Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife

Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Completion Report Evaluation of Centrarchid Populations throughout Leech Lake 2015 by Matt Ward Walker Area Fisheries Office Reimbursed under Federal Aid by the Sport Fish Restoration Act to Minnesota F13AF00322 1 Citation: Ward, M. 2016. Evaluation of Centrarchid populations throughout Leech Lake, 2015. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Section of Fisheries, Completion Report, F15AF00162, Study 3. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ..................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................5 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................5 METHODS .........................................................................................................................6 RESULTS ...........................................................................................................................6 DISCUSSION .....................................................................................................................8 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................8 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................9 LITERATURE CITED .....................................................................................................9 TABLES ............................................................................................................................12 Table 1. The estimated total catch and harvest statistics by number for Centrarchids from the summer creel season, Leech Lake, MN, 1991-2014. The species sought by boat parties is also included. ........................................................................................13 Table 2. Summary of overall bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie catch rates by major bay, Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ...................................................................14 Table 3. Summary of bluegill catch rates by size by major bay, Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015..............................................................................................................................15 Table 4. Summary of largemouth bass catch rates by size by major bay, Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. .............................................................................................................16 Table 5. Summary of black crappie catch rates by size by major bay, Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. .............................................................................................................17 Table 6. The percentage of bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie sampled that were stock size (PSD) and preferred size (RSD-P) sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. Values for other area lakes and year surveyed are also represented. ................18 Table 7. Mean length (inches) at age for bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ..................................................................19 Table 8. Comparisons of length and age at 50% maturity of bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. .....................................20 Table 9. The relative weight (Wr) for bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ..................................................................20 Table 10. Catch rate (number/hour) comparisons for largemouth bass and black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015compared to other recent surveys on other Walker area lakes. ........................................................................................................20 3 FIGURES ..........................................................................................................................21 Figure 1. Map of the littoral area (≤15 feet) of Leech Lake. ......................................22 Figure 2. Map of the electrofishing stations for Leech Lake, 2012. ...........................23 Figure 3. Map of the electrofishing stations for Leech Lake, 2015. ...........................24 Figure 4. Catch rates (fish/hour) for bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ..................................................................25 Figure 5. Length-frequency of bluegill sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ...26 Figure 6. Age-frequency of bluegill sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. .......26 Figure 7. Length-frequency of largemouth bass sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015..............................................................................................................................27 Figure 8. Age-frequency of largemouth bass sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ......................................................................................................................................27 Figure 9. Length-frequency of black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ......................................................................................................................................28 Figure 10. Age-frequency of black crappie sampled in Leech Lake in 2012 and 2015. ......................................................................................................................................28 4 INTRODUCTION Leech Lake is renowned among anglers as an exceptional multi-species fishery. Although summer creel surveys continue to indicate the majority of anglers target walleye ( x = 64%; Stevens and Ward 2015), the proportion of anglers targeting Centrarchids has an increasing trend (Table 1). The four summer creel surveys conducted throughout the 1990s indicated 3% of anglers targeted Centrarchids, while that percentage has increased to 7% over the past seven surveys. On average, summer creel surveys since the early 2000s have indicated anglers caught 41,086 bluegill, 12,333 largemouth bass, and 12,369 black crappie, while they harvested 17,987, 2,029, and 8,712, respectively. Leech Lake also has supported as many as seven large (>50 boats) bass tournaments annually during the past decade. Thus, given the increasing attention from anglers as well as the likelihood Leech Lake will be impacted by ecosystem changes (invasive species introductions, warming climate, etc.), bluegill, largemouth bass, and black crappie were targeted for a comprehensive assessment during spring. Standardized large lake sampling gears such as gill nets are intended to target walleye, northern pike, yellow perch, and cisco. This gear does not adequately sample Centrarchids and alternate sampling techniques are being evaluated. Based on criteria stated within the Fisheries Management Plan for Leech Lake 2016-2020, spring assessments will be conducted every three years, with sampling methodology, location, and timing becoming standardized by 2018. The intent of this sampling is to monitor for potential changes in size structure and catch rates. The initial lakewide Centrarchid survey was completed in 2012, and this report compiles the 2012 and 2015 electrofishing assessments and serves as a benchmark for future stock assessments of this subset of the Leech Lake fish community. STUDY AREA Leech Lake has approximately 112,000 surface acres and 201 miles of shoreline. The maximum depth of the lake is near 150 feet; however, nearly 52 percent or 57,994 acres of the lake is ≤15 feet deep (littoral acres, Figure 1). Leech Lake varies considerably from a morphological perspective and contains bays with eutrophic, mesotrophic, and oligotrophic characteristics. Steamboat, Boy, and Headquarters display eutrophic characteristics, whereas Portage, Sucker, and Shingobee have mesotrophic characteristics, while Walker, Kabekona, and Agency, have properties more congruent with oligotrophic lakes. The main portion of the lake, like most large Minnesota walleye lakes, is mesotrophic. Approximately 53 percent of the shoreline was classified as either having dense aquatic vegetation, moderate aquatic vegetation, or phragmites and cattails, nearly all of which is used as habitat by Centrarchids (Wilcox 1979). The diversity of the Leech Lake shoreline and substrate, as well as its extensive littoral zone, provides excellent spawning and nursery habitats for a number of fish species, including bluegill Lepomis macrochirus, largemouth bass Micropterus salmoides, and black crappie Pomoxis nigromaculatus. 5 METHODS In attempts to refine sampling methodology, location, and timing, sampling procedures varied between the spring 2012 and 2015 assessments. In 2012, spring nighttime electrofishing was used to target Centrarchids from late-May through early-June. Sampling was conducted using a two-person crew in a Coffelt pulsed-DC electrofishing boat (VVP 2E; single array anode). Forty-nine stations were sampled lakewide, with four to six stations per major bay (Figure 2). Transects were approximately 3-5 feet deep on shorelines with both submergent and emergent aquatic macrophytes. Transects consisted of 20 minutes of continuous on-time from the starting point. Sampling typically started at 2200 hours and concluded at 0400 hours. All target species sampled were measured and recorded (TL, mm) in the boat. Subsampling

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    28 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us