Early Mesozoic Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of the Western

Early Mesozoic Paleogeography and Tectonic Evolution of the Western

Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on August 26, 2011 Early Mesozoic paleogeography and tectonic evolution of the western United States: Insights from detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology, Blue Mountains Province, northeastern Oregon Todd A. LaMaskin1,†, Jeffrey D. Vervoort2, Rebecca J. Dorsey1, and James E. Wright3 1Department of Geological Sciences, University of Oregon, 1272 University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403-1272, USA 2School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2812, USA 3Department of Geology, University of Georgia, 308 Geography-Geology Building, 210 Field Street, Athens, Georgia 30602-2501, USA ABSTRACT the southwestern United States and modi- Vallier, 1995; Dorsey and LaMaskin, 2007, fied by input from cratonal, miogeoclinal, 2008). This proliferation of models reflects, This study assesses early Mesozoic prove- and Cordilleran-arc sources during Triassic in part, insufficient constraints on provenance nance linkages and paleogeographic-tectonic and Jurassic time. Jurassic sediments likely links to North America, the early Mesozoic models for the western United States based were derived from the Cordilleran arc and latitude of marginal arc-basin complexes, and on new petrographic and detrital zircon data an orogenic highland in Nevada that yielded the amount of subsequent post-Jurassic margin- from Triassic and Jurassic sandstones of the recycled sand from uplifted Triassic backarc parallel displacement. “Izee” and Olds Ferry terranes of the Blue basin deposits. Our data suggest that numer- Accreted terranes of the Blue Mountains Mountains Province, northeastern Oregon. ous Jurassic Cordilleran basins formed close Province in northeastern Oregon and western Triassic sediments were likely derived from to the Cordilleran margin and support a Idaho preserve one of the most complete and the Baker terrane offshore accretionary sub- model for moderate post-Jurassic translation least-deformed early Mesozoic stratigraphic duction complex and are dominated by Late (~400 km) of the Blue Mountains Province. records in the western U.S. Cordillera (Fig. 1; Archean (ca. 2.7–2.5 Ga), Late Paleo protero- see stratigraphic compilations in Saleeby zoic (ca. 2.2–1.6 Ga), and Paleozoic (ca. 380– INTRODUCTION and Busby-Spera, 1992). Marine deposition 255 Ma) detrital zircon grains. These detrital took place in this region from Late Triassic ages suggest that portions of the Baker ter- There is significant controversy regarding the through early Late Jurassic time, preserving a rane have a genetic affinity with other Cor- early Mesozoic paleogeography and tectonic record of terrane and marginal-basin evolution dilleran accretionary subduction complexes evolution of allochthonous and parautochtho- (Dickinson and Vigrass, 1965; Dickinson and of the western United States, including those nous terranes of the western U.S. Cordillera. Thayer, 1978; Dickinson, 1979; Vallier, 1995; in the Northern Sierra and Eastern Klamath Workers generally agree that Cordilleran ter- Dorsey and LaMaskin, 2007, 2008; LaMaskin terranes. The abundance of Precambrian ranes represent oceanic and craton-fringing et al., 2008a). In this paper, we use petrographic grains in detritus derived from an offshore crustal fragments that were accreted to western and detrital zircon U-Pb age data from Trias- complex highlights the importance of sedi- Laurentia prior to development of an integrated sic and Jurassic Cordilleran margin sedimen- ment reworking. Jurassic sediments are Andean-type convergent margin in Cretaceous tary basins of the Blue Mountains Province in dominated by Mesozoic detrital ages (ca. time; however, the configuration and construc- Oregon to assess potential linkages to cratonal 230–160 Ma), contain significant amounts of tion of the “pre-Andean” western Laurentian North America and place new constraints on Paleozoic (ca. 290, 380–350, 480–415 Ma), margin remain debated. Numerous contrast- tectonic and paleogeographic models for the Neoproterozoic (ca. 675–575 Ma), and Meso- ing tectonic models have been proposed to western United States (Fig. 2). Our objectives protero zoic grains (ca. 1.4–1.0 Ga), and explain early Mesozoic development of the are to (1) test and refine existing correlations of have lesser quantities of Late Paleoprotero- continental-margin arc in Arizona-California early Mesozoic sedimentary successions from zoic grains (ca. 2.1–1.7 Ga). Detrital zircon and marginal arc-basin complexes of the Sierra eastern Oregon to western Idaho, (2) document ages in Jurassic sediments closely resemble Nevada foothills and Klamath Mountains the evolution of sediment source areas through well-documented age distributions in trans- (Fig. 1; e.g., Harper