A Phase I Study of Pexidartinib, a Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor Inhibitor, in Asian Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

A Phase I Study of Pexidartinib, a Colony-Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor Inhibitor, in Asian Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors

Investigational New Drugs https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-019-00745-z PHASE I STUDIES A phase I study of pexidartinib, a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor, in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors Jih-Hsiang Lee1 & Tom Wei-Wu Chen2 & Chih-Hung Hsu2,3 & Yu-Hsin Yen2 & James Chih-Hsin Yang2,3 & Ann-Lii Cheng2,3 & Shun-ichi Sasaki4 & LiYin (Lillian) Chiu5 & Masahiro Sugihara4 & Tomoko Ishizuka4 & Toshihiro Oguma4 & Naoyuki Tajima4 & Chia-Chi Lin2,6 Received: 15 January 2019 /Accepted: 7 February 2019 # The Author(s) 2019 Summary Background Pexidartinib, a novel, orally administered small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has strong selectivity against colony- stimulating factor 1 receptor. This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label multiple-dose study evaluated pexidartinib safety and efficacy in Asian patients with symptomatic, advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods Patients received pexidartinib: cohort 1, 600 mg/d; cohort 2, 1000 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 800 mg/d. Primary objectives assessed pexidartinib safety and tolerability, and determined the recommended phase 2 dose; secondary objectives evaluated efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile. Results All11patients(6males,5 females; median age 64, range 23–82; cohort 1 n = 3; cohort 2 n = 8) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event; 5 experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 adverse event, most commonly (18%) for each of the following: increased aspartate aminotransfer- ase, blood alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and anemia. Recommended phase 2 dose was 1000 mg/d for 2 weeks and800mg/dthereafter.Pexidartinibexposure,areaundertheplasmaconcentration-timecurvefromzeroto8h(AUC0-8h), and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) increased on days 1 and 15 with increasing pexidartinib doses, and time at Cmax (Tmax) was consistent throughout all doses. Pexidartinib exposure and plasma levels of adiponectin and colony-stimulating factor 1 increased following multiple daily pexidartinib administrations. One patient (13%) with tenosynovial giant cell tumor showed objective tumor response. Conclusions This was the first study to evaluate pexidartinib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors. Pexidartinib was safe and tolerable in this population at the recommendedphase2dosepreviouslydeterminedforWesternpatients (funded by Daiichi Sankyo; clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02734433). Keywords Tenosynovial giant cell tumor . Pexidartinib . Pharmacokinetics . Safety . Solid tumors Introduction Pexidartinib is a novel, orally administered small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with strong selective activity * Chia-Chi Lin against the colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) [1]; [email protected] the receptors KIT and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 internal 1 National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu Branch No. 25, Lane tandem duplication mutation (FLT3-ITD) are also inhibited 442, Sec. 1, Jingguo Rd, Hsinchu City 300, Taiwan [2]. Based on these targets, pexidartinib may inhibit tumor 2 National Taiwan University Hospital, 7 Chung Shan S Rd, growth directly by blocking the oncogenic drivers colony- Taipei 10002, Taiwan stimulating factor 1 (CSF1), tyrosine protein kinase KIT (c- – 3 Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College KIT), and FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) [3 6], or indi- of Medicine, 7 Chung Shan S Rd, Taipei 10002, Taiwan rectly by modulating the tumor microenvironment and affect- – 4 Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 1-2-58 Hiromachi, Shinagawa-ku, ing interactions between stromal and tumor cells [7 9]. Tokyo 140-8710, Japan Pexidartinib may also hinder tumor progression by blocking – 5 Daiichi Sankyo Co., Ltd., 7F-1, No. 308, Sec. 2, Bade Rd, migration and angiogenesis of the tumor cell [10 12]. Zhongshan Dist., Taipei City 104, Taiwan The utility of pexidartinib in treating patients with cancer 6 Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University was initially evaluated in a phase I study of Western patients College of Medicine, 7 Chung Shan S Rd, Taipei 10002, Taiwan with solid tumors [1]. In the dose-escalation part of the study Invest New Drugs (n = 41), grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events Materials and methods (AEs) occurred in 11/41 patients (27%), and those occurring in more than 1 patient included anemia, increase in aspartate Patients aminotransferase (AST) level, and decrease in lymphocyte count (with each event occurring in 2 patients [5%]). A total Eligible patients were age 20 or older and had a histologically of 8 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in 5 (12%) pa- confirmed solid tumor that had relapsed from or was refracto- tients. The steady-state (day 15) median exposures, maximum ry to standard treatment, or for which standard treatment was observed plasma concentration (Cmax), and area under the not