Electricity: 8700

Covenant of Mayors 4 Climate & Energy Workshop on Data Solutions for Evidence- Based Policy and Stakeholder UNECE Webinar George Abulashvili COM Statistics for Georgia <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Signatories </li><li style="flex:1">Population </li></ul>Akhaltsikhe 17,903 41,641 152,839 53,590 19,001 21,221 77,549 54,337 147,635 3,795 Lanchkhuti Mtskheta Ozurgeti Poti 31,486 7,800 Akhmeta Batumi 62,500 41,465 125,103 51,761 29,948 1,108,717 38,721 9,468 Bolnisi Chokhatauri Dedoplistskaro Gori Rustavi Sagarejo Sighnagi <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Tbilisi </li><li style="flex:1">Gurjaani </li></ul><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Kutaisi </li><li style="flex:1">Telavi </li></ul>Kazbegi Kvareli Tianeti 29,827 41,678 Zugdidi Bagdati 62,511 29,2235 Lagodekhi 2 CNC’s ; 3 CTC’s and 3 CS’s 10 SE(C)Aps developed Georgian MDCP - Mayors Club Georgia • Analysis <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">of </li><li style="flex:1">barriers </li><li style="flex:1">and </li><li style="flex:1">drivers, </li></ul>Development of a National Roadmap (task 3.1.2) • Development of a Benchmark Database (task 3.1.3) • Development of a Project Pipeline (task 3.1.4) Number of Projects by Sectors 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 75 N of Projects SECAP Sectors Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable energy 0 12 21 75 4 Street Lighting 21 Other (transport, …) 12 4<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">TOTAL </li><li style="flex:1">108 </li></ul>0<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Adaptation CC EE in Buildings </li><li style="flex:1">Renewable </li></ul>energy <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Street Lighting </li><li style="flex:1">Other </li></ul>Number of municipalities implementing the projects -15; total number of CoM signatories - 24. Project Investments by Sectors, 1000 EUR 50,000 43379 45,000 40,000 35,000 30,000 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,000 0Investments 000 EUR SECAP Sectors Adaptation CC EE in Buildings Renewable energy Street Lighting Other (transport, …) TOTAL 08,538 225 1,509 43,379 53,651 8538 1509 225 0<ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Adaptation CC </li><li style="flex:1">EE in Buildings Renewable energy Street Lighting Other (transport, </li></ul>…) The huge figure in the “Other” sector is mainly due to the EBRD and EU E5P financing of the Tbilisi CNG bus project for 34 million euros. Data Acquisition – Table 1 Number Number Number of Number Of Responses <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Of </li><li style="flex:1">of </li></ul>Data Requested / Sector Projects Responses Projects <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">EE in Buildings </li><li style="flex:1">RE - Solar </li></ul>Energy Savings, kWh/Y Financial Savings, GEL/Y GHG emission reduction, kg CO2e/Y RE Generation, kWh/Y 12 12 12 12 2221 21 21 21 21 18 18 18 18 Speciific Energy Consumption Before Project, kWh/M2 Speciific Energy Consumption After Project, kWh/M2 12 12 00 21 21 33The tables show the most important data requested and number of responses to the request. The data of 4 sectors is divided into two tables. Data Acquisition - Table 2 Number of Number of Number of Number of Data Requested <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Projects </li><li style="flex:1">Responses </li><li style="flex:1">Projects Responses </li></ul><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Sector </li><li style="flex:1">Street Lighting </li><li style="flex:1">Other Sectors </li></ul><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Energy Savings, kWh/Y </li><li style="flex:1">75 </li></ul>75 75 75 75 34 35 34 34 34 44400 00100 Financial Savings, GEL/Y GHG emission reduction, kg CO2e/Y Energy Consumption Before Project, kWh/Y Energy Consumption After Project, kWh/Y The average rate of all responses is 44%. These responses are mostly from the projects monitored by EECG. Municipalities have no mechanism to monitor their EE / RE projects. Barriers Legal <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Institutional </li><li style="flex:1">Administrative </li><li style="flex:1">Financial </li></ul>Absence of framework Lack of institutionalization Lack of vision and clear Lack of municipal funds legislation Efficiency on Energy of SE(C)APs in municipal understanding of CoM and <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">structures </li><li style="flex:1">SEAP implications by local </li></ul>leaders Absence of national norms Absence and standards on energy energy managers <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">of </li><li