Pesticide Resistance of Agricultural Pests in Japan

Pesticide Resistance of Agricultural Pests in Japan

Pesticide Resistance of Agricultural Pests in Japan By TOSHIKAZU IWATA Chief, 3rd Laboratory of Insect Control Investigation, Department of Phytopathology and Entomology, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences A quarter century has passed since DDT other organophosphorus chemicals such as was firstly applied to control agricultural in­ methyl paration. As the result the parathion­ sect pests. The amount of synthesized organic resistant borer was prevented from spreading insecticides applied in fields increased rapidly by changing insecticide to be applied for the since 1952 and the rate of increase was about control. 10 per cent a year. In 1960 an evident report Control of the rice stem borer by BHC dust was made on insecticide resistance of insects, was established in about 1950, and application so 10 years have passed following the first of fine dust or granular formulation of BHC appearance of insecticide-resistant insects. to paddy fields became very popular in 1961 Today, pest species developed or suspected of or 1962. In 1964, declination of susceptibility resistance totals 11 species of insects and 6 of the borers to BHC was found in Kagawa species of mites as shown in Table 1. The Prefecture. After that, similar phenomena author reviews the circumstances of occur­ were reported in some other prefectures. The rence and some results of studies on major amount of BHC applied to paddy fields has instances of resistant pests. been decreased for its residue in rice plants. Consequently, BHC resistance of rice stem Rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis borer may not become a serious problem in Walker future. Recently, declination of susceptibility of The rice stem borer is one of the most im­ the borer to fenitrothion is suspected in a portant pests of rice plants in Japan. few parts of Japan. A more detailed survey Parathion has been used extensively to con­ is needed to clarify the resistance of trol them since 1953. In 1960, it was report­ fenitrothion. ed that the control of the rice stem borer by parathion had failed in some parts of Kagawa Green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix Prefecture, Shikoku districts. This was the cincticeps Uhler first important problem of pesticide resistance of agricultural pest insects in Japan, and its In 1954 and '55, malathion was found to be remarkable phenomenon was attributed to an excellent chemical to control the green rice the fact that this was the first example of leafhopper. Since then, this chemical has been resistance to organophosphorus insecticides applied extensively in most areas where this in Lepiclopterous insects in the world. Stu­ insect is prevalent. In Kochi Prefecture, dies clarified the point that parathion-resistant Shikoku districts, malathion has been used to larvae had high activity of parathion degrada­ control this pest from 1955, and 1.5% mala­ tion and did not have cross resistance to the thion dust was applied to paddy fields under 35 Table 1. A list of agricultural pests developed (or suspected to be developed) resistance to pesticide in Japan Pest species Host plant or crop Pesticide developed resistance Insect in paddy field Rice stem borer, Chilo suppressalis Rice parathion, BHC, fenitrothion* Green rice leafhopper, Nephotettix cine· I/ malathion, other OP**, carbamates ticeps Smaller brown planthopper, laodelphax I/ BHC, malathion striatellus Rice leaf beetle, Oulema oryzae I/ BHC Smaller rice leaf miner, Hydrellia gri· I/ BHC* seala Insect in vegetable field Common cabbage worm, Pieris rapea Cruciferous DDT crucivora vegetable Onion maggot, Hylemya antique Onion aldrin*, heptachlor* Seed-corn maggot, Hylemya platura Bean and other crops aldrin, heptachlor Diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella Cruciferous DDVP* vegetable Striped flea beetle, Phyllotreta I/ aldrin*, heptachlor* strioleta Green peach aphid, Myzus persicae I/ some kinds of OP Mite European red mite, Panonychus ulmi Apple tree phenkapton, Tedion, Sappiran, vami­ dothion, Tmidan, Kelthane, Morestan Citrus red mite, Panonychus citri Citrus phenkapton, Tedion, dimethoate, Ket. thane, binapacryl, Morestan Two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus Apple, peach, pear phenkapton, methyl demeton, vami- ulticae plant dothion, Kelthane Sweet cherry spider mite Tetranychu.s Peach tree methyl demeton viemzensis Kanzawa spider mite, Tetranychus kan· Tea plant phenkapton, Tedion, Estox, Kelthane zawai Carmine mite, Tetranychus telaritts Flowering and pear methyl demeton, Estox, Kelthane plants * : suspected or farmer's report **: abbreviation of organophosphorus chemical the cooperative control program from 1958. was applied for control of both the stem borer In the spring of 1960, the effect of malathion and the leafhopper, but it was discovered dust was low and satisfactory results of con­ that only poor results were obtained to con­ trol could not be obtained even by application trol the leafhopper. In the following year, of 3% dust. insecticide-susceptibility was tested in the In Ehime Prefecture, Shikoku districts, leafhopper populations from many parts of malathion was used in 1959 to control the the prefecture and it was found that some green rice leafhopper, but at that time, methyl populations had inferior susceptibility to parathion had been already used in a large methyl parathion and malathion. In 1965, ef­ amount to control the rice stem borer from fect of fenthion was also found to be low several years ago. In 1962, methyl parathion against this leafhopper. 