How Do Seemingly Non-Vagile Clades Accomplish Trans-Marine Dispersal?

How Do Seemingly Non-Vagile Clades Accomplish Trans-Marine Dispersal?

Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on May 3, 2017 How do seemingly non-vagile clades rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org accomplish trans-marine dispersal? Trait and dispersal evolution in the landfowl (Aves: Galliformes) Research Peter A. Hosner1,2, Joseph A. Tobias3, Edward L. Braun1 Cite this article: Hosner PA, Tobias JA, Braun and Rebecca T. Kimball1 EL, Kimball RT. 2017 How do seemingly non-vagile clades accomplish trans-marine 1Department of Biology, and 2Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA dispersal? Trait and dispersal evolution in the 3Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK landfowl (Aves: Galliformes). Proc. R. Soc. B PAH, 0000-0001-7499-6224; JAT, 0000-0003-2429-6179 284: 20170210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0210 Dispersal ability is a key factor in determining insular distributions and island community composition, yet non-vagile terrestrial organisms widely occur on oceanic islands. The landfowl (pheasants, partridges, grouse, turkeys, quails and relatives) are generally poor dispersers, but the Old World quail (Coturnix) Received: 31 January 2017 are a notable exception. These birds evolved small body sizes and high-aspect- ratio wing shapes, and hence are capable of trans-continental migrations and Accepted: 3 April 2017 trans-oceanic colonization. Two monotypic partridge genera, Margaroperdix of Madagascar and Anurophasis of alpine New Guinea, may represent additional examples of trans-marine dispersal in landfowl, but their body size and wing shape are typical of poorly dispersive continental species. Here, we estimate Subject Category: historical relationships of quail and their relatives using phylogenomics, and Evolution infer body size and wing shape evolution in relation to trans-marine dispersal events. Our results show that Margaroperdix and Anurophasis are nested within the Coturnix quail, and are each ‘island giants’ that independently evolved Subject Areas: from dispersive, Coturnix-like ancestral populations that colonized and were evolution, genomics, taxonomy and subsequently isolated on Madagascar and New Guinea. This evolutionary systematics cycle of gain and loss of dispersal ability, coupled with extinction of disper- sive taxa, can result in the false appearance that non-vagile taxa somehow Keywords: underwent rare oceanic dispersal. Galliformes, dispersal limitation, island gigantism, phylogeny, ultraconserved elements 1. Introduction Organisms that are unable to disperse across physical or environmental barriers Author for correspondence: should be unable to achieve widespread or global distributions. Yet, paradoxically, Peter A. Hosner organisms that lack dispersal capability are still characteristic components of e-mail: [email protected] isolated continents and island communities [1–4]. For example, large-bodied and flightless ratite birds (e.g. ostrich, emu) have seemingly colonized distant areas over evolutionary time despite severe dispersal constraints [5–8]. Two hypotheses explain how dispersal-limited organisms reach novel areas: via chance dispersal and vagile ancestors. The chance dispersal hypothesis relies on rare, stochastic events to explain colonization by poor dispersers over evolutionary time [9–11]. Examples include New World monkeys, rodents and salt-intolerant amphibians that rafted between continents or islands on floating debris [12–15]. Alternatively, the vagile ancestor hypothesis posits that non- dispersive lineages are descended from mobile ancestors that reached new islands and continents by colonizing across geographical barriers. Subsequently, parallel or convergent selection towards reduced dispersal abilities and/or increased Electronic supplementary material is available body size resulted in poorly dispersing descendants. Extinction of the original online at https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9. vagile ancestor lineages over time may then result in the appearance of dis- persal-limited groups with relict distributions. This cycle of range expansion, figshare.c.3745475. morphological evolution and extinction has recently been favoured to explain & 2017 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved. Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on May 3, 2017 (a)(c) 2 phasianoid combined natural distrubution, excluding Coturnix 40 rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org 25 Anurophasis 15 Coturnix 10 Proc. R. Soc. B Margaroperdix Margaroperdix Anurophasis mean hand-wing index (HWI; wingshape) other Phasianoids (b) Coturnix combined natural distribution 6.3 31 100 316 1000 3162 284 mean body mass (g) : 20170210 (d) Alectoris chukar Coturnix coturnix HWI = 28 HWI=41 5cm 5cm Figure 1. Maps of (a) the combined natural distribution of all phasianoid landfowl excluding Coturnix species; phasianoids are limited to continents and islands with recent land connections to Laurasia with the exception of Margaroperdix and Anurophasis.