https://englishkyoto-seas.org/ View the table of contents for this issue: https://englishkyoto-seas.org/2019/04/vol-8-no-1-of-southeast-asian-studies/ Subscriptions: https://englishkyoto-seas.org/mailing-list/ For permissions, please send an e-mail to: [email protected] SOUTHEAST ASIAN STUDIES Vol. 8, No. 1 April 2019 CONTENTS Articles Stéphane RENNESSON Wrestling Beetles and Ecological Wisdom: How Insects Contribute to the Cosmopolitics of Northern Thailand .........................................................................( 3 ) James R. CHAMBERLAIN History that Slithers: Kra-Dai and the Pythonidae ..............................( 25 ) Nguyen Thi My HANH Application of Center-Periphery Theory to the Study of Vietnam-China Relations in the Middle Ages ............( 53 ) Jamshed KHALID Regional Cooperation in Higher Education: Anees Janee ALI Can It Lead ASEAN toward Harmonization? ..................................( 81 ) Nordiana Mohd NORDIN Syed Fiasal Hyder SHAH Yogi Setya PERMANA Politicizing the Fear of Crime in Decentralized Indonesia: An Insight from Central Lombok .....................................................( 99 ) Jakraphan CHAOPREECHA Revitalization of Tradition through Social Media: A Case of the Vegetarian Festival in Phuket, Thailand ..................(117) Book Reviews Keith BARNEY Bruce Shoemaker and William Robichaud, eds. Dead in the Water: Global Lessons from the World Bank’s Model Hydropower Project in Laos. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 2018. ..............................(153) Nathan PORATH Hjorleifur Jonsson. Slow Anthropology: Negotiating Difference with the Iu Mien. Ithaca: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, 2014. .............................................................(157) Iyas SALIM Ooi Keat Gin, ed. Brunei—History, Islam, Society and Contemporary Issues. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2016. ................................................................................(160) Amado Anthony G. Geoffrey B. Robinson. The Killing Season: MENDOZA III A History of the Indonesian Massacres, 1965–66. Oxford and Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018. Jess Melvin. The Army and the Indonesian Genocide: Mechanics of Mass Murder. Rethinking Southeast Asia. Abingdon, Oxon and New York: Routledge, 2018. ..........................(164) Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 49, No. 2, September 2011 Wrestling Beetles and Ecological Wisdom: How Insects Contribute to the Cosmopolitics of Northern Thailand * Stéphane Rennesson** In Northern Thailand, a game that builds upon an uncanny cooperation between human beings and rhinoceros beetles (xylotrupes Gideon) has developed at a high level of refinement and institutionalization. Beetle-fighting is even being widely presented as a marker of the local identity and a local ecological wisdom. In this paper, I will show how it is not so much the coleoptera that symbolize a harmonious connection built by human populations with their natural environment, but rather a question of what happens in the intimate relationship between human beings and insects. Following the way players build on the great alterity between them and the insects, this article will address how the technical and conceptual handling of the beetles shapes pragmatically an original cosmology. It will pay specific attention to the ways players try to connect with their coleopteran by projecting human traits on them and adopting their communication mode. Through these, we can examine how beetles force humans to reflect on their engagement in the world, up to the point where it brings this game onto the stage of political ecology. Keywords: Northern Thailand, beetles, cosmology, ecology, cybernetics, analogy, nature, culture, pragmatism In the campus of Chiang Rai Rajabhat University, one can visit a “museum of life” (phiphithaphan chiwit, พิพิธภัณฑ์ชีวิต). Designed at the end of the twentieth century by local academics, it aims to celebrate the traditional way of life of “Northern Thai people” (khon müang, คนเมือง). Interestingly the museum is structured in two parts where two different practices are exhibited. These practices, thought to be representative of the “Lanna (Thousands of rice fields) culture”—the local culture that flourished in the ancient Principalities situated geographically in the northern part of the contemporary Kingdom * This article is based on three fieldworks. The main one was carried out with Emmanuel Grimaud and Nicolas Césard, with whom I co-authored four articles (2008; 2011; 2012a; 2012b) and an ethnographic film (2013). ** Research Institute on Contemporary Southeast Asia (IRASEC), French National Center of Scientific Research (CNRS), 179 Wireless Road, Lumphini, Phrathumwan, Bangkok 