Potentiometric Surface Map of the Unconsolidated Aquifers of Hancock County, Indiana

Potentiometric Surface Map of the Unconsolidated Aquifers of Hancock County, Indiana

Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., Governor Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Robert E. Carter Jr., Director Potentiometric Surface Map 18-A POTENTIOMETRIC SURFACE MAP OF THE UNCONSOLIDATED AQUIFERS OF HANCOCK COUNTY, INDIANA Hancock County, Indiana is located in the central portion of the state. The majority of the R. 7 E. R. 8 E. R. 6 E. R. 7 E. county is situated in the East Fork White River Basin, however, a relatively small area in the northwest section is located within the White and West Fork White River Basin. C k o e u e n r t The Potentiometric Surface Map (PSM) of the unconsolidated aquifers of Hancock County y 0 C 0 0 R 10 40 85 11 was mapped by contouring the elevations of 1745 static water-levels reported on well records 8 9 9 8 9 r 13 0 o N 7 12 2 a a «¬ 11 0 C 9 a 9 0 d 0 s 109 0 g 3 8 o received primarily over a 50 year period. These wells are completed in aquifers at various 8 10 h «¬ 7 8 4 0 u 0 u 5 v 12 9 8 i 9 6 11 0 n S 1 l l 9 depths, and typically, under confined conditions (bounded by impermeable layers above and 9 0 0 e t 9 R y 10 6 E 8 d Fortville R below the water bearing formation). However, some wells were completed under unconfined o County Road 1000 N a (not bounded by impermeable layers) settings. The potentiometric surface is a measure of R. 5 E. R. 6 E. d Nashville 0 5 1 the pressure on water in a water bearing formation. Water in an unconfined aquifer is at 9 1 0 0 atmospheric pressure and will not rise in a well above the top of the water bearing formation, k 15 E 14 e 13 16 in contrast to water in a confined aquifer which is under hydrostatic pressure and will rise in 18 e 17 83 15 r 14 0 17 16 18 a well above the top of the water bearing formation. 0 16 C 0 13 0 ® 8 13 d 14 7 r R 8 a rd 18 15 g Milners 14 o 17 Static water-level measurements in individual wells used to construct county PSM’s are cC «¬9 u M 36 S Corner N d 0 indicative of the water-level at the time of well completion. The groundwater level within an orth ¤£ C 0 F R 0 0 ork ty Road 900 N o 9 Coun 0 1 n u aquifer constantly fluctuates in response to rainfall, evapotranspiration, groundwater 7 a 1 n 8 i t d y 0 i movement, and groundwater pumpage. Therefore, measured static water-levels in an area r 9 R e 21 22 9 23 Woodbury k o 20 may differ due to local or seasonal variations. Because fluctuations in groundwater are M 24 a e 23 19 22 d 0 20 e 19 2 r 24 typically small, static water-levels can be used to construct a generalized PSM. Groundwater 7 Warrington 8 20 0 C 23 21 22 21 0 flow is naturally from areas of recharge toward areas of discharge. As a general rule, but 19 k 24 East Fork E 23 c Eden certainly not always, groundwater flow approximates the overlying topography and intersects White River u «¬234 B the land surface at major streams. Basin ranch «¬234 Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinates for the water wells were either physically Dry B 26 29 28 27 obtained in the field, determined through address geocoding, or reported on water well 27 26 25 30 29 28 records; however, the location of the majority of the water well records used to make the 25 27 26 28 30 Shirley PSM were not field verified. Elevation data were obtained from a digital elevation model. McCordsville 30 29 Quality