Annual Privatization Report

Annual Privatization Report

Reason Foundation Annual Privatization Report Edited by Leonard C. Gilroy Reason Foundation Reason Foundation’s mission is to advance a free society by developing, apply- ing, and promoting libertarian principles, including individual liberty, free markets, and the rule of law. We use journalism and public policy research to influence the frameworks and actions of policymakers, journalists, and opin- ion leaders. Reason Foundation’s nonpartisan public policy research promotes choice, competition, and a dynamic market economy as the foundation for human dignity and prog- ress. Reason produces rigorous, peer-reviewed research and directly engages the policy pro- cess, seeking strategies that emphasize cooperation, flexibility, local knowledge, and results. Through practical and innovative approaches to complex problems, Reason seeks to change the way people think about issues, and promote policies that allow and encourage individuals and voluntary institutions to flourish. Reason Foundation is a tax-exempt research and education organization as defined under IRS code 501(c)(3). Reason Foundation is supported by voluntary contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. The views expressed in these essays are those of the individual author, not necessarily those of Reason Foundation or its trustees. Copyright © 2007 Reason Foundation. All rights reserved. Authors Editor Contributing Authors • Leonard C. Gilroy • William D. Eggers is the global director for Deloitte Research—Public Sector. Principal Authors • Jerry Ellig, Ph.D. is the acting director • Ted Balaker of the Regulatory Studies Program at • Shikha Dalmia the Mercatus Center at George Mason • Leonard C. Gilroy University. • Amanda Kathryn Hydro • David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. is a professor of transportation studies at • Adrian T. Moore the University of North Carolina at • Amy Pelletier Charlotte. • Robert W. Poole, Jr. • Patrick R. Mullen, Ph.D. is an assistant • Geoffrey F. Segal professor of public administration and • Skaidra Smith-Heisters policy, with a joint appointment with the Institute for State Leadership and Policy, • Lisa Snell at the University of Illinois at Springfield. • Samuel R. Staley • Adam B. Summers • Steven Titch Annual Privatization Report 2007 Letter from the Editor By Leonard C. Gilroy elcome to Reason Foundation’s Chicago, managed competition in San WAnnual Privatization Report 2007. Diego, and Georgia’s new and innovative Now in its 21st year of publication, APR contract cities. is the world’s longest running and most As always, this year’s APR provides comprehensive report on privatization news, a comprehensive overview of domestic developments, and trends. and international developments in air APR 2007 details the latest on and surface transportation, including a privatization and government reform summary of Reason’s groundbreaking initiatives at all levels of government. In 2006 study, Building Roads to Reduce addition to the latest news on President Traffic Congestion in America’s Cities: Bush’s continuing efforts to bring more How Much and at What Cost?, which competition to federal programs and provides a detailed analysis of the looming save billions of taxpayer dollars, this national congestion crisis and quantifies the issue includes an expanded section on the investments needed to remedy it. federal Performance Assessment Rating You’ll also find the latest news on Tool (PART), used by the administration highway tolling and public-private to rate programs and determine budget partnerships (PPPs) in the “Surface priorities. Dr. Patrick Mullen, professor Transportation” section. For instance, at the University of Illinois at Springfield, we offer readers a detailed overview of offers readers a detailed assessment of the long-term toll road concessions, which PART process, its successes to date, and can mobilize large new sums of capital implementation challenges that still remain. investment to meet a significant share of The “Local and State Update” section the need for new highway capacity. And offers a wide-ranging review of the latest given the controversy generated by PPPs action across state and local government and concessions over the past year, APR that includes a state privatization roundup features an article by Deloitte Research’s and budget outlook, an article on new public sector global director William Eggers accounting rules covering government responding to the most commonly-voiced liabilities, and the latest on Mayor Richard concerns, objections, and misperceptions Daley’s extensive privatization efforts in about PPPs. Two issues that have attracted a great to us. Please feel free to contact us with deal of attention in policy circles this past questions, suggestions, or for more year are examined in APR’s “Emerging information. For more privatization news, Issues” section. First, we review federal check out Privatization Watch (www. and state efforts to make government more reason.org/pw.shtml), now in its 31st transparent by allowing taxpayers access year of publication. For the most up-to- to spending information, typically through date information on the rapidly changing “Google government” Web databases. privatization world, please visit Reason’s Second, we provide a roundup of several Privatization Center (www.reason.org/ states’ proposals to privatize their lottery privatization/) and our weblog, Out of systems. Control (www.reason.org/outofcontrol/). APR’s “Education” section includes Leonard C. Gilroy, Editor comprehensive updates on school choice and child welfare privatization, as well as two articles on the promise of the weighted- student-funding program for improving low-performing school districts and giving parents more choice. APR 2007 also dives in to the ever- changing world of telecommunications policy, with updates on video franchise reform, network neutrality, and the municipal provision of broadband services. This update includes an assessment of the rocky start for Provo, Utah’s municipal broadband system, as well as a summary of Reason’s 2006 study, A Dynamic Perspective on Government Broadband, authored by the Mercatus Center’s Jerry Ellig. With private property rights remaining a hot topic in state legislatures and at the ballot box two years after the Supreme Court’s controversial Kelo vs. New London decision, this APR highlights the latest state action on eminent domain reform. We also feature an analysis of Arizona’s Proposition 207, a comprehensive package of property rights protections approved by Arizona voters last November that’s designed to protect property owners from both eminent domain abuse and regulatory takings via land use regulation. Your comments on the Annual Privatization Report 2007 are important Annual Privatization Report 2007 Annual Privatization Report Federal Update ........................................................................................................ 1 A. Update on the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART): PART Nears Full Cycle Assessing All Federal Programs .............................................................................. 1 B. Program Performance Evaluation Continues ........................................................ 7 C. Federal Competitive Sourcing Slows, But Continues to Demonstrate Results .........8 Local and State Update .......................................................................................... 10 A. Local Privatization Update ................................................................................ 10 B. State Privatization Update................................................................................ 12 C. State Budget Outlook ........................................................................................17 D. State and Local Tax Burdens Hit 25-Year High .................................................... 19 E. New Accounting Rule Shines Light on Government Liabilities .............................20 Surface Transportation ..........................................................................................22 A. Building Roads to Reduce Traffic Congestion in America’s Cities: How Much and at What Cost? ............................................................................... 22 B. Long-Term Toll Road Concessions: An Overview ................................................. 25 C. Privatization of Existing Toll Roads .................................................................... 29 D. New PPP Toll Roads & Toll Lanes ........................................................................31 E. International Toll Road Developments ............................................................... 35 F. Answers to the Most Common Objections to PPPs .............................................. 39 Air Transportation ..................................................................................................44 A. Global Airport Privatization ..............................................................................44 B. U.S. Airport Privatization ..................................................................................46 C. U.S. Airport Security ........................................................................................48 D. Global Air Traffic Control .................................................................................. 49 E. U.S. Air Traffic Control .......................................................................................51 Education and Child Welfare .................................................................................

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    122 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us