South Tyneside Strategic Land Review Character Area Site Assessments Inner South Shields January 2018 i Inner South Shields Character Area – Sites Analysis Summary Site Ref. Site Location Ward Site Area Housing Employment Flood Brown Green Planning Homes Jobs RESULT (ha) Net Net Developable Risk field field Permission Capacity Capacity Developabl Area (ha) Net e Area (ha) Developa ble Area (ha) ISS1 Land at River Drive, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.20 1.08 0.48 Y 43 Red ISS10 Union Alley Car Park, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.14 0.14 0.14 Y 7 48 Green ISS11 Land at Mile End Road, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.41 0.37 0.41 Y (Part Permitted) 18 142 Green ISS12 Land at Barrington Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.00 0.90 0.40 Y Permitted 45 138 Green ISS13 Transport Interchange, Keppel Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.35 0.35 0.35 Y N/A N/A Green ISS14 Former South Shields Library, Prince Georg Square, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.30 0.30 0.30 Y 15 104 Green ISS15 Land at Winchester Street/Fowler Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.20 1.08 0.48 Y 54 112 Green ISS16 Land at Fowler Street west (Phase 1), South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.99 0.89 0.40 Y (Part Permitted) 45 92 Green ISS16a Land West of Fowler Street and North of Mount Terrace, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.71 1.54 0.68 Y 77 159 Green ISS17 Oyston Street Car Park, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.41 0.37 0.41 Y Permitted N/A N/A Green Y 98 242 ISS18 Land at Fowler Street west (Phase 2), South Shields Beacon & Bents 2.60 1.95 1.04 Green ISS19 Land at Crossgate, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.30 0.30 0.30 Y Permitted 15 104 Green ISS2 Land next to residential flats, River Drive, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.41 0.37 0.41 Y Permitted 18 Green ISS20 Land at Tudor Road/Wilson Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.01 0.91 0.40 Y (Part Permitted) N/A 94 Green ISS21 Land at 1 Robinson Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.03 0.03 0.03 Y 2 Green ISS22 Land to west of Foreshore Caravan Site, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.14 0.14 0.14 Y 4 Red ISS23 Land at Foreshore Car Park, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.18 0.18 0.18 Y 9 Red ISS24 Land at Foreshore Caravan Site, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.11 0.11 0.11 Y 6 Red ISS25 Land at Station Road/Commercial Road, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.29 0.29 0.29 Y 100 Green ISS26 Former B&Q, Millbank Industrial Estate, Secretan Way, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.00 0.90 0.40 Y 93 Green ISS27 South Tyneside House, Westoe Road, South Shields (150sqm conversion of 4 floors) Beacon & Bents 0.06 0.06 0.06 Y 3 21 Green ISS28 Land adj. Ocean Road Community Centre, Ocean Road, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.07 0.07 0.07 Y 4 24 Green ISS29 Land at Chatsworth Court, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.08 0.08 0.08 Y 4 28 Green ISS3 St Stephens Gardens, South Shields Beacon & Bents 1.40 1.26 0.56 Mixed Mixed 50 Red ISS4 Land at River Drive/Wapping Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 2.34 1.76 0.94 Y 70 218 Green ISS5a Land at Ferry Street, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.11 0.11 0.11 Y 6 38 Amber ISS6 Land at Harton Quay, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.53 0.48 0.21 Y 24 73 Amber ISS7 Wouldhave House (Site A), South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.21 0.21 0.21 Y Permitted N/A N/A Withdrawn ISS8 Wouldhave House (Site B), South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.10 0.10 0.10 Y 5 35 Green ISS9 Market Square, South Shields Beacon & Bents 0.46 0.41 0.18 Y 21 64 Red South Shields Town Centre Market Place Asda Holborn (Middle Docks) Key SLR Ref: ISS1 Site Area:1.2ha Site Location: Land at River Drive, South Shields YES Is the site in the Green Belt? SHLAA Ref: SS.02.003 NO Land Use: Recreational open space, Site appraised for: Residential / B - Economic Devt Green Belt Separation Would development development on onthis this site site impact impact upon upon Low ImpactImpact High Adjacent Uses: Residential, Offices thethe five five purposes purposes of ofthe the Green Green Belt? Belt? A B C D E Site Photos Designations Map 1.1. ToCheck check unrestricted the unrestricted sprawl sprawl of the ofbuilt the-up area? built-up area? 2. To safeguard borough’s countryside from 2.further Safeguard encroachment? borough countryside from encroachment? 3. To prevent merging of South Tyneside with Sunderland, Washington or Gateshead? 3. Prevent merging of South Tyneside with 4.Sunderland, To preserve Washington the special or & Gateshead?separate characters of the Urban Fringe villages? 5. To assist in the regeneration of the urban 4. Preserve the special & separate characteristics of area, by encouraging the recycling of land? the Urban Fringe villages? Purpose 1-4: A. Development is likely to have little or no adverse impact. 