Observational Constraints on Venus Surface Composition and Geologic History

Observational Constraints on Venus Surface Composition and Geologic History

Comparative Tectonics and Geodynamics (2015) 5025.pdf OBSERVATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ON VENUS SURFACE COMPOSITION AND GEOLOGIC HISTORY. M. S. Gilmore, Dept. Earth & Environmental Sciences, Wesleyan University, 265 Church St., Mid- dletown CT 06457 [email protected], www.wesleyan.edu/planetary. Introduction: The Venus atmosphere precludes hematite, the high emissivity anomalies correspond to the visible-near-infrared hyperspectral observations more mafic (less weathered) compositions [10] and the that have revolutionized the study of the surface com- low emissivity anomalies correspond to more felsic position of mars, Mercury and the Moon. Our under- compositions [7, 9, 11]. If the weathering rate of bas- standing of the surface composition the Earth-sized alt to hematite is fast, this suggests the volcanoes are planet Venus is derived wholly from 1) geochemical geologically young [10]. analyses of rocks from 7 landing sites, 2) observations Tesserae – How felsic? The radiance flux corre- of the surface at 1µm through a spectral window in the sponds to low emissivity values for tessera terrain atmosphere. These data are supported by theoretical leading to the following radical conclusions about Ve- and laboratory studies of the weathering, rheology and nus: 1) tesserae have a different (more felsic, less fer- spectra of candidate rocks at Venus temperatures and rous) primary composition. This can include Archean atmospheric composition. – type (TTG) granites formed by dehydration of under- Bulk Composition: The Venera and Vega landers thrust slabs or the lower crust, or true granites which acquired drilled samples (rock + soil) at 7 locations on may require a mature global recycling mechanism in- Venus. Major elements were measured by XRF at 3 troducing water-rich rocks. This may also include an- sites and U/K/Th were measured by γ-ray data at 5 orthosites (or granites) formed via differentiation of sites [1]. All elemental analyses and calculated norma- large mafic intrusions, ala Proterozoic massif anortho- tive mineralogical compositions are consistent with sites. 2) The emissivity values are also consistent with basalt, specifically MORB and high-K alkaline basalts mafic rocks that covered with low emissivity weather- [2]. The landers lie with geologic units mapped as lava ing products formed under a different weathering re- flows that comprise plains that cover the bulk of the gime than the plains. The lack of water today predicts surface of Venus [3]. Thus it is generally accepted that that basalts may weather to hematite and minor anhy- the Venus surface is generally basaltic melts derived drite [e.g., 12]. However, an elevated atmospheric from the mantle. PH2O (perhaps due to enhanced volcanic outgassing) Mineralogy: Radiation observed through 1.0, 1.1, would drive this reaction to completion. Tesserae may and 1.18 µm near-infrared spectral windows in the have formed on an extinct Venus with an active hydro- Venus atmosphere windows contains a large compo- logical cycle producing phyllosilicate minerals whose nent of surface emission [e.g., 4]. In common silicate dehydrated forms may persist today. 3) The lower minerals, 1 µm reflectance is controlled by crystal field emissivity data are also consistent with tesserae have a spectra of transition metal ions in the crystal lattice. different primary grain size: if igneous, they could be As Fe2+ is the most common transition metal in sili- glassy, or have higher porosity [e.g., 13], or 4) they cates, 1 µm reflectance is dominated by and positively could be non-igneous materials. Note that quartz-rich correlated to ferrous iron content, where olivine and rheologies are prohibited by models of buckle folding pyroxenes have low reflectance, and quartz and feld- for the tesserae [14]. Each of these scenarios requires spars have high reflectance [e.g., 5]; this translates to a that the tesserae have experienced a different and ex- lower emissivity, e, via Kirchoff’s Law: e=1-r, where r tinct geological history than the plains. = reflectivity, typically of room-temperature library References: [1] Surkov et al. (1984) Proc 15th minerals. Measurements of the emissivity of rocks and LPSC, 393 (1986 JGR 91, 215; (1987) JGR 92, 537. minerals at Venus temperatures are underway and are [2] Barsukov et al., (1986) Geochem. Int. 23, 53. [3] necessary to accurately interpret 1 µm radiation [e.g., Weitz & Basilevsky (1993) JGR 98, 17069. [4] Mead- 6]. ows & Crisp (1996) JGR 101, 4595. [5] Hunt & Salis- Observations of Venus made by VEx VIRTIS [7] bury Mod. Geol. 1, 283. [6] Helbert et al. (2013) EPSL (corroborated by VEx VMC [8] and Galileo NIMS [9]) 252, 371. [7] Mueller et al. (2008) JGR 113, E00B17; show surface radiance with a spatial resolution of ≥50 Helbert et al. (2008) GRL 35, L11201. [8] Basilevsky km of the southern hemisphere, which is dominated by et al. (2012) Icarus 217, 434. [9] Hashimoto et al. plains. Regions of higher than average emissivity cor- (2008) JGR 113, E00B24. [10] Smrekar et al. (2010) respond to volcanoes and Lada Terra flows [7] and Science 328, 605. [11] Gilmore et al. Icarus, in revi- areas of lower than average emissivity correspond to sion. [12] Fegley & Treiman (1992) AGU Monograph tesserae [7, 9]. The average emissivity values as cal- 66, 7. [13] Harloff & Arnold (2001) PSS 49, 191. [14] culated via Kirchoff’s Law are consistent with basalt + Brown & Grimm (1997) EPSL 147, 1. .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us