control/quality assurance procedures were utilized to refine or remove data where 26 25 h errors were readily apparent. c Wilkinson unty Road 700 N n 0 Co a 8 r Unconsolidated static water levels in Hancock County range from a high of 1012 feet mean 9 B W sea level (msl) in the northeastern section of the county, to a low of 740 feet msl in the 0 35 0 w 32 33 34 4 33 36 southwestern portion. Groundwater flow direction within the White and West Fork White 32 35 o 31 31 34 l d 36 l a 34 35 i River Basin is northwest toward Fall Creek, and generally to the south-southwest, toward 36 o 32 33 31 R Willow W T. 17 N. Sugar Creek and the Big Blue River, in the East Fork White River Basin. y 35 t Branch n T. 16 N. u o The county PSM can be used to define the regional groundwater flow path and to identify C County Road 600 N significant areas of groundwater recharge and discharge. County PSM’s represent overall T. 17 N. regional characteristics and are not intended to be a substitute for site-specific studies. 4 3 T. 16 N. 1 6 5 2 3 2 5 4 6 0 0 3 2 1 7 3 6 5 4 k 9 8 e 2 1 e r County Road 500 N C 0 Maxwell 2 e 8 0 N n County Road 50 F i o w r t y v d W i 8 l 10 l n 9 W 9 7 8 0 e 12 11 a 0 11 0 0 P r 10 3 9 0 i k 8 5 7 B d e 7 a 11 9 d 0 10 12 0 o a 9 8 5 9 0 o 12 R Location Map 11 8 8 0 R y County Road 400 N t West Fork y n t C u n o o White River u u o C Mowhawk n C Basin t y k R W e o 0 17 e a 13 18 0 16 15 r d 14 14 2 15 16 C 3 d 13 18 0 a 13 k 14 0 o 17 14 Mount c E 15 R u 16 Comfort y Road 300 N B 17 t County 18 n u o 40 C 8 County Road 300 N ¨¦§70 23 22 23 20 21 24 19 k 22 e 22 e 19 20 21 21 r 19 20 23 24 C 24 70 23 ¨¦§ e County Road 200 N l i 0 m 6 x 8 i 200 N 9 County Road 8 26 S 0 h c 27 t 30 i 25 27 26 29 28 D 29 25 8 30 28 26 6 s 27 t 0 t 26 28 o 30 29 P 1 0.5 0 1 Mile 0 County Road 100 N 8 5 25 7 9 0 Charlottesville W 33 34 0 31 33 35 0 32 1 Cleveland 0 32 35 36 92 d 34 a 31 1 0.5 0 1 Kilometer 35 o 36 34 R 40 33 £ 31 y ¤ T. 16 N. 0 36 32 t 35 n 3 u T. 15 N. 8 o Greenfield 9 C 2 0 0 84 0 4 T. 16 N. Cumberland 9 T. 15 N. 2 1 6 Philadelphia 5 4 3 40 5 C £ 1 6 4 ¤ o 4 Spring 2 6 5 u 0 1 Gem n 3 Lake 3 t 9 y 2 unty Road 100 S Co R oad 100 S o County R C a o d u 8 n 0 t y 0 R E o 7 a 11 12 7 d 10 k 10 7 9 9 e 12 8 11 1 9 8 e 8 r 0 1 C 0 0 12 0 82 E 11 r 9 a g EXPLANATION u County Road 200 S C S Digital Elevation Model of Hancock County, Indiana o C u o Line of equal elevation, in n u 9 t n W 0 y 0 t feet above mean sea level y 0 R 950 0 k o R Westland k 5 Potentiometric Contour a e e o 16 d 17 e d 15 14 e 18 17 a r r a 13 13 d 14 4 18 interval 10 feet o 15 C C 17 16 0 18 16 5 R e 0 0 8 r 8 M 9 W o 0 y 0 e 14 13 5 E i t o 0 D 0 e E n 8 r Stream r 0 4 r u 0 7 i o B s t d o C a w o n County Road R P 8 i 8 y k 0 t e n 8 u 20 21 9 o 9 State Road 1 «¬ 24 «¬ C 19 0 19 20 21 22 23 19 22 23 W 21 24 B i 20 0 870 nf 23 24 0 or 40 US Highway 4 d ¤£ R d d a o 400 S R County Road P New k 70 Interstate r 8 y e 5 t ¨¦§ e a 0 860 Palestine n 8 r 0 i u 3 r 0 C 3 i o 8 e 30 e C B 29 Basin Boundary n r 26 25 30 29 i 28 27 a 28 82 26 w n 28 27 0 25 c 0 y h 84 25 29 d 26 30 n a Municipal Boundary 800 r r S B County Road 500 e iv C R o M u e n lu e t 0 y 3 8 52 r 8 B i ¤£ Lake & River d 1 R ig County Road 550 S 0 i a o 34 36 B 7 Carrollton 33 n 34 31 a 32 33 d 9 35 31 R 0 32 33 32 35 36 3 31 d 35 36 0 Little SugarCreek 0 E T.

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    1 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us