The Wine Proteins: Origin, Characteristics and Functionality Andrea Curioni

The Wine Proteins: Origin, Characteristics and Functionality Andrea Curioni

<p><strong>The wine proteins: origin, characteristics and functionality </strong></p><p>Andrea Curioni <br>Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Agrarie <br>Centro interdipartimentale per la Ricerca in Viticoltura ed Enologia (CIRVE) </p><p>Università di Padova </p><p>1</p><p>The CIRVE campus in Conegliano </p><p>2</p><p>Protein Structure / Functionality </p><p>Aminoacid sequence </p><p> <strong>Protein </strong></p><p>• <strong>Size </strong>• <strong>Charge </strong></p><p>Protein structure </p><p>• <strong>Hydrophobicity </strong></p><p>Proprieties </p><p><strong>Functionality </strong></p><p> <strong>Environment </strong></p><p>• <strong>pH </strong></p><p><strong>Detectable </strong></p><p>• <strong>Solvent </strong></p><p><strong>effects </strong></p><p>• <strong>Ionic strength </strong>• <strong>Temperature </strong>• <strong>Etc. </strong></p><p>3</p><p>Proteins in wine </p><p><strong>Implications in wine </strong></p><p>–<strong>Hazing of white wines (negative) </strong></p><p>–“Mouthfeel” and aroma –Foam volume and stability </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>4</p><p>Protein Haze in wine </p><p> <strong>Serious quality defect </strong> <strong>Prevention: Protein removal by bentonite treatments </strong></p><p><strong>Bottled wine </strong><br><strong>Precipitation </strong></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>Flocculation </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>Coagulation </strong></li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Bentonite </strong></p><p>Other methods? </p><p><strong>several drawbacks:&nbsp;</strong>• <strong>Loss of aroma </strong></p><p><strong>Knowledge is needed </strong></p><p>• <strong>Cost </strong>• <strong>Waste </strong>• <strong>….. </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>5</p><p>Wine Proteins: Origin </p><p>Where do the wine proteins came from? </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>6</p><p>Wine Proteins: Origin </p><p>• The&nbsp;wine proteins derive from </p><p> <strong>Grape </strong>(mainly): </p><p><strong>involved in wine hazing </strong></p><p> Microorganisms </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>7</p><p>Grape Proteins </p><p>• Accumulate&nbsp;after veraison </p><p>– with&nbsp;sugars </p><p>• <em>Low quantity </em></p><p>– ≈ hundreds mg/Kg </p><p>• <strong>heterogeneous </strong></p><p>- &gt; 300 components </p><p>• <strong>Few main </strong>components </p><p>Pocock et al. (2000) JAFC 48, 1637 </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>8</p><p>The Grape Proteins similar in all the varieties </p><p>Sarry <em>et al.</em>, 2004 <em>Proteomics</em>, <strong>4</strong>, 201 </p><p><strong>pH </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>9</p><p>Grape Proteins: Identification by MS </p><p><strong>PR-proteins </strong></p><p>Sarry <em>et al.</em>, 2004 <em>Proteomics</em>, <strong>4</strong>, 201 </p><p>10 </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>Grape Proteins: the main components </p><p><strong>Pathogenesis related (PR)-Proteins </strong></p><p>– <strong>THAUMATIN-LIKE PROTEINS </strong>(<strong>TLP</strong>, PR 5) </p><p>• ≈ 24 kDa </p><p>– <strong>CHITINASES </strong>(PR 3) </p><p>• ≈ 30 kDa </p><p>– Osmotins – Beta-(1,3)-glucanases </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>11 </p><p>Thaumatin-like Proteins (TLP) </p><p>• Antifungal&nbsp;activity • Expressed&nbsp;mainly in the berry • Several&nbsp;types </p><p>– main:&nbsp;<strong>VvTL1 </strong>(constitutive) – minor&nbsp;: VvTL2&nbsp;(less present in healthy grapes), . </p><p>• Tattersall,&nbsp;et al.