Succession Within the Prokaryotic Communities During the VAHINE Mesocosms

Succession Within the Prokaryotic Communities During the VAHINE Mesocosms

Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Biogeosciences Discuss., 12, 20179–20222, 2015 www.biogeosciences-discuss.net/12/20179/2015/ doi:10.5194/bgd-12-20179-2015 BGD © Author(s) 2015. CC Attribution 3.0 License. 12, 20179–20222, 2015 This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Biogeosciences (BG). Succession within Please refer to the corresponding final paper in BG if available. the prokaryotic communities during Succession within the prokaryotic the VAHINE communities during the VAHINE mesocosms U. Pfreundt et al. mesocosms experiment in the New Caledonia lagoon Title Page Abstract Introduction U. Pfreundt1, F. Van Wambeke2, S. Bonnet2,3, and W. R. Hess1 Conclusions References 1University of Freiburg, Faculty of Biology, Schaenzlestr. 1, 79104 Freiburg, Germany Tables Figures 2Aix Marseille Université, CNRS/INSU, Université de Toulon, IRD, Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO) UM110, 13288, Marseille, France 3Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, AMU/CNRS/INSU, Université de Toulon, J I Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO) UM110, 13288, Marseille-Noumea, France-New Caledonia J I Back Close Received: 4 December 2015 – Accepted: 6 December 2015 – Published: 18 December 2015 Correspondence to: W. R. Hess ([email protected]) Full Screen / Esc Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 20179 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract BGD N2 fixation fuels ∼ 50 % of new primary production in the oligotrophic South Pacific Ocean. The VAHINE experiment has been designed to track the fate of diazotroph 12, 20179–20222, 2015 derived nitrogen (DDN) and carbon within a coastal lagoon ecosystem in a compre- 3 5 hensive way. For this, large-volume (∼ 50 m ) mesocosms were deployed in the New Succession within Caledonia lagoon and were intentionally fertilized with dissolved inorganic phospho- the prokaryotic rus (DIP) to stimulate N2 fixation. This study examined the temporal dynamics of the communities during prokaryotic community together with the evolution of biogeochemical parameters for the VAHINE 23 consecutive days in one of these mesocosms (M1) and in the Nouméa lagoon us- mesocosms 10 ing MiSeq 16S rRNA gene sequencing. We observed clear successions within M1, some of which were not mirrored in the lagoon. The dominating classes in M1 were U. Pfreundt et al. alpha- and gammaproteobacteria, cyanobacteria (mainly Synechococcus), eukaryotic microalgae, on days 10 and 14 Marine Group II euryarchaea, on days 12–23 also Flavobacteriia. Enclosure led to significant changes in the M1 microbial community, Title Page 15 probably initiated by the early decay of Synechococcus and diatoms. However, we did Abstract Introduction not detect a pronounced bottle effect with a copiotroph-dominated community. The fer- tilization with ∼ 0.8 µM DIP on day 4 did not have directly observable effects on the Conclusions References overall community within M1, as the data samples obtained from before and four days Tables Figures after fertilization clustered together, but likely influenced the development of individ- 20 ual populations later on, like Defluviicoccus-related bacteria and UCYN-C type dia- J I zotrophic cyanobacteria. Growth of UCYN-C led to among the highest N2 fixation rates ever measured in this region and enhanced growth of nearly all abundant heterotrophic J I groups in M1. We further show that different Rhodobacteraceae were the most efficient Back Close heterotrophs in the investigated system and we observed niche partitioning within the Full Screen / Esc 25 SAR86 clade. Whereas the location in- or outside the mesocosm had a significant effect on community composition, the temporal effect was significantly stronger and similar in both locations, suggesting that overarching abiotic factors were more influential than Printer-friendly Version the enclosure. While temporal community changes were evident, prokaryotic diversity Interactive Discussion 20180 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | (Shannon Index) only declined slightly from ∼ 6.5 to 5.7 or 6.05 in the lagoon and M1, respectively, throughout the experiment, highlighting the importance of multiple and BGD varying sources of organic matter maintaining competition. 12, 20179–20222, 2015 1 Introduction Succession within the prokaryotic 5 The South West Pacific ocean is recognized as an area with one of the highest dini- communities during trogen (N ) fixation rates in the global ocean (Garcia et al., 2007; Luo et al., 2012). 