·U.S: BUREAu Of MINES P.O. BOX 550 IUNEAU, AlASK} OQ9( ' Conodonts frorn the Genesee Formation in Western New York GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1032-B \ Conodonts from the Genesee Formation in Western New York By JOHN W. HUDDLE, assisted by JOHN E. REPETSKI STRATIGRAPHY AND CONODONTS OF THE GENESEE FORMATION (DEVONIAN) IN WESTERN AND CENTRAL NEW YORK GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1032-B Conodonts from the Genesee Formatz"on z"n western New York, first descrz"bed by G.]. Hz"nde z"n 1879 and W. L. Bryant z·n 1921, are redescrz"bed, and the b£ostrat£graph£c zones are determz"ned UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE,WASHINGTON 1981 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR JAMES G. WATT, Secreta·ry GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Doyle G. Frederick, Acting Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Huddle, John Warfield, 1907-1975 Conodonts from the Genesee Formation in western New York. (Stratigraphy and conodonts of the Genesee Formation (Devonian) in western and central New York) (Geological Survey professional paper ; 1032-B) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.16:1032-B 1. Conodonts. 2. Paleontology-Devonian. 3. Paleontology-New York (State) I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: United States. Geological Survey. Professional paper ; 1032-B. QE899.H83 557.3'08s [562] 77-608125 For sale by the Distribution Branch, U.S. Geological Survey, 604 South Pickett Street, Alexandria, VA 22304 FOREWORD After John Huddle's death in late November 1975, I was asked to serve as author's representative in the completion of this report. In September 1975, Huddle had completed. the posttechnical review copy of his manuscript and had forwarded it for U.S. Geological Survey publica­ tion approval. I received the edited manuscript in September 1976, for review of accuracy of taxonomy and of technical matters and details noted by the Survey editors and by myself. My contribution consisted of checking for, and correcting where necessary, objective errors in the manuscript. In making necessary changes, I relied on Huddle's most recent worksheets, notes, and notes on specimen slides as much as possible in order to preserve the integrity of his work. No changes were made in subjective matters of taxonomy or of interpretation. Throughout my efforts on this paper, I have tried to avoid making any changes that would have affected Huddle's substance or style, so that this published report would be as· much as possible John Huddle's original work. John E. Repetski U.S. Geological Survey Washington, D.C. 1/12/77 III . I CONTENTS Page Page Abstract B1 Biostratigraphy-Continued Application of conodont zo11ation to New York Introduction -------------------------------------­ 1 Purpose of the investigation ------------------ 1 formations-Continued Age of the Penn Yan Shale Member of the Fieldvvork -----------------------------------­ 2 Laboratory preparation ----------------------- 2 Genesee Formation --------------------­ B15 Previous vvork ------------------------------­ 2 Age of the Williams Brook Coquinite Member of Ithaca facies of Caster (1933) ------­ 15 Acknovvledgtnents ----------------------------- 3 Age of the Genundevva Limestone Member Occurrence of conodonts in the Genesee· Formation -­ 3 3 of the Genesee Formation --------------­ 16 Distribution and abundance -------------------­ Age of the Crosby Sandstone Member of the Revvorked conodonts, lag concentrates, and un- Standish Formation as used by Torrey and 3 conformities -------------------------------- 16 9 others (1932) -------------------------­ Facies distribution ---------------------------- Age of the West River Shale Member of the 9 Biostratigraphy ---------------------------------­ Genesee Formation ---------------------- 16 Ammonoid zonation --------------------------­ 9 Systematic paleontology of conodonts ---------­ 16 Conodont zonation ---------------------------­ 9 Multielement versus element taxonomy ----­ 16 Polygnathus varcus Zone -----------------­ 11 Why element taxonomy is used in this report 18 Schmidtognathus hermanni-Polygnathus cri- Locality numbers and type depository ------ 18 status Zone ----------------------------- 12 Description of genera and spec·ies -------------­ 19 Polygnathus asymmetricus Zone ----------- 12 Platform and blade elements -------------­ 19 Problems in using the European range zon.es Platform elements -------------------­ 19 12 in vvestern Nevv York ------------------­ Blade elements ----------------------­ 33 Sequence of first appearances in the N evv Ozarkodinan elements --------------------­ 34 York Genesee Formation ---------------­ 13 Neoprioniodontan elements ---------------­ 39 Application of conodont zonation to Nevv York Hindeodellan elements --------------------­ 41 formations --------------------------------­ 14 Ligonodinan elements --------------------­ 44 Age of the Windom Member. of the Moscovv Lonchodinan elements --------------------- 45 Shale and th.e Tully Limestone ---------­ 14 Locality list -------------------------------------­ 47 Age of the Geneseo Shale Member and asso- References cited ---------------------------------- 57 ciated beds of the Genesee Formation __ _ 14 Index -------------------------~------------------ 63 ILLUSTRATIONS [Plates 1-31 following index] PLATE 1-3. Ancyrodella. 