The Voice of Transport

The Voice of Transport

elopment ance | Dev nning | Fin Policy | Pla 17 RMATION 20 MEDIA INFO News 13 anuary 2016 LTT687 11 December 2015 - 07 J 14 News .com/ltt nd sportXtra Scotla Tran uth East 2015 s – So October ritorie tober - 29 ting ter 2008 83 16 Oc ion, opera USINESS LTT6 al competit Bus B age potenti al s to encour g potenti takings wa k deterrin the under y is to ris ffect toda ss of but their e acce w ts.” Rail launches revie entran ghlin ews ape McLou 12 N st ging landsc r an - i ch eti ges F The comp char : reased s s ced inc u e ave fa and d tions h cGill’s p i era M s op nd e d ’s a i n t t il a s p s O i a u l ssr a i ro o e b of C r i t e s sigh tG h r l t n ove rs t o of l i in p ncing F s s fina e e of the s 5 r ity u a bil a l da i or B a aff n 1 ed r o- w s CP5 pr ia ie ’ e h 0 ev R of th in ot s r R lexity be used L 2 O comp ll also wi m m g r ie y Andrew Forster lio.” Thameslink o ion fro stron e b ent portfo s t t. by t age ncem r s st b i LE track us g the enha f we Ea IAB din s e d 5 m n THE VAR mme, inclu er and more e h in th cotlan e gra e larg k ac S d 8 v u e respect of th n geco ed in wne 6 renc c ta n -o o t diffe i S ai y T N r ary lines he adds: “This a nstr blicl econd S s co u T al and s le not t s t p L 6 o costs on rur n “on a sca ro- t up i rges tio t p u 2 ARY electrifica lex enhancemen a rstGro the la or- - p RET omp b i is aj r TRANSPORT SEC ng cost (i.e. debt c r “F hich n is m e p e times een financi s n, w hia 4 ch as thre K”. betw e hia Lot b o 3can be as mu re in the U s u Lot As mpted befo wo project d m t. “ m e dered atte es.” These t b y fro Firs rgh e g g hlin has or s gramm n alr ys bu ov n a ain Patrick McLoug ng) and scheme cost h riv ain,” sa f Edin p the m vici U it o N i r than those on nal respon- ser s e in Br City t o highe rganisatio riodic i th ny the 3 i t • unclear o tside NR’s pe t th pa – d 1 c n fice of Rail are funded ou t wi com rity pare x r t a review of the Of re critical following o so bus c autho ts com tu according to a repor etwork became mo c y do publi rb cos E se network, sibilities of the DfT, N , with the ORR S n onl ed by a to abso d lea and Road’s rail responsibilities, tion, where NR review cycles n but ca ity own ter ability r fares an P ed by the Rail Deliv- NR reclassifica o and a grea n lowe commission f its Rail and the ORR no part in determining d t Scotl cil – it has t to sustai rst- al review o playing i s un s i Fi ing a critic e rigorous l Ea Co low l.” (RDG). follow cope of became subject to mor s outh which al rcial riva ery Group ition of the s t n S up, me t • poor defin equirements. f s i rts Gro com 2 t etwork r funding r i n po irst a 01 /l rseeing N ica- thie l tio re F han in 2 role in ove The reclassif ra r to es t an om This seems to be at variance ‘scope creep’ capital controls. lso us ope Forste rating loss n Midlothi ra.c gramme of enhance- schemes, and ntally McLoughlin said he a aking b ndrew higher ope ith depot i rs in the tXt teg’s A Heavy Load to Rail’s pro portfolio tion of NR fundame loss-m hority. A its Dalke ber of yea por with P • poor programme and expected “passengers and oper- s to cut ets Aut oup closed s for a num ns ly 2014) which ments. l increases the oversight required p want Mark Gr eavy losse thian”. Tra Bear report (Ju r of management at Network Rai lay a much greater role stGrou ion and r posting h n from Lo the rvices Dame Colette Bowe, chai uring the affordability of ators to p Fir mpetit “afte competitio 2001 from argued that regional rail se sting errors in ass ities for future the Co significant formed in . the Banking Standards Board, • co re investment.” in developing prior oval of face of cGill’s was operations were being unfairly penalised. iew that insufficient rail infrastructu ior- appr k-based M nverclyde inted by McLoughlin “It is my v g the investments”. “Investment pr Greenoc d West’s I now has d that lightweight regional was appo en by all Alongside announcin a Scotlan , McGill’s G Pteg sai auses of the consideration was giv ities should be more closely le of Arriv 3 vehicles rclyde, DIN cated the same to investigate the c review of the ORR, McLoughlin sa ing with 3 cross Inve VI trains were allo ys three parties [DfT/NR/ORR] to o the franchising pro- a beginn 0 routes a ge). RO ewals cost escalations and dela e DfT was working with aligned t From perating 11 s over pa P T track maintenance and ren deliverability of the enhance- said th han 400, o (see map g EN afflicting Network Rail’s (NR) the pproach to gov- gramme.” more t Glasgow he survivin ND costs as inter-city trains, which amme, as distinct NR on a new a e is shire and s and also t PE enhancement pro- ment progr he aim Bowe emphasises that sh Renfrew dependent irstGroup DE “twenty times the infra- £11.5bn r strategic erning enhancements. “T s bought in in 2012. F NT IN caused nd and Wales from its affordability o not recommending moving away cGill’s ha tland West cross a E e per mile”. gramme for Engla is to provide the Government M Arriva Sco n to First a PM structure damag /15- desirability,” says Bowe. e long-term (five-year) rations of competitio clyde O S & tudy of in control period 5 (2014 the flexibility it needs to from th ope ow offers from Strath EL W EThe RDG initiated its s In an extraordinary passage, with r NR’s routine cGill’s n d services to EV NE C 2018/19). The Great Western nvestment pro- funding model fo says M on tendere “expected | D SIN the charging system in early 2014 the DfT did not even adjust its i mend a and has w First had E IS odernisation programme, Bowe says n future, spending. “I do not recom wide are sport that NC YS has now published its route m R’s role in gramme,” he said. “I ip for Tran NA AL and lectrification understand the OR replacing the periodic review Partnersh rce com- FI AN t detailing its find- comprising e of scope will be formally defined tion of”. up with fie | summary repor and judging the affordability for operations and main- quire a por d FirstGro sgow. ING e in three between London agreed along with an assess- system ac as provide st of Gla N ings. The work was don enhancements. and d renewals agecoach h , to the ea ead AN 9 Oxford/Newbury/ Bristol/ verability, including tenance an St bernauld d head-to-h PL 98 different phases by three different provided to the review ment of deli n in Cum of sustaine t- | d 1 f has been particularly “Views rtainties expenditure,” she says. petitio ear period roup, Firs Y TI Cardif ation of unce r-y rstG IC consultancies (F te that within the Depart- consider wing a fou ach and Fi vy 2015 OL e ly affected, with costs rising indica ts and sched- “Follo en Stageco ere so hea P Consulting/ bad that may affect cos betwe epot w Consulting/LEK 3 ment, it was expected that the mpetition bernauld d it has p licy from £1.6bn to £2.8bn (2012/1 l projects will be subject co at its Cum y 2013 and ambridge Economic Po ng that the port- ules. Al ort of the Bowe Review losses t in Ma . C ORR was assuri ol Rep Group’s n to close i irstGroup p he key finding prices). to a clear change contr ing of Network was take xplains F Associates). T chemes developed into the plann ision ch,” e ti- e’s final report lists a folio of s the dec o Stagecoa ing compe o to be that no major Bow thin the process.” Rail’s enhancement een sold t ced grow appears uld be delivered wi ntly b lso fa urgh t s of contributory factors to co e appropri- 9 is rece ess has a he Edinb t 33 ing and serie e added: “Wher ramme 2014-201 usin ing t Recruitmen changes to the charg unding envelope.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    7 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us