Manresa Island Traffic Study

Manresa Island Traffic Study

IDGE P R RO B G K R L A A M Walk Bridge Program W Norwalk, CT Manresa Island Traffic Study October 2020 Prepared for: Connecticut Department of Transportation 2800 Berlin Turnpike Newington, Connecticut 06111 Prepared by: WSP USA 500 Winding Brook Drive Glastonbury, Connecticut 06033 The Walk Bridge Program Manresa Island Traffic Study Norwalk, CT October 2020 Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................. i 1 1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Roadway Information.............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Project Study Area Limits........................................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2 Existing Roadway and Intersection Geometry ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.2.1 Martin Luther King Jr. Drive & Monroe Street .................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2.2 South Main Street & Monroe Street/Hanford Place........................................................................................................... 7 2.2.3 South Main Street & Henry Street ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 2.2.4 South Main Street & Woodward Avenue/Concord Street............................................................................................................. 9 2.2.5 WOODWARD Avenue & Grove Street ................................................................................................................................................ 10 2.2.6 Woodward Avenue & route 136 (Burritt Avenue).......................................................................................................................... 11 2.2.7 Woodward Avenue & Route 136 (Meadows Street) ..................................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Land Use .................................................................................................................................................................................. 13 2.4 Multimodal Use....................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 Pedestrian ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.2 Bike………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...…..15 2.4.3 Commuter Rail ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 2.4.4 Transit……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..….17 3 Analysis Methodology .......................................................................................................................... 20 3.1 Traffic Operational Analysis Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Safety Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................................................... 21 4 Traffic Operational Analysis ................................................................................................................ 21 4.1 Traffic Data Collection ........................................................................................................................................................... 21 4.2 Traffic Volumes ....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Traffic Volumes ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 4.2.2 Manresa Island Trip Generation .......................................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.3 Manresa Island Trip Distribution ......................................................................................................................................................... 25 4.2.4 Manresa Island Traffic Volumes .......................................................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Traffic Modeling & Analysis ................................................................................................................................................. 28 i | P a g e The Walk Bridge Program Manresa Island Traffic Study Norwalk, CT October 2020 5 Safety Analysis ...................................................................................................................................... 33 5.1 Crash Summaries .................................................................................................................................................................... 33 5.2 Crash Trends & Patterns ....................................................................................................................................................... 36 5.3 Crash Rates .............................................................................................................................................................................. 38 6 Conclusions & Recommendations ...................................................................................................... 38 Tables Table 2.1: Norwalk Transit District Bus Schedules................................................................................................................................. 18 Table 3.1: Signalized Intersection Level of Service Criteria ............................................................................................................... 20 Table 3.2: TWSC & AWSC Intersection Level of Service Criteria ...................................................................................................... 21 Table 4.1: Traffic Data Sources ..................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Table 4.2: Average Growth Factor ................................................................................................................................................................ 23 Table 4.3: Manresa Island Daily Trip Generation .................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 4.4: Synchro Analysis Results – Martin Luther King Jr. Drive & Monroe Street.............................................................. 29 Table 4.5: Synchro Analysis Results – South Main Street & Monroe St/Hanford Place ........................................................... 30 Table 4.6: Synchro Analysis Results – South Main Street & Henry Street .................................................................................... 30 Table 4.7: Synchro Analysis Results – South Main Street & Woodward Ave/Concord Street ................................................ 31 Table 4.8: Synchro Analysis Results – Woodward Avenue & Grove Street (One-Way Stop Controlled) ............................ 31 Table 4.9: Synchro Analysis Results – Woodward Avenue & Route 136 (Burritt Avenue) ..................................................... 32 Table 4.10: Synchro Analysis Results – Woodward Avenue & Route 136 (Meadows Street) ................................................ 32 Table 4.11: Synchro Analysis Results – Overall Intersection Operations ...................................................................................... 33 Table 5.1: Crashes By Intersection - 3-Year Period ............................................................................................................................... 34 Table 5.2: Crashes By Collision Type & Severity .................................................................................................................................... 35 Table 5.3: Crashes By Road Surface & Light Condition ........................................................................................................................ 36 Table 5.4: Crash Rates ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 38 Figures Figure 1: Project Location

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    149 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us