Jeeps, Communists, and Quonset Huts: World War II Surplus Disposal in the Territory of Hawai‘i gwen sinclair In the waning days of World War II, the Honolulu Advertiser pub- lished a prescient article by a reporter named Gerry Burtnett about military surplus disposal: The disposal of surplus property in Hawaii is going to be one of the big- gest stories of the last days of the war and the postwar period. It may be a rather unpleasant story, from present indications.1 Disposal of war surplus in Hawai‘i was a big story, judging from the hundreds of newspaper articles about it published between 1945 and 1950. As soldiers, sailors, and marines returned home and life in the Territory began to be shaped by peacetime concerns, surplus disposal became an important industry in the Territory of Hawai‘i and in the nation as a whole. The disposal of surplus property captured the attention not only of the surplus-consuming public, but also of Congressional investigating committees. This paper will examine the effects of surplus disposal, why surplus held people’s attention for so long, and the major events and key people involved with surplus dis- posal in the Territory of Hawai‘i. Gwen Sinclair is a librarian and Head of the Government Documents & Maps Department at the University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa Library. Her publications and research interests range from government secrecy to presidential executive orders and proclamations relating to federal property in Hawai‘i. The Hawaiian Journal of History, vol. 50 (2016) 121 122 the hawaiian journal of history Long before the end of World War II, officials in Washington, D.C. recognized that disposal of quantities of salvage and surplus govern- ment property, primarily by the armed forces, would be required. As a staging area for bases in the Pacific, the Territory of Hawai‘i held millions of tons of building materials, equipment, clothing, food— anything and everything needed to fight the war—at the close of hos- tilities in September 1945. To facilitate the orderly disposal of surplus, the U.S. Congress passed the Surplus Property Act in 1944, which established the Sur- plus Property Board and directed it to issue regulations for the dispo- sition of surplus personal and real property.2 The regulations priori- tized recipients for the disposition of surplus property as follows: 1. Federal government 2. State and local governments 3. Veterans (those who were certified as having served in WWII) 4. Certified non-profit institutions 5. Small dealers 6. Wholesalers 7. Large dealers 8. General public3 Congress gave a high priority to veterans, who were anticipated to farm or start small businesses with the help of surplus goods. Veterans could also obtain surplus for their personal use, so they were well- positioned to acquire many of the thousands of vehicles and other items declared surplus. The Beginning of Surplus Disposal in Hawai‘i The organization of the mechanics of surplus disposal took a long time, so surplus disposal did not really begin in earnest until late 1945. On the U.S. Mainland, several agencies handled surplus dis- posal in rapid succession, and eventually the War Assets Administra- tion (WAA) became the principal agency handling disposition of sur- plus property. However, in Alaska, Hawai‘i, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, the Surplus Property Office (SPO) of the Department of the Interior was initially charged with the disposal of everything except aircraft and vessels. In September 1945, Crawford Sloan, assis- tant director of SPO, opened an office located at ‘Iolani Palace in jeeps, communists, and quonset huts 123 Honolulu. Advertisements were placed for office assistants, engineers, appraisers, inspectors, and investigators to staff the office, which even- tually employed at least 228 people.4 Col. William B. Cobb was hired to head the Honolulu office of SPO in December 1945. Like many people who worked in surplus disposal, he had just been discharged from the Army. Formerly a lawyer and Wyoming legislator, he had served as assistant chief of staff for General Delos Emmons (commanding general of the Army’s Hawaiian Depart- ment and military governor from 1941–1943) during the war.5 One might wonder how Cobb’s background qualified him to lead surplus disposal in the Territory. Cobb did not have any direct experience with surplus disposal, and this may have contributed to some of the difficul- ties he encountered, which will be discussed later. It is conceivable that his past experience with the Army in Hawai‘i was seen as an advantage. Furthermore, there may have been a desire to hire an outsider who was not previously associated with surplus disposal and therefore not tainted by complaints that surplus sales were moving too slowly. Congress Investigates Cobb faced a daunting task. The War Department and Navy had not yet determined how much