36 JARQ Vol. 5, No. 2, 1970 These are two remarkable examples of re­ insecticides and their amounts applied previ­ sistant leafhopper which were reported early, ously in paddy fields. but afterwards, reports of similar evidences in In contrast with parathion resistance of many prefectures were received in succession. rice stem borer, there is practically no alterna­ Due to the fact that green rice leafhoppers tive organophosphorus insecticide for the inhabit paddy fields throughout the rice culti­ resistant green rice leafhopper, and the only vating period and pass three or four genera­ effective insecticides may be carbamates. As tions there, they are frequently exposed to there seems to be a possibility that the green various organophosphorus insecticides which rice leafhopper will develop resistance to are applied to the other insect pests. For this carbamate insecticides in future, insecticide reason, some other organophosphorus insecti­ resistance of this leafhopper is now a serious cides as well as malathion are considered af­ problem confronting Japan. fecting the green rice leafhoppers as selecting pressure. Therefore, the leafhopper resistance Rice leaf beetle, Oulema oryzae to organophosphorus insecticides is likely to Kuwayama occur as multiple resistance as well as cross of malathion. This possibility is fully In Hokkaido, BHC has been applied to con­ observed in Table 2; that is, there is a close trol the rice leaf beetle which is one of the relationship existing between LD,o values of major pest insects of rice plants in the north- Table 2. LDo0 values of insecticides to the green rice leafhoppers collected in five places and amount of insecticides previously applied there LD (µg/g of body weight) of populations collected in Insecticides 50 Konosu Sojima Fujita Osone Nakagawara Malathion 0.65 8.51 3. 51 4.63 12.41 PAPTHION 0. 75 5. 45 4. 43 6.58 9.46 Dimethoate 2.53 46.99 14. 39 7. 45 43.83 Parathion 3.06 19. 54 32.60 4. 09 125.26 Methyl parathion 6.84 40.65 141. 98 16.08 319. 76 Fenitrothion 14.62 37.67 390.16 19.92 1090. 94 Diazinon 1. 85 5.36 2. 77 1. 44 8. 99 Fenthion 9.91 56.63 32.83 14.46 39. 43 EPN 4.91 15. 98 18. 25 5.32 63.65 Carbary) 1.14 3.07 1. 04 1. 39 1. 64 Hoppcide 3.30 4.76 4.08 2. 99 4.. 18 Propox.ur 4. 33 4.43 3. 75 3. 60 3. 23 Amount of insecticides (g of ingredient per hectare applied in each place for period of) 1960-1963 1958-1963 1957-1963 1957-1963 Malathion 2860 2131 4232 101 Parathion 669 5953 Methyl parathion 2243 2690 637 7304 Fenitrothion 887 Fenthion 29 5 EPN 151 725 2720 3892 Carbary) 87 37 ern part of Japan. This chemical has been was 487 times higher than the most suscep­ used once or twice in a nursery bed for con­ tible population. trol of the rice leaf beetle since 1954 when Now, VC-13 is recommended as an alterna­ the smaller rice leaf miner, Hydrellia, g1·iseola tive insecticide to control the seedcorn maggots Fallen, occurred severely. BHC was also ap­ resistant to organochlorinated hydrocarbons. plied customarily to control the rice stem There are similar other cases that the seed­ borer in the periods when the rice leaf beetle corn maggots are suspected to have developed was in the larva or new adult stage. For resistance to aldrin or heptachlor, but no these reasons, damage to rice plants by rice trouble occurs by using that alternative in­ leaf beetles was slight, but it increased in secticide. 1963 and some areas where BHC dust showed only poor effect to this beetle were Mites found in 1964. At that time, even 3% dust of BHC was not sufficient, although in Resistance to pesticides is a very serious early time, good control results were achieved problem in mites. Not only fruit and tea by BHC dusts of 0.5 to 1.0%. Areas where culturists but also chemical manufactures are the resistant populations occurred were sur­ now distressed by the fact that several kinds veyed and detecting methods of resistance of mites damaging fruit trees and tea plants were studied from 1965. Those were clarified develop resistance to various acaricides one that there were some populations which were after another. about ten times more resistant than suscep­ European red mite, P<inonychus ul1ni Koch, tible population and that the resistance was in Aomori Prefecture, for example, lowered its maintained in all stages of this insect.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us