available. Female patients were required to have a nega- plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0–24) tive serum pregnancy test within 14 days prior to treatment generally increased with increasing dose, and the median time allocation, be surgically sterile, or be postmenopausal for to Cmax (Tmax) values ranged from 1 to 2 h. In the extension ≥1 year; male and female patients of childbearing potential part of study (n = 23), pexidartinib treatment resulted in a 52% were required to use a highly effective contraception method overall response rate (ORR) and an 83% disease control rate throughout the study and for up to 90 days after completion. by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 Additional inclusion criteria were Eastern Cooperative (RECIST v1.1) in patients with recurrent or inoperable Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1; life tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) [1]. expectancy of ≥3 months; adequate hematologic, hepatic, and This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label multiple-dose renal function; resolution (≤ grade 1 or baseline) of all toxic- study is the first to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic ities from previous cancer therapy; and adequate treatment profiles of pexidartinib in Asian patients with advanced solid washout period before registration. Patients were excluded if tumors. they had previous use of pexidartinib or any biologic Fig. 1 Schematic of overall study 600 mg/d design and plan. DLT, dose- (cohort 1) limiting toxicity; MTD, 3 patients maximum tolerated dose; SMC, safety monitoring committee 0/3 patient DLT 1/3 patient DLT ≥2/3 patient DLT Add 3 patients SMC assesses 1/6 patient DLT ≥2/6 patient DLT if 400 mg/d is appropriate 1000 mg/d (cohort 2) 3 patients SMC assesses if 800 mg/d is appropriate or discusses whether ≤1/3 patient DLT ≥2/3 patient DLT to reopen cohort 1 and expend up to a total of 6 patients if ≥3/6 patient DLT 3 patients were initially evaluated Add 3 patients SMC assesses if 800 mg/d 2/6 patient DLT is appropriate or discusses whether to add 3 patients for ≤1/6 patient DLT 1000 mg/d evaluation MTD ≤2/9 patient DLT Invest New Drugs treatment targeting CSF1 or CSF1R, active primary central the evening) for the first 2 weeks and 800 mg/d (400 mg twice nervous system tumors or brain metastases, history of lung per day, in the morning and evening) thereafter (Fig. 1).The or heart disease (congestive heart failure, myocardial infarc- decrease in dose from 1000 to 800 mg/d after 2 weeks was tion, or unstable angina), or Fridericia-corrected QT interval based on a previous phase I study, in which many TGCT (QTcF) ≥450 ms (men) or ≥ 470 ms (women). In addition, any patients required dose modification [1]. Each treatment cycle patients with refractory nausea and vomiting, active or chronic was 28 days. Treatment continued until patient’s consent with- infection with hepatitis C, active tuberculosis, or uncontrolled drawal, disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. The infection requiring intravenous injection of antibiotics, antivi- maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was determined when no rals, or antifungals were excluded. All patients provided writ- more than 1 of 6 patients experienced a DLT during cycle 1, ten informed consent. which in turn determined the recommended phase 2 dose. The Institutional Review Board at each participating center Study design and treatment approved the study; ethics were in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice guidelines This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label multiple-dose study of the International Conference on Harmonisation. The study was conducted at the National Taiwan University Hospital. is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02734433. The study had a dose-escalation 3 + 3 design (June 2016 to June 2017), comprising two dose levels (cohort 1 and cohort Study objectives and endpoints 2). Patients in cohort 1 received 600 mg/d (200 mg in the morning and 400 mg in the evening); patients in cohort 2 The primary objectives were to assess the safety and tolerabil- received 1000 mg/d (400 mg in the morning and 600 mg in ity of pexidartinib and to determine the recommended phase 2 Eligible patients (N = 12) Nonrandomized to receive pexidartinib (N = 11) Cohort 1 (n = 3) Cohort 2 (n = 8) Intention-to-treat analysis Intention-to-treat analysis (n = 3) (n = 8) Safety analysis set Safety analysis set (n = 3) (n = 8) 3 excluded • Lack of tumor assessment at Effi cacy analysis set Effi cacy analysis set baseline or postbaseline (n = 3) (n = 5) Dose-limiting toxicities Dose-limiting toxicities 2 excluded n n analysis set ( = 3) analysis set ( = 6) • Low compliance with study drug Pharmacokinetic Pharmacokinetic (cycle 1) analysis set (n = 3) analysis set (n = 8) • Patient withdrawal Pharmacodynamic Pharmacodynamic analysis set (n = 3) analysis set (n = 7) 1 excluded • Lack of postdose pharmacodynamic measurements Discontinued pexidartinib (n = 2) Discontinued pexidartinib (n = 8) • Withdrawal by patient (n = 1) • Withdrawal by patient (n = 2) • Disease progression (n = 1) • Disease progression (n = 5) • Clinical progression (n = 1) Continued to extended part (n = 1) Continued to extended part (n = 0) Fig. 2 CONSORT diagram Invest New Drugs dose. The safety endpoints included treatment-emergent ad- lesions by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    12 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us