material would be declared excess to their needs because the size and distribution of the peacetime armed forces had not yet been determined. At the same time, civilians who had been deprived of many consumer goods during the war saw the mountains of material stockpiled at military bases, warehouses, and depots and demanded immediate access. Many complaints were received by members of Congress, resulting in the creation of special committees to investigate war industries. Now that the war was over, these committees turned their attention to investigation of the mas- sive disposal bottlenecks in the U.S. and in overseas theatres. The Senate Special Committee Investigating the National Defense Program held a hearing in Washington, D.C. in November 1945 at which Sloan testified that he had heard stories about or personally observed numerous instances of the destruction of usable surplus property by the Army and Navy while he was in Honolulu. Interest- ingly, Sloan testified that he took reporters from both the Honolulu Advertiser and the Honolulu Star­Bulletin with him on some of his visits 124 the hawaiian journal of history to salvage yards. Apparently, Sloan hoped that the reporters would shine a spotlight on the destruction of automobiles, construction material, and other items that, in his opinion, could be sold as sur- plus. However, the Advertiser decided that the story was too “hot” and elected not to publish it. Sloan claimed that the paper’s reluctance was due to the publisher’s friendship with General Richardson, who was the commanding general of the armed forces in the middle Pacific and military governor of Hawai‘i. The Star­Bulletin does not appear to have reported a story about a visit to the Army Corps of Engineers Reclamation Yard, where Sloan and a reporter observed prisoners of war cutting up new roofing material to level the yard.6 Members of the special committee undertook a world tour to visit surplus disposal operations and question both civilian and military officials about the progress of disposal and alleged mishandling of surplus property. Between visits to California and the Marshall Islands, a subset of committee members, Senators Tunnell, Mitchell, and Knowland, accompanied by George Meader, the committee’s counsel, conducted hearings in Honolulu from December 31, 1945 through January 2, 1946. Their questioning mainly focused on the alleged destruction of perfectly good vehicles by the Army. Two SPO employees, George J. Ryan and Tommy Miller, had visited a salvage depot at Schofield Barracks. They claimed to have observed vehicles with low mileage being cut apart and scrapped. Ryan subsequently wrote a confidential report containing many allegations of miscon- duct on the part of the armed services.7 Army officials vehemently denied these charges and asserted that vehicles were scrapped because they were too dangerous to drive and could not be economi- cally repaired.8 Although most of the committee’s attention was directed at the disposal of surplus WW II material, the existence of surplus remaining from previous conflicts did not go unnoticed. For example, a stock- pile of saddles at Schofield Barracks that dated back to the Spanish- American War of 1898 caught the attention of Meader, the commit- tee’s legal counsel.9 What Was for Sale? What did the Army and Navy ultimately decide to get rid of ? When one thinks of military surplus, one is likely to imagine items like jeeps, jeeps, communists, and quonset huts 125 clothing, weapons, tents, and the like. There was certainly an abun- dance of all shapes and sizes of vehicles, from two-and-a-half ton trucks to jeeps to passenger cars. Even bicycles used at Pearl Harbor were declared surplus. Aside from Army boots, clothing for the full range of Army and Navy personnel was released for sale—jackets, pants, pajamas, WAAC and WAVE skirts and blouses, nurse’s uniforms, and of course underwear. Food, medications, medical supplies, hospital beds and sheets, dishes, furniture, and tents were released by the hun- dreds of thousands. Both the Army Corps of Engineers and the Navy Construction Bat- talion (Seabees) had massive quantities of construction material and equipment, from lumber, roofing, fence posts, and barbed wire to bridge sections, road grading equipment, tractors, generators, and electrical supplies. Wooden frame buildings, Dallas huts, and Quon- set huts were dismantled or sold whole. The Signal Corps had type- writers, telephones, switchboards, radios, photographic equipment and supplies, and office supplies. Some of the more unusual surplus items offered for sale in Hawai‘i included Army mules, beeswax, spun glass cloth, scale models of ships and airplanes, a horseshoer’s kit, cigarettes, pigeon lofts, and a threshing machine. Naturally, many aircraft and parts were no longer needed after the war, and both the Army and the Navy declared many planes surplus or salvage.