2 the VAHINE In this region, plankton taxa capable of N fixation (N -fixing or diazotrophic organ- 2 2 mesocosms isms) are very diverse (Moisander et al., 2010) and fuel up to 60 % of the primary production (Bonnet et al., 2015a), yet their interactions with surrounding planktonic U. Pfreundt et al. 10 communities are rarely studied. Within this vast oceanic region, most of the studies regarding the coupling between phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria have tar- geted the Nouméa lagoon, New Caledonia. Phytoplankton and bacterial production Title Page shows seasonal patterns, with maxima in December and January and an annual het- erotrophic bacterial production representing 21 to 34 % of primary production (Torréton Abstract Introduction 15 et al., 2010). High N2 fixation rates are a recurrent feature in the Nouméa lagoon (Bie- Conclusions References gala and Raimbault, 2008; Garcia et al., 2007), and diazotroph-derived N (DDN) was shown to be significantly channeled through the heterotrophic bacterial compartment Tables Figures in this environment (Berthelot et al., 2015; Bonnet et al., 2015a). Yet, no information is J I available on the potential effects of this N2 fixation on bacterial successions. 20 The production and quality of varying sources of organic matter is expected to vary J I as blooms of diazotrophic organisms are transient events. Such variation is expected Back Close to influence not only biogeochemical fluxes, but also the succession of different het- erotrophic bacteria, according to their metabolic capabilities. Indeed, the importance of Full Screen / Esc quality and quantity of dissolved organic matter (DOM) in structuring bacterioplank- 25 ton communities has been well established (Alonso-Sáez and Gasol, 2007; Beier Printer-friendly Version and de Albuquerque, 2015), either by comparing the continuum of trophic conditions Interactive Discussion in situ (West et al., 2008), or following phytoplankton blooms under natural (Teeling 20181 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | et al., 2012) or experimental (Lebaron et al., 2001) conditions. Since the 1970s, het- erotrophic bacterial succession during phytoplankton blooms has been observed with BGD culture-dependent techniques (Fukami et al., 1981a) and linked to the possible origin 12, 20179–20222, 2015 of DOM sources (release, lysis, sloppy feeding, degradation of phytoplankton detritus), 5 DOM size (low or high-molecular weight molecules), or quality (Biddanda and Pomeroy, 1988; Murray et al., 2007; Nagata, 2000; Riemann et al., 2000). Succession within The VAHINE experiment (Bonnet et al., 2015b) provided a unique opportunity to the prokaryotic study the fate of DDN in the marine planktonic food web and the interactions between communities during phytoplankton and heterotrophic bacteria by simultaneously addressing biogeochem- the VAHINE 10 ical parameters, stocks and fluxes, as well as biodiversity based on 16S rRNA gene mesocosms sequencing and flow cytometry cell counts. After fertilization with dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP), ∼ 0.8µmolL−1 on the U. Pfreundt et al. evening of day 4, to alleviate any potential limitation often observed in the region (Moutin et al., 2007), two periods of about 10 days each (P1 and P2, see descrip- Title Page 15 tion in Sect. 2.1) were clearly identified in terms of diazotroph succession. During the first period, diatom–diazotroph associations (DDAs) were dominating (Turk-Kubo et al., Abstract Introduction 2015) the diazotrophic community with N2 fixation rates decreasing from 17.9 ± 2.5 −1 −1 Conclusions References to 10.1 ± 1.3nmol NL d (Bonnet et al., 2015a). Unicellular N2-fixing cyanobacte- ria of the UCYN-C type (Cyanothece-like) dominated the diazotroph community in Tables Figures 20 the mesocosms during the second period, but did not appear in Nouméa lagoon waters (Turk-Kubo et al., 2015). N2-fixation rates increased during days 15–23 and J I reached > 60nmol NL−1 d−1, which are among the highest rates measured in marine J I waters (Bonnet et al., 2015a; Luo et al., 2012). These two periods corresponded to characteristic successions in phytoplankton taxa, chlorophyll stocks, primary and het- Back Close 25 erotrophic bacterial production, discussed in detail in companion studies in this issue Full Screen / Esc (Berthelot et al., 2015; Leblanc et al., 2015; Van Wambeke et al., 2015). In this manuscript we focus on prokaryotic community dynamics and possible par- Printer-friendly Version allels between or successions among different groups of phytoplankton, heterotrophic Interactive Discussion bacteria and N2-fixing organisms. 20182 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | 2 Material and methods BGD 2.1 Mesocosm description, sampling strategy and stocks/fluxes analyses 12, 20179–20222, 2015 Three large mesocosms (∼ 50 m3) were deployed in the

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    44 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us