Uveitis and Cystoid Macular Oedema Secondary to Topical Prostaglandin

Uveitis and Cystoid Macular Oedema Secondary to Topical Prostaglandin

Review Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315280 on 12 June 2020. Downloaded from Uveitis and cystoid macular oedema secondary to topical prostaglandin analogue use in ocular hypertension and open angle glaucoma Jason Hu,1 James Thinh Vu ,1 Brian Hong,1 Chloe Gottlieb1,2,3 ► Additional material is ABSTRact complications and PGAs became popular due to published online only. To view, Background Of the side effects of prostaglandin having once- daily administration and few side please visit the journal online (http:// dx. doi. org/ 10. 1136/ analogues (PGAs), uveitis and cystoid macular oedema effects. PGAs have emerged as the most potent bjophthalmol- 2019- 315280). (CME) have significant potential for vision loss based IOP- lowering topical medication with bimatoprost on postmarket reports. Caution has been advised due reported as the most effective and unoprostone as 1 University of Ottawa, Faculty to concerns of macular oedema and uveitis. In this the least effective.3 of Medicine, Ottawa, Ontario, report, we researched and summarised the original data Canada The specific mechanism of action of PGAs is 2University of Ottawa Eye suggesting these effects and determined their incidence. not completely understood. It is known that they Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Methods Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic increase uveoscleral outflow and there is growing Canada review and Meta- Analyses guidelines were followed. 3 evidence that they also increase conventional Ottawa Hospital Research Studies evaluating topical PGAs in patients with ocular 4 Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, outflow through Schlemm’s canal. The proposed Canada hypertension or open angle glaucoma were included. mechanism is that PGAs bind to E- type prostanoid MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, receptors and prostaglandin F receptors in ‘the Cochrane Library, LILACS and ClinicalTrials. gov were Correspondence to ciliary muscle, resulting in ciliary muscle relaxation searched between 1946 and 2019. Experimental studies, Dr Chloe Gottlieb, University and increased aqueous humour outflow’. They also of Ottawa Eye Institute, TOH animal studies and randomised studies with other ‘induce[s] (matrix metalloproteinases) MMP-1, General Campus, CCW Box 307, intraocular pressure-lowering eye drops were excluded. Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada; MMP-3 and MMP-9 expression in ciliary smooth cgottlieb@ toh. ca Results 214 studies (28 232 patients) met the inclusion criteria. Using prospective data, the incidence of uveitis muscle cells’ that break down collagens and other Received 24 September 2019 and CME among PGA users were 62/28 232 (0.22%) connective tissue structures in the ‘extracellular Revised 30 November 2019 matrix in the ciliary muscle, iris root and sclera, and 25/28 232 (0.09%), respectively. A higher frequency 5 Accepted 27 December 2019 of both uveitis and CME were found among latanoprost reducing outflow resistance to fluid flow’. After users compared with bimatoprost. There were 21 case being on the market, cases of uveitis and CME were studies reporting CME including 48 eyes in 43 patients. reported after PGA use. Due to these studies, PGA 47 of 48 eyes (97.9%) had previous incisional ocular drug labels include 1) intraocular inflammation surgery. 8 eyes were re-challenged, of which 7 (87.5%) (uveitis) and 2) CME, especially in aphakic patients, recurred. 7 case studies reported uveitis in 15 eyes of 10 pseudophakic patients with a torn posterior lens http://bjo.bmj.com/ patients. 7 of 15 eyes (46.7%) were either pseudophakic capsule or in patients with known risk factors for or aphakic. 6 eyes were re-challenged, and all 6 (100%) macular oedema.6 recurred. The retrospective review of 94 patients by Conclusions Cases of uveitis or CME revealed a Warwar et al revealed 6.4% and 2.1% of patients confounding effect of ocular surgery, aphakia or developed anterior uveitis and cystoid macular subluxed intraocular lens. PGAs may be used in non- oedema (CME), respectively, while being treated on September 27, 2021 by guest. Protected copyright. surgical patients without concern of causing CME or with latanoprost.7 We found few randomised uveitis. The incidences of PGA-associated CME and controlled trials (RCTs) that study the relation- uveitis are rare with limited prospective studies on the ship between PGs, CME and uveitis. As well, CME cause- effect relationship. and uveitis are rarely reported as complications in RCTs. In RCT by Gandolfi et al comparing bimatoprost (n=119) and latanoprost (n=113) in patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension, INTRODUCTION uveitis was reported in only one patient in each Endogenous prostaglandins (PGs) have a role in group.8 We compiled a systematic literature review © Author(s) (or their inflammatory mediation in the eyes, as they do employer(s)) 2020. Re- use