Rose, E. L., Salesa, D., Benson-Rea, M., Raskovic, M. (Matt), & Osegowitsch, T. 2021. Letter from the Editors: Engaging with Oceania: Some Background about the Region – and Why It Matters for IB Research. AIB Insights, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.46697/ 001c.21196. Editorial Letter from the Editors: Engaging with Oceania: Some Background about the Region – and Why It Matters for IB Research Elizabeth L. Rose, Guest Editor 1, Damon Salesa 2, Maureen Benson-Rea 2, Matevz (Matt) Raskovic, Guest Editor 3, Tom Osegowitsch, Guest Editor 4 1 University of Leeds, UK; Indian Institute of Management Udaipur, India, 2 University of Auckland, New Zealand, 3 Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand, 4 University of Melbourne, Australia Keywords: geopolitics, climate change, sustainability, indigenous, ocean continent https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.21196 AIB Insights Vol. 21, Issue 1, 2021 This special issue aims to introduce readers to the southern Pacific region of Oceania, which includes Australia, Melanesia, Micronesia, New Zealand, and Polynesia. This region represents remarkable diversity of institutions, cultures, and languages, and its history and economic development are deeply intertwined with the ocean. While typically viewed as a collection of geographically-remote and generally small-population island nations, relative to global centers, Oceania offers an interesting context for IB research, with respect to a variety of issues, from the impact of climate change to cross-cultural management and geopolitics. To belong to an island is to look outwards, understanding of IB research, the Pacific rarely eaturesf as a holistic entity that the horizon is not simply a boundary between what is in IB research (Thomas, Shenkar, & Clarke, 1994). Instead, visible and what is invisible, what is known and unknown, we continue to draw on a physical geography-informed but a challenge: to imagine, to yearn, to leave, to search, epistemology and pursue nation-state-centric research, as to return. (Laughlin, 2017: 10) opposed to reimagining such a region as an idea-scape or a 1 space for exploring various types of critical junctures of tra- THE CONTEXT dition and modernity, the physical and the metaphysical, or the global and the local (Schorch & Pascht, 2017). For ex- The history of humanity and its socioeconomic develop- ample, the Federated States of Micronesia, located north- ment has always been inextricably determined by geogra- east of New Guinea and east of the Philippines, comprise phy and connected to water (Morris, 2011). Many ancient some 600 islands and have a population of just over 104,000 civilizations emerged in coastal areas, and ocean-going people. While small in land mass, Micronesia stretches over trade has existed for millennia. Oceanic trade in the Age of 2,700 km in length and covers an area of 2.6 million km2, Discovery gave birth to the first multinational orporations:c making it the 10th-largest country (after Kazakhstan) in the British and Dutch East India Companies. These trading terms of surface. Occupied by Spain from the 16th century organizations became archetypes of the modern multina- CE, they were sold to Germany (1899) and were then oc- tional corporation and central actors in what would, cen- cupied by Japan (1914). Post-WWII, they have been admin- turies later, come to define the field of international busi- istered by the US. The example of Micronesia illustrates ness (IB). Their government-backed activities had conse- the region’s many paradoxes and its often-contested na- quences that were both immediate and enduring. The scars ture. The Pacific region is also characterized by far-reaching left by various extractive empires and their trading corpora- linkages and diversity. For example, the Northern Mariana tions are still visible today, either as remnants of colonial- Islands and American Samoa represent the western and ism or as more contemporary forms of economic and politi- southern extremes of the US. The islands of Wallis and Fu- cal power struggles in the name of peace, security, and pros- tuna are part of France, while Tokelau is the northernmost perity. part of New Zealand. Consider the Pacific region. With a surface of over 165 Whereas the Indian and Atlantic Oceans became indus- million km2, the Pacific Ocean is the largest body on Earth, trialization and globalization superhighways between the larger than all the continents combined (Winchester, 2015); 15th and 20th centuries, we view the Pacific Ocean as a lo- it is the planet’s largest single feature (Thompson, 2019). cation of the future, where economic, political, and security Yet, in terms of “mental maps” and the geographical scope interests are confronted by the wicked problems of climate 1 This editorial draws heavily on Damon Salesa’s keynote speech at the 2020 AIB-Oceania research symposium. Tom Osegowitsch, Matevz (Matt) Raskovic, and Elizabeth L. Rose served as Guest Editors for the special issue. Letter from the Editors: Engaging with Oceania: Some Background about the Region – and Why It Matters for IB Research Figure 1: Map of Oceania Source: https://mapcruzin.com/free-world-maps/oceania1182x819.jpg change and sustainability (Winchester, 2015). A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE Oceania – the subject of this Special Issue – is part of the vast Pacific region, and includes 14 ountries:c Australia, The region represents contradictions of scale. While the Pa- Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Marshall Is- cific is the planet’s largest entity, accounting for nearly one lands, Nauru, New Zealand, Palau, Papua New Guinea, third of the Earth’s surface, most of the countries in the Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, and Vanuatu (see region are island states that are tiny in terms of both size Figure 1). The name “Oceania” is attributed to Danish car- and population. Yet, many of the region’s inhabitants take tographer Conrad Malte-Brun (1755–1826), who referred to a different view. They do not see themselves as citizens of a supercontinent in the southern Pacific that included Aus- small island nations but as custodians of vast ocean envi- tralia and the South Pacific islands. For many in the global ronments. Kiribati, for instance, with a population of less West, though, Oceania connotes something more than ge- than 120,000, has an Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) mea- ography. It has long been viewed as a kind of a paradise; suring 3.4 million km2, similar to the size of India’s land Harrington (1656) described “Oceana” as a utopian consti- surface and close to 15 times that of the United Kingdom. tutional republic in the South Pacific. While Oceania is of- Kiribati’s ocean area is larger than the land surface of all ten characterized as having a common South Pacific iden- but six countries in the world. The Kiribati view highlights tity, this particular externally-defined identity is not shared the ocean rather than land mass, and Kiribatians see them- by the region’s many peoples and nations (Wood, 2003). The selves in charge of caring for a very substantial part of the South Pacific is a place of remarkable cultural and linguistic planet. diversity, comprising indigenous Polynesian, Melanesian, This is a view that is now very common across the Pacific. and Micronesian cultures, along with various colonial and Referring to the region as “the Blue Pacific” – effectively, more recent influences. For example, there are more than an ocean continent – emphasizes a shared identity among 800 different languages spoken in Papua New Guinea alone, Pacific people, built on their onnecc tion with the ocean, with a population of fewer than nine million. the environment, and culture. Such a shift in language This complexity means that studying Oceania involves (re)claims size and significance for the region, and repre- navigating a sea of contextualized knowledge and compet- sents a dramatic change in perspective. Thinking of the re- ing world views (e.g., Wood, 2003). Doing this effectively gion as an ocean continent affirms acificP peoples’ onc - demands that researchers be aware of, and acknowledge, nections with the ocean, the environment, culture, and re- their own epistemological and methodological embedded- sources. ness (Bhambra, 2017). Understanding the myriad of para- This offers a powerful way of viewing the region. For ex- doxes and tensions in the South Pacific, as ellw as respect- ample, one of the key IB-related questions that we might ing indigenous cultures, necessitates the decolonization of ask is: Where does the Pacific fit in a globalizing and dy- methodologies (Tuhiwai Smith, 2012). namic world of business, trade, and engagement in global relationships? Thinking of the region as an ocean conti- AIB Insights 2 Letter from the Editors: Engaging with Oceania: Some Background about the Region – and Why It Matters for IB Research nent, rather than a collection of small and marginal nation- a substantial diaspora throughout the world. Many Pacific states allows us to place the Pacific at the enterc of some nations – including the Cook Islands, Niue, Samoa, Tokelau, important issues that are likely to define many aspects of and Tonga – have more than 50% of their people living away the 21st century. from their homelands. The Pacific region is also home to First, the region is arguably a key arena for the multi- substantial immigrant-originated communities; more than faceted contest between China and the US. Physically, what a third of Fiji’s population is of Indian descent, following an sits between these two global powers is the Pacific. The US influx of indentured laborers during the late 19th and ear- has tuned its economic focus more strongly to the Pacific; ly 20th centuries, and Australia and New Zealand are both 50 years ago, the major US commercial ports were on the home to large immigrant populations from many countries. Atlantic, while, today, five of the nation’s busiest 10 ports The Pacific, especially in light of the real potential for cli- are on the Pacific.