
<p>Global Arbitration Review </p><p>The Guide to Construction Arbitration </p><p>General Editors Stavros Brekoulakis and David BrynmorThomas QC </p><p>Third Edition </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p>The Guide to Construction </p><p>Arbitration </p><p>Third Edition <br>Editors <br>Stavros Brekoulakis and David BrynmorThomas QC </p><p>Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd <br>This article was first published in October 2019 <br>For further information please contact [email protected] </p><p>gar </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p>Publisher </p><p>David Samuels </p><p>Account Manager </p><p>BevanWoodhouse </p><p>Editorial Coordinator </p><p>Hannah Higgins </p><p>Head of Production </p><p>Adam Myers </p><p>Deputy Head of Production </p><p>Simon Busby </p><p>Copy-editor </p><p>Claire Ancell </p><p>Proofreader </p><p>Rakesh Rajani Published in the United Kingdom by Law Business Research Ltd, Meridian House, 34-35 Farringdon Street, London EC4A 4HL, UK © 2019 Law Business Research Ltd www.globalarbitrationreview.com </p><p>No photocopying: copyright licences do not apply. The information provided in this publication is general and may not apply in a specific situation, nor does it necessarily represent the views of authors’ firms or their clients. Legal advice should always be sought before taking any legal action based on the information provided.The publishers accept no responsibility for any acts or omissions contained herein.Although the information provided is accurate as of September 2019, be advised that this is a developing area. </p><p>Enquiries concerning reproduction should be sent to Law Business Research, at the address above. Enquiries concerning editorial content should be directed to the Publisher – [email protected] </p><p>ISBN 978-1-83862-211-4 Printed in Great Britain by Encompass Print Solutions, Derbyshire </p><p>Tel: 0844 2480 112 </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><strong>Acknowledgements </strong></p><p>The publisher acknowledges and thanks the following firms for their learned assistance throughout the preparation of this book: </p><p>39 ESSEX CHAMBERS <br>3VERULAM BUILDINGS <br>ADVOKATFIRMAN RUNELAND AB <br>AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP <br>ANKURA <br>ARGOS CONSTRUCTION <br>BÄR & KARRER <br>CENTRE FOR COMMERCIAL LAW STUDIES, QUEEN MARY <br>UNIVERSITY OF LONDON </p><p>CLIFFORD CHANCE <br>CORRS CHAMBERSWESTGARTH COVINGTON & BURLING LLP CROWN OFFICE CHAMBERS DEBEVOISE & PLIMPTON LLP <br>DECHERT (PARIS) LLP <br>HERBERT SMITH FREEHILLS LLP <br>KING & SPALDING </p><p>i</p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p>KPMG SA <br>MATTOS FILHO,VEIGA FILHO, MARREY JR. <br>E QUIROGA ADVOGADOS </p><p>PAKSOY <br>QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP <br>SCHELLENBERGWITTMER LTD <br>THREE CROWNS LLP TOWER CHAMBERS VINSON & ELKINS WHITE & CASE LLP <br>ZHONG LUN LAW FIRM <br>ZULFICAR & PARTNERS LAW FIRM </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><strong>Contents </strong></p><p>Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 </p><p><em>Stavros Brekoulakis and David Brynmo r T homas QC </em></p><p><strong>Part I: International Construction Contracts </strong></p><p>1234567<br>The Contract: the Foundation of Construction Projects................................ 7 </p><p><em>Aisha Nadar </em></p><p>Parties to a Construction Contract.............................................................. 18 </p><p><em>Scott Stiegler </em></p><p>Bonds and Guarantees ................................................................................ 27 </p><p><em>Jane Davies Evans </em></p><p>Pricing and Payment .................................................................................. 43 </p><p><em>T o ny Dymond and Sophia Burton </em></p><p>Introduction to the FIDIC Suite of Contracts............................................. 54 </p><p><em>Ellis Bake r , Anthony Lavers and Rebecca Major </em></p><p>Allocation of Risk in Construction Contracts............................................. 74 </p><p><em>Ellis Bake r , R ichard Hill and Ibaad Hakim </em></p><p>Contractors’ Claims, Remedies and Reliefs................................................. 