No. /No 1. Have all the Cities prepared SLIP as Yes The SLIPs for the 44 Mission per the suggested approach? cities have been formulated in accordance with the Guidelines under the Mission. 2. Has the SAAP prioritized cities for Yes The State has prioritized proposed investment as per priority sectors and investment across cities based on gap assessment? the basis of existing Service Levels in Water Supply & Sewerage Sector and the financial status of the Mission Cities. 3. Is the indicator wise summary of Yes Indicator wise summary of improvements proposed (both improvement proposed for investments and management investment and management is in improvements) by State in place? place. 4. Have all the cities under Mission Yes The Mission Cities have identified identified/done baseline assessments and carried out the Base Line of service coverage indicators? Assessment of service coverage indicators. 5. Is the SAAP derived from an Yes SAAP has been derived from the approach towards meeting Service basis of the gaps in the service Level Benchmarks agreed by level. Ministry for each Sector? 6. Is the investment proposed Yes Investment proposed is commensurate to the level of commensurate to the level of improvement envisaged in the service level improvement as indicator? envisaged in the said indicator. 7. Are State Share and ULB share in Yes State & ULB share is in line with line with proposed Mission the proposed Mission approach. approach? 8. Is there a need for additional Yes Required efforts have already resources and have state considered been taken to mobilize additional raising additional resources (State resources through 14th Finance programs, aided projects, additional Commission and other state devolution to cities, 14th Finance programmes or other resources. Commission, external sources)? 3 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) 9. Does State Annual Action Plan Yes SAAP verifies that cities have verify that the cities have undertaken undertaken & identified revenue financial projections to identify requirements for repayments and revenue requirements for O&M and O&M. repayments? 10. Has the State Annual Action Plan Yes State Annual Action Plan has considered the resource mobilization considered the resource capacity of each ULB to ensure that mobilization capacity & financial ULB share can be mobilized? status of ULBs. Additional resources if needed is being mobilized through user charges and through various financial institutions by the ULBs themselves. 11. Has the process of establishment of Yes Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, PDMC been initiated and a state owned authority is the completed? PDMC under the Mission. 12. Has a roadmap been prepared to Yes The resource potential of each realize the resource potential of the ULB has been taken into account ULB? while preparing the SAAP and road map is prepared. 13. Is the implementation plan for Yes The implementation plan for projects and reforms in place projects & Reforms is in place. (Timelines and yearly milestones)? All the reforms will be implemented in the timeline given in the SAAP. 14. Has the prioritization of projects in Yes Prioritization of projects has been ULBs been done in accordance with done taking into account the gap para 7.2 of the guidelines? in service levels in accordance with paragraph 7.2 of the guidelines. 4 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) Benchmarks for SAAP Submission 1. At least 25% of SAAP – I amount should have been contracted Yes, Contracts of 34 % of SAAP-I amount is awarded 2. At least 50% of SAAP – I and SAAP – II should have their DPR approved. Yes, 75 % DPR of SAAP I & II are approved. 3. 100 % of Central fund and corresponding State share against the SAAP – I and SAAP –II to be transferred to the State Mission Directorate/ ULBs/ Parastatals 100 % Central share along with state share has been transferred to Mission Directorate/ ULB account. 4. PDMC should have been appointed and in place PDMC is appointed and is in place 5. Regarding Credit Rating , work must be awarded for all Mission Cities and Credit Rating targeted to be completed by March 2017 Work Order of Credit rating has been given. 6. Satisfaction of the progress and assurance regarding adoption of Model Building Byelaws, w.r.t its 14 essential features by January,2017 Yes 5 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) SHPSC MINUTES 6 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) Urban Development Department Government of Maharashtra Minutes of Eighth Meeting of State High Powered Committee (SHPSC) The meeting of SHPSC was held on 07/03/2017 at 1:00 pm under the Chairmanship of Shri. Sumit Mullick, Chief Secretary, Government of Maharashtra. 2. The following Members were present for the meeting. Sr. Name and Designation No. 1 Mr. Sanjay Kumar Member Additional Chief Secretary, Housing Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32. 2 Mrs. Vandana Krishna Member Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 3 Mrs. Manisha Patankar-Mhaiskar Member Principal Secretary Urban Development Department-II, Convener Mantralaya. 4 Mr. Virendra Singh Member Commissioner and Director of Municipal Administration,Worli, Mumbai. 5 Shri. Shrirang Landge Member Joint Secretary, Urban Development-I, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 (Representative of Principal Secretary, Urban Development-I) 6 Shri. Prakash Mahajan Member Joint Secretary, Forest Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 (Representative of Secretary, Forest Department) 03. At the outset the Member Convener of the committee, Principal Secretary UDD-II & State Mission Director welcomed all the members of the SHPSC. A brief presentation on the proposed SAAP 2017-18 was made by the Mission Director. 7 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) 04. The following was presented before the committee. 4.1 In accordance with the needs & service level gaps in the mission cities the department has prioritised the sector of water supply, sewerage & Storm Water Drainage for the third year of the mission. 4.2 As per the requirement & gap analysis, sewerage facility & reuse of waste water has been given the second priority. 4.3 Funds have been earmarked for the green spaces @ 2.5 % of SAAP Cost & activities will be identified subsequently. 4.4 The State Govt. has appointed Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran (MJP) the State owned Technical Authority for Water Supply & Sanitation as Project Development and Management Consultant during the Mission period. 4.5 The SLIPS & the SAAP have therefore been developed and prepared with the assistance of the MJP. 4.6 It was further informed that since most of the Mission cities lack in adequate technical staff to handle the Mission activities the Cabinet has approved appointment of MJP for Technical Assistance & guidance to the ULBs for implementation of projects at Mission city level. 4.7 The projects would therefore be executed and implemented by an MoU between State Government, Mission Cities & MJP. 4.8 The Funding Pattern: Sr. Population of the GoI Share GoM Share ULB No Mission City Share 1 2 3 4 5 1 Less Than 10 Lac 50 % 25 % 25 % 2 More than 10 Lac 33.33% 16.67% 50% Overall GoM share will not be less than 20 % of the SAAP (as per Guideline 7.4). 4.9 Mobilisation of funds by the ULBs: a) By Dovetailing funds available under the 14th Finance Commission and other Grants. b) Through loans from Financial Institutions etc. 8 | P a g e State Annual Action Plan (SAAP) c) Levy of User charges etc. 4.10 SHPSC was informed that DPRs under the SAAP will include Operation and Maintenance cost for at least a period of five years, to be paid to the Contractor for the O & M activities he is supposed to carry out during the period of 5 years. But the O &M cost will be borne by the ULBs through levy of user charges or other revenue streams. However, for the purpose of allocation of GoI grant, the O&M cost will be excluded from project cost. The ULBs will fund the O&M through an appropriate cost recovery mechanism like user charges etc. in order to make them self-reliant and cost effective. 4.11 Reforms Action Plan:- SHPSC was informed that during the Mission period, 11 Reforms with 54 milestones have to be implemented by the State and Mission Cities. Government of India has kept apart 10 % of the annual budget allocation for the Mission from second year onwards and to be given to the States as an incentive for achievement of Reforms. The Mission will give incentives for achievement under Reforms in the previous year, at the start of the succeeding financial year. Accordingly state had received amount of Rs.45.57 Crres for reform implementation in the year of 2015-16. State needs to complete 13 reforms milestones during this year of 2016-17. The timelines and agencies responsible for implementation of each Reform which has to be implemented this year are stated hereunder: Sr.