style="flex:1">municipal Lack of technical skills of Lack of skills to develop and </li></ul>local staff and dependence design projects and grant efficiency <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">on external expertise </li><li style="flex:1">proposals </li></ul>Absence of secondary Lack <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">of </li><li style="flex:1">coordination Lack of cooperation and Time </li><li style="flex:1">consuming </li><li style="flex:1">legal </li></ul>legislation normative acts) (subordinate mechanisms national between coordination and local different between process for receiving grant municipal financing by municipalities <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">governments </li><li style="flex:1">departments </li></ul>Lack of supporting national Absences of well-defined Absence of local statistical Dependence on for implementation grant SECAP policies and programs to and structured internal data financing support investments in responsibility mechanisms <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">municipal </li><li style="flex:1">sustainable within municipality </li></ul>climate change policies. Conclusion: ••••There is high potential for energy efficiency investments in Georgia, however it still remains largely unused. There is no legislative framework and national level policy in place in climate change mitigation and adaptation fields. Coordination and communication mechanisms between stakeholders, especially between national and local level governments still needs significant improvements. Institutional and administrative arrangement of municipalities, as well as capacity building of local authorities and technical staff remains as significant gap towards implementing local climate change policies. •Time-consuming legal procedures in receiving external finances (loan, grant) represents significant barrier for both municipalities and international organizations towards financing EE projects. ••Financial environment is not very favorable for investments in energy efficiency as familiarity of local financial institutions (banks) with financing EE projects and measures is very low. Low awareness about the multiple benefits of energy efficiency projects in public and private sector is viewed as the main barrier to increasing investment and financing flows to energy efficiency projects. Project Title: “Biomass Energy and Energy Efficient Technologies as a sustainable energy solutions for Georgian CoM signatories”- BioEn4CoM Sign Project EU Commission Energy Efficiency Center Georgia Telavi Municipality City Hall 2018-2021 წ.წ 748,641.60 € 598,913.28 € 149,728.32€ (99,819.55€ is transferred to EECG ) Donor: Main Applicant: Co-Applicant: Implementation Period: Total Budget: Grant: Co-financing: Project Purpose: To enhance Georgian CoM signatory cities/municipalities capacities in climate change mitigation and fulfillment of sustainable local energy policy through implementation of investment projects in line with their Sustainable Energy (Climate) Action Plans (SE(C)APs. The Action will be implemented in Telavi Municipality City. Direct Beneficiaries: decision makers, municipal service providers of Telavi municipality as well as the employers and users of the selected renovated public buildings, which energy efficiency parameters were improved. Indirect Beneficiaries: private companies; more specifically agro vine (vine-growing) farms and/or companies providing their agricultural wastes (vineyard pruning resides) to the municipalities as an energy source as well as local population of the municipalities. Implemented and Ongoing Activities Action 2: Selection of 2 Municipal Buildings & Performance of Energy Audits Complete Thermo-modernization of 2 Municipal Buildings (Kindergartens) though Installation of EE and RE Applications IKALTO KG TELAVI #1 Total Area: 1125 m2 Total Area: 1640 m2 Action 4: Establishment of Biomass Supply Chain in Telavi Municipality Implemented & Ongoing Activities ❖ Developed the feasibility study for establishment of a biomass supply chain; ❖ Procurement of necessary vehicles and equipment for equipping the biomass supply chain; ❖ Selection of storage space, development technical drawings (TDs) for warehouse construction; Tender on construction for storage of biomass (vineyards pruning); ❖ Testing of round baler for collecting of locally available biomass in the vineyards and shredding of the biomass through chopper/shredder in Telavi municipality. <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">IKALTO KG </li><li style="flex:1">TELAVI #1 KG </li></ul>PHSHAVELI KG Testing of Vineyards Pruning Collection and Shredding <a