Differences in Human Pigmentation: Measurement, Geographic Variation, and Causes* G

Differences in Human Pigmentation: Measurement, Geographic Variation, and Causes* G

Vol. 60. o. 6 TilE J OU RNA L OF I NVESTIGATIVE DEilMATOLOGY Printed in U.S.A. Copyri ght© 1973 by The Williams & Wilkins Co. DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN PIGMENTATION: MEASUREMENT, GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION, AND CAUSES* G. AINS WORTH HARRISON, PH.D. INTRODUCTION affected b y o nly a s ingle pair of ge nes. Since most of the genetic studies of population differences in T he racial differences in pi gmentation t hat have pigmentation relate to skin color, I shall , for the been studied by ant hropolog ists are t he readily most part, confine my d isc ussion to it. observable o nes t hat occur in skin, ha ir, a nd t he eye. T he co lor of t hese structures is due to a THE MEASUREM ENT OF SKIN CO LOR number of factors, but variation in them, espe­ For a long time, t he study o f skin co lor variation cia lly as it occurs between popu l at i m~s, ~p pe ~ r s to. in fi eld sit uations was beset with difficult problem be largely due to the amount and dtstn butwn of of m easurement. At first, measurements involved t he pigment melanin. This was first _most firml y_ visual co mpari son with sets of co lor standards such established fo r skin in t he now classtcal work of as the Va n Luschan t iles or the colored papers used Edwards and Duntley (1939) and has subsequently by Gates ( 1949) . These were hi ghly unsatisfactory been demonstrated fo r hair and the iris diaphragm not onl y because of the subjectivity of visual of the eye. Hair color, however, may be influenced matching, but also because of t he necessity of by a totally different pigment, t ri chosiderin, which imposing discrete units upon a natural continuum. is concerned with the red shades (Barnicot, 1956a, Furthermore, it was a lmost impossible to m atch b). Histologic (Gates and Zimmermann, 1953; t he texture of the skin with the texture of eit her Gates, 1961) a nd electron microscopic studies tiles or papers; t hose who have used t hese tech­ (Barnicot et a l. , 1955; Birbeck et al. , 1956) have niques know t he difficul ty of fin ding a n_y corre­ show n h ow t he mela nin pigment is organized into spondence between the standa rds a nd s ~m color. discrete encapsul ated gra nules in skin and ha ir. H arrison and Salza no (1966) , workmg wtth South Little attention has been given recently to t he basis American Indian populations, fou nd li ttle corre­ of eye color differences, but it has been established spondence between measurements made with Van t hat much of t he color vari ation in the iris is due to Luschan tiles and t hose made with a s pectropho­ different a moun ts of phys ical refraction which tometer. depend upon how t he melanin is di stributed in t he The sit uation was somewhat improved by the t issues (Coon et a l. , 1950). use of the Milton Bradley color top in which In the development o f skin color, melanin is segments of four colored papers-black, white, red. synthesized solely by melanocytes in the basal and yellow-were arra nged in differin g amounts so layer of t he epid ermis from which pigment e nters that wh en t he top was spun t he blending of the t he neighboring epidermal cell s of t he stratum colors produced a visual range varying fr om dark to Malpighi (Bi llingha m and Medawar, 1948). There­ li cr ht brow n . This at least presented a continuous fore, in a ny consideration of racial va ri ation and s;ale of measurements, but it still retain ed the the ge netics of skin color, the ul timate concern ts fundamental disadvantage of visual subjectivity. t he hereditary fa ctors that regulate melanin sy n­ H ow to co mbine t he amounts of t he four color t hesis a nd distribution by the skin melanocytes. discs, which corresponded to any particula r skin However, the activit ies of these melanocytes them­ color, into a s ingle measurement o f t hat color wa selves are a ffected by numerous external factors, never adequately solved . At first, t he extent of especia ll y exposure to ultraviolet radiation . Hence expos ure of t he black disc was taken as the skin color in man i s a typical, quantitatively measurement, but it was later show n that the red varying character dependent wit hin and between disc itself contained black pi gment a nd t hat allow­ populations upon both hered itary an? environ­ ance had to be made for t his. mental factors