Early Modern Human Dispersal from Africa: Genomic Evidence For

Early Modern Human Dispersal from Africa: Genomic Evidence For

Tassi et al. Investigative Genetics (2015) 6:13 DOI 10.1186/s13323-015-0030-2 RESEARCH Open Access Early modern human dispersal from Africa: genomic evidence for multiple waves of migration Francesca Tassi1†, Silvia Ghirotto1†, Massimo Mezzavilla2, Sibelle Torres Vilaça1,3, Lisa De Santi1 and Guido Barbujani1* Abstract Background: Anthropological and genetic data agree in indicating the African continent as the main place of origin for anatomically modern humans. However, it is unclear whether early modern humans left Africa through a single, major process, dispersing simultaneously over Asia and Europe, or in two main waves, first through the Arab Peninsula into southern Asia and Oceania, and later through a northern route crossing the Levant. Results: Here, we show that accurate genomic estimates of the divergence times between European and African populations are more recent than those between Australo-Melanesia and Africa and incompatible with the effects of a single dispersal. This difference cannot possibly be accounted for by the effects of either hybridization with archaic human forms in Australo-Melanesia or back migration from Europe into Africa. Furthermore, in several populations of Asia we found evidence for relatively recent genetic admixture events, which could have obscured the signatures of the earliest processes. Conclusions: We conclude that the hypothesis of a single major human dispersal from Africa appears hardly compatible with the observed historical and geographical patterns of genome diversity and that Australo-Melanesian populations seem still to retain a genomic signature of a more ancient divergence from Africa Keywords: Human demographic history, Migration, Evolutionary divergence, Admixture, Linkage disequilibrium, Population structure Background their gene pool, which are eventually expressed and may Anatomically modern humans (AMH), defined by a result in phenotypic differences affecting, for example, lightly built skeleton, large brain, reduced face, and the immune response [8] or lipid catabolism [9]. prominent chin, first appear in the East African fossil Although the general picture is getting clearer, many record around 200,000 years ago [1, 2]. There is a gen- aspects of these processes are still poorly understood, eral consensus that, while dispersing from there, they starting from the timing and the modes of AMH disper- largely replaced preexisting archaic human forms [3]. sal. The main exit from Africa, through the Levant, has Recent DNA studies also suggest that the replacement been dated around 56,000 years ago [10, 11]. However, was not complete, and there was a limited, but nonzero, morphologic [12, 13], archaeological [14], and genetic interbreeding with Neandertals [4], Denisovans [5], and [13, 15–20] evidence suggest that part of the AMH perhaps other African forms still unidentified at the fos- population might have dispersed before that date, pos- sil level [6, 7]. As a result, modern populations might sibly by a Southern route into southern Asia through the differ in the amount of archaic genes incorporated in horn of Africa and the Arab Peninsula. Regardless of whether there was a single major expan- * Correspondence: [email protected] † sion or two, several DNA studies clearly showed that Equal contributors genetic diversity tends to decrease [21, 22] and linkage 1Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnologies, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy disequilibrium to increase [23, 24] at increasing Full list of author information is available at the end of the article © 2015 Tassi et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. Tassi et al. Investigative Genetics (2015) 6:13 Page 2 of 16 distances from Africa. This probably means that, as they NspI) from the Affymetrix GeneChip Human Mapping came to occupy their current range, AMH went through 500K Array Set), and Xing et al. (2010) [36] (n = 165 a series of founder effects [25, 26]. These results offer an samples from 8 populations genotyped on an Affymetrix excellent set of predictions which we used in the present 6.0 array) (Additional files 1 and 2). study to test whether current genomic diversity is better We devised a careful strategy to combine the seven accounted for by processes involving a single major datasets genotyped with different platforms according to dispersal (hereafter: SD) or multiple major dispersals different protocols developing a pipeline built on Perl. (hereafter: MD) from Africa. First, for each dataset, we checked for the presence of One preliminary problem, however, is how to select old rs IDs, if it is necessary changing them with the new the appropriate populations for informative compari- ones. Then, we looked for the SNPs shared among all sons. The details of the dispersal routes, and the rela- datasets, and