Master S Thesis

Master S Thesis

A Critical Discourse Study of Hillary Clinton’s 2015/2016 Presidential Campaign Discourses Aalborg University Spring 2016 Ida Jensen Ida Koch Jakobsen Lonnie Helene Pichler Abstract In the light of the 2016 American presidential election, the thesis uncovers underlying discursive structures in Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign discourse. This is done through the use of the theory and methodology of Critical Discourse Analysis and corpus linguistics. The specific aim is to identify elements of gender references, persuasive techniques and social inclusion and exclusion. The primary analysis (with focus on Clinton’s Campaign Launch Speech from June 2015) shows that the campaign launch discourse relies heavily on constructed frames, such as the family frame and the battle frame. Furthermore, gender references are marked by implicitness, and Clinton performs both stereotypical masculine and feminine genders. Also, we found elements of rhetorical tools of persuasion as well as examples relating to George Lakoff’s family models in American politics. As for social inclusion and exclusion, Clinton’s use of pronouns revealed her attitude towards her supporters and opponents alike. The secondary analysis is a corpus-based analysis with focus on comparing selected aspects from the primary analysis. Finally a discussion of the analytical findings concludes the thesis. According to our results, it might seem that Clinton’s main purpose of her campaign discourses is to construct a narrative of herself as President of the United States of America, and additionally, she pushes the boundaries of the historical perception of the American presidency in regards to gender. 2 1.Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................... 7 2. Theory ...................................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Critical Discourse Analysis .................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 Meaning in speech act theory ............................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Intertextuality and interdiscursivity ............................................................................................. 12 2.4 Framing .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Gendered discourse ................................................................................................................................. 14 2.5.1 Lexical and syntactical differences ......................................................................................... 15 2.5.2 Performative gender ...................................................................................................................... 17 2.6 Rhetorical tools of persuasion ........................................................................................................... 18 2.7 Metaphorical structures in American political rhetoric ...................................................... 19 2.7.1 The Strict Father model ................................................................................................................ 20 2.7.2 The Nurturant Parent model ..................................................................................................... 21 2.8 Grammar ....................................................................................................................................................... 23 2.8.1 Pronouns and deixis ....................................................................................................................... 23 2.8.2 Personal pronouns .......................................................................................................................... 24 2.8.3 Possessive pronouns ...................................................................................................................... 26 2.9 Conjunctions ................................................................................................................................................ 27 2.9.1 The coordinating conjunction ‘but’ ........................................................................................ 27 2.9.2 The subordinating conjunction ‘if’ .......................................................................................... 27 3. Methodology ....................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.1 CDA ................................................................................................................................................................... 29 3.1.1 Discussion of CDA ............................................................................................................................. 30 3.2 Corpus linguistics ..................................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.1 Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies......................................................................................... 31 3.2.1.1 Specialized corpus ......................................................................................................................... 32 3.2.2 AntConc.................................................................................................................................................. 33 3.3 Analysis of data .......................................................................................................................................... 34 4.1 Primary analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 36 4.1.1 Intertextuality .................................................................................................................................... 36 4.1.1.1 Franklin Roosevelt ........................................................................................................................ 36 4.1.1.2 Bill Clinton & Barack Obama ................................................................................................... 38 4.1.1.3 The Beatles ...................................................................................................................................... 40 4.1.2 Framing ................................................................................................................................................. 41 4.1.3 Gendered discourse ........................................................................................................................ 46 3 4.1.4 Persuasive techniques ................................................................................................................... 51 4.1.5 Family Models .................................................................................................................................... 57 4.1.6 Pronouns .............................................................................................................................................. 63 4.1.6.1 The pronouns ‘me’, ‘my’ and ‘I’ .............................................................................................. 63 4.1.6.2 The pronoun ‘you’......................................................................................................................... 73 4.1.6.3 The pronouns ‘we’ and ‘our’ ..................................................................................................... 75 4.1.6.4 The pronouns ‘their’, ‘they’, ‘them’ and ‘themselves’ ....................................................... 78 4.1.7 The coordinating conjunction ‘but’ ........................................................................................ 80 4.2 Corpus analysis .......................................................................................................................................... 84 4.2.1 Pronouns .............................................................................................................................................. 84 4.2.2 Frames ................................................................................................................................................... 86 4.2.2.1 Family frame ................................................................................................................................... 86 4.2.2.2 Patriotic frame ................................................................................................................................ 90 4.2.2.3 Battle frame ..................................................................................................................................... 91 4.2.2.4 Republican frame .......................................................................................................................... 95 4.2.2.5 Prosperity frame ............................................................................................................................. 96 4.2.3 Keyness in the CLS ........................................................................................................................... 99 4.2.3.1 Americans

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    188 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us