&nbsp;(1997). Plant Physiology 114, 759; Pocock et al. (2000) </p><p>• No&nbsp;sweet taste </p><p>• Peng,&nbsp;et al. (1997) J. Agric. Food Chem.,&nbsp;45, 4639 </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>12 </p><p>Chitinases </p><p>• Up&nbsp;to 13 isoforms (4 basic and 9 acidic) Derckel et al.(1996), Plant Sci. 119, 31 • Chitinolitic&nbsp;activity </p><p>• Main:&nbsp;class IV chitinase Robinson et al., 1997 Plant Physiol. 114, 771 </p><p><strong>Catalytic domain </strong></p><p><strong>CHITIN- BINDING DOMAIN </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>13 </p><p>Chitinases </p><p>reduced </p><p><strong>Chitinase activity </strong></p><p>Chitinolytic activity detection after SDS-PAGE of </p><p>grape <strong>berries (1), wine (2) </strong>and pomegranate fruit </p><p>(3) proteins under (A)–(C) reducing and (D)–(F) nonreducing conditions. Gels contained (A), (D) 0.01, (B), (E) 0.05, and (C), (F) 0.10% glycol chitin. In (D)–(E), the arrowheads indicate the chitinase isoform retarded in the presence of glycol chitin. </p><p>Vincenzi and Curioni (2005) Electrophoresis, 26, 60 </p><p>Not reduced </p><p> Chitinase is active in wine  Chitinase can bind chitin </p><p>Percent chitin in the gel </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>0.01 % </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>0.05 % </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>0.10 % </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>14 </p><p>PR-Proteins </p><p><strong>Pathogen defense </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>1. Inducibility by </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>2. Resistance </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>. pathogens <br>. acidic pH </p><p>. solvents <br>. abiotic stress <br>. proteolysis </p><p><strong>Grape</strong>: only in part <br><strong>PR-Proteins are </strong><br><strong>Constitutive </strong></p><p>.<strong>Stable </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>15 </p><p>What happens to the grape proteins during winemaking? </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>16 </p><p>Proteins and winemaking </p><p><strong>Proteins (but not PR-P) </strong></p><p><strong>1. Juice extraction </strong></p><p>•Denaturation (acidic pH) •Degradation (proteases) •Precipitation (tannins) </p><p>• <strong>Low pH </strong></p><p><strong>only PR-proteins </strong></p><p>• <strong>Grape Proteases </strong></p><p><strong>resist </strong></p><p><strong>2. Fermentation </strong></p><p>• <strong>Yeast Proteases </strong></p><p><strong>WINE </strong></p><p>• <strong>Alcohol </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>17 </p><p>Proteins in wine: Quantity </p><p><strong>Low concentration </strong></p><p>10 – 250 mg/L </p><p>Large <strong>variability </strong></p><p>(reported: &lt; 1 mg/L - &gt; 1 g/L). </p><p><em>Are proteins quantified correctly? </em></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>18 </p><p>Quantification by the Smith assay of the protein recovered by the KDS method from different Prosecco and Manzoni Bianco wine samples. Data are expressed in BSA equivalents. </p><p>Vincenzi et al., AJEV 2005 </p><p><strong>N</strong></p><p><strong>°</strong></p><p><strong>Protein concentration wine </strong><br><strong>(mg/L) ± SD </strong></p><p>123456789</p><p><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup><br><strong>14.9 ± 1.9 15.5 ± 1.5 19.7 ± 0.5 15.7 ± 1.6 20.0 ± 0.5 14.2 ± 0.7 12.2 ± 2.6 14.1 ± 1.7 16.9 ± 1.3 14.7 ± 1.8 </strong><br><strong>121.5 ± 2.9 </strong><br><strong>30.5 ± 3.6 30.5 ± 3.6 26.5 ± 1.9 </strong><br><strong>176.1 ± 9.3 </strong><br><strong>328.0 ± 40.5 </strong><br>10 <strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup>11 <strong>Prosecco</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>b </strong></sup>12 <strong>Incrocio Manzoni 6.0.13</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup>13 <strong>Incrocio Manzoni 6.0.13</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup>14 <strong>Incrocio Manzoni 