in other parts of the body.1 In 1977, Camras et to assess the relationship between PGAs, uveitis permitted under CC BY- NC. No al found that low doses of topical prostaglandin and CME to address the gap in evidence of these commercial re- use. See rights side effects. Current teaching advises caution in and permissions. Published analogues (PGAs) decreased intraocular pressure 1 2 using PGAs in patients with uveitis and CME and by BMJ. (IOP). In contrast, large quantities of PGAs infused into animal eyes led to ocular inflam- further knowledge would allow clinicians to better To cite: Hu J, Vu JT, Hong B, mation with breakdown of the blood- aqueous weigh the benefits and risks of PGA administration et al. Br J Ophthalmol Epub across different patient profiles. Our primary study ahead of print: [please barrier. This prompted further studies, leading include Day Month Year]. to the first PGA, latanoprost, being approved by outcome is the incidence of uveitis or CME after doi:10.1136/ the United States Food and Drug Administration PGA use in patients treated for ocular hypertension bjophthalmol-2019-315280 in 1996. Clinical trials did not yield any serious (OH) and open angle glaucoma (OAG). Hu J, et al. Br J Ophthalmol 2020;0:1–5. doi:10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315280 1 Review Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-315280 on 12 June 2020. Downloaded from Table 1 Summary of studies included in the systematic review, Table 2 Agents used in the included studies (99 RCTs, 87 including description of study design, number of studies, number of observational studies and 28 case studies) patients, source of funding and length of follow- up Agent Number of groups (%) Study design Latanoprost 145 (46.5) RCT Observational study Case study Bimatoprost 74 (23.7) Number of included studies n (%) 99 (46.3) 87 (40.6) 28 (13.1) Travoprost 52 (16.7) Number of patient n (%) 28 232 (33.8) 55 250 (66.1) 53 (0.1) Tafluprost 21 (6.7) Source of funding n (%) Latanoprostene Bunod 9 (2.9) None 5 (0.05) 7 (0.08) 5 (0.18) Unoprostone 7 (2.2) Industry 54 (0.55) 41 (0.47) 0 ONO 9054 4 (1.3) Public 0 1 (0.01) 4 (0.14) Number does not add to a total of 136 because there may be multiple groups in a Unspecified 40 (0.40) 38 (0.44) 19 (0.68) single study (total=183). Length of follow- up in months RCT, randomised controlled trial. Mean (SD) 4.85 (5.34) 8.26 (11.58) 5.16 (4.28) Range 0.2–36 0.5–60 0.5–19 Data collection RCT, randomised controlled trial. Data from all eligible articles were extracted by two independent authors (JH and BH) using a predefined data extraction form for articles obtained from 1946 to 2016 (see online supplementary appendix 2). The data extraction for articles from 2016 to 2019 METHODS was collected by JTV. A sample of eligible studies was piloted to The methodology we used closely adheres to the recommen- 9 test the completeness of the data extraction form. Further data dations found in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred extraction was performed by JH and JTV for case studies using Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analyses guide- a different template (see online supplementary appendix 3). Any lines were followed, including a 27-item checklist and a 4- phase changes were reflected in the final manuscript. flow diagram to optimise transparency and clarity of reporting.10 A meta- analysis was not completed. Our study adhered to the Summary measures, data synthesis and analysis Declaration of Helsinki and informed consent was not required Information summarised included study design distribution, for our study. source of funding and length of follow- up (table 1). The agents used in these studies were tabulated (table 2). Occurrences of Eligibility criteria for considering studies for this review uveitis and CME were summarised for prospective RCTs and In order to be considered for this systematic review, all poten- their incidences were calculated (table 3). A Fischer’s exact tially eligible studies had to evaluate the use of topical PGAs in test was performed to assess the significance of uveitis and CME frequencies among latanoprost and bimatoprost users. A patients with OH or OAG. Definitions for OH and OAG in this summary of each case study was created that included the PGA study follow the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) used, the number of eyes and patients, clinical history, time of preferred practice patterns. Experimental studies were excluded onset to CME or uveitis, postoperative status, whether the agent from this review. To isolate the side- effect profile of PGAs, http://bjo.bmj.com/ was re- challenged and if so whether the adverse event recurred studies that evaluate topical PGA in combination with other and the reversibility of the adverse event (online supplementary topical medications such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, beta- appendices 4, 5). blockers, miotics and alpha-agonists were excluded.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    5 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us