Genomespecific Introgression Between Wheat and Its Wild Relative

Genomespecific Introgression Between Wheat and Its Wild Relative

doi: 10.1111/jeb.12040 SHORT COMMUNICATION Genome-specific introgression between wheat and its wild relative Aegilops triuncialis C. PARISOD*, C. DEFINOD*, A. SARR*, N. ARRIGO*† &F.FELBER*1 *Laboratory of Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Biology, University of Neuchaˆtel, Neuchaˆtel, Switzerland †Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Keywords: Abstract barbed goatgrass; Introgression of sequences from crop species in wild relatives is of funda- containment strategy; mental and practical concern. Here, we address gene flow between culti- crop-to-wild gene flow; vated wheat and its widespread polyploid relative, Aegilops triuncialis, using genetically modified wheat; 12 EST-SSR markers mapped on wheat chromosomes. The presence of genome-specific introgression; wheat diagnostic alleles in natural populations of the barbed goatgrass hybridization; growing in proximity to cultivated fields highlights that substantial gene mapped EST-SSR; flow occurred when both species coexisted. Furthermore, loci from the A transgene escape. subgenome of wheat were significantly less introgressed than sequences from other subgenomes, indicating differential introgression into Ae. triun- cialis. Gene flow between such species sharing nonhomeologous chromo- somes addresses the evolutionary outcomes of hybridization and may be important for efficient gene containment. have been reported in European agro-ecosystems Introduction (Felber et al., 2007). With the advent of genetically Reproduction between genetically distinct taxa, pro- modified crops, the consequences of introgression on ducing offspring of mixed ancestry (i.e. hybridization), local biota are receiving growing attention (Chapman plays a crucial role in evolution (Arnold, 2006). & Burke, 2006; Kwit et al., 2011). However, interspecific gene flow has been generally The Triticum/Aegilops species complex represents an overlooked, and the factors determining the outcome outstanding model to evaluate crop-to-wild gene flow. of hybridization remain poorly understood (Abbott The cultivated durum wheat (Triticum turgidum; et al., in press). In particular, the impact of spontane- 2n = 4x = 28; genome BA) is an allotetraploid species ous hybridization followed by backcrosses leading to with subgenomes originating from T. uratu (A genome) introgression of genetic material into related species and Ae. speltoides (B genomes), whereas the bread deserves further consideration. Introgression of loci wheat (T. aestivum;2n = x = 42; genome BAD) is an al- from domesticated plants to wild relatives is of funda- lohexaploid species with an additional subgenome (D mental, practical and economic interest (Ellstrand genome) originating from Ae. tauschii (Feldman & Levy, et al., 1999) and therefore represents a convenient 2009). In addition to those species that participated in model to explore the evolutionary significance of wheat evolution, the genus Aegilops presents a great hybridization. The majority of cultivated plants indeed diversity of diploid and polyploid species that have been potentially hybridize at low level with wild species, classified in three natural clusters (i.e. the U, D and A and at least 27 cases of crop-to-wild gene transfer genome clusters) based on conserved karyotypes (Zoh- ary & Feldman, 1962; Kilian et al., 2011). Cultivated wheat and several wild relatives are crossable, resulting Correspondence: Christian Parisod, Laboratory of Evolutionary Botany, in hybrids that occasionally produce viable seeds Institute of Biology, Rue Emile-Argand 11, University of Neuchaˆtel, (reviewed in Kilian et al., 2011). Most of the tetraploid 2000 Neuchaˆtel, Switzerland. Aegilops grow in geographical proximity and present Tel.: +41 32 718 2344; fax: +41 32 718 3001; e-mail: [email protected] phenological overlap with wheat, sustaining occasional 1Present address: Muse´e et Jardins botaniques cantonaux, Avenue de hybridization. Spontaneous hybridization was indeed Cour 14bis, 1007 Lausanne, Switzerland. reported for most of the species from the cluster U ª 2012 THE AUTHORS. J. EVOL. BIOL. 26 (2013) 223–228 JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY ª 2012 EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY 223 224 C. PARISOD ET AL. (Ae. columnaris, Ae. geniculata, Ae. neglecta and Ae. triuncialis) Materials and methods and the cluster D (Ae. cylindrica, Ae. ventricosa;reviewedin Zaharieva & Monneveux, 2006), and wheat is considered Surveyed populations as a ‘moderate risk crop’ for transgene escape (Stewart et al., 2003). However, empirical studies conclusively Eleven and 19 populations of the barbed goatgrass (Aegi- documenting the magnitude of introgression in natural lops triuncialis) were collected in Spain (Europe) and in Aegilops populations are scarce, precluding formal risk California (United States of America; Fig. 1). The present