WINTER 2010 Noir City Sentinel 9 By Gary Deane Special to the Sentinel hen theorists and aficionados attempt to • Another female, good and dutiful, in love with and the director Mr. Curtiz has achieved a locate a definitive “end point” for the clas- the man; certain amount of suspense but little else.” Wsic period of film noir, four films emerge as • An urban setting where lives are lived out (UK Times, May 1957) the leading candidates: unhappily by day and by night; • A lurid and convoluted plot conveyed with hard- To present-day eyes, The Scarlet Hour isn’t drab at • Touch of Evil (1958), for its baroque inflations boiled urgency; all, merely dense in its complications and saturated of character and style; • Shadows, low angles, and “trick” shots adding with character types that seem contemporary and • Odds Against Tomorrow (1959), for its modern- unsettled atmosphere. anachronistic at the same time. It’s a familiar tale of ism and progressive tonal shifts; dark love, obsession, duplicity and murder. Tryon is • Psycho (1960), for its narrative and generic The Scarlet Hour was produced and directed by E.V. “Marsh” Marshall, the protégé of land developer dislocations; the renowned Michael Curtiz. Backed by Paramount, Ralph Nevins (Gregory), who happens to be having • Blast of Silence (1961), for its all-pervasive the film received a healthy A-feature budget. an affair with his boss’s wife, Paulie (Ohmart). moral desolation. However, the cast was populated with mostly “new faces,” including Tom Tryon, Carol Ohmart, James Disagreement is inevitable, given that the very Gregory, and Jody Lawrance. When completed, the definition of film noir is itself fluid. film was released with little fanfare and quickly dis- Each of these four films, however, represents appeared from screens. For more than fifty years, it some kind of distinct change from what went before. has languished in total obscurity. Thus the actual endpoint of “classic noir” might more Is its obscurity justified? Contemporary reviews logically be found in a film that sums up what that of the film were lukewarm at best. It actually played “fluid” consensus had been. more in Great Britain than in the States—and the UK A final and unapologetic evocation of exactly press, so often harsh in its assessment of crime films, what went before is precisely what we’re in search of did not make an exception to this rule for The Scarlet … and is what brings us to The Scarlet Hour (1956). Hour: Despite its release date, The Scarlet Hour is a film far more in character with ’40s noir, with many “It is a very drab hour and a half, in the of the insistent thematic, narrative, and visual motifs company of actors who have not yet of the earlier decade: established their reputations and are unlikely to achieve them as a result of this • A male protagonist obsessed with a sexually movie. The story combines a rather alluring woman; unsavoury triangle with a jewel robbery Tom Tryon and Carol Ohmart in The Scarlet Hour 10 Noir City Sentinel WINTER 2010 Marshall and Ed Binns as the investigating police better elaborated, adding visual luster and character officers. All had established their acting bona fides in dimension, setting in motion several story elements in television, and all would become fixtures on the small one fell swoop. screen in the 60s. And the script has its share of well-turned one- Jody Lawrance, on the rebound from an aborted liners, most of them handed to Paulie. They are not launch at Columbia earlier in the decade, does what only memorably hard-boiled, they add character reso- she can with her role, but in her bottle-blonde incar- nance: nation she is too reminiscent of the edgier and far “Don’t try to brush me off, Marsh—when I more distinctive Jan Sterling. She might have stood stick, I stick hard.” out more as a brunette. (Lawrance disappeared from “I never thought about the things I wanted, only Hollywood in 1961). the things I didn’t want.” All in all, Paulie Nevins is an unusually self- ne actress who stands out here—and does so reflexive femme fatale. Many of her lines function in with style—is Elaine Stritch, playing Phyllis the film the way Walter Neff’s voiceover frames Elaine Stritch (right) almost steals The Scarlet Hour out ORycker, friend and confidante to Paulie. In her Double Indemnity. Like Neff, she goads herself into a from under star Carol Ohmart film debut, Stritch displays her trademark skill at criminal act to tap into a strange nether region of self- wresting attention away from anyone sharing the worth. She’s Phyllis and Walter