94 </p><p><em>James Bremen and Leith Ben Ammar </em></p><p>iii </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><em>Contents </em></p><p>89<br>Employers’ Claims and Remedies ..............................................................105 </p><p><em>James Bremen and Mark Grasso </em></p><p>Delay and Quantum: the Role of Delay Analysis Programmes and Financial Methods for the Computation of Costs and Damages in Construction Arbitration ...........................................................................114 </p><p><em>Jean-François Djanett and Jean-Luc Guitera </em></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">10 </li><li style="flex:1">Comparative Approaches to Concurrent Delay ..........................................127 </li></ul><p></p><p><em>Hamish Lal, Brendan Casey and Josephine Kaiding </em></p><p><strong>Part II: Dispute Resolution for Construction Disputes </strong></p><p>11 12 13 <br>Claims Resolution Procedures in Construction Contracts..........................145 </p><p><em>Philip Norman and Leanie van de Merwe </em></p><p>Dispute Boards..........................................................................................155 </p><p><em>Lindy Patterson QC and Nicholas Higgs </em></p><p>Alternative Dispute Resolution in Construction and Infrastructure Disputes....................................................................................................165 </p><p><em>Marion Smith QC, Hannah McCarthy and Joe-han Ho </em></p><p>14 15 16 17 <br>Suitability of Arbitration Rules for Construction Disputes .........................172 </p><p><em>David Kiefer and Adrian Cole </em></p><p>Agreements to Arbitrate Disputes in Construction Contracts .....................179 </p><p><em>Paul Darling QC and Samar Abbas </em></p><p>Subcontracts and Multiparty Arbitration in Construction Disputes.............188 </p><p><em>Stavros Brekoulakis and Ahmed El Far </em></p><p>Interim Relief, Including Emergency Arbitrators in Construction Arbitration ...........................................................................201 </p><p><em>Philip Norman and Leanie van de Merwe </em></p><p>iv </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><em>Contents </em></p><p></p><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">18 </li><li style="flex:1">Organisation of the Proceedings in Construction Arbitrations: </li></ul><p>General Considerations and Special Issues..................................................212 </p><p><em>Pierre-Yves Gunter and Anya Marinkovich </em></p><p>19 20 21 22 <br>Expert Evidence in Construction Disputes:Arbitrator Perspective..............226 </p><p><em>Nathali e V o ser and Katherine Bell </em></p><p>Expert Evidence in Construction Disputes: ExpertWitness Perspective......236 </p><p><em>Guy Elkington and Pau l T a plin </em></p><p>Documents in Construction Disputes........................................................246 </p><p><em>Bartosz Kru z ˙ewski and Robert Moj </em></p><p>Awards ......................................................................................................257 </p><p><em>Roger ter Haar QC, Crispi n W inser and Maurice Holmes </em></p><p><strong>Part III: Select Topics on Construction Arbitration </strong></p><p>23 24 25 26 27 28 <br>InvestmentTreaty Arbitration in the Construction Sector...........................273 </p><p><em>T o ny Dymond, Gavin Chesney and Laith Najjar </em></p><p>Construction Arbitrations in the Nuclear Sector ........................................288 </p><p><em>Jane Davies Evans </em></p><p>Energy Sector Construction Disputes ........................................................301 </p><p><em>Scott Stiegler and James L Loftis </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration and Concession Contracts ..................................309 </p><p><em>Philip Dunham and José Manuel García Represa </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration andTurnkey Projects ..........................................320 </p><p><em>James Doe, David Nitek and Noe Minamikata </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration in the Context of China’s Belt and Road Projects............................................................................................330 </p><p><em>Aisha Nadar </em></p><p>v</p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><strong>Part IV: Regional Construction Arbitration </strong></p><p>29 30 31 32 33 <br>Construction Arbitration in Australia .........................................................345 </p><p><em>Andrew Stephenson, Lee Carroll and Lindsay Hogan </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration inTurkey............................................................361 </p><p>Serdar Paksoy and Simel Sarıalio<sup style="top: 0em;"><em>ğ</em></sup>lu </p><p>Construction Arbitration in the MENA Region........................................373 </p><p><em>Mohamed S Abde l W a hab </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration in Brazil .............................................................411 </p><p><em>Flávio Spaccaquerche Barbosa an d T hiago Fernandes Moreira </em></p><p>Construction Arbitration in Mainland China and Hong Kong ...................423 </p><p><em>W e i Sun,Adela Mao, ZhaoYingfu an d W a ng Ziyue </em></p><p>About the Authors...............................................................................................445 Contact Details....................................................................................................469 </p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><strong>Introduction </strong></p><p><strong>Stavros Brekoulakis and David Brynmor Thomas QC</strong><sup style="top: -0.2775em;"><strong>1 </strong></sup></p><p>It is a pleasure to introduce the third edition of <em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration</em>.The <em>Guide </em>has evolved since its first edition to form, we hope, a valuable resource for clients, in-house counsel, experts and external counsel involved in construction arbitration, whether they are dealing with construction arbitration for the first time or have extensive experience in it. <br>The construction industry is a major contributor to economic growth worldwide. In the United Kingdom it has been estimated that every £1 investment in construction output generates £2.84 in total economic activity.<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">2 </sup>In India, the BJP, which now forms the government,proposed infrastructure spending of 100 lakh crore rupees (over US$1,300 billion) over the next five years in its 2019 manifesto. <br>The industry covers a wide range of different types of projects, from building offices, factories and warehouses,shopping malls,hotels and homes to major infrastructure projects that involve more complex civil engineering works such as the construction of harbours, railroads, mines, highways and bridges. Other construction projects involve specialist engineering works such as shipbuilding;bespoke plant and machinery such as turbines, generators and aircraft engines; or works that aim to support energy projects such as upstream oil and gas projects or renewables (wind, wave, solar) and nuclear plants. <br>These complex construction projects are rarely completed without encountering risks that lead to changes to the time and cost required for their execution.Those changes in turn give rise to disputes, the majority of which (possibly the vast majority) are submitted to alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes and eventually arbitration.The reasons that lead construction parties to choose ADR and arbitration owe as much to the (perceived or </p><p>12<br>Stavros Brekoulakis is a professor and the director of the School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London and an associate member of 3Verulam Buildings. David BrynmorThomas QC is a barrister at 39 Essex Chambers and visiting professor at Queen Mary University of London. Report of Economic Consultants LEK for the UK Contractors Group. </p><p>1</p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><em>Introduction </em></p><p>real) inefficiencies of national courts as to the (perceived or real) advantages of out-of-court dispute resolution. For example, with a few notable exceptions such as theTechnology and Construction Court in England andWales, most national courts lack construction specialist departments or judges with construction expertise and experience.Arbitration, on the other hand,allows construction parties to appoint arbitrators with the necessary specialised knowledge and understanding of complex construction projects. Importantly, arbitration allows construction parties to ‘design and build’ (to stay in tune with the theme of <em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration</em>) the dispute resolution procedure in a way that addresses a number of procedural challenges in construction arbitrations, including the typically large volume of documentary evidence, the most effective use of experts to address delay and quantum, as well as complex technical issues, and programme analysis.While the use of some ADR methods such as dispute adjudication boards has spread relatively recently,<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">3 </sup>arbitration has traditionally been included as the default dispute resolution mechanism for disputes arising out of international construction contracts.<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">4 </sup><br>A question that often arises is: what is special about international construction disputes that they require specialist arbitration knowledge? In the first place, construction projects are associated with considerably more risk than any other typical commercial transaction, both in terms of the amount of risk allocated under them and the complexity of that risk. Their nature and typically long duration lead to risks including unexpected ground and climate conditions, industrial accidents, fluctuation in the price of materials and in the value of currency, political risks (such as political riots, governmental interventions and strikes) and legal risks (such as amendments in law or failure to secure legal permits and licences). <br>Further,time is very often critical in construction projects.An Olympic