assessment. study characterizes 351 individuals using wheat genome- A recent molecular survey of European populations specific markers (Table 1). The distance from the nearest of three common relatives belonging to the cluster U cultivated field was recorded (irrespective of the crop using anonymous markers provided indirect evidence currently grown), allowing to distinguish between popu- of gene flow from wheat (Arrigo et al., 2011). In par- lations collected ‘close to wheat’ and ‘distant from wheat’ ticular, the tetraploid barbed goatgrass (Ae. triuncialis; (i.e. more than 50 m away from field). As pollen-medi- genomes UC) showed signs of introgression from cul- ated gene flow rarely exceeds 30 m in wheat (Zaharieva tivated wheats. These species only share homeologous & Monneveux, 2006; Matus-Cadiz et al., 2007), this chromosomes, which expectedly hampers pairing and partition is assumed conservative. recombination in resulting hybrids (Sears, 1976), and would be predicted to show limited introgression. As Molecular survey targeting transgenes to specific subgenomes not shared by wild relatives was suggested as a strategy Naturally occurring individuals of Ae. triuncialis were to limit their escape, the molecular mechanisms genotyped with twelve EST-SSR loci mapped on wheat underlying the unpredicted introgression reported in chromosomes using nulli-tetrasomic wheat lines (Zhang Ae. triuncialis need to be further addressed. The pres- et al., 2007). Such genic molecular markers are appro- ent work thus uses suitable interspecific genetic priate for introgression assessment and allow evaluating markers mapped on wheat chromosomes to: (i) dem- genome-specific gene flow. The effectiveness of the onstrate and quantify introgression of cultivated EST-SSR markers in assessing gene flow between wheat wheat sequences into the barbed goatgrass genome in and Ae. triuncialis was evaluated by genotyping 25 Europe, but also in the United States where the spe- cultivated wheat references (tetraploid and hexaploid cies is presently invasive and (ii) document genome-spe- accessions collected during field sampling and from the cific patterns of introgression. The presence of wheat ‘Agroscope Changins-Wa¨denswil’ germplasm) and three diagnostic alleles in natural populations of Ae. triuncialis accessions of pure Ae. triuncialis, Ae. geniculata and offers conclusive evidence of substantial gene flow Ae. cylindrica chosen to represent much of the genetic in the course of species coexistence and reveals diversity present in the species. A total of 37 EST-SSR that wheat subgenomes introgress with differential were initially examined and showed almost no intraspecific effectiveness. allelic variation. Four EST-SSRs markers showing clearly Fig. 1 Gene flow from wheat in naturally occurring populations of its wild relatives Aegilops triuncialis in Spain (Europe) and in California (USA). The proportion of individuals showing introgression from wheat as detected with genome-specific EST-SSR markers is shown in black. The size of the pie chart is proportional to the number of individuals sampled, and populations collected ‘close to wheat’ are marked by a star. ª 2012 THE AUTHORS. J. EVOL. BIOL. 26 (2013) 223–228 JOURNAL OF EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY ª 2012 EUROPEAN SOCIETY FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY Gene flow between wheat and Aegilops 225 Table 1 Sampled populations of Aegilops ¶ triuncialis (Pop) with geographical Genome-specific introgression coordinates (NDD: latitude; EDD: longitude) Pop NDD EDD Dist* N† N † BAD and introgression of cultivated wheat intro subgenomes (B, A or D). Spain, Europe SP1 40.01 À2.96 C 9 4 1 3 4 SP2 39.98 À2.09 C 8 1 1 0 0 SP3 38.26 À5.7C33232300 SP6 41.22 À3.88 C 9 1 0 0 1 SP7 39.22 À1.94 C 12 1 0 0 1 SP8 37.54 À4.34 C 20 1 0 0 1 SP9 39.97 À4.71 C 10 9 9 0 0 SP11 39.17 À6.25 D 14 3 2 0 2 SP12 36.77 À5.27 D 11 0 0 0 0 SP14 37.46 À4.32 D 29 2 0 1 1 SP15 38.15 À3.02 D 10 0 0 0 0 California, USA CA1 37.97 À122.20 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA4 38.11 À120.66 D 10 3 1 1 1 CA5 38.15 À120.61 D 10 2 0 0 2 CA6 38.05 À120.44 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA7 37.86 À120.51 D 10 1 0 0 1 CA8 37.93 À120.63 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA9 38.89 À121.01 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA10 39.08 À121.09 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA11 39.26 À121.03 D 10 1 1 0 0 CA12 39.18 À121.29 D 10 1 0 0 1 CA13 38.57 À121.87 D 10 0 0 0 0 CA14 38.53 À121.97 D 10 2 0 0 2 CA15 38.50 À122.03 D 12 1 0 0 1 CA16 38.48 À122.61 D 8 0 0 0 0 CA17 38.47 À122.62 D 6 0 0 0 0 CA18 38.77 À122.96 D 10 3 1 0 2 CA19 38.83 À123.00 D 10 1 0 0 1 CA20 38.99 À123.08 D 10 1 0 0 1 CA21 39.44 À123.31 D 10 1 1 0 0 Total 351 62 40 5 22 (17.7%) (64.5%) (8.0%) (35.5%) *Distance from nearest cultivated field: close to wheat (C) and distant from wheat (D; i.e. more than 50 m away from field).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us