href="/goto?url=https://www.facebook.com/eecgeorgia/videos/168724621233802/?v=168724621233802" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/eecgeorgia/videos/168724621233802/?v=168724621233802 </a><a href="/goto?url=https://www.facebook.com/300211266670236/videos/863781454043418/" target="_blank">https://www.facebook.com/300211266670236/videos/863781454043418/ </a>2 Unit Tractors with Trailer Shredder Round Baler BALECHIPPER 120 unit high-pressure sodium lamps with 250 watts was replaced by 80 units with 60-watt and 40 units with LED lights. and its surrounding 74 units high- pressure sodium lamps was replaced with 74 units lamps with 150 watt and 90 watt LED Light <ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">Average Annual Saving </li><li style="flex:1">Average Annual Saving </li></ul><ul style="display: flex;"><li style="flex:1">▪Electricity : 145,633kWh; </li><li style="flex:1">▪Electricity : 57,230kWh; </li></ul>▪Money Savings: 22,682GEL; ▪ Emission Reduction: 15,340kgCO2 ▪Money Saving: 7,900 GEL; ▪Emission Reduction :7,780kgCO2 ▪Roof Insulation (1,140m2) with “IZOCAM“ Mineral Wool (thickness 10 sm); ▪Replacing inefficient lamps in classrooms and corridors with compact fluorescent and LED lamps; ▪Replacing the diesel heating system with a natural gas system. Average Annual Saving ▪Electricity: 9,180kWh.; ▪Diesel: 5,070 L; ▪Money Saving: 8,800 GEL; ▪Emission Reduction: 6,900kgCO2 ; In 2014, a solar water heater system with a total area of 72 square meters panels and 2250 liters of hot water tank was installed. Result: Reduction of natural gas consumption on water heating by 60-70% in several buildings: infectious disease department, laundry & kitchen.. Average Annual Saving ▪Natural Gas 36,620 m3; ▪Money Saving : 334,740GEL ▪Emission Reduction: 69,580 kg CO2 ❑Installation of natural gas heating and hot water supply system integrated with the solar thermal system; ❑Thermal insulation of the building (insulation of external walls, installation of internal partitions and doors to avoid cold air flows); ❑ Replacement of non efficient lamps with LED ones Average Annual Saving ▪Energy: 181,600 kWh; ▪Money Saving: 13,900 GEL; ▪Emission Reduction: 35 tone CO2. with a total area of 34.5 m2 has been installed, which heats 2000-2500 liters of water daily. Average Annual Savings Natural Gas: 7,000 m3; Money: 5,200 GEL; Emission Reduction: 13 tone CO2 Boiler Capacity - 151 kW. The whole building is heated; Consumed 18 tons of hazelnut shells; The cost of the shell is 3960 GEL; CO2 emissions - 0 Building Area - 1050 m2; Used non EE wood stoves; Several rooms were heated; The cost of firewood - 5000 GEL Comparison with Natural Gas (NG); 1 kg hazelnut shell = 0.58 m3 of NG; The cost of heating on NG was GEL 8,874; CO2 emissions ≈ 20 tons ▪ A 2,000-liter solar water heater was installed, which was connected to the existing heating and hot water supply system; ▪A 1,500 watt on-grid PVC system with 16 LED lights was installed; ▪10 units of high-pressure sodium-type outdoor lamps was replaced with LED lamps; ▪The 450 m2 floor was insulated with XPS boards; ▪200 units of non EE lamps was replaced with LED lamps. Annual Saving ▪Natural Gas: 10,000 m 3; ▪Electricity: 8,700 kWh; ▪Money: 9,900 GEL; ▪Emission Reduction: 20 toneCO2. For popularization of solar technologies, 26 solar lamps were installed in the square located on Rustaveli Avenue in Kutaisi City. The 87 units (400 watt) high-pressure outdoor lighting lamps at the the Rabat Castle and its surrounding area were replaced by 26 units (240-watt) LED colored lamps and 61 units (150 watts) of LED lamps. Average Annual Saving Electricity : 77,930 kWh.; Money: 15,430 GEL; Emission Reduction: 10.6 tone CO2. System Peak Capacity: 4.16 kW; Solar modules: 16 units; Average Annual Saving ▪Electricity: 7300 kWh.; ▪Money: 1,460 GEL; ▪Emission Reduction ~ 1 tone CO2 On the demonstration monitor is reflected the current and past period parameters: capacity, generated energy, energy consumption, reduced CO2 (saved wood; reduced car mileage in km). For improving of heating and cooling systems of the building additionally were installed "Air-Water" air pumps ; Average Annual Savings Diesel: 4,000 liter; Money: 8,000 GEL; Emission Reduction: 11 tone CO2 ▪Primitive wood stoves was replaced by modern autonomous heating and hot water supply systems operating on local agricultural wastes (hazelnut shells); ▪230 litre solar water heater installed; ▪A 1,300-watt grid-on PVC system was installed, which supplies the kindergarten with free electricity and supplies excess electricity to the grid; ▪Thermal insulation of the building elements (partitions & ceiling between the used and unused spaces of the building). Thank you!

Electricity: 8700

Details

Download

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

Support