we mapped the genome positions of these tionships between fossils and contemporary populations, variants to the human reference genome, build hg18 are all but established. Whereas Europeans are consist- (NCBI 36). ently regarded as largely derived from the most recent When merging data from different SNP chip versions, African exit in all relevant studies, opinions differ as for strand identification can be ambiguous, possibly leading many aspects of the peopling of Asia [12–19], with many to mistakes in identifying the right alleles for A/T and populations also experiencing complex demographic his- G/C SNPs (as also reported in the PLINK tool documen- tories involving admixture, as suggested by both ancient tation [37]). Thus, to preserve as much genetic informa- [27] and modern [28–31] DNA evidence. To obtain tion as possible, we selected from each dataset only insight into the past history of Eurasian populations, we these ambiguous SNPs and we used the information analyzed genome-wide autosomal single nucleotide contained in the Affymetrix Annotation file to evaluate polymorphisms (SNPs) from 71 worldwide popula- the strand polarity used to define each allele. We consid- tions (Additional files 1 and 2). In what follows, a ered each dataset separately and we annotated the SNPs number of preliminary analyses allowed us to quantify on the plus strand, flipping only the proper SNPs. We the extent and the pattern of admixture and gene checked the reliability of this conversion process flow in our data, thus making it possible to identify a comparing the allele frequencies for these SNPs in spe- subset of Far Eastern populations which, under the cific populations typed in more than one dataset (i.e., MD model, may be regarded as largely deriving from Besemah, CEU, Onge), so as to verify the consistency of the oldest expansion. the frequency spectrums between the different datasets. This way, we could tackle two questions, related, re- Once these ambiguities have been resolved, with the spectively, with the historical and geographical context PLINK v 1.07 software [37] we merged progressively the of the dispersal process, namely (1) are separation times datasets selecting, from each one, just the individuals between non-African and African populations the same from populations of our interest and flipping SNPs dis- (as expected under SD), or is there evidence of a longer cordant for strand. separation between Far Eastern and Africans than be- Using the same software, we selected only the auto- tween Europeans and Africans (as expected under MD)? somal SNPs with genotyping success rate >98 % and And (2) which geographical migration routes were minor allele frequency (MAF) >0.01. We identified cryp- followed by first humans outside Africa? tic relatedness among samples computing identity by descent (IBD) statistic for all pairs of individuals, as Methods unmodeled excess of genetic sharing would violate sam- Populations and markers ple independence assumption of downstream analyses. Our analysis was based on public genomic datasets. No When pairs of individuals showed a Pi-Hat value >0.3, new biological sample was collected. We combined gen- we removed the individual with the lowest genotyping omic data from several published datasets: the Human rate. We did not apply this screening procedure for the Genome Diversity Cell Line Panel [32] (n = 40 samples Southeast Asia and Oceania samples, since they come from 10 populations genotyped on Affymetrix GeneChip from populations with extremely low effective sizes, Human Mapping 500K Array Set), Pugach et al. (2013) where a certain degree of random inbreeding is inevit- [33] (n = 117 samples from 12 populations genotyped able [38]. To determine whether there were genetic out- on an Affymetrix 6.0 array), Reich et al. (2009) [34] liers within each population, we conducted in PLINK a (n = 56 samples from 11 populations genotyped on an “distance to the nearest neighbor analysis” (neighbor Affymetrix 6.0 array), Reich et al. (2011) [5] (n = 509 option). Within each population, the measure of similar- samples from 13 populations genotyped on an Affy- ity in terms of identity by state (IBS) between each indi- metrix 6.0 array), Xing et al. (2009) [35] (n = 243 sam- vidual and their nearest neighbor was calculated and ples from 17 populations genotyped on one array (version transformed into a Z-score. Z-score distributions were Tassi et al. Investigative Genetics (2015) 6:13 Page 3 of 16 examined from the first to the fifth neighbor. Outliers an unsupervised analysis, assuming a number of ancestral were identified by an extremely negative Z-score pro- admixing populations from k =2 to k = 7. The proportion duced by low allele sharing with their nearest neighbor of the individuals’ genome belonging to each ancestral and were then dropped from the population.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    16 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us