Revision of the Section Hololeuce Bunge of the Genus

Revision of the Section Hololeuce Bunge of the Genus

TurkJBot 28(2004)307-347 ©TÜB‹TAK ResearchArticle RevisionoftheSectionHololeuce BungeoftheGenusAstragalus L. (Leguminosae)inTurkey MuratEK‹C‹ GaziUniversity,FacultyofArtsandScience,DepartmentofBiology,06500,Teknikokullar,Ankara-TURKEY TunaEK‹M ‹stanbulUniversity,FacultyofScience,DepartmentofBotany,34460Süleymaniye,‹stanbul-TURKEY Received:16.01.2003 Accepted:05.09.2003 Abstract: WerevisedthesectionHololeuce BungeofthegenusAstragalus L.(Leguminosae)inTurkey.Thesectionusedtocontain 20taxainTurkey,butinthisstudyithasbeenreducedto15.Anewspecies(Astragalusdumanii Ekici&Aytaç)hasbeendescribed. Inaddition,weconcludedthatA.vuraliiH.Duman&Aytaç,A.cylindraceus DC.,A.alindanus Boiss.,A.paecilanthusBoiss.&Heldr. andA.squalidus Boiss.&NoëaresynonymsofAandrasovszkyi Bornm.,A. globosusVahl,A.hirsutusVahl,A.sibthorpianus Boiss. and A.amoenus Fenzlrespectively.Thepollengrainsaretricolporate,prolate,subprolateorprolatesphaeroidalandthe ornamentationisreticulate. KeyWords: Turkey,Revision,Astragalus,sect.Hololeuce Türkiye’ninAstragalus L.(Leguminosae)CinsininHololeuce BungeSeksiyonununRevizyonu Özet: Türkiye’ninAstragalus L.cinsineaitHololeuce Bungeseksiyonununrevizyonuyapılmıfltır.Seksiyonülkemizde20taksonasahip ikenyapılanbuçalıflmaylasayı15’eindirilmifltir.Bilimdünyasıiçinyenibirtür( Astragalusdumanii Ekici&Aytaç)betimlenmifltir. AyrıcaA.vuralii H.Duman&Aytaç A.andrasovszkyii Bornm.’nin;A.cylindraceus DC.A.globosus Vahl’un;A.alindanus Boiss.A. hirsutus Vahl’un; A. paecilanthus Boiss.&Heldr. A.sibthorpianus Boiss.’un; A.squalidus Boiss.&Noë A.amoenus Fenzl’un sinonimleriolduklarıtespitedilmifltir.Polenlertrikolporat,prolat,subprolatveyaprolatsferoyidveornemantasyonuretikul attır. AnahtarSözcükler: Türkiye,Revizyon,Astragalus Sek.Hololeuce Introduction 1975),Caraganella Bunge(Podlech,1975),Theiochrus DuringthepreparationoftheFloraofTurkey,many Bunge (Podlech&Kozik,1983), Herpocaulos Bunge taxonomicalproblemsinsomegeneraandsectionswere (Podlech,1984), Caprini DC.(Podlech,1988), onlymentionedbutnotsolvedbecauseofthelimited Hypoglottidei DC.(Maassoumi,1988), Campylanthus timeandmaterial.Theeditorssuggestedthatfurther Bunge, Microphysa Bungeand Poterion Bunge(Tietz, revisionshouldbecarriedouttosolvetheseproblems 1988), Platyglottis Bunge(Podlech,1990), (Chamberlain&Matthews,1970;Davis&Hedge, Chlorostachys Bunge, Phyllobium Bungeand 1975;Davis,1975). Astragalus L.,therichestgenus Skythropus Simpson(Wenninger,1991), Megalocystis thatbelongstothefamily Leguminosae, isanexample Bunge (Tietz&Zarre,1994), Hymenostegis Bunge withmanyunresolvedtaxonomicalproblems.Thus, (Zarre&Podlech,1996), Dasyphyllium Bunge(Aytaç, certainsectionsofthegenus Astragalus havebeen 1997), Adiaspastus Bunge, Macrophyllium Bungeand revisedsincethepublicationofvolume3oftheFloraof Pterophorus Bunge(personalcommunicationwith Turkeysuchas Acanthophace Bungeand Aegacantha Zarre),and Alopecias Bunge(personalcommunication Bunge(Deml,1971), Stipetella G.Grig.(Podlech, withAkan). 307 RevisionoftheSectionHololeuce BungeoftheGenusAstragalus L.(Leguminosae)inTurkey ThefirststudyonthegenuswascarriedoutbyPallas Podlech(1988;1999;2001);Davisetal.(1988); (1800),followedbythoseofDeCandolle(1802)and Greuteretal.