(b) The combined natural distribution of Coturnix, which is found widely throughout the Eastern Hemisphere. (c) Bivariate plot of mean body mass and mean hand-wing index (HWI) for phasianoid species; Coturnix species occupy a unique area of morphospace, having small body size and short wings. (d) Examples of phasianoid wingshape and their hand-wing indices; Alectoris chukar has short, broad wings typical of the ‘partridge’ morphotype, whereas Coturnix coturnix has long, narrow wings typical of Old World quail. (Online version in colour.) the distributions of non-vagile birds as diverse as the flight- body size and high-aspect-ratio wings (figure 1c,d), both adap- less ratites and tinamous [5,7,8], and the mostly flightless tations that improve long-distance flight performance [26]. New Zealand wrens [16]. However, in these cases, the putative In addition, Coturnix species are widespread on oceanic islands vagile ancestors were purely hypothetical. The only fossil in the Atlantic, Indian and Pacific Oceans, and they have evidence of vagile ratites is from the Palaearctic, where no repeatedly crossed major faunal boundaries such as Wallace’s extant ratites reside [8,17–19]. Similarly, all known fossil and Lydekker’s Lines (figure 1b). New Zealand wrens already feature non-vagile traits [16]. Curiously, even within the putative ‘non-vagile’ phasianoids The pheasants, partridges, grouse, turkeys, quail and (all but Coturnix and perhaps Lagopus), two species are found relatives (Aves: Phasianoidea, Phasianidae, Odontophoridae on landmasses across marine barriers from continental and Numididae) feature a near-worldwide distribution, being sources: Madagascan partridge (Margaroperdix madagarensis) absent only from southern South America, Antarctica, extre- of Madagascar and Snow Mountain quail (Anurophasis mely dry deserts and some insular regions (figure 1a,b). Yet, monorthonyx)ofNewGuinea.Anurophasis and Margaroperdix despite having a broad distribution, phasianoids are among have medium-sized bodies and short, rounded wings similar the poorest-dispersing flighted birds. Species are generally to various other partridges and francolins (figure 1c). However, heavy-bodied, short-winged and ground dwelling [20]. Most previous authors have noted some similarities between Margar- fly only in short bursts to escape predators, or into trees to operdix, Anurophasis and Coturnix, including plumage characters roost. Phasianoids are generally thought to be incapable of of their downy chicks [20]. Molecular data now support close crossing marine barriers [21], and thus are generally limited to relationships between Margaroperdix and Coturnix [27–29]. Yet, continents and continental islands (i.e. islands that had recent because several Coturnix species and Anurophasis lack DNA dry-land connections to continents during periods of low sea sequence data, relationships in the group remain uncertain. levels or sea-ice connections). Rare overwater movements Continental vicariance of Madagascar and Australasia far have been observed in arctic ptarmigan (Lagopus spp.) [22] preceded diversification of phasianoids [30] and modern birds (but see [23,24]), otherwise historical movements of phasianoid in general [31–33], meaning Margaroperdix and Anurophasis lineages between North America and Asia were likely to have ancestors must have crossed permanent marine barriers. been facilitated by the Bering Land Bridge [25]. How did these ‘non-vagile’ phasianoids come to inhabit their The Old World quail (Coturnix) are a great contrast to most present insular distributions? Are they examples of rare, chance phasianoids in terms of dispersal ability. Coturnix are excellent dispersal across oceanic barriers by generally non-vagile birds? flyers, and their impressive long-distance transcontinental Alternatively, are they descended from small-bodied, disper- movements were recorded in texts as dating back to the Old sive Coturnix stock, which evolved into ‘island giants’ once Testament (Numbers 11: 31–32) and Pliny’s Natural History isolated in unique insular environments? Previous studies (AD 79). Unlike other phasianoids, Coturnix exhibit small have identified great plasticity in phasianoid morphotypes, Downloaded from http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/ on May 3, 2017 with ‘pheasant’ (large-bodied, long-tailed), ‘partridge’ HWI for phasianoids and outgroups based on measurements 3 (medium-bodied, short-tailed) and ‘quail’ (small-bodied, from traditional museum skins with the wings prepared folded rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org short-tailed)

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    8 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us