6.0.13</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup>15 <strong>Incrocio Manzoni 6.0.13</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>a </strong></sup></p><p>A</p><p>Commercial bottled wines; </p><p>b</p><p>wine samples taken before bentonite fining. </p><p>16 <strong>Incrocio Manzoni 6.0.13</strong><sup style="top: -0.375em;"><strong>b </strong></sup></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>19 </p><p>Grape/Juice <em>vs </em>Wine </p><p><strong>Grape </strong><br><strong>WWiniene </strong></p><p>Marangon et al. (2009) JAFC, 57, 4415 </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p>2D-PAGE of wine proteins (<em>cv</em>. Manzoni Bianco) (Polesani, 2004, unpublished). </p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>20 </p><p>Wine Proteins: Preparative Purification </p><p><em>1. </em><strong>Cation exchange chromatography </strong></p><p><em>(SCX) for Chardonnay wine . </em></p><p><strong>2. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography </strong></p><p><em>(HIC, Phenyl Sepharose) </em></p><p><strong>SDS-PAGE bands used for MS identification </strong></p><p><em>SDS-PAGE and RP-HPLC profile of purified proteins </em></p><p>Gazzola et al., unpublished </p><p>21 </p><p>Identification by Nano LC-MS/MS </p><p><strong>band </strong></p><p>C 1-2 C 4 </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1"><strong>sequence </strong></li><li style="flex:1"><strong>protein </strong></li></ul><p></p><p>PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera class IV chitinase (CHI4D), mRNA </p><p><strong>Class IV chitinase </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>] </p><p>LOC100232841, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera VVTL1 (LOC100232841), mRNA </p><p><strong>VVTL1 </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>] </p><p>LOC100256970, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera hypothetical protein LOC100256970 (LOC100256970), mRNA <br>C 6-7 α </p><p><strong>Vacuolar invertase 1</strong>, [<em>Vitis Vinifera</em>]. </p><p>LOC100256970, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera hypothetical protein LOC100256970 (LOC100256970), mRNA <br>C 6-7 β </p><p><strong>Vacuolar invertase 1</strong>, [<em>Vitis vinifera</em>]. </p><p>PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera thaumatin-like protein (TL3), mRNA <br>C 6-7 γ </p><p><strong>Thaumatin-like protein </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>] </p><p>D 1-2-3-&nbsp;LOC100232841, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera VVTL1 </p><p><strong>VVTL1 </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>]. </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">4</li><li style="flex:1">(LOC100232841), mRNA </li></ul><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">E 1-2-3 </li><li style="flex:1">Lipid transfer protein isoform 1 [Vitis vinifera] </li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Lipid Transfer Protein 1 </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>]. <strong>VVTL1 </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>]. </p><p>LOC100232841, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera VVTL1 (LOC100232841), mRNA <br>H 4 I 1 <br>LOC100232841, PREDICTED: Vitis vinifera VVTL1 (LOC100232841), mRNA </p><p><strong>VVTL1 </strong>[<em>Vitis vinifera</em>]. </p><p>22 </p><p>Gazzola et al.2011, unpublished </p><p>How do the wine protein behave to form haze? </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>23 </p><p>Proteins and Haze formation </p><p>• 1.&nbsp;Protein <strong>denaturation </strong></p><p>– Limiting step </p><p>• 2.&nbsp;<strong>Interactions </strong>(?) • 3.&nbsp;Insoluble <strong>particles </strong></p><p>formation (invisible) <br>• 4.