and Wright, 1984; Ingersoll time, (3) evaluate paleogeographic and paleo- continental sands of Ouachita-Appalachian and Schweickert, 1986; Burchfiel et al., 1992; tectonic models for the Blue Mountains, and provenance that were transported across Saleeby, 1992; Saleeby and Busby-Spera, 1992; (4) assess the implications of our results for the Dickinson, 2000, 2008; Dickinson et al., 1996; pre-Cretaceous configuration of the western Day and Bickford, 2004; Gray and Oldow, 2005; Laurentian margin. †Current address: Department of Environmental Snoke, 2005; Ernst et al., 2008), and the Blue In the John Day region of northeastern Ore- Sciences, Wisconsin Geological and Natural History gon, sediment is interpreted to have been derived Survey, University of Wisconsin–Extension, 3817 Mountains Province (Dickinson, 1979, 2000; Mineral Point Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53705- Burchfiel et al., 1992; Saleeby, 1992; Saleeby from both outboard subduction-accre tionary 5100, USA; [email protected] and Busby-Spera, 1992; Avé Lallemant, 1995; complexes and inboard volcanic-dominated GSA Bulletin; September/October 2011; v. 123; no. 9/10; p. 1939–1965; doi: 10.1130/B30260.1; 15 figures; 3 tables; Data Repository item 2011188. For permission to copy, contact [email protected] 1939 © 2011 Geological Society of America Downloaded from gsabulletin.gsapubs.org on August 26, 2011 LaMaskin et al. 122°W 118°W 114°W 110°W CANADA 48°N 48°N EXPLANATION WA Cenozoic, undivided OR BM Cretaceous plutonic belts MT 44°N Figure 2 WY 44°N Wrangellia terrane and metamorphic rocks of the Washington Cascades MSNI KM Cordilleran continental arc OR Fault ID CA BRT Outboard arc and ophiolitic terranes 40°N LFTB Cordilleran 40°N North American fringing-arc terranes SN thrust belt Colorado Pre-Cretaceous subduction Plateau complexes NV UT CO Paleozoic and Mesozoic NM 36°N AZ eugeoclinal rocks 36°N Late Proterozoic to Permian miogeoclinal rocks N North American craton 0 km 200 32°N Modified from Wyld et al. (2006) 32°N 122°W 118°W 114°W 110°W Figure 1. Simplified pre-Tertiary geology of the western United States, modified from Wyld et al. (2006). BM—Blue Mountains Province; BRT—Black Rock terrane; KM—Klamath Mountains; SN—Sierra Nevada; MSNI—Mojave–Snow Lake–Nevada–Idaho fault (after Wyld and Wright, 2005); LFTB—Luning-Fencemaker thrust belt. sources (Dickinson and Thayer, 1978; Dick- inson, 1979; Dickinson et al., 1979). This sandstone provenance framework provides im- Figure 2 (on following page). Geologic map of the Blue Mountains Province, modified from portant constraints for understanding detrital LaMaskin (2009). Ages of plutons are shown where data are available; z—U-Pb zircon zircon age distributions in the same deposits. age; K-Ar—potassium-argon age. Question marks indicate uncertain terrane affiliations Our new detrital zircon data are consistent and/or terrane boundary locations. The Bourne and Greenhorn subterranes, Grindstone with—and provide new insights into—previ- terrane, and Burnt River Schist are here considered subterrane-level units of the Baker ously documented shifts in sandstone compo- terrane. Pz—Paleozoic; Mz—Mesozoic; Tr—Triassic; Jr—Jurassic; K—Cretaceous; MS— sition from Late Triassic to early Late Jurassic megasequence (after Dorsey and LaMaskin, 2007); BRS—Burnt River Schist; BMB—Bald time (e.g., Dickinson, 1979; Dickinson et al., Mountain batholith; WB—Wallowa batholith; PCF—Poison Creek fault; Cpx.—complex; 1979). In particular, these data suggest that Ldg.—landing; WA—Washington; OR—Oregon; ID—Idaho. Data were compiled from nu- Jurassic basins of the Blue Mountains Province merous sources, including Dickinson and Vigrass (1965); Brown and Thayer (1966, 1977); were linked to a large, Triassic–Jurassic trans- Thayer and Brown (1966); Hendricksen et al. (1972); Brooks et al. (1976); Dickinson and continental sediment-dispersal system (i.e., Thayer (1978); Brooks (1979); Walker and MacLeod (1991); Walker (1986, 1995); Vallier Rahl et al., 2003; Dickinson and Gehrels, 2003; (1995, 1998); Ashley (1995); Ferns and Brooks (1995); Leeman et al. (1995); Ferns et al. 2009), either directly or via tectonic and sedi- (2001); Lewis (2002); Lund (2004); Kays et al. (2006); Dorsey and LaMaskin (2007); Mann mentary recycling. and Vallier (2007); Parker et al. (2008); Unruh et al. (2008); J. Schwartz (personal commun., The presence of Laurentian detrital zircon 2009), and K. Johnson (personal commun., 2009). grains in sediments of the Blue Mountains Province has implications for the proximity of 1940 Geological Society of America Bulletin, September/October 2011 EXPLANATION Coon Downloaded from Plutonic Rocks Tr-Jr Sedimentary and Jr Sedimentary and Volcanic rocks of Hollow Cretaceous-Paleogene MS-1, John Day region Volcanic rocks of MS-2 Jr-K Sedimentary

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    27 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us