Games stadium must be delivered before the hard deadline that is the date of the games. If a shopping mall is not ready for the commercially busy Christmas period, significant amounts may be lost in seasonal retail trade.The late delivery of a power station can disrupt the project financing used to fund it. <br>Moreover, arguments as to causation, especially of delay, in construction projects are typically complex. Many phases of a construction project can run concurrently, which often makes it difficult to identify the origins and causes of delay. Legal concepts such as concurrent delay, critical paths and global claims are unique to construction disputes. <br>Equally, the involvement of a wide number of parties with different capacities and divergent interests adds to the complexity of construction disputes.A typical construction project may involve not only an employer and a contractor, but several subcontractors, a project manager,an engineer and architect,specialist professionals such as civil or structural engineers and designers, mechanical engineers, consultants such as acoustic and energy consultants, lenders and other funders, insurers and suppliers. A seemingly limited dipute arising on one subcontract may lead to disputes under other subcontracts and the main construction contract, and may have financial and legal consequences for many of the above parties, triggering disputes under much wider documentation such as shareholder agreements, joint operating agreements, funding documents and concessions.That often </p><p>34<br>Dispute adjudication boards were first introduced in FIDIC contracts (in the Orange Book) in 1995 and in ICE contracts as recently as in 2005. Arbitration has been included in FIDIC contracts since the publication of the first FIDC contract in 1957. </p><p>2</p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><em>Introduction </em></p><p>gives rise to issues about multiparty arbitration proceedings and third-party participation in arbitration proceedings. <br>Another important feature of construction disputes is the widespread use of standard forms,such as the FIDIC or the ICE conditions of construction contracts.Efficient dispute resolution requires familiarity and understanding of the, often nuanced, risk allocation arrangements in these standard forms.Good knowledge of construction-specific legislation is necessary too.While the resolution of most construction disputes will depend on the factual circumstances and the provisions of the contractual agreement of the parties, legal issues may often arise in relation to statutory (frequently mandatory) warranty and limitation periods for construction claims, statutory direct claims by subcontractors against the employers,<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">5 </sup>statutory prohibition of the pay-when-paid and pay-if-paid provisions<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">6 </sup>and, of course, mandatory legislation on public procurement.<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">7 </sup><br>Finally, as already mentioned, construction disputes are technically complex, requiring efficient management of challenging evidentiary processes, including document management, expert evidence, programme analysis and quantification of damages. The evidentiary challenges in construction disputes have given rise to the use of tools, such as Scott Schedules (used to present fact intensive disputes in a more user friendly format), that are unique in construction arbitrations.<sup style="top: -0.2775em;">8 </sup><br>It is for all these reasons that alternative dispute resolution and arbitration of construction disputes require special focus and attention, which is what <em>The Guide to Construction </em></p><p><em>Arbitration </em>aims to provide. </p><p><em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration </em>is designed to appeal to different audiences. The authors of the various chapters are themselves market-leading experts, so it can provide a ready resource for specialist construction arbitration practitioners who already have a view of the information they seek. Beyond that, it has been compiled and written to offer practical information to practitioners who are inexperienced in international construction contracts or dispute resolution in construction disputes. For example, in-house lawyers who may be experienced in negotiating and drafting construction contracts but not in running disputes arising from them,or construction professionals who may have experience in managing construction projects but may lack experience in the conduct of construction arbitration, will find <em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration </em>useful. Lawyers in private practice who are familiar with arbitration, but lack experience in construction will also benefit. Last but not