Cigarette Smoking and the Hispanic Paradox: the Role of Socioeconomic Status Andrew Fenelon, University of Pennsylvania

Cigarette Smoking and the Hispanic Paradox: the Role of Socioeconomic Status Andrew Fenelon, University of Pennsylvania

Cigarette Smoking and the Hispanic Paradox: the Role of Socioeconomic Status Andrew Fenelon, University of Pennsylvania Current Smoking status 1987 – 2004 (women) Contribution of Smoking by Years of Education •Background Never Former Current • Mexican-Americans Mexican-American vs. White • The life expectancy advantage of Mexican-Americans over 80 Men Women Individuals of Hispanic origin in the United States enjoy lower are less likely to be 4 whites is larger at lower levels of education. It is more than mortality and higher life expectancy on average than non-Hispanic current smokers and 4.5 years for those with fewer than 12 years and less than 2 more likely to have 3 1 60 years for those with at least 13 years of education. whites, despite lower socioeconomic status. The so-called Hispanic never smoked than • non-Hispanic whites. 2 Smoking is typically responsible for greater life expectancy Paradox long failed to generate a convincing explanation. Recent 40 differences at lower levels of education. 2 % Mexican • Advantage 1 • For those with fewer than 12 years, it explains 3.8 years evidence suggests, however, that smoking may be key. The smoking (years) prevalence of other difference among women (86% of the total) and 3.7 years Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites also differ in the relationship 20 0 Hispanics is between among men (72%). between socioeconomic status (SES) and both mortality and that of Mexican- -1 • In the absence of smoking, the Hispanic advantage would be smoking; the gradients are much weaker among Hispanics. 0 Americans and eliminated (and reversed) for those with more than 13 years. whites. White Mexican- Other -2 Smoking American Hispanics < 12yrs 12 yrs ≥ 13 yrs < 12 yrs 12 yrs ≥ 13 yrs Other factors Other Hispanics vs. White • The life expectancy advantage of other Hispanics over whites •Objectives Percent of deaths due to smoking (ages 35+) 5 Men Women is also larger at lower levels of education. 30% 4 • Smoking again seems to be somewhat more important at 1) Estimate the contribution of smoking to the adult life 27.3% • Non-Hispanic whites lower levels of education. 3 expectancy advantage of Mexican Americans and other 25% have the highest • Overall, smoking is a less important factor explaining the mortality related to Other Hispanic 2 advantage of other Hispanics. Hispanics. 19.4% Advantage 20% smoking and (years) 17.8% Mexican-Americans 1 White the lowest. 15% 13.6% 13% 2) Identify differences in the size of the advantage and Mexican-American 0 Other Hispanic contribution of smoking by education 10% • The relative ordering 7.9% -1 of groups is the same < 12yrs 12 yrs ≥ 13 yrs < 12 yrs 12 yrs ≥ 13 yrs 5% for men and women 0% •Data and Methods Women Men •Conclusions Data are from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 1) Smoking-related mortality is a major factor explaining the excess mortality of whites compared to Mexican- between 1987 and 2004. The sample contains 281,567 individuals Contribution of smoking to Hispanic Advantage Americans and all other Hispanics aged 35 or higher and 57,467 deaths. Group-specific death rates are Mexican-American vs. Other Hispanic vs. • Smoking explains 64% 3 White White predicted using hazard regression. Contribution of of the advantage for Other Factors Mexican-American 2) The Hispanic life expectancy advantage and contribution of smoking are generally larger at lower levels of 2.5 Smoking-attributable mortality (A) is estimated by comparing Contribution of women and all of the education Smoking 2 advantage for men observed death rates (nMx) to rates among those who have never * Diff smoked (nMx ) In 1.5 • The advantage would Life 3) Education differences may reflect assimilation patterns: as immigrants remain in the US longer, their smoking ∗ Exp. 1 be cut by half for 푛푀푥 − 푛푀푥 other Hispanic behavior becomes more similar to that of whites and they experience increases in education. 퐴 = 0.5 women and 40% for 푛푀푥 men 0 Women Men Women Men -0.5 Acknowledgements References I am grateful to Laura Blue, Douglas Ewbank, Irma Elo, and Sam Preston for 1. Palloni, A., and E. Arias (2004) Paradox Lost: Explaining the Hispanic Adult Mortality Advantage. Demography. 41(3) 385-415. helpful advice. This research was supported by NIH grant F31-AG-039188-01 2. Blue, L. and A. Fenelon (2011) Explaining low mortality among US immigrants relative to native-born Americans: the role of smoking. International Journal of Epidemiology. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr011. 2011..

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us