(1989);Maassoumi,(1989;1994;1998); Bunge(1868,1869).Theoriginsofthegenusextendto Yakovlevetal.(1996);Aytaç,(2000). the1700sandashorttaxonomichistoryofthegenusis Asitisimpossibletostudyallthespeciesatthesame givenontheinFigure1. time,itismorereasonabletostudythegenus sectionby Tournefourtcollectedsomethornyspeciesof section. Astragalus fromtheMiddleEastthathenamed ThemembersoftheHololeuce sectionaredistributed Tragacantha.Later,asseeninFigure1,severalscientists acrossthecentralandeasternpartsofAnatolia,the havestudiedthegenus.In1983,theGermanbotanist MediterraneanandBlackSearegionsinTurkey, Podlechdecidedtoseparatesomespeciesofthisgenusas Afghanistan,Armenia,Azerbaijan,Georgia, Iraq,Iran, anewgenus Astracantha, delimitedbyhaving Lebanon,TajikistanandTurkmenistan.Theworld “paripinnateleaveswith spiny rachisandflowersbornein distributionofthesectionHololeuce isshowninFigure2. axisofleaves ”(Podlech,1983).Neverthless,afterthis separation,itwasrealisedthattherearemany TheFloraofTurkey,Volume3(Chamberlain& transitionalspeciesbetweenthese2genera.Thatthey Matthews,1970),recognised20specieswithinthe boundariesofTurkey,16ofwhichwereconsidered werereunitedagainasthegenericdelimitationofthese2 endemic.Someofthespeciesareonlyknownfrom generaisnotjustified(Zarre&Podlech,1997). ancientgatheringssuchas A.sibthorpianus (1850), A. Astragalus isrepresentedbyc.10subgenera,130 andrasovszkyi (1911)and A.caudiculosus (1916).In sectionsand2500taxaworldwide.Acomparisonofthe somespecies,someimportantmorphologicalcharacters numberofspeciesinTurkeyandothercountriesisgiven aremissing.Forexample,in Astragaluscaudiculosus, the inTable1Shishkin(1965);Chater(1968);Chamberlain fruitcharacterwasnotknown.Inaddition,thereisa &Matthews(1970);Tackhom,(1974);Townsend& similaritybetweenthesections Hololeuce and Guest(1974);Hedge&Podlech(1987);Zohary(1987); Onobrychium.Someofthespeciesof Onobrychium are Tournefort (1700): Astragalus Tragacantha Astragaloides Linnaeus (1753): Astragalus Phaca DC (1802): Oxytropis Astragalus Phaca Gray (1864): Astragalus Von Bunge (1868) Astragalus Phaca Tragacantha etc. Podlech (1983): Oxytropis Astragalus Astracantha Zarre&Podlech(1997): Oxytropis Astragalus Figure1.Theshorttaxonomichistoryof Astragalus. 308 M.EK‹C‹,T.EK‹M Table1.ComparisonofthenumberofAstragalusspeciesbetweenTurkeyandotheroldworldcountries. Region Country TotalSpecies End.Species End.rate Iran 678 381 56.19% SaudiArabia 21 1 4.76% W.ASIA Iraq 145 9 6.20% Afghanistan 293 144 49.14% FormerUSSR Russia 1005 562 55.92% Europe 142 50 35.21% Europe Turkey 446 210 47.08% Syria-Lebanon 59 15 25.42% M.EAST Jordan 35 2 5.71% Palestine 52 4 7.69% India 54 4 7.40% S.ASIA Pakistan 135 26 19.25% E.ASIA China 278 22 7.91% Egypt 34 2 5.88% Algeria 39 2 5.12% AFRICA Morocco 45 9 20.00% Libya 89 24 26.96% N 0500km Figure2.WorlddistributionofthesectionHololeuce. 309 RevisionoftheSectionHololeuce BungeoftheGenusAstragalus L.(Leguminosae)inTurkey transferredto Hololeuce, whereassomespeciesof andCltweremeasuredandtheratioofClg/Clt Hololeuce aretransferredto Onobrychium.Therefore, it calculated. wasdecidedtocarryouttherevisionofsectionHololeuce - Structure:Intheopticcross-section,thecharacters presentedhere;therevisionofthesection Onobrychium ofalayerofpollen. isalsoplanned. - Sculpture: Intheopticcross-section,thesurfaceof exineanditsornamentation. MaterialsandMethods - Thelengthofporesonthepolarside(Plg)and Researchmaterialsofthesection Hololeuce were equatoriallengthweredetermined. collectedfromdifferentpartsofTurkeyinApril-August, Inaddition,thedetailsofthepollenandmorphology bothinthefloweringandfruitingperiod,between1996 wereexaminedusingascanningelectronmicroscope and1999.Inordertostudythevariationpatterns, (SEM). Thesizesofthepollenofallspeciesaregivenin specimenswerecollectedfromasmanydifferentpartsof Table2. theexistingdistributionareaofthesectionaswas possible.Inaddition,thecollectionsofAEF,ANK,ATA,B, SEMMethod CUM,E,EGE,GAZI,HUB,ISTF,K,KNYA,M,MSBandW Pollengrainsweretransferredtostubsandcoated herbariawereexamined.Theauthornameofevery withgold.Afterstudyingtheresultingphotographs,we specieswaswrittenaccordingtotheAuthorsofPlant couldnotfinddiagnosticdifferences. Names(Brummitt&Powell,2001). Taxonomictreatmentofthesection: MorphologicalStudies Astragalus sect. Hololeuce BungeinMém.Acad. Arangeofcharacteristicsthatwereconsideredtobe Imp.Sci.SaintPétersbourg11(16):104.1868. taxonomicallyimportantinthesectionwasinvestigated. Lectotype:A.hololeucus Boiss.&Buhse(Podlech, Theseincludethefollowing:stipulestructureandlength, 1990). leaflength,leafletshapeandlength,theinflorescence, bractshapeandlength,whetherthecalyxisinflatedor =A.sect.Chlorosphaerus BungeinMém.Acad.Imp. not,thecorollastandard,wingandkeelandthe Sci.SaintPétersbourg11(16):106.1868. structure,andsizeofthefruitbeak.Measurementswere Lectotype: A.chlorosphaerus Boiss.(Podlech, obtainedfromatleast10replicatesoneachof10 1990). specimensandtheaveragevalueofeachcharacterwas Scaposeorshortlycaulescent,perennialherbs. evaluated.Themaximumandminimumvaluesofthe Stipulesfreeoradnatetothepetioles.Leaves measurementsofthesepartsaregiveninthedescriptions imparipinnate;leaflets4-20-paired,withbifurcateor ofthetaxa. sub-bifurcatehairs;narrowlyovateornarrowlyelliptic, Palynologicalanalysis oblongorobovate.Inflorescenceadense,pedunculate many-floweredspike;globose,ovateorcylindrical. Thepollenmorphologyofthespecieswasexamined Pedunclegenerallywhite-hairyandalmostaslongasor usingaKyowaMicro-Lux-11lightmicroscope(10x100) longerthanleaves.Bractslinear,triangular-ovate,with andpollenpreparationsweremadebytheWoodhouse whiteorblackhairs.Bracteolesabsentor1-2.Pedicels methodandstainedwithbasicfuchsin(Woodhouse, generallyabsentorupto1mm.Calyxmembranous, 1959).Theirdescriptionshavebeendrawnupusingthe generallytubular,hairy;calyxteethlinear,triangular; morphologicalcharactersgivenbelow(Pehlivan,1995): generallywithblackhairsoutside,glabrousorwithonly - Pollentype:Theapertureshapeandarrangement whitehairsinside.Standardglabrous.Clawofwingsand onthepollen. keelonlyadnateatthebasetostaminaltube.Stamens - Pollenshape:Thedivisionofthepolaraxis(P)tothe diadelphus,filamentsglabrous.Staminaltubestraightly equatorialaxis(E). cut.Ovaryovateorelliptic,withwhitehairs.Fruitsovoid, oblong;bilocular,almostaslongascalyx,beakstraightor - Theexineandintinethickness. curved;2seedsineachlocule,Seedsrectangular- - Thepolarandequatorialdiameterofthecolpus:Clg

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    41 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us