&nbsp;Aggregation </p><p></p><p><strong>Visible HAZE </strong></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>24 </p><p>Proteins and Haze formation </p><p>• <strong>1. Wine Protein denaturation </strong></p><p>Can be reversible </p><p>– <strong>Temperature </strong>(!) </p><p>– Other factors (?) </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>25 </p><p>Thermal stability of wine proteins </p><p><strong>Chitinase </strong><br><strong>TLP </strong></p><p>Repeated DSC scans of <strong>chitinase </strong>from Sauvignon blanc showing a melt </p><p>temperature of <strong>55 °C</strong>, <strong>no reversibility </strong></p><p>of thermal unfolding </p><p>Repeated DSC scans of <strong>thaumatin-like </strong></p><p><strong>protein </strong>from Semillon showing a melt </p><p>temperature of <strong>61 °C </strong>and some <strong>reversibility </strong>of thermal unfolding. </p><p>Falconer et al.; <em>J. Agric. Food Chem. &nbsp;</em><strong>2010, </strong>58, 975. </p><p>Copyright © 2009 American Chemical Society </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>26 </p><p>Haze formation at 30°C </p><p>Effect of incubation at <strong>30°C for 22 h </strong>on the </p><p>protein composition of wine. <br>(<strong>A</strong>) PAGE&nbsp;of proteins from Sauvignon blanc wine after 22 h at 30 °C. The wine was centrifuged and the obtained pellet washed with model wine. Proteins from 100 μL for control (before heating, C) and supernatant (after heating, S) and from 500 μL </p><p><strong>Chitinase </strong></p><p>of <strong>pellet (after heating, P) </strong>were loaded per </p><p>lane. </p><p>TLP </p><p>(<strong>B</strong>) Reverse phase (C8) HPLC chromatograms of unheated Sauvignon blanc wine (C) and </p><p><strong>supernatant </strong>after 22 h at 30 °C (S). </p><p> <strong>Chitinase is more sensitive than LTP </strong></p><p>Marangon et al; <em>J. Agric. Food Chem. &nbsp;</em><strong>2011, </strong>59, 733-740. </p><p>Copyright © 2010 American Chemical Society </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>27 </p><p>Chitinases and haze </p><p><strong>Wine Treatment with Chitin</strong> specific interaction with the chitin </p><p>binding domain of Chitinases </p><p>Proteins: <strong>- 29% </strong><br>Haze :&nbsp;<strong>- 80% </strong></p><p>(Bentonite: -90%) <br>(Bentonite: -100%) </p><p> <strong>Chitinase is strongly involved in wine hazing </strong></p><p><em>Vincenzi et al. (2005) Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 6:3:246 </em></p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>28 </p><p>Proteins and Haze formation </p><p>The wine proteins do not form haze in model wine, but only in real wines! </p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">model </li><li style="flex:1">real </li></ul><p></p><p><strong>2. interactions with other compounds </strong></p><p>• the&nbsp;“factor(s) X” </p><p>– Sulfate – Tannins </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p><p>29 </p><p>Proteins and Haze formation </p><p>• <strong>Sulfate </strong></p><p>(Pocock et al. <em>JAFC 2007, &nbsp; 55, 1799; </em>Marangon et al. <em>JAFC 2011, &nbsp; 59, 73) </em></p><p><strong>SO</strong><sub style="top: 0.435em;"><strong>4 </strong></sub>&gt; HPO<sub style="top: 0.435em;">4 </sub>&gt; acetate<sup style="top: -0.525em;">- </sup>&gt; Cl<sup style="top: -0.525em;">- </sup>&gt; NO<sub style="top: 0.435em;">3 </sub></p><p><strong>2- </strong></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">2 - </li><li style="flex:1">-</li></ul><p></p><p><strong>Hofmeister series: </strong></p><p>• Remove water </p><p>• Promote <strong>Hydrophobic interactions </strong></p><p>Model wine </p><p>Effect of increasing <strong>sulfate </strong></p><p>concentration on the haze produced by heating wine proteins (150 mg/L) in model wine. </p><p>Effect of protein concentration and composition on haze </p><p>30 </p><p>formed in model wine. </p><p><strong>The wine proteins </strong></p><p><strong>Tarragona 2011 </strong></p>

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    38 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us