10330, Thailand e-mail: [email protected] Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, April 2019, pp. 3–24 DOI: 10.20495/seas.8.1_3 3 ©Center for Southeast Asian Studies, Kyoto University 4 S. RENNESSON of Thailand—consist of: the fishing of the famous “Mekong giant catfish” (plaa bük, ปลาบึก, pangasianodon gigas) in the Mekong River; and the fighting competitions of Rhinoceros beetles (xylotrupes Gideon), locally called kwaang กวาง่ , maeng kwaang แมงกวาง่ or maeng khaam แมงคาม. The Mekong giant catfish and Rhinoceros beetles are notably highlighted due to their dramatically decreasing populations: both species are endangered because of the rapid development of the region. It is widely assumed that the building of numer- ous dams in the Mekong basin negatively affects the well-being of the giant catfish, whereas the Rhinoceros beetles are becoming scarcer every year because of deforesta- tion and the intensification of chemical use in commercial crops. The museum was thus designed to claim that the relations with the two species speak in favor of the local wisdom of a “harmonious relationship” (khwaam klomkleun, ความกลมกลืน, khwaam saamakkhi, ความสามัคคี) between human populations and their “natural environment” (singwaetlom, สิ่งแวดล้อม), as opposed to a more predator-like relationship in the western model of development. Through the fishing of the biggest and most sought-after fish of the Mekong River (known for its famously unmatched fat meat and its scarcity), one can understand the regional social life. Fishing in itself is quite complicated and requires a certain level of cooperation among villagers to be effective, thus presenting a good opportunity to celebrate the village collectivity. Moreover, the giant catfish also symbolizes the nourish- ing role of the Mekong River, an idea that is discussed in Yos Santasombat’s book, The River of Life. But what about the beetles mentioned earlier that are not even eaten? They cannot be considered utilitarian animals whose force or part of the body would be useful to people. Further, they seem to have no special aesthetic, religious, or ritual value. Neither are the beetles considered pests that pose a nuisance to the peasants. How, then, could they embody an ecological issue or any local predisposition to a sustainable way of life? Yet the local people emphasize the fact that contrary to the rest of Thailand, they do not eat the beetles but play with them (Cf. Fig. 1). In the local idiom, claiming to be respectful of that mere life form is a way to show a higher level of “civilization” (khwam jaroen, ความเจริญ). However, that strategy of differentiation is still thin, all the more because games involving insects can be found elsewhere, especially in Asia. In Japan for example, all kind of bugs are enrolled in games (Laurent 1997), notably Japanese rhinoceros beetles (allomyrina dichotoma), which are a cousin species of the one in ques- tion here (Hoshina and Takada 2012; Takada 2012). But coming back to our xylotrupes Gideon, it has to be specified that they are found all over Southeast Asia, in Southern Australia, and in the Solomon Islands. Many kids throughout these regions play with insects, notably beetles, especially rhinoceros beetles which are among the favorite Wrestling Beetles and Ecological Wisdom 5 Fig. 1 An Advertisement for a Competition That Met Someone’s Interest (Stéphane Rennesson) bugs alongside stag beetles, for example. However, from the information gathered on the subject, it is only in Northern Thailand that the human–coleoptera relationship has reached such a level of refinement and institutionalization. The great development of the rhinoceros beetle fighting game could support the claim made by all the players I met in Northern Thailand during my fieldwork—especially Khun Pairat, the chairman of an international association of kwaang fighting which he founded himself in the early 1990s—that only “people of Northern Thailand” (khon müang) know the “true and deep nature of the rhinoceros beetle” (thammachaat thae khong kwaang, ธรรมชาติแท้ของกวาง่ ). In that regard, the museum gives insights on the life cycle of the animal and the material culture that emerged from the institutionalization of the game. Visitors can thus appreciate the craftsmanship and the imagination of the locals in their designing of equipment meant to breed, take care of, and play with beetles. Yet it is still difficult to frame the real significance of Pairat’s assertion—how the idea of life links, ecologically speaking, people’s and beetles’ own existences. It actually fails to suggest how the numerous competitions of chon kwaang (ชนกวาง่ ) can stir passions among 6 S. RENNESSON a fair part of the regional masculine population every year between September and November, which is the