Some Leaf-Beetles Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Mistakenly Reported for the Latvian Fauna

Some Leaf-Beetles Species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Mistakenly Reported for the Latvian Fauna

Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp. 10 (1) 2010 ISSN 1407 - 8953 SOME LEAF-BEETLES SPECIES (COLEOPTERA: CHRYSOMELIDAE) MISTAKENLY REPORTED FOR THE LATVIAN FAUNA Andris Bukejs Bukejs A. 2010. Some leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) mistakenly reported for the Latvian fauna. Acta Biol. Univ. Daugavp., 10 (1): 71- 75. During revision of collection material in connection with the study of leaf-beetles of Latvian fauna, I discovered that voucher material for several species were misidentified. Thus, Labidostomis lucida axillaris (Lacordaire, 1848), Cryptocephalus signatifrons Suffrian, 1847, C. elegantulus Gravenhorst, 1807, C. chrysopus (Gmelin, 1788), C. pygmaeus Fabricius, 1792, C. populi Suffrian, 1848, C. rufipes (Goeze, 1777), and Ochrosis ventralis (Illiger, 1807 are deleted from the check-list of Latvian Coleoptera. General information on these species are given. Key words: Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Latvia, fauna, misidentifications. Andris Bukejs. Institute of Systematic Biology, Daugavpils University, Vienîbas 13, Daugavpils, LV-5401, Latvia; [email protected] INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHODS The leaf-beetles (Chrysomelidae) are one of the The examined material is stored in the collection largest beetle family in the world fauna (30000 – of V. Pūtele (in Institute of Biology LU, Salaspils) 50000 species are known) (Bieńkowski 2004, and entomological collection of the Latvian Jolivet 1988, Mohr 1966) and also in the Latvian University Institute of Biology (Salaspils, Latvia). fauna. The following information is given for each The history of investigation of leaf-beetles in species: scientific name & author, published Latvia is more than 220 years old. It is necessary bibliographic sources for Latvia, revised material, to give particular attention to V. Pūtele works on host plants, general distribution (after studying of Chrysomelidae of Latvian fauna. She Warchałowski 1991, 1993, 1998, 2003, Bieńkowski has mentioned more than 30 species for Latvia 2004) and notes. for the first time. However the reports of some species mentioned for the local fauna are doubtful (Bukejs 2008). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION The part of collection of V. Pūtele is preserved in During revision of material of V. Pūtele ex- the entomological collection of the Latvian collection and collection of the Latvian University University Institute of Biology. During the Institute of Biology, I discovered that voucher current research the revision of this material has material for Labidostomis lucida axillaris been made. (Lacordaire, 1848), Cryptocephalus signatifrons 7 1 Bukejs A. Suffrian, 1847, C. elegantulus Gravenhorst, 1807, General distribution: S and southern part of C C. chrysopus (Gmelin, 1788), C. pygmaeus Europe (northward to Poland and Ukraine), Asia Fabricius, 1792, C. populi Suffrian, 1848 and C. Minor (Turkey). rufipes (Goeze, 1777) were misidentified. Note: Faunal data of this species in Latvia are Occurrence of Ochrosis ventralis (Illiger, 1807) absent, therefore it is excluded from the list of in the Latvian fauna also is doubtful. Therefore Latvian Coleoptera. thess species were deleted from the check-list of Latvian Coleoptera. Cryptocephalus elegantulus Gravenhorst, 1807 References: Pūtele 1974; Telnov et al. 1997; Some leaf beetle species, Aphthona nigriceps Telnov 2004; Valainis 2007; Bukejs et al. 2007; (Redtenbacher, 1842), A. gracilis Faldermann, Bukejs 2008a. 1837, A. aeneomicans Allard, 1875, Material in revised collection: Single report of Neocrepidodera crassicornis (Faldermann, this species “Mežciems, 13.08.1972 (1 ex., leg. 1837), Chaetocnema breviuscula (Faldermann, V.Pūtele)” (Pūtele 1974) was misidentified and 1837) and Psylliodes deplanatus L. Medvedev, relate to C. fulvus Goeze, 1777. 1962, were deleted previously in catalogues of Host plants: Artemisia (Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). Latvian Coleoptera (Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov General distribution: Europe (excl. N), 2004). Reports of these species were based on Caucasus, south part of Siberia, Kazakhstan, misidentification too. Central Asia (Kyrghyzia), Mongolia, Russian Far East, China, Korean Peninsula. CHRYSOMELIDAE LATREILLE, 1802 Note: Faunal data of this species in Latvia are CLYTRINAE KIRBY, 1837 absent, therefore it is excluded from the list of Latvian Coleoptera. The nearest known locality Labidostomis lucida axillaris (Lacordaire, of this species is in Poland (Warchałowski 1991; 1848) A. Warchałowski pers. comm.) and southern syn.: sareptana Kraatz, 1872 Belarus (Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). References: Pūtele 1984 (lucida sareptana Kr.); Telnov et al. 1997 (lucida Germar, 1824); Telnov Cryptocephalus chrysopus (Gmelin, 1788) 2004 (lucida Germar, 1824). References: Pūtele 1974, 1984; Telnov et al. 1997; Material in revised collection: Record of this Telnov 2004; Valainis 2007b; Bukejs