least, students who study construction arbitration will find it to be a helpful source of information. <br>While the main focus of <em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration </em>is the resolution, by arbitration, of disputes arising out of construction projects, Part I is devoted to important substantive aspects of international construction contracts.To understand how construction disputes are resolved in international arbitration, one has to understand how disputes arise out of a typical construction contract in the first place, and what are the substantive rights, obligations and remedies of the parties to a construction contract. </p><p>5678<br>For example, in France, Law No. 75-1334 of 31 December 1975 on Subcontracting. For example, in the United Kingdom with the UK Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996. For example, EU Directive 2014/24. J. Jenkins and K. Rosenberg,‘Engineering and Construction Arbitration’, in Lew et al. (editors) <em>Arbitration in England</em>, Kluwer (2013). </p><p>3</p><p>© Law Business Research </p><p><em>Introduction </em></p><p>Thus,this book is broadly divided in four parts.Part I examines a wide range of substantive issues in construction contracts,such asThe Contract:the Foundation of Construction Projects,Bonds and Guarantees,an Introduction to the FIDIC Suite of Contracts,Allocation of Risk in Construction Contracts, Contractors’ and Employers’ Claims, Remedies and Reliefs. Chapters valuably address the quantification of delays, the role of programmes and the various methods used for the computation of costs and damages in construction arbitrations, while an entire chapter is devoted to an examination, from a comparative law perspective, of the practically critical topic of concurrent delay. <br>Part II then focuses on dispute resolution processes in construction disputes.The aim of this Part is to look into special features of construction arbitration,and the following chapters are included: Suitability of Arbitration Rules for Construction Disputes, Subcontracts and MultipartyArbitration in Construction Disputes,Interim Relief,including Emergency Arbitrators in Construction Arbitration, Organisation of the Proceedings in Construction Arbitrations, Documents in Construction Disputes and Awards, and the role and management of expert evidence. <br>Part III examines a number of select topics in international construction arbitration by reference to some key industry sectors and contract structures,including the nuclear sector, energy sector, concession contracts and turnkey projects. Part IV examines construction arbitration in specific jurisdictions of particular interest and with very active construction industries <br>We have taken the opportunity to add to the chapters in this third edition, to address matters identified by users of the first two editions. These include chapters examining dispute boards,ADR in construction contracts, agreements to arbitrate and interim relief in detail.There are chapters on pricing and payment, investment treaty arbitration in the construction sector, a discussion of the typical parties to a construction contract, further discussion of the organisation of expert testimony and a chapter on construction arbitration in Brazil. </p><p>Overall,the third edition of <em>The Guide to Constructio n A rbitration </em>builds upon the success </p><p>of the first two editions and has been further expanded.The structure and organisation of <em>The Guide to Construction Arbitration </em>is broadly based on the LLM course on International Construction Contracts and Arbitration that we teach at Queen Mary University of London.The course was first introduced by HH Humphrey Lloyd in 1987 and was taught by him for more than 20 years. Humphrey has been an exceptional source of inspiration for hundreds of students who followed his classes, and we are personally indebted to him for having conceived the course originally and for his generous assistance when he passed the course on some years ago. </p><p>We want to thank all the authors for contributing to <em>The Guide to Constructio n A rbitration</em>. </p><p>We are extremely fortunate that a group of distinguished practitioners and construction arbitration specialists from a wide range of jurisdictions have agreed to participate in this project.We further want to thank Gemma Chalk, BevanWoodhouse and Hannah Higgins for all their hard work in the commission, editing and production of this book.They have made our work easy. Special thanks are due to David Samuels and GAR for asking us to conceive, design and edit this book.We thoroughly enjoyed the task, and hope that the readers will find the result to be useful and informative. </p>
Details
-
File Typepdf
-
Upload Time-
-
Content LanguagesEnglish
-
Upload UserAnonymous/Not logged-in
-
File Pages28 Page
-
File Size-