and poss tbly o n an mteractton The fi eld of study o f skin color vari ation on a between them. geogra phic basis has been revo~ut i o ni ze d in t he last Al t hough ha ir a nd eye color appear to be less decades by the development of t he portable reflect­ affected by norma l enviro nmental factors, t hey are ance spectrophotometer. This instrument oYer­ in£1 uenced by age and sex differences; and ha tr came practicall y a ll the earli er problems by provid­ color, of course, is often artifi cia lly c hanged. Even ing a measure o f color on a continuous_ and after a ll owance has been made for t hese factors, objective scale of measurement. A vane_ty of such both tend to show quantitative variations wit hin instruments have been used in [i eld stud1 es, but all populations. Red ha ir (Reed, 1952) a nd i he more work on essentiall y t he sa me principle. marked differences in eye color such as blue versus Li ght is e mitted from a standa rd source and brown (Brues, 1946) behave as t hough t hey were passes on to the surface of the skin t h1:ough any one of a series of co lor fil ters, wh1ch typtcall y samp l~ • From the An thropology Laboratory , Depa rtment of t he visual spectrum. The re11 ected light is the11 Human Anatomy, Un iversity of Oxford, Oxford, Eng­ picked up by a photocell a nd measured on a land . 418 DIFFERENCES IN HUMAN PIGMENTATION 419 galvano meter unit . The a mount of li ght refl ected melanin concentration, it probably arises from from t h e skin is compared with t hat ref1 ected from different li fe styles and different exposure to sun­ a pure white standard such as magnesium oxide or light. Age differences t hat have been reported magnesium carbonate, or in some cases with a (some rather complicated ) have been assumed to more robust standard which itself has been ca li­ be related to hormonal balance. brated against what is regarded as 100% ref1 ect­ The use of spectrophotometers hi ghlights some ance. T he two photometers most commonly used of the problems inherent in the measurement of in field studies are t he EEL (Weiner, 1952), large ly a ny continuously varin g t rait, for one seldom has used by British, Cont in ental, a nd Indian investiga­ t he opportunity to measure t he same c haracter tors, and the P hotovolt (Lasker, 1954), used by directly on such totally different scales as t hose orth Ameri cans. These instruments are obtaina­ afforded b y t he various wavelengths of t he differ­ ble with many different fi lters. The EEL is nor­ ent fi lters. Within most popul ations, t he variation mally s upplied with a standard set of nine. Photo­ in skin color tends to be sli ght and when graph­ volt offers a considerable variety from which to ically plotted does not detectably depart from a choose. Unfortunately, because t he filters differ Gaussian distribution. Where t he within-popula­ not only in their dominant wavelength but also in tion variabili ty is high (e.g., in hybrid groups and many other optical properties, it is difficul t to between p arental populations differing markedly mak e direct comparisons between t he two instru ­ in color), a non-Gaussia n distribution may be due ments. Filters have been designed for many spec i­ to other factors tha n the scale of measurements, fic purposes; for example, for color analys is a nd, such as the differing contributions of t he parental like t h e set of nine provided wi th the EEL instru­ populations o r assortative mating. men t, for m easuring ref1ecta nce over a narrow Only when populations differing markedly in waveband. In using t hese instruments, one must skin color a re studied on t he diffe rent scales of never forget exactly what is being measured. wavelength d oes the problem of scale itself become Typical refle ctance curves measured with t he clear. For example, Figure 2 compares a European EEL instrument are shown in Figure 1. Refl ectance whi te population, an African black population, values depend not only on t he particul ar instru ­ and an F 1 hybrid population in terms of t he ment a nd fi lter u sed, bu t a lso body s ite. Most reflectance of blue light with that of red li ght. Note investigators measure at one or more of t hree that one wou ld have to come to totally diffe rent sites- t h e fo rehead, t he inner aspect of t he fore­ conclusions about t he potence of t he genes on the arm, a nd t he inner aspect of the upper a rm two scales.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    9 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us