et al. 2007; sprcies “Krasti, 06.07.1977 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)” Bukejs 2008a. was misidentified and relate to Labidostomis Material in revised collection: Report of this longimana (Linnaeus, 1761). species “Tetele, 12.08.1973 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)” General distribution: SE Europe (north to (Pūtele 1974) was misidentified and relate to C. Slovakia), Caucasus, Iran, south part of Siberia pusillus Fabricius, 1777. (eastward till Baikal), Kazakhstan. Host plants: Salix, Quercus, Rosa (Lopatin, Note: Occurrence of this species in Latvian fauna Nesterova 2005). is impossible, therefore it is excluded from the General distribution: Europe (excl. N), Caucasus, list of Latvian Coleoptera. Sayans, Kazakhstan. Note: Probably, other report of this species by V. CRYPTOCEPHALINAE GYLLENHAL, 1813 Pūtele (Pūtele 1984) from Slītere National Park Cryptocephalus signatifrons Suffrian, 1847 were based also on misidentification. Occurrence References: Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004; of this species in Latvian fauna is doubtful, Valainis 2007; Bukejs et al. 2007; Bukejs 2008a. therefore it is excluded from the list of Latvian Material in revised collection: Record of this Coleoptera. The nearest known localities of this sprcies “Ozolnieki, 12.06.1977 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)” species are in Poland (Warchałowski 1991; A. was misidentified and relate to C. Warchałowski pers. comm.) and southern Belarus decemmaculatus (Linnaeus, 1758). (Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). Host plants: Corylus, Quercus (Bienkowski 2004). 7 2 Some leaf-beetles species (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) mistakenly reported for the Latvian fauna Cryptocephalus pygmaeus Fabricius, 1792 Note: Faunal data of this species in Latvia are References: Pūtele 1974; Telnov et al. 1997; absent and its occurrence in local fauna is Telnov 2004; Bukejs et al. 2007; Bukejs 2008a. doubtful, therefore the species is excluded from Material in revised collection: Record of this the list of Latvian Coleoptera. species “Misa, 06.07.1977 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)” was misidentified and relate to C. fulvus Goeze, ALTICINAE NEWMAN, 1834 1777. Ochrosis ventralis (Illiger, 1807) Host plants: various Lamiaceae and Compositae References: Pūtele 1968, 1970a, 1970b, 1971a, (Bienkowski 2004). 1971b; Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004. General distribution: Europe (excl. N), NW Africa Host plants: Solanum, Anagallis, Pistacia (Morocco), Near East, Asia Minor, Caucasus, (Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). Kazakhstan. General distribution: Europe (northwards to the Note: Occurrence of this species in Latvian fauna Netherlands, SW Poland and S Belarus), Asia is doubtful, therefore it is excluded from the list Minor, Caucasus, N Africa. of Latvian Coleoptera. The nearest known Note: Pūtele (1968) mentioned the species from localities of this species are in Ukraine and S single locality in Saldus d., Broceņi. I have not Poland (Warchałowski 1991; A. Warchałowski found specimen of O. ventralis in the collection pers. comm.). of Pūtele [in the collection of Institute of Biology]. Perhaps, this record is based on misidentification Cryptocephalus populi Suffrian, 1848 and relate to Lythraria salicariae (Paykull, 1800). References: Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004; Occurrence of this species in the Latvian fauna Bukejs et al. 2007; Bukejs 2008a. is doubtful, therefore it is excluded from the list Material in revised collection: Records of this of Latvian Coleoptera. species “Šķede, 24.07.1973 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)”, “Malta, 07.07.1977 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele) ”, and “Rūķīši, 24.07.1973 (1 ex., leg. V.Pūtele)” were ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS misidentified and relate to C. fulvus Goeze, 1777. Host plants: Salix, Populus (Lopatin, Nesterova The author greatly thank Andrzej Warchałowski 2005). (Wrocław, Poland) and Vytautas Tamutis General distribution: C and S Europe, Caucasus, (Kaunas, Lithuania) for valuable comments and Kazakhstan, south part of Russian Far East. constructive advice. Note: Faunal data of this species in Latvia are absent and its occurrence in local fauna is The research has been done within the framework doubtful, therefore it is excluded from the list of of the project of European Social Fund (No 2009/ Latvian Coleoptera. The nearest known locality 0206/1DP/1.1.1.2.0/09/APIA/VIAA/010) of this species is in Poland (Warchałowski 1991; A. Warchałowski pers. comm.) and southern Belarus (Lopatin, Nesterova 2005). REFERENCES Cryptocephalus rufipes (Goeze, 1777) Bieńkowski A.O. 2004. Leaf-beetles (Coleoptera: References: Telnov et al. 1997; Telnov 2004; Chrysomelidae) of the Eastern Europe. New Bukejs et al. 2007; Bukejs 2008a. key to subfamilies, genera and species. Material in revised collection: Record of this Moscow, Mikron-print: 1–278. species “Tiļiši, 06.08.1977 (1, leg. V.Pūtele)” was

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    6 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us