4, 5. Icriodus. 6. Palmatolepis? and Polygnathus. 7-17. Polygnathus. 18. Polygnathus and N othognathella. 19. Prioniodina, Polygnathus, Spathognathodus, Pandorinellina, and Synprioniodina. 20. Bryantodus and Ozarkodina. 21. Bryantodus. 22. Bryantodus and Ozarkodina. 23. N eoprioniodus and Synprioniodina. 24. H indeodella. 25. Hindeodella and Angulodus. 26. Bryantodus, Angulodus, Ozarkodina, and Enantiognathus. 27. Enantiognathus and Ligonodina. 28. Ligonodina and Prioniodina. 29. Bryantodus, Prioniodina, Lonchodina, ·and Trichonodella. 30. Prioniodina, Lonchodina, Trichonodella, and Bryantodus?. 31. Bryantodus, Lonchodina, and Prioniodina. v VI CONTENTS Page PLATE 32. Diagram showing the sequential appearance of conodont species in the basal beds of the Genesee For- mation ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------In pocket FIGURE 1. Stratigraphy and conodont zonation of the Belgian Frasnian stratotype section ------------------- Bll TABLES Page TABLE 1. Occurrence of conodonts by species, sample number, and stratigraphic units ----------------·---- In pocket 2. Range chart of conodont :species by first ap·pea.rances ---------------------------------------------- B4 3. Occurrence, from west to east for each member, of conodonts in samples of the Windom Member of the Moscow Shale and the Tully Limestone ------------------------------------------------------ 6 4. Occurrence, from west to east, of platform and blade conodonts in the Leicester Marcasite Member of Moscow Formation of Sutton (1951) and the North Evans Limestone of Rickard (1964) ------- 7 5. Early Late Devonian ammonoid zonation in Europe and New York -------------------------------- 9 6. Comparison of European and North American conodont zonation --------------------------------- 10 STRATIGRAPHY AND CONODONTS OF THE GENESEE FORl\tiATION (DEVONIAN) IN \VESTERN AND CENTRAL NE\V YORK CONODONTS FROM THE GENESEE FORMATION IN WESTERN NEW YORK By JoHN W. HuDDLE/ assisted by JoHN E. REPETSKI ABSTRACT erence section in North America and with the cor­ Conodonts from the Genesee Formation in western New relation of these rocks with Upper Devonian rocks York were first described by G. J. Hinde in 1879, and cono­ in other areas. These studies were intended to aid donts from the "conodont bed" (North Evans Limestone of in the search for oil and gas in New York, Pennsyl­ Rickard, 1964) were desc·ribed by W. L. Bryant in 1921. vania, and Ohio. Many new species and genera were named in these reports, and a multielement species was proposed by Hinde. Taxo­ This study of the conodont faunas of the Genesee nomic revision, redescription, and improved illustrations of Formation in western New York was carried out these species are given in the present report, which also from 1956 to 1959 by W. H. Hass in cooperation documents the ranges of conodonts in the classic New York with a study of the physical stratigraphy of the Devonian section and relates their ranges to the occurrence formation by Wallace de Witt, Jr., and G. W. Colton. of ammonoids. Sixty-eight element sp,ecies of conodonts are described, including one new species, Polygnathus collieri, I continued the study of the conodonts after 1962. and three new subspecies, Polygnathus rhenanus marijae, P. The sequence of first appearances of conodont asymmetricus unilabius, and P. dubius frons. species in New York does not correspond to that of the standard European ~onodont ~onation; the zona­ INTRODUCTION tion of Klapper and others (1971) for North Amer- PURPOSE OF THE INVESTIGATION ica is used here for the conodont zones near the Chapter A of this Professional Paper (de Witt boundary between the Middle and Upper Devonian. and CoUon, 1978) is the report of work done by Conodont zo~e,~ ne~r this boundary need revision, U.S. Geological Survey parties under the direction but such revisiOn IS not done here. The boundary of James F. Pepper as part of a study of the origin I between the Middle and Upper Devonian is not dis­ and occurrence of black petroliferous shales. Field cussed here because i.t is not de,finable in central parties began measuring sections and mapping in I and ~estern New York until international agree- 1947: More than 400 sections were measured in I ment IS reach:d