combined, wrapped Nevins’ secretary Kathy Stevens (Lawrance) is the screen with her. up in one leggy, complicated package. “good girl,” a la Virginia Huston in Out of the Past, Phyllis is a retired-but-not-quite-reformed B-girl Despite these flourishes, the film suffers from who pines for Marsh. who’s found true love in the arms of a blue-collar hedo- an odd type of flatness. All the elements of a top- nist (husband Tom plumbs for a living, but lives to keep notch 40s noir are present, but the combination of a aulie wants the life Ralph’s wealth affords her, his own pipes well-lubricated). She and Paulie have a weak lead actor (Tryon), overly glossy production but she doesn’t want him. In order to take her long backstory—all the way from tenement days—and values, and a lack of velocity in the final reel make Pleave from him with the requisite wherewithal, it’s through their intimate exchanges that we learn things seem a bit stale. Even with such a kinetic she uses her considerable charms to seduce Marsh something more of who Paulie is and what motivates script, the film is just not as emphatic in style and pac- into hijacking a jewelry heist that they overhear being her. While she’s cunning and dressed to kill, we’re also ing as it needs to be. planned while parked in a lovers’ lane. However, allowed to know her as a woman damaged by life and A major reason is that the visuals, despite their Ralph is aware that Paulie has something going on burdened with regret. When Phyllis toasts her ever- enhanced use of low lighting (thanks to a new lens behind his back. Prone to violence, he begins to keep solicitous and slightly sozzled husband, “Here’s to from Japan employed by veteran noir cinematograph- tabs on his wandering wife. When he decides to take happy marriages made in heaven,” Paulie replies: er Lionel Linden), are less seamless than they ought action, the plot thickens and darkens. “Here’s to happy marriages made anywhere.” to be. Not every shot or sequence is as creatively or That’s about as much as you should need or carefully composed as it might have been, and camera want to know going into this film. A good deal of the One actress who stands out here— movement is much less fluid than one is accustomed pleasure to be had from these tales of triangulation and does so with style—is Elaine to in a Curtiz film. and treachery is inevitably in the details. The plot Stritch, playing Phyllis Rycker, Thus Curtiz’ attempt to return to the more ornate twists are ably supplied by lead screenwriter Frank friend and confidante to Paulie. In noir style—one that he’d virtually invented in Tashlin, better known for his work in comedy—The Mildred Pierce, embroidered to baroque perfection in Lieutenant Wore Skirts (1956), Will Success Spoil her film debut, Stritch displays her The Unsuspected (virtually a textbook example of Rock Hunter? (1957)—with the hard-boiled lines trademark skill at wresting atten- Foster Hirsch’s notion of “italicized [visual] served up by Alford “Rip” Van Ronkel and Curtiz’ tion away from anyone sharing the moments”), and synthesized in The Breaking Point— protégé and stepson, John Meredyth Lucas, who screen with her. was derailed by a combination of factors he could not would polish his skills in TV crime dramas over the overcome. In those earlier films, the complicated cho- next decade. This is Tashlin’s sole noir credit, but a Stritch, always a brash scene-stealer, also chal- reography of plot, visuals, and actorly presence desperate undercurrent was palpable in his comedies, lenges Ohmart to stand up to her. Ohmart manages to meshed into something greater than the sum of its well noted by film critic Dave Kehr: “More than most do so, and then some: their scenes together invigorate many parts: in The Scarlet Hour, the yeast doesn’t of his contemporaries, Tashlin was attuned to the the film. quite rise. We have only intimations of the robust fla- ways in which our own desire betrays us.” That qual- Stritch would later dismiss her role in the film as vorings that classic noir provides. ity is abundantly on display here. little more than a random walk-on, but she creates one (Finally, there’s the title. Moviegoers may have Part of the potential in The Scarlet Hour is com- of the great “bit” parts in all of noir and barely breaks wondered, as we do today, just what the heck a “scar- promised by Tom Tryon’s lack of range. Some of this a sweat. let hour” is. The working title for the film was Too stems from the script, which leaves little leeway for Clearly, The Scarlet Hour doesn’t shy away Late, My Love.