PNNL-14998 Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 TJ Carlson JP Duncan RL Johnson FINAL REPORT March 31, 2005 Prepared for the Bonneville Power Administration under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor Battelle Memorial Institute, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or Battelle Memorial Institute. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY operated by BATTELLE for the UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Printed in the United States of America Available to DOE and DOE contractors from the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, P.O. Box 62, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-0062; ph: (865) 576-8401 fax: (865) 576-5728 email: [email protected] Available to the public from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161 ph: (800) 553-6847 fax: (703) 605-6900 email: [email protected] online ordering: http://www.ntis.gov/ordering.htm This document was printed on recycled paper. PNNL- 14998 Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 TJ Carlson JP Duncan RL Johnson FINAL REPORT March 31, 2005 Prepared for the Bonneville Power Administration under a Related Services Agreement with the U.S. Department of Energy Under Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830 Pacific Northwest National Laboratory P.O. Box 999 Richland, Washington 99352 Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 Summary This report describes a study conducted by Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) for the Bonneville Power Administration to characterize the conditions fish experience when entrained in pump flow at the Grand Coulee Dam. PNNL conducted field studies at Grand Coulee Dam in 2004 using the Sensor Fish to measure the acceleration and pressure conditions that might be experienced by fish that pass through pumps at Grand Coulee Dam's Pump-Generating Plant and are transported up into the feeder canal leading to Banks Lake. The probability that fish would be struck by the Pump-Generating Plant's new nine-bladed turbines was also estimated. Our measurements showed relatively low turbulence except in the immediate vicinity of the runner environment. The lowest and highest pressures experienced by the Sensor Fish were 6.4 and 155 psi (the pressure gauge saturated at 155 psi). The probability of strike was also calculated, based on the average length of hatchery-reared juvenile kokanee (land-locked sockeye). Strike probabilities ranged from 0.0755 for 2.36-inch fish to 0.3890 for 11.8-inch fish. The probability of strike estimates indicate that the majority (77%) of recently released hatchery kokanee would be carried through the test pump without being struck and most likely with low risk of injury resulting from pressure and turbulence exposure. Of the 23% that might be struck it is expected that 60% would arrive in Banks Lake without visible external injuries. Thus more than 90% of entrained fish could be expected to arrive in Banks Lake without significant injury, assuming that no kokanee were injured or killed by pressure exposure during passage. v Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 vi Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 Acknowledgments Our study would not have been possible without the assistance of staff and equipment provided by the Colville Confederated Tribes. Richard LeCaire, lead for the Chief Joseph Kokanee Enhancement Program, and Steve Francis helped with the release and recovery of Sensor Fish and many other aspects of planning and execution of the study. We wish to thank the Bonneville Power Administration for their sponsorship of this work through the Colville Confederated Tribes’ Chief Joseph Kokanee Enhancement Program. We thank Steve Sauer and Jan Schrader from the Bureau of Reclamation for their assistance in understanding the pump environment and planning the sensor release location. Our work would not have been possible without the assistance of the operation and maintenance crews at Grand Coulee, who among other things removed access hatches permitting us access to the turbine pump intake. We also acknowledge the support provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Wind and Hydropower Technologies Program for development of the Sensor Fish Device and for providing the sensors used for the study. We also acknowledge the assistance of Pacific Northwest National Laboratory staff Dan Tano and Ian Welch who assisted with equipment setup. Ian was also responsible for radio tracking during recovery of the Sensor Fish in Banks Lake. vii Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 viii Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 Contents Summary .....................................................................................................................................................iii Acknowlegments ......................................................................................................................................... iv 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................................................1.1 1.1 Background...............................................................................................................................1.1 1.2 Objectives and Scope ...............................................................................................................1.1 1.3 Report Contents........................................................................................................................1.2 2.0 Methods ........................................................................................................................................2.1 2.1 Study Site..................................................................................................................................2.1 2.2 Sensor Fish Device ...................................................................................................................2.3 2.3 Sensor Fish Releases ................................................................................................................2.4 2.4 Data Acquisition and Analysis .................................................................................................2.5 2.4.1 Pressure Time Histories ...................................................................................................2.5 2.4.2 Probability of Strike.........................................................................................................2.6 3.0 Results...........................................................................................................................................3.1 3.1 Site Elevations..........................................................................................................................3.1 3.2 Pressure and Acceleration Time Histories................................................................................3.2 3.3 Estimation of Strike Probability for Fish Entrained in Pump Flow..........................................3.5 4.0 Discussion.....................................................................................................................................4.1 5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations .............................................................................................5.1 5.1 Conclusions ..............................................................................................................................5.1 5.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................................................5.1 6.0 References.....................................................................................................................................6.1 ix Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 x Characterization of Pump Flow at the Grand Coulee Dam Pumping Station for Fish Passage, 2004 Figures Figure 2.1. Grand Coulee Dam, Washington............................................................................................2.1 Figure 2.2. Canal carrying water from Lake Roosevelt through the pump-generating units to Banks Lake. ..............................................................................................................................2.2 Figure 2.3. Sensor Fish Device.