5. Assist in the regeneration of the urban area? B. Development likely to have limited negative impact which can be mitigated. C. Development may have a moderate negative impact, would require some mitigation. D. Development likely to have a major adverse impact with major mitigation required. E. Development would have significant adverse impact with significant mitigation required. Purpose 5: A. Brownfield land forming part of the built up area B. Greenfield land in a built up area or brownfield land in urban fringe C. Greenfield land in urban fringe or brownfield land in open countryside D. Greenfield land in open countryside Key Designations: Adjacent Designations: Mineral Safeguarding Area Tyne Regeneration Corridor Zero/Low Impact - no Medium Impact - High Impact – Coal Resource Area / Coal Arbeia Roman Fort Buffer Zone or minimal mitigation mitigation significant mitigation Authority Standing Advice Open Space Provision Priority required required required Area / Strategic Recreational Areas Open Space / Footpaths Wildlife Corridor Landscape and Townscape Biodiversity Category 1: Grade I Agricultural Land The broad area comprises a mixture of residential with extensive amenity There are no formal biodiversity designations onsite but there is a Significant space which facilitates movement between the adjacent housing. Site is open, Would development of the site have an adverse impact on: significant tree belt on the site boundary. It is considered that developing Constraints but in a predominantly urban and residential area and it contributes to a long Category 1: Ramsar Site this site would have a low impact and mitigation would be required where Significant Special Protection Area (SPA) Category 2: Area of High Landscape Value linear green corridor with significant vegetation and trees and allows expansive appropriate. Constraints Special Area of Conservation (SAC) Constraints or Significance views along the riverside. It is therefore considered that developing this site would have a high impact and significant mitigation would be required. Woodland Plantation Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) Tree Preservation Order (TPO) Local Nature Reserve Grade 2 or 3a Agricultural Land Category 2: Local Wildlife Site (LWS) Constraints Local Geodiversity Site (LGS) Area of Significant Historic Zero/Low Impact - no Medium Impact - High Impact – Zero/Low Impact - no Medium Impact - High Impact – Landscape or minimal mitigation mitigation required significant mitigation Great Crested Newt Pond (+500m or minimal mitigation mitigation significant mitigation required required buffer) required required required Wildlife Corridor Are there any known Unknown protected / DBAP species or habitats on the site? Would the development of Unknown – but extensive tree the site impact upon the belt corridor adjacent connectivity of habitats? Historic Environment & Culture Green Infrastructure Category 1: Scheduled Ancient Monument Does the site have any historical or archaeological significance? Category 1: Historic Park or Garden (EH List) Site is identified as amenity greenspace and as having high quality and value Significant (+ 50m buffer zone if not designated) The locally listed Dolly Peel Statue is located within this site. The site also Significant score in the Open Space Strategy. The site also includes footpaths and Constraints provides wide-ranging views along the river and interpretation of riverside Constraints Village Green forms part of a much wider strategic green infrastructure corridor. It is heritage can be found on the site. considered that developing this site would have a high impact as it provides World Heritage Site & Setting (+ Cemetery / Churchyard an important large, local open space in a heavily developed area with low candidate) provision. Significant mitigation would be required. Grade I/Grade II*Listed Category 2: Public Open Space/Playing Field/Play Building/Structure Constraints Area Category 2: Grade II Listed Building/Structure Developing this site is considered to have a medium impact upon historic Allotment Constraints environment and culture and mitigation would be required. Conservation Area Public Right of Way (cycleway/ footpath/bridleway) Archaeological Site (Known & Zero/Low Impact - no Medium Impact - High Impact – Green Infrastructure corridor Zero/Low Impact - no Medium Impact - High Impact – potential) or minimal mitigation mitigation required significant mitigation or minimal mitigation mitigation significant mitigation Locally-Listed Building/ Is the proposed development site required required Amenity required required required Structure/ Space designated as open space or playing greenspace fields? Site quality classification in Open Quality score: High Space Strategy / Playing Pitch Value score: High Strategy 2015. Flooding Infrastructure and Services Category 1: Flood Risk Zone 3B (Functional No water flooding issues have been identified on the site.