The Evolution of Gigantism on Temperate Seashores

The Evolution of Gigantism on Temperate Seashores

bs_bs_banner Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 776–793. The evolution of gigantism on temperate seashores GEERAT J. VERMEIJ* University of California Davis, Department of Geology, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 Received 10 January 2012; revised 22 February 2012; accepted for publication 22 February 2012bij_1897 776..793 The extent to which animal lineages achieve large body size, a trait with broad advantages in competition and defence, varies in space and time according to the supply of (and demand for) resources, as well as the magnitude and effects of extinction. Using the maximum sizes of shallow-water marine shell-bearing molluscs belonging to nineteen guilds (groups of species with similar habits and food sources) in seven temperate regions from the Early Miocene to the Recent, the present study examined the controls on productivity and predation that enable and compel large size to evolve. The North Pacific (especially its eastern sector) has been most favourable to large-bodied species from the Pliocene onward. Large productive kelps (Laminariales) evolved there in conjunction with herbivorous mammals, setting the stage through positive feedbacks between production and consumption for the evolution of large molluscan herbivores and suspension-feeders. The evolution of bottom-feeding predatory mammals together with other large predators created intense selection for large molluscan sizes. Very large molluscs in the Early Miocene were concentrated in the southern hemisphere, especially among metabolically passive species. Extinctions, which preferentially targeted the largest members of guilds in most regions, were more numerous in the southern hemisphere and the North Atlantic than in the North Pacific. Minimal disruption, together with the early evolution of metabolically-active consumers and the positive feedbacks they engendered, accounts for the evolution of molluscan gigantism in the North Pacific. © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 776–793. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: extinction – Miocene – Mollusca – New Zealand – North Atlantic – North Pacific – Pliocene – South Africa – South America. INTRODUCTION climatically similar times and places aiming to ascertain when, where, in which ecological guilds, and When humans began to exploit marine shellfish for in which clades very large body size evolved and food at least 164 000 years ago in South Africa disappeared. (Marean, 2011) and later elsewhere, they encountered Adult body size evolutionarily integrates predict- many exceptionally large and abundant edible animal able aspects of the demand for (and supply of) species. Had humans instead begun to search for food resources. Demand is created by the costs of doing the on temperate seashores during the Oligocene (32 to work of life (i.e. metabolism) and by natural selection 23 million years ago), they would have encountered stemming from competition in its broadest sense much smaller shellfish. How this potential food source including predation (Van Valen, 1976) for locally lim- affected (and was affected by) consumers on the iting resources. Natural selection results in large demand side and producers on the supply side over size when being larger confers advantages in acquir- geological time is the subject of the present study. The ing and defending sufficient resources to survive aim is to probe the circumstances that permitted, and leave offspring. Within a guild (a group of compelled, and sometimes disallowed large body co-occurring species with similar habits, habitats, size to evolve and be maintained in some of the metabolic rates, and food sources), large-bodied world’s most productive and accessible ecosystems. To species tend to be competitive dominants that control that end, geographical and historical comparisons a disproportionately large fraction of available are made of shallow-water marine ecosystems from resources (Brown & Maurer, 1986). In addition, they enjoy a partial refuge in large size from their most *E-mail: [email protected] potent predators because the costs in time, energy, 776 © 2012 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 106, 776–793 EVOLUTION OF GIGANTISM 777 and risk of injury required for predators to kill and feeders and herbivores. On the demand side, basal consume victims rise faster than the benefits with metabolic rates and the intensity of directional selec- increasing prey size (Palmer, 1990). The vulnerable tion for traits that enhance competitive ability and part of the life cycle, when individuals are small and antipredatory defence generally increase with higher young, is characterized by rapid growth in places temperatures and greater food abundance (Vermeij, that are relatively safe from enemies, as in the 2011a, b). Competition and selection may be intense pelagic realm, under stones, in a resistant egg capsule when food is globally scarce, although the ability or inside the parent’s body. In this way, large-bodied of a population to respond to selection is minimal species with high metabolic demands reduce the func- (Vermeij, 2004a). There is mounting evidence that tional trade-offs between traits necessary for survival demand, especially predation, stimulates primary early in life and the benefits associated with a large production (Vermeij, 2010; Vermeij & Leigh, 2011). body in the reproductive adult stage. Enabling factors, metabolism, and selection are thus The extent to which selection drives species toward connected through strong positive feedbacks between larger body size depends on enabling factors, which consumers and producers. These feedbacks arise control the supply of (and access to) food. The because consumers with large appetites exert strong enabling factors that permit large size to evolve in selection on their victim species in favour of rapid metabolically active species with high demand growth and therefore higher biomass turnover and include: (1) reliably high productivity (the rate at productivity. This selection, in turn, permits consum- which food is made available); (2) the existence of ers to become larger, more abundant, and metaboli- technology to tap, defend, and capitalize on available cally more active. These feedbacks may become resources; (3) high oxygen availability, especially in evolutionarily best developed in regions when produc- cold water; and (4) minimal constraints on access to tion and consumption remain relatively undisturbed food from either enemies or from excessive heat, cold, for long periods of time. turbulence, and toxicity. Maximum adult size in Large body size becomes disadvantageous when the marine animal species is known to increase along food supply declines or becomes unstable, or when geographical gradients of increasing primary produc- access to food is restricted by conditions unfavourable tivity in suspension-feeding bivalves, herbivorous to biological activity. These adverse circumstances gastropods, and many predatory gastropods and crus- arise during times of widespread extinction, when taceans (Vermeij, 1978, 1980; Bosman, Hockey & primary productivity is reduced and positive feed- Siegfried, 1987; Reaka-Kudla, 2000; Linse, Barnes & backs between producers and consumers are dis- Enderlein, 2006; Sejr, Blicher & Rysgaard, 2009). rupted. Such crises place the largest species in a guild Species with low metabolism and minimal mainte- at greatest risk of extinction because it is these nance costs can attain large size under less produc- species that rely most heavily on a predictably prolific tive conditions, although they can do so only if supply of food (Vermeij, 2004b; Vermeij, Dietl & Reid, mortality during the slow-growing, small-bodied 2008). Regions in which extinction has been minor young stages is low. These latter circumstances should therefore have been most favourable to the produce the ‘gentle giant’ syndrome of many soft- evolution of very large size. bodied Antarctic marine animals (Arnaud, 1974; Rosa In the light of these expected patterns, the present & Seibel, 2010) and island tortoises. study examined how production and consumption The conditions that enable and compel the evolu- together have affected the evolution of gigantism in tion of large body size in consumers vary in space and bottom-dwelling shallow-water molluscs. As an exten- time. Suspension-feeders are supported by primary sion of previous work in the North Atlantic (Vermeij production of phytoplankton, which peaks at mid et al., 2008) and the tropics (Vermeij, 2011a), this latitudes, especially in regions where nutrients enter present study reports and interprets spatial and tem- from the land via rivers or are brought up to the sea poral patterns in maximum body size in molluscan surface from deep reservoirs by upwelling (Mann, guilds from four northern and three southern temper- 2000). Herbivores depend on primary production on ate regions. No attempt has been made to quantify the seafloor, which, on temperate coasts, is highest the roles of supply and demand because doing so where nutrient-rich waters wash over extensive beds implies that these factors act independently, when in of large seaweeds and meadows of seagrass (Mann, fact they are inextricably linked through feedbacks. 2000). The release of copious dissolved organic matter Instead, the conditions that have influenced produc- from living and decaying seaweeds also benefits phy- tion and consumption in each